LP Agent
Nvidia GeForce RTX 3090 Ti — 加密货币挖矿
Nvidia GeForce RTX 3090 Ti 每天净赚 最高 $5.26,最佳为 AI 出租 $0.25/小时,共 1 个挂单。 也可用于:挖 PearlHash 算力 90 Th/s($0.98/天) and 出售 KAWPOW 算力($-0.21/天)。 功耗 320 W — 按 $0.10/kWh 计算,按当前行情有利润。
点击切换 · 8 个区块 加密货币挖矿 2/8
每日预测
每日各收入流的胜出值 — 来自该矿机的历史记录,在 $0.1/kWh 下计算的平均值
| 周期 | /日 | /月 |
|---|---|---|
| 收入 | $3.52 | $105.68 |
|
成本
$0.1/kWh
|
$0.77 | $23.10 |
| 利润 | $2.75 | $82.58 |
内部共识混合值 — 来自多个外部来源,不是任何单一市场的原始报价。
LP Agent
Cheapest cloud GPUs for AI
Compare staking yields across networks.
Live gold + precious-metal spot prices.
Vietnamese product price comparison.
Tech reviews and gadget deep-dives.
Live RSI screener across stocks and crypto.
Our own 0% fee mining pool — your wallet address is your login, payouts on-chain.
此页面是否有帮助?
感谢您的反馈!
还有什么想告诉我们?表单已在下方打开。
挖矿收益历史
| 周期 | /日 | /月 |
|---|---|---|
| 收入 | $1.75 | $52.50 |
|
成本
$0.1/kWh
|
$0.77 | $23.10 |
| 利润 | $0.98 | $29.40 |
内部共识混合值 — 来自多个外部来源,不是任何单一市场的原始报价。
| 算法 | 净收益 / 天 |
|---|---|
|
PearlHash
★ 最佳
90 Th/s · 320.0 W
|
$0.98 |
|
EVR
53 Mh/s · 360.0 W
|
$0.03 |
|
53 Mh/s · 360.0 W
|
$-0.09 |
|
122 Mh/s · 350.0 W
|
$-0.21 |
|
1.3 Hh/s · 380.0 W
|
$-0.31 |
|
55 Mh/s · 377.0 W
|
$-0.53 |
|
285 Mh/s · 450.0 W
|
$-0.57 |
|
134 Mh/s · 230.0 W
|
$-0.63 |
|
157 Hh/s · 330.0 W
|
$-0.65 |
|
DYN
7.9 Kh/s · 230.0 W
|
$-0.67 |
|
128 Mh/s · 350.0 W
|
$-0.70 |
|
16 Hh/s · 380.0 W
|
$-0.70 |
|
149.5 Hh/s · 285.0 W
|
$-0.77 |
|
1.2 Gh/s · 150.0 W
|
$-0.77 |
|
125 Mh/s · 450.0 W
|
$-0.77 |
|
22 Gh/s · 140.0 W
|
$-0.77 |
|
81 Mh/s · 320.0 W
|
$-0.77 |
|
XEL
52 Kh/s · 290.0 W
|
$-0.77 |
|
PYR
8 Gh/s · 190.0 W
|
$-0.77 |
|
600 Kh/s · 210.0 W
|
$-0.77 |
|
KAR
1.65 Gh/s · 140.0 W
|
$-0.77 |
|
HOO
470 Mh/s · 140.0 W
|
$-0.77 |
|
MEO
53 Mh/s · 320.0 W
|
$-0.77 |
|
MER
128 Mh/s · 350.0 W
|
$-0.77 |
|
QHA
210 Mh/s · 200.0 W
|
$-0.77 |
|
TON
5.5 Gh/s · 420.0 W
|
$-0.77 |
|
ABE
125 Mh/s · 350.0 W
|
$-0.77 |
|
CUC
10.9 Hh/s · 290.0 W
|
$-0.77 |
|
157.0 hh/s · 330.0 W
|
$-0.77 |
|
EQU
89 Hh/s · 350.0 W
|
$-0.77 |
|
CUC
6.6 Hh/s · 350.0 W
|
$-0.77 |
|
2.4 Gh/s · 150.0 W
|
$-0.77 |
| Coin | Algorithm | 收入 | 成本 | 利润 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
PRL
|
PearlHash
90Th · 320.0W
|
$1.75 | $0.77 | $0.98 |
EVR
|
EvrProgPow
53Mh · 360.0W
|
$0.80 | $0.86 | $-0.06 |
Firo
|
FiroPoW
53Mh · 360.0W
