Nvidia GeForce RTX 3050 — Minage
Nvidia GeForce RTX 3050 rapporte jusqu'à $0.03 par jour, meilleur en minant Octopus à 23.89169 Mh/s. Également disponible : location IA à $0.01/h ($0.14/jour) and vente de hashpower KAWPOW ($0.19/jour). Consomme 132 W au mur — à $0.10/kWh, rentable aux tarifs actuels.
Nvidia GeForce RTX 3050 mine Octopus avec le meilleur rendement. Cette page contient le classement complet des algorithmes, les options de minage fusionné, les pools recommandés, et un graphique d'historique des paiements que vous pouvez basculer en cliquant sur n'importe quelle ligne.
Projection quotidienne
Gagnants quotidiens parmi tous les flux de revenus — moyenne de l'historique enregistré du rig à $0.1/kWh
| Période | /Jour | /Mois |
|---|---|---|
| Revenu | $0.35 | $10.45 |
|
Coût
$0.1/kWh
|
$0.32 | $9.60 |
| Profit | $0.03 | $0.85 |
Historique des paiements par algorithme ▶ Octopus
Bénéfice net $/jour si vous miniez cet algorithme en continu à $0.1/kWh. Cliquez sur n'importe quel algorithme ci-dessus pour changer.
Projection quotidienne
| Période | /Jour | /Mois |
|---|---|---|
| Revenu | $0.35 | $10.50 |
|
Coût
$0.1/kWh
|
$0.32 | $9.60 |
| Profit | $0.03 | $0.90 |
| Coin | Algorithm | Revenu | Coût | Profit |
|---|---|---|---|---|
CFX
⚠
Conflux
|
Octopus
23.89169Mh · 132.0W
|
$0.35 | $0.32 | $0.03 |
|
BEAM
⚠
Beam
|
BeamHashIII
16Hh · 124.0W
|
$0.07 | $0.30 | $-0.23 |
|
AE
⚠
Aeternity
|
CuckooCycle
4Hh · 116.0W
|
$0.06 | $0.28 | $-0.22 |
|
RVN
Ravencoin
|
KAWPOW
12.3Mh · 129.0W
|
$0.05 | $0.31 | $-0.26 |
ERG
⚠
Ergo
|
Autolykos2
79.83Mh · 60.0W
|
$0.05 | $0.14 | $-0.09 |
|
ETC
Ethereum Classic
|
Etchash
23.202878Mh · 75.0W
|
$0.02 | $0.18 | $-0.16 |
NEXA
⚠
Nexa
|
NexaPoW
8.085Mh · 86.0W
|
— | $0.21 | — |
|
MONA
⚠
Monacoin
|
Lyra2REv2
41.2638Mh · 126.0W
|
— | $0.30 | — |
IRON
⚠
Iron Fish
|
IronFish
5Gh · 50.0W
|
— | $0.12 | — |
KAS
Kaspa
|
KHeavyHash
265.066256Mh · 115.0W
|
— | $0.28 | — |
|
BTC
Bitcoin
|
Sha256
300Mh · 50.0W
|
— | $0.12 | — |
|
—
|
Astralhash
11.5656Mh · 75.0W
|
— | $0.18 | — |
|
—
|
HeavyHash
208.0494Mh · 69.0W
|
— | $0.17 | — |
|
VTC
⚠
Vertcoin
|
Lyra2REv3
39.65145Mh · 132.0W
|
— | $0.32 | — |
|
—
|
NIST5
20.26063Mh · 130.0W
|
— | $0.31 | — |
|
—
|
Ethash
23.202878Mh · 75.0W
|
— | $0.18 | — |
|
—
|
Memehash
13.5Mh · 100.0W
|
— | $0.24 | — |
|
—
|
Cuckarood29
1.124Hh · 95.0W
|
— | $0.23 | — |
|
—
|
XelisHashV2
1.4Gh · 140.0W
|
— | $0.34 | — |
|
—
|
Equihash+Scrypt
21.188Kh · 128.0W
|
— | $0.31 | — |
|
—
|
Equihash(144,5)
36Hh · 130.0W
|
— | $0.31 | — |
|
—
|
Equihash(210,9)
180Hh · 121.0W
|
— | $0.29 | — |
|
—
|
Equihash(192,7)
17Hh · 108.0W
|
— | $0.26 | — |
|
—
|
C11
11.754Mh · 86.0W
|
— | $0.21 | — |
|
—
|
X16R