|
$0.68 | $0.86 | $-0.18 |
CFX
⚠
Conflux
|
Octopus
122Mh · 350.0W
|
$0.56 | $0.84 | $-0.28 |
|
GRIN
⚠
Grin
|
Cuckatoo32
1.3Hh · 380.0W
|
$0.46 | $0.91 | $-0.45 |
|
Ravencoin
|
KAWPOW
55Mh · 377.0W
|
$0.24 | $0.90 | $-0.66 |
ERG
⚠
Ergo
|
Autolykos2
285Mh · 450.0W
|
$0.20 | $1.08 | $-0.88 |
NEXA
⚠
Nexa
|
NexaPoW
134Mh · 230.0W
|
$0.14 | $0.55 | $-0.41 |
LTZ
⚠
Litecoinz
|
Zhash
157Hh · 330.0W
|
$0.12 | $0.79 | $-0.67 |
DNX
⚠
DNX
|
DynexSolve
7.9Kh · 230.0W
|
$0.10 | $0.55 | $-0.45 |
|
Ethereum Classic
|
Etchash
128Mh · 350.0W
|
$0.07 | $0.84 | $-0.77 |
|
AE
⚠
Aeternity
|
CuckooCycle
16Hh · 380.0W
|
$0.07 | $0.91 | $-0.84 |
|
Zcash
|
Equihash
149.5Hh · 285.0W
|
— | $0.68 | — |
|
Bitcoin
|
Sha256
1.2Gh · 150.0W
|
— | $0.36 | — |
|
—
|
Memehash
105Mh · 270.0W
|
— | $0.65 | — |
|
—
|
Ethash
125Mh · 450.0W
|
— | $1.08 | — |
|
—
|
IronFish
22Gh · 140.0W
|
— | $0.34 | — |
IRON
⚠
Iron Fish
|
FishHash
81Mh · 320.0W
|
— | $0.77 | — |
|
—
|
XelisHashV2
52Kh · 290.0W
|
— | $0.70 | — |
|
—
|
PyrinHash
8Gh · 190.0W
|
— | $0.46 | — |
|
—
|
zkSNARK
600Kh · 210.0W
|
— | $0.50 | — |
|
—
|
KarlsenHashV2
1.65Gh · 140.0W
|
— | $0.34 | — |
|
—
|
Hoohash
470Mh · 140.0W
|
— | $0.34 | — |
|
—
|
MeowPow
53Mh · 320.0W
|
— | $0.77 | — |
|
—
|
Meraki
128Mh · 350.0W
|
— | $0.84 | — |
|
—
|
Qhash
210Mh · 200.0W
|
— | $0.48 | — |
|
—
|
Ton
5.5Gh · 420.0W
|
— | $1.01 | — |
|
—
|
Abelhash
125Mh · 350.0W
|
— | $0.84 | — |
|
—
|
Cuckatoo31
10.9Hh · 290.0W
|
— | $0.70 | — |
Kaspa
|
KHeavyHash
157.0hh · 330.0W
|
— | $0.79 | — |
RTM
⚠
RTM
|
GhostRider
81.0Mh · 320.0W
|
— | $0.77 | — |
|
—
|
CryptoNightFast
6.3Hh · 310.0W
|
— | $0.74 | — |
|
—
|
EquihashZEL
89Hh · 350.0W
|
— | $0.84 | — |
Epic Cash
|
ProgPow
49Mh · 360.0W
|
— | $0.86 | — |
|
—
|
Cuckaroo29
6.6Hh · 350.0W
|
— | $0.84 | — |
|
—
|
X25X
1.9Mh · 250.0W
|
— | $0.60 | — |
|
—
|
Argon2d
510.0Hh · 290.0W
|
— | $0.70 | — |
|
—
|
Skydoge
24Mh · 180.0W
|
— | $0.43 | — |
ALPH
|
Blake3
2.4Gh · 150.0W
|
— | $0.36 | — |
|
—
|
MTP
50.0Mh · 350.0W
|
— | $0.84 | — |
|
VTC
⚠
Vertcoin
|
Verthash
1.9Mh · 250.0W
|
— | $0.60 | — |
| 矿池 | 支持算法 | 费率 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| CuckooCycle (AE) · Autolykos2 (ERG) · Etchash (ETC) | 1.0% | Visit → | |
| Sha256 (BTC) | 0.0% | Visit → | |