10.33799Mh · 107.0W
|
— | $0.26 | — |
|
—
|
Keccak
604.42849Mh · 108.0W
|
— | $0.26 | — |
|
—
|
PHI1612
11.4209Mh · 89.0W
|
— | $0.21 | — |
|
LTZ
⚠
Litecoinz
|
Zhash
30Hh · 113.0W
|
— | $0.27 | — |
|
—
|
Skein2
60.758816406Gh · 124.0W
|
— | $0.30 | — |
|
—
|
Argon2d4096
24.939Kh · 123.0W
|
— | $0.30 | — |
|
GRIN
⚠
Grin
|
Cuckatoo32
2.5Hh · 70.0W
|
— | $0.17 | — |
|
—
|
BCD
8.670626Mh · 86.0W
|
— | $0.21 | — |
|
—
|
X16RT
7.6345Mh · 109.0W
|
— | $0.26 | — |
|
—
|
CNReverseWaltz
1.0615Kh · 96.0W
|
— | $0.23 | — |
|
—
|
CryptoNightGPU
1.5Kh · 100.0W
|
— | $0.24 | — |
|
—
|
Ton
1.4Gh · 140.0W
|
— | $0.34 | — |
|
—
|
Blake (2s)
3.319251631Gh · 109.0W
|
— | $0.26 | — |
|
—
|
HMQ1725
4.66437Mh · 115.0W
|
— | $0.28 | — |
|
—
|
Keccak-C
601.31338Mh · 109.0W
|
— | $0.26 | — |
|
—
|
Curvehash
1.7011Mh · 79.0W
|
— | $0.19 | — |
FIRO
Firo
|
FiroPoW
12.752Mh · 129.0W
|
— | $0.31 | — |
|
—
|
X25X
962.23Kh · 69.0W
|
— | $0.17 | — |
|
—
|
Ubqhash
26.19577Mh · 115.0W
|
— | $0.28 | — |
|
—
|
PyrinHash
1.8Gh · 50.0W
|
— | $0.12 | — |
|
—
|
X16Rv2
7.1533Mh · 108.0W
|
— | $0.26 | — |
|
—
|
Xevan
4.02172Mh · 129.0W
|
— | $0.31 | — |
|
—
|
DynexSolve
2Kh · 60.0W
|
— | $0.14 | — |
|
—
|
Qhash
55Mh · 50.0W
|
— | $0.12 | — |
|
—
|
KarlsenHashV2
400Mh · 50.0W
|
— | $0.12 | — |
|
—
|
Meraki
26.5Mh · 80.0W
|
— | $0.19 | — |
|
FTC
⚠
Feathercoin
|
NeoScrypt
858.11Kh · 128.0W
|
— | $0.31 | — |
|
—
|
SHA256DT
974.038Mh · 122.0W
|
— | $0.29 | — |
|
—
|
GhostRider
643Hh · 79.0W
|
— | $0.19 | — |
|
—
|
Equihash(125,4)
20Hh · 118.0W
|
— | $0.28 | — |
|
—
|
Radiant
375.818Kh · 114.0W
|
— | $0.27 | — |
|
—
|
EvrProgPow
26.5Mh · 80.0W
|
— | $0.19 | — |
|
—
|
Skydoge
300.0Mh · 50.0W
|
— | $0.12 | — |
|
—
|
Blake3
34.0Mh · 90.0W
|
— | $0.22 | — |
|
VRSC
⚠
Verus
|
VerusHash
5.1449Mh · 100.0W
|
— | $0.24 | — |
ACM
⚠
Actinium
|
Lyra2z
2.50804Mh · 75.0W
|
— | $0.18 | — |
|
—
|
ProgPowSERO
13.111107Mh · 132.0W
|
— | $0.32 | — |
|
—
|
ProgPowZ
13.088639Mh · 132.0W
|
— | $0.32 | — |
|
—
|
Abelhash
29Mh · 80.0W
|
— | $0.19 | — |
|
—
|
X21S
5.2701Mh · 102.0W
|
— | $0.24 | — |
|
—
|
zkSNARK
220.0Mh · 50.0W
|
— | $0.12 | — |
|
—
|
X15
7.99385Mh · 117.0W
|
— | $0.28 | — |
|
—
|
Hoohash
110Mh · 50.0W
|
— | $0.12 | — |
| Pool | Algos supportés | Frais | |
|---|---|---|---|
|
|
CuckooCycle (AE) · BeamHashIII (BEAM) · Autolykos2 (ERG) | 1.0% | Visit → |
HeroMiners
|
BeamHashIII (BEAM) · Autolykos2 (ERG) · Etchash (ETC) | 0.9% | Visit → |
|
★
K1Pool
|
Sha256 (BTC) · Autolykos2 (ERG) · Etchash (ETC) | 1.0% | Visit → |
Rplant
|
FiroPoW (FIRO) · NexaPoW (NEXA) | 1.0% | Visit → |
| Fournisseur | GPU | Revenu | Coût | Profit |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Clore Ai
Place de marché GPU
|
RTX 3050
$0.009/h ·
1 offre
|
$0.18
96.66 CLORE/day
1 CLORE ≈ $0.00184
|
$0.32 |
$-0.14
★
Visiter →
|
Flux de revenus Comment Nvidia GeForce RTX 3050 gagne sur le marché de GPU pour l'IA how we got $-0.14/day · ▾
Nvidia GeForce RTX 3050 gagne $0.03/jour en minant Octopus, ce qui dépasse actuellement les $-0.14/jour que rapporterait la location sur les marchés IA. Les tarifs évoluent chaque jour — à revérifier régulièrement.
Historique des revenus nets de location
| Période | /Jour | /Mois |
|---|---|---|
| Revenu | $0.18 | $5.40 |
|
Coût
$0.1/kWh
|
$0.32 | $9.60 |
| Profit | $-0.14 | $-4.20 |
Historique des revenus nets du marché du hashrate
| Période | /Jour | /Mois |
|---|---|---|
| Revenu | $0.13 | $3.88 |
|
Coût
$0.1/kWh
|
$0.32 | $9.60 |
| Profit | $-0.19 | $-5.72 |
| Rigs × Qty | Share | Rev /rig/day | Cost /rig/day | Profit /rig/day | Total profit /day |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| — | — | — | — | — | — |
Retour sur investissement pour Nvidia GeForce RTX 3050
Modélisez l'amortissement, l'électricité et le rendement de la première année pour cet équipement.
Coût matériel récupéré quand la ligne croise zéro.
| Month | Earned (mo) | Cost burned (mo) | Cumulative earned | Cumulative cost | Net | % ROI |
|---|
Émissions annuelles par source
Basé sur la consommation annuelle et l'intensité carbone.
| Source d'énergie | CO₂e / an |
|---|---|
| Wind | 12.55 kg |
| Nuclear | 13.69 kg |
| Hydroelectric | 27.37 kg |
| Geothermal | 43.34 kg |
| Solar | 51.32 kg |
| Biofuels | 262.31 kg |
| Gas | 558.84 kg |
| Coal | 935.19 kg |
Estimations seulement.
Qu'est-ce que cela veut dire ?
At the world-average grid intensity of about 475 g CO₂e/kWh, Nvidia GeForce RTX 3050 running 24/7 for a year releases about 542 kg of carbon dioxide equivalent. Here's what that looks like in everyday terms:
Où tu branches compte
Electricity is not one thing. A kilowatt-hour from a coal plant carries roughly 820 g of CO₂; the same kilowatt-hour from a hydro reservoir carries about 24 g. That's a 34× difference — large enough that Nvidia GeForce RTX 3050's annual footprint swings from roughly 935 kg on coal-heavy grids down to about 27 kg on hydro-dominated grids. The single biggest lever a miner has on their carbon footprint is choosing where to plug in.
Regions commonly used for low-carbon crypto mining include Quebec and British Columbia (hydro-dominated, typically <50 g CO₂/kWh), Iceland and Norway (geothermal + hydro, often <30 g), Paraguay (Itaipú hydro), and parts of the US Pacific Northwest. Coal-heavy grids — Kazakhstan, Inner Mongolia, Poland, parts of Australia — sit at the opposite end, often above 700 g CO₂/kWh.