| Blake3 (ALPH) · Sha256 (BTC) · Etchash (ETC) | — | Visit → | |
| Sha256 (BTC) | — | Visit → | |
| Blake3 (ALPH) · Sha256 (BTC) · FiroPoW (FIRO) | — | Visit → | |
| Sha256 (BTC) | — | Visit → | |
| Sha256 (BTC) | — | Visit → | |
| Sha256 (BTC) | — | Visit → | |
| Autolykos2 (ERG) · Etchash (ETC) | 0.9% | Visit → | |
| Sha256 (BTC) · Autolykos2 (ERG) · Etchash (ETC) | 1.0% | Visit → | |
| Autolykos2 (ERG) · GhostRider (RTM) · Verthash (VTC) | — | Visit → | |
| Sha256 (BTC) · Etchash (ETC) · KAWPOW (RVN) | — | Visit → | |
|
N
Nanopool
|
Octopus (CFX) · KAWPOW (RVN) | — | Visit → |
| Sha256 (BTC) | 0.0% | Visit → | |
| Sha256 (BTC) | — | Visit → | |
| PearlHash (PRL) | — | Visit → | |
| PearlHash (PRL) | — | Visit → | |
| Sha256 (BTC) | — | Visit → | |
| Blake3 (ALPH) · Sha256 (BTC) · Octopus (CFX) | — | Visit → | |
| PearlHash (PRL) | — | Visit → | |
| FiroPoW (FIRO) · NexaPoW (NEXA) | 1.0% | Visit → | |
| Sha256 (BTC) | — | Visit → | |
| Sha256 (BTC) | — | Visit → | |
| Sha256 (BTC) | — | Visit → | |
| GhostRider (RTM) · KAWPOW (RVN) · Verthash (VTC) | — | Visit → | |
| Sha256 (BTC) | — | Visit → | |
| Sha256 (BTC) | — | Visit → | |
| Sha256 (BTC) | — | Visit → | |
| CuckooCycle (AE) · Blake3 (ALPH) · Octopus (CFX) | — | Visit → |
净租赁收入历史
| 周期 | /日 | /月 |
|---|---|---|
| 收入 | $6.03 | $180.90 |
|
成本
$0.1/kWh
|
$0.77 | $23.10 |
| 利润 | $5.26 | $157.80 |
内部共识混合值 — 来自多个外部来源,不是任何单一市场的原始报价。
收入流 Nvidia GeForce RTX 3090 Ti 在 AI GPU 出租市场上的收益路径 how we got $5.26/day · ▾
出售算力收益历史
| 周期 | /日 | /月 |
|---|---|---|
| 收入 | $0.56 | $16.91 |
|
成本
$0.1/kWh
|
$0.77 | $23.10 |
| 利润 | $-0.21 | $-6.19 |
内部共识混合值 — 来自多个外部来源,不是任何单一市场的原始报价。
MRR
· KAWPOW
· $0.48/day
访问 on MRR →
MRR
访问 on MRR →
| Rigs × Qty | Share | Rev /rig/day | Cost /rig/day | Profit /rig/day | Total profit /day |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| — | — | — | — | — | — |
Nvidia GeForce RTX 3090 Ti 的回本周期
测算此设备的回本周期、电费和首年收益。
曲线穿过零点即回本。之后全是利润。
| Month | Earned (mo) | Cost burned (mo) | Cumulative earned | Cumulative cost | Net | % ROI |
|---|
按能源来源的年度排放
基于年度耗电量和常见电网的碳强度。
| 能源来源 | CO₂e / 年 |
|---|---|
| Wind | 30.41 kg |
| Nuclear | 33.18 kg |
| Hydroelectric | 66.36 kg |
| Geothermal | 105.06 kg |
| Solar | 124.42 kg |
| Biofuels | 635.9 kg |
| Gas | 1,354.75 kg |
| Coal | 2,267.14 kg |
仅为估算 — 实际排放因硬件、冷却和电网而异。
这意味着什么?