Some operators also reduce their net impact by using otherwise-wasted energy: flare gas at oil wells (burning methane that would be vented anyway), curtailed renewables (wind or solar that the grid can't absorb), or behind-the-meter hydro during off-peak hours. These arrangements can drop effective emissions below the local grid average because the energy would have been wasted or flared without the mining load.
Comment réduire l'empreinte de ce miner
- Pick a greener ASIC. The efficiency column above matters as much as the grid: a 15 J/TH rig emits roughly half the CO₂ of a 30 J/TH rig for the same hashrate.
- Choose a low-carbon host. Data centres advertising hydro, geothermal, or nuclear power typically sit at <100 g CO₂/kWh.
- Look for stranded or curtailed energy. Flare-gas miners, wind-curtailment co-location, and off-peak hydro arrangements use energy that would otherwise be wasted.
- Use heat recovery. Capturing the heat for greenhouse agriculture, pool heating, or district warmth offsets fossil-fuel heating that would have been burned anyway.
- Time-shift your uptime. In grids with high daytime solar, running more during the day and less at night lowers your effective intensity even if you don't switch providers.
- Purchase verifiable offsets. Treat this as a last resort, not a substitute — and favour additional, permanent, third-party-verified projects (Gold Standard, Verra VCS).
Questions fréquentes
Yearly electricity use = rig power (W) × 24 × 365 ÷ 1000. We multiply that by each row's grid intensity in grams CO₂-equivalent per kWh and convert to kilograms. Intensities are representative averages — real emissions depend on your specific utility mix, time of day, and local transmission losses.
It depends almost entirely on where the electricity comes from. A single rig plugged into hydro in Quebec emits less over a year than an average family's two cars in a month. The same rig on a coal-dominated grid can exceed that in a few days. The hardware is the same — the grid is what changes the answer.
Network-wide estimates vary by methodology; the Cambridge Centre for Alternative Finance's Bitcoin Electricity Consumption Index is the most widely cited reference. As of recent reporting, the network's sustainable-energy share has grown as more hashrate migrates to hydro, wind, solar, and stranded-gas sites. This page just estimates a single rig — for the big picture, CCAF's dashboard is the best source.
Not directly. The rig draws the same wattage regardless of which pool it joins or how difficulty trends — so its electricity use, and therefore its emissions, stay constant. Those factors change revenue, not power consumption.
Projection quotidienne
Gagnants quotidiens parmi tous les flux de revenus — moyenne de l'historique enregistré du rig à $0.1/kWh
| Période | /Jour | /Mois |
|---|---|---|
| Revenu | $0.35 | $10.45 |
|
Coût
$0.1/kWh
|
$0.32 | $9.60 |
| Profit | $0.03 | $0.85 |
Historique des paiements par algorithme ▶ Octopus
Bénéfice net $/jour si vous miniez cet algorithme en continu à $0.1/kWh. Cliquez sur n'importe quel algorithme ci-dessus pour changer.