At the world-average grid intensity of about 475 g CO₂e/kWh, Nvidia GeForce RTX 3090 Ti running 24/7 for a year releases about 1,313 kg of carbon dioxide equivalent. Here's what that looks like in everyday terms:
你在哪里接电很重要
Electricity is not one thing. A kilowatt-hour from a coal plant carries roughly 820 g of CO₂; the same kilowatt-hour from a hydro reservoir carries about 24 g. That's a 34× difference — large enough that Nvidia GeForce RTX 3090 Ti's annual footprint swings from roughly 2,267 kg on coal-heavy grids down to about 66 kg on hydro-dominated grids. The single biggest lever a miner has on their carbon footprint is choosing where to plug in.
Regions commonly used for low-carbon crypto mining include Quebec and British Columbia (hydro-dominated, typically <50 g CO₂/kWh), Iceland and Norway (geothermal + hydro, often <30 g), Paraguay (Itaipú hydro), and parts of the US Pacific Northwest. Coal-heavy grids — Kazakhstan, Inner Mongolia, Poland, parts of Australia — sit at the opposite end, often above 700 g CO₂/kWh.
Some operators also reduce their net impact by using otherwise-wasted energy: flare gas at oil wells (burning methane that would be vented anyway), curtailed renewables (wind or solar that the grid can't absorb), or behind-the-meter hydro during off-peak hours. These arrangements can drop effective emissions below the local grid average because the energy would have been wasted or flared without the mining load.
如何减少该矿机的碳足迹
- Pick a greener ASIC. The efficiency column above matters as much as the grid: a 15 J/TH rig emits roughly half the CO₂ of a 30 J/TH rig for the same hashrate.
- Choose a low-carbon host. Data centres advertising hydro, geothermal, or nuclear power typically sit at <100 g CO₂/kWh.
- Look for stranded or curtailed energy. Flare-gas miners, wind-curtailment co-location, and off-peak hydro arrangements use energy that would otherwise be wasted.
- Use heat recovery. Capturing the heat for greenhouse agriculture, pool heating, or district warmth offsets fossil-fuel heating that would have been burned anyway.
- Time-shift your uptime. In grids with high daytime solar, running more during the day and less at night lowers your effective intensity even if you don't switch providers.
- Purchase verifiable offsets. Treat this as a last resort, not a substitute — and favour additional, permanent, third-party-verified projects (Gold Standard, Verra VCS).
常见问题
Yearly electricity use = rig power (W) × 24 × 365 ÷ 1000. We multiply that by each row's grid intensity in grams CO₂-equivalent per kWh and convert to kilograms. Intensities are representative averages — real emissions depend on your specific utility mix, time of day, and local transmission losses.
It depends almost entirely on where the electricity comes from. A single rig plugged into hydro in Quebec emits less over a year than an average family's two cars in a month. The same rig on a coal-dominated grid can exceed that in a few days. The hardware is the same — the grid is what changes the answer.
Network-wide estimates vary by methodology; the Cambridge Centre for Alternative Finance's Bitcoin Electricity Consumption Index is the most widely cited reference. As of recent reporting, the network's sustainable-energy share has grown as more hashrate migrates to hydro, wind, solar, and stranded-gas sites. This page just estimates a single rig — for the big picture, CCAF's dashboard is the best source.
Not directly. The rig draws the same wattage regardless of which pool it joins or how difficulty trends — so its electricity use, and therefore its emissions, stay constant. Those factors change revenue, not power consumption.