Projection quotidienne
| Période | /Jour | /Mois |
|---|---|---|
| Revenu | $0.35 | $10.50 |
|
Coût
$0.1/kWh
|
$0.32 | $9.60 |
| Profit | $0.03 | $0.90 |
| Coin | Algorithm | Revenu | Coût | Profit |
|---|---|---|---|---|
CFX
⚠
Conflux
|
Octopus
23.89169Mh · 132.0W
|
$0.35 | $0.32 | $0.03 |
|
BEAM
⚠
Beam
|
BeamHashIII
16Hh · 124.0W
|
$0.07 | $0.30 | $-0.23 |
|
AE
⚠
Aeternity
|
CuckooCycle
4Hh · 116.0W
|
$0.06 | $0.28 | $-0.22 |
|
RVN
Ravencoin
|
KAWPOW
12.3Mh · 129.0W
|
$0.05 | $0.31 | $-0.26 |
ERG
⚠
Ergo
|
Autolykos2
79.83Mh · 60.0W
|
$0.05 | $0.14 | $-0.09 |
|
ETC
Ethereum Classic
|
Etchash
23.202878Mh · 75.0W
|
$0.02 | $0.18 | $-0.16 |
NEXA
⚠
Nexa
|
NexaPoW
8.085Mh · 86.0W
|
— | $0.21 | — |
|
MONA
⚠
Monacoin
|
Lyra2REv2
41.2638Mh · 126.0W
|
— | $0.30 | — |
IRON
⚠
Iron Fish
|
IronFish
5Gh · 50.0W
|
— | $0.12 | — |
KAS
Kaspa
|
KHeavyHash
265.066256Mh · 115.0W
|
— | $0.28 | — |
|
BTC
Bitcoin
|
Sha256
300Mh · 50.0W
|
— | $0.12 | — |
|
—
|
Astralhash
11.5656Mh · 75.0W
|
— | $0.18 | — |
|
—
|
HeavyHash
208.0494Mh · 69.0W
|
— | $0.17 | — |
|
VTC
⚠
Vertcoin
|
Lyra2REv3
39.65145Mh · 132.0W
|
— | $0.32 | — |
|
—
|
NIST5
20.26063Mh · 130.0W
|
— | $0.31 | — |
|
—
|
Ethash
23.202878Mh · 75.0W
|
— | $0.18 | — |
|
—
|
Memehash
13.5Mh · 100.0W
|
— | $0.24 | — |
|
—
|
Cuckarood29
1.124Hh · 95.0W
|
— | $0.23 | — |
|
—
|
XelisHashV2
1.4Gh · 140.0W
|
— | $0.34 | — |
|
—
|
Equihash+Scrypt
21.188Kh · 128.0W
|
— | $0.31 | — |
|
—
|
Equihash(144,5)
36Hh · 130.0W
|
— | $0.31 | — |
|
—
|
Equihash(210,9)
180Hh · 121.0W
|
— | $0.29 | — |
|
—
|
Equihash(192,7)
17Hh · 108.0W
|
— | $0.26 | — |
|
—
|
C11
11.754Mh · 86.0W
|
— | $0.21 | — |
|
—
|
X16R
10.33799Mh · 107.0W
|
— | $0.26 | — |
|
—
|
Keccak
604.42849Mh · 108.0W
|
— | $0.26 | — |
|
—
|
PHI1612
11.4209Mh · 89.0W
|
— | $0.21 | — |
|
LTZ
⚠
Litecoinz
|
Zhash
30Hh · 113.0W
|
— | $0.27 | — |
|
—
|
Skein2
60.758816406Gh · 124.0W
|
— | $0.30 | — |
|
—
|
Argon2d4096
24.939Kh · 123.0W
|
— | $0.30 | — |
|
GRIN
⚠
Grin
|
Cuckatoo32
2.5Hh · 70.0W
|
— | $0.17 | — |
|
—
|
BCD
8.670626Mh · 86.0W
|
— | $0.21 | — |
|
—
|
X16RT
7.6345Mh · 109.0W
|
— | $0.26 | — |
|
—
|
CNReverseWaltz
1.0615Kh · 96.0W
|
— | $0.23 | — |
|
—
|
CryptoNightGPU
1.5Kh · 100.0W
|
— | $0.24 | — |
|
—
|
Ton
1.4Gh · 140.0W
|
— | $0.34 | — |
|
—
|
Blake (2s)
3.319251631Gh · 109.0W
|
— | $0.26 | — |
|
—
|
HMQ1725
4.66437Mh · 115.0W
|
— | $0.28 | — |
|
—
|
Keccak-C
601.31338Mh · 109.0W
|
— | $0.26 | — |
|
—
|
Curvehash
1.7011Mh · 79.0W
|
— | $0.19 | — |
FIRO
Firo
|
FiroPoW
12.752Mh · 129.0W
|
— | $0.31 | — |
|
—
|
X25X
962.23Kh · 69.0W
|
— | $0.17 | — |
|
—
|
Ubqhash
26.19577Mh · 115.0W
|
— | $0.28 | — |
|
—
|
PyrinHash
1.8Gh · 50.0W
|
— | $0.12 | — |
|
—
|
X16Rv2
7.1533Mh · 108.0W
|
— | $0.26 | — |
|
—
|
Xevan
4.02172Mh · 129.0W
|
— | $0.31 | — |
|
—
|
DynexSolve
2Kh · 60.0W
|
— | $0.14 | — |
|
—
|
Qhash
55Mh · 50.0W
|
— | $0.12 | — |
|
—
|
KarlsenHashV2
400Mh · 50.0W
|
— | $0.12 | — |
|
—
|
Meraki
26.5Mh · 80.0W
|
— | $0.19 | — |
|
FTC
⚠
Feathercoin
|
NeoScrypt
858.11Kh · 128.0W
|
— | $0.31 | — |
|
—
|
SHA256DT
974.038Mh · 122.0W
|
— | $0.29 | — |
|
—
|
GhostRider
643Hh · 79.0W
|
— | $0.19 | — |
|
—
|
Equihash(125,4)
20Hh · 118.0W
|
— | $0.28 | — |
|
—
|
Radiant
375.818Kh · 114.0W
|
— | $0.27 | — |
|
—
|
EvrProgPow
26.5Mh · 80.0W
|
— | $0.19 | — |
|
—
|
Skydoge
300.0Mh · 50.0W
|
— | $0.12 | — |
|
—
|
Blake3
34.0Mh · 90.0W
|
— | $0.22 | — |
|
VRSC
⚠
Verus
|
VerusHash
5.1449Mh · 100.0W
|
— | $0.24 | — |
ACM
⚠
Actinium
|
Lyra2z
2.50804Mh · 75.0W
|
— | $0.18 | — |
|
—
|
ProgPowSERO
13.111107Mh · 132.0W
|
— | $0.32 | — |
|
—
|
ProgPowZ
13.088639Mh · 132.0W
|
— | $0.32 | — |
|
—
|
Abelhash
29Mh · 80.0W
|
— | $0.19 | — |
|
—
|
X21S
5.2701Mh · 102.0W
|
— | $0.24 | — |
|
—
|
zkSNARK
220.0Mh · 50.0W
|
— | $0.12 | — |
|
—
|
X15
7.99385Mh · 117.0W
|
— | $0.28 | — |
|
—
|
Hoohash
110Mh · 50.0W
|
— | $0.12 | — |
| Pool | Algos supportés | Frais | |
|---|---|---|---|
|
|
CuckooCycle (AE) · BeamHashIII (BEAM) · Autolykos2 (ERG) | 1.0% | Visit → |
HeroMiners
|
BeamHashIII (BEAM) · Autolykos2 (ERG) · Etchash (ETC) | 0.9% | Visit → |
|
★
K1Pool
|
Sha256 (BTC) · Autolykos2 (ERG) · Etchash (ETC) | 1.0% | Visit → |
Rplant
|
FiroPoW (FIRO) · NexaPoW (NEXA) | 1.0% | Visit → |
| Fournisseur | GPU | Revenu | Coût | Profit |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Clore Ai
Place de marché GPU
|
RTX 3050
$0.009/h ·
1 offre
|
$0.18
96.66 CLORE/day
1 CLORE ≈ $0.00184
|
$0.32 |
$-0.14
★
Visiter →
|
Flux de revenus Comment Nvidia GeForce RTX 3050 gagne sur le marché de GPU pour l'IA how we got $-0.14/day · ▾
Nvidia GeForce RTX 3050 gagne $0.03/jour en minant Octopus, ce qui dépasse actuellement les $-0.14/jour que rapporterait la location sur les marchés IA. Les tarifs évoluent chaque jour — à revérifier régulièrement.
Historique des revenus nets de location
| Période | /Jour | /Mois |
|---|---|---|
| Revenu | $0.18 | $5.40 |
|
Coût
$0.1/kWh
|
$0.32 | $9.60 |
| Profit | $-0.14 | $-4.20 |
Historique des revenus nets du marché du hashrate
| Période | /Jour | /Mois |
|---|---|---|
| Revenu | $0.13 | $3.88 |
|
Coût
$0.1/kWh
|
$0.32 | $9.60 |
| Profit | $-0.19 | $-5.72 |
| Rigs × Qty | Share | Rev /rig/day | Cost /rig/day | Profit /rig/day | Total profit /day |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| — | — | — | — | — | — |
Retour sur investissement pour Nvidia GeForce RTX 3050
Modélisez l'amortissement, l'électricité et le rendement de la première année pour cet équipement.