点击切换 · 8 个区块 加密货币挖矿 2/8
每日预测
每日各收入流的胜出值 — 来自该矿机的历史记录,在 $0.1/kWh 下计算的平均值
| 周期 | /日 | /月 |
|---|---|---|
| 收入 | $3.52 | $105.68 |
|
成本
$0.1/kWh
|
$0.77 | $23.10 |
| 利润 | $2.75 | $82.58 |
内部共识混合值 — 来自多个外部来源,不是任何单一市场的原始报价。
挖矿收益历史
| 周期 | /日 | /月 |
|---|---|---|
| 收入 | $1.75 | $52.50 |
|
成本
$0.1/kWh
|
$0.77 | $23.10 |
| 利润 | $0.98 | $29.40 |
内部共识混合值 — 来自多个外部来源,不是任何单一市场的原始报价。
| 算法 | 净收益 / 天 |
|---|---|
|
PearlHash
★ 最佳
90 Th/s · 320.0 W
|
$0.98 |
|
EVR
53 Mh/s · 360.0 W
|
$0.03 |
|
53 Mh/s · 360.0 W
|
$-0.09 |
|
122 Mh/s · 350.0 W
|
$-0.21 |
|
1.3 Hh/s · 380.0 W
|
$-0.31 |
|
55 Mh/s · 377.0 W
|
$-0.53 |
|
285 Mh/s · 450.0 W
|
$-0.57 |
|
134 Mh/s · 230.0 W
|
$-0.63 |
|
157 Hh/s · 330.0 W
|
$-0.65 |
|
DYN
7.9 Kh/s · 230.0 W
|
$-0.67 |
|
128 Mh/s · 350.0 W
|
$-0.70 |
|
16 Hh/s · 380.0 W
|
$-0.70 |
|
149.5 Hh/s · 285.0 W
|
$-0.77 |
|
1.2 Gh/s · 150.0 W
|
$-0.77 |
|
125 Mh/s · 450.0 W
|
$-0.77 |
|
22 Gh/s · 140.0 W
|
$-0.77 |
|
81 Mh/s · 320.0 W
|
$-0.77 |
|
XEL
52 Kh/s · 290.0 W
|
$-0.77 |
|
PYR
8 Gh/s · 190.0 W
|
$-0.77 |
|
600 Kh/s · 210.0 W
|
$-0.77 |
|
KAR
1.65 Gh/s · 140.0 W
|
$-0.77 |
|
HOO
470 Mh/s · 140.0 W
|
$-0.77 |
|
MEO
53 Mh/s · 320.0 W
|
$-0.77 |
|
MER
128 Mh/s · 350.0 W
|
$-0.77 |
|
QHA
210 Mh/s · 200.0 W
|
$-0.77 |
|
TON
5.5 Gh/s · 420.0 W
|
$-0.77 |
|
ABE
125 Mh/s · 350.0 W
|
$-0.77 |
|
CUC
10.9 Hh/s · 290.0 W
|
$-0.77 |
|
157.0 hh/s · 330.0 W
|
$-0.77 |
|
EQU
89 Hh/s · 350.0 W
|
$-0.77 |
|
CUC
6.6 Hh/s · 350.0 W
|
$-0.77 |
|
2.4 Gh/s · 150.0 W
|
$-0.77 |
| Coin | Algorithm | 收入 | 成本 | 利润 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
PRL
|
PearlHash
90Th · 320.0W
|
$1.75 | $0.77 | $0.98 |
EVR
|
EvrProgPow
53Mh · 360.0W
|
$0.80 | $0.86 | $-0.06 |
Firo
|
FiroPoW
53Mh · 360.0W
|
$0.68 | $0.86 | $-0.18 |
CFX
⚠
Conflux
|
Octopus
122Mh · 350.0W
|
$0.56 | $0.84 | $-0.28 |
|
GRIN
⚠
Grin
|
Cuckatoo32
1.3Hh · 380.0W
|
$0.46 | $0.91 | $-0.45 |
|
Ravencoin
|
KAWPOW
55Mh · 377.0W
|
$0.24 | $0.90 | $-0.66 |
ERG
⚠
Ergo
|
Autolykos2
285Mh · 450.0W
|
$0.20 | $1.08 | $-0.88 |
NEXA
⚠
Nexa
|
NexaPoW
134Mh · 230.0W
|
$0.14 | $0.55 | $-0.41 |
LTZ
⚠
Litecoinz
|
Zhash
157Hh · 330.0W
|
$0.12 | $0.79 | $-0.67 |
DNX
⚠
DNX
|
DynexSolve
7.9Kh · 230.0W
|
$0.10 | $0.55 | $-0.45 |
|
Ethereum Classic
|
Etchash
128Mh · 350.0W
|
$0.07 | $0.84 | $-0.77 |
|
AE
⚠
Aeternity
|
CuckooCycle
16Hh · 380.0W
|
$0.07 | $0.91 | $-0.84 |
|
Zcash
|
Equihash