Coût matériel récupéré quand la ligne croise zéro.
| Month | Earned (mo) | Cost burned (mo) | Cumulative earned | Cumulative cost | Net | % ROI |
|---|
Émissions annuelles par source
Basé sur la consommation annuelle et l'intensité carbone.
| Source d'énergie | CO₂e / an |
|---|---|
| Wind | 12.55 kg |
| Nuclear | 13.69 kg |
| Hydroelectric | 27.37 kg |
| Geothermal | 43.34 kg |
| Solar | 51.32 kg |
| Biofuels | 262.31 kg |
| Gas | 558.84 kg |
| Coal | 935.19 kg |
Estimations seulement.
Qu'est-ce que cela veut dire ?
At the world-average grid intensity of about 475 g CO₂e/kWh, Nvidia GeForce RTX 3050 running 24/7 for a year releases about 542 kg of carbon dioxide equivalent. Here's what that looks like in everyday terms:
Où tu branches compte
Electricity is not one thing. A kilowatt-hour from a coal plant carries roughly 820 g of CO₂; the same kilowatt-hour from a hydro reservoir carries about 24 g. That's a 34× difference — large enough that Nvidia GeForce RTX 3050's annual footprint swings from roughly 935 kg on coal-heavy grids down to about 27 kg on hydro-dominated grids. The single biggest lever a miner has on their carbon footprint is choosing where to plug in.
Regions commonly used for low-carbon crypto mining include Quebec and British Columbia (hydro-dominated, typically <50 g CO₂/kWh), Iceland and Norway (geothermal + hydro, often <30 g), Paraguay (Itaipú hydro), and parts of the US Pacific Northwest. Coal-heavy grids — Kazakhstan, Inner Mongolia, Poland, parts of Australia — sit at the opposite end, often above 700 g CO₂/kWh.
Some operators also reduce their net impact by using otherwise-wasted energy: flare gas at oil wells (burning methane that would be vented anyway), curtailed renewables (wind or solar that the grid can't absorb), or behind-the-meter hydro during off-peak hours. These arrangements can drop effective emissions below the local grid average because the energy would have been wasted or flared without the mining load.
Comment réduire l'empreinte de ce miner
- Pick a greener ASIC. The efficiency column above matters as much as the grid: a 15 J/TH rig emits roughly half the CO₂ of a 30 J/TH rig for the same hashrate.
- Choose a low-carbon host. Data centres advertising hydro, geothermal, or nuclear power typically sit at <100 g CO₂/kWh.
- Look for stranded or curtailed energy. Flare-gas miners, wind-curtailment co-location, and off-peak hydro arrangements use energy that would otherwise be wasted.
- Use heat recovery. Capturing the heat for greenhouse agriculture, pool heating, or district warmth offsets fossil-fuel heating that would have been burned anyway.
- Time-shift your uptime. In grids with high daytime solar, running more during the day and less at night lowers your effective intensity even if you don't switch providers.
- Purchase verifiable offsets. Treat this as a last resort, not a substitute — and favour additional, permanent, third-party-verified projects (Gold Standard, Verra VCS).
Questions fréquentes
Yearly electricity use = rig power (W) × 24 × 365 ÷ 1000. We multiply that by each row's grid intensity in grams CO₂-equivalent per kWh and convert to kilograms. Intensities are representative averages — real emissions depend on your specific utility mix, time of day, and local transmission losses.
It depends almost entirely on where the electricity comes from. A single rig plugged into hydro in Quebec emits less over a year than an average family's two cars in a month. The same rig on a coal-dominated grid can exceed that in a few days. The hardware is the same — the grid is what changes the answer.
Network-wide estimates vary by methodology; the Cambridge Centre for Alternative Finance's Bitcoin Electricity Consumption Index is the most widely cited reference. As of recent reporting, the network's sustainable-energy share has grown as more hashrate migrates to hydro, wind, solar, and stranded-gas sites. This page just estimates a single rig — for the big picture, CCAF's dashboard is the best source.
Not directly. The rig draws the same wattage regardless of which pool it joins or how difficulty trends — so its electricity use, and therefore its emissions, stay constant. Those factors change revenue, not power consumption.