149.5Hh · 285.0W
|
— | $0.68 | — |
|
Bitcoin
|
Sha256
1.2Gh · 150.0W
|
— | $0.36 | — |
|
—
|
Memehash
105Mh · 270.0W
|
— | $0.65 | — |
|
—
|
Ethash
125Mh · 450.0W
|
— | $1.08 | — |
|
—
|
IronFish
22Gh · 140.0W
|
— | $0.34 | — |
IRON
⚠
Iron Fish
|
FishHash
81Mh · 320.0W
|
— | $0.77 | — |
|
—
|
XelisHashV2
52Kh · 290.0W
|
— | $0.70 | — |
|
—
|
PyrinHash
8Gh · 190.0W
|
— | $0.46 | — |
|
—
|
zkSNARK
600Kh · 210.0W
|
— | $0.50 | — |
|
—
|
KarlsenHashV2
1.65Gh · 140.0W
|
— | $0.34 | — |
|
—
|
Hoohash
470Mh · 140.0W
|
— | $0.34 | — |
|
—
|
MeowPow
53Mh · 320.0W
|
— | $0.77 | — |
|
—
|
Meraki
128Mh · 350.0W
|
— | $0.84 | — |
|
—
|
Qhash
210Mh · 200.0W
|
— | $0.48 | — |
|
—
|
Ton
5.5Gh · 420.0W
|
— | $1.01 | — |
|
—
|
Abelhash
125Mh · 350.0W
|
— | $0.84 | — |
|
—
|
Cuckatoo31
10.9Hh · 290.0W
|
— | $0.70 | — |
Kaspa
|
KHeavyHash
157.0hh · 330.0W
|
— | $0.79 | — |
RTM
⚠
RTM
|
GhostRider
81.0Mh · 320.0W
|
— | $0.77 | — |
|
—
|
CryptoNightFast
6.3Hh · 310.0W
|
— | $0.74 | — |
|
—
|
EquihashZEL
89Hh · 350.0W
|
— | $0.84 | — |
Epic Cash
|
ProgPow
49Mh · 360.0W
|
— | $0.86 | — |
|
—
|
Cuckaroo29
6.6Hh · 350.0W
|
— | $0.84 | — |
|
—
|
X25X
1.9Mh · 250.0W
|
— | $0.60 | — |
|
—
|
Argon2d
510.0Hh · 290.0W
|
— | $0.70 | — |
|
—
|
Skydoge
24Mh · 180.0W
|
— | $0.43 | — |
ALPH
|
Blake3
2.4Gh · 150.0W
|
— | $0.36 | — |
|
—
|
MTP
50.0Mh · 350.0W
|
— | $0.84 | — |
|
VTC
⚠
Vertcoin
|
Verthash
1.9Mh · 250.0W
|
— | $0.60 | — |
| 矿池 | 支持算法 | 费率 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| CuckooCycle (AE) · Autolykos2 (ERG) · Etchash (ETC) | 1.0% | Visit → | |
| Sha256 (BTC) | 0.0% | Visit → | |
| Blake3 (ALPH) · Sha256 (BTC) · Etchash (ETC) | — | Visit → | |
| Sha256 (BTC) | — | Visit → | |
| Blake3 (ALPH) · Sha256 (BTC) · FiroPoW (FIRO) | — | Visit → | |
| Sha256 (BTC) | — | Visit → | |
| Sha256 (BTC) | — | Visit → | |
| Sha256 (BTC) | — | Visit → | |
| Autolykos2 (ERG) · Etchash (ETC) | 0.9% | Visit → | |
| Sha256 (BTC) · Autolykos2 (ERG) · Etchash (ETC) | 1.0% | Visit → | |
| Autolykos2 (ERG) · GhostRider (RTM) · Verthash (VTC) | — | Visit → | |
| Sha256 (BTC) · Etchash (ETC) · KAWPOW (RVN) | — | Visit → | |
|
N
Nanopool
|
Octopus (CFX) · KAWPOW (RVN) | — | Visit → |
| Sha256 (BTC) | 0.0% | Visit → | |
| Sha256 (BTC) | — | Visit → | |
| PearlHash (PRL) | — | Visit → | |
| PearlHash (PRL) | — | Visit → | |
| Sha256 (BTC) | — | Visit → | |
| Blake3 (ALPH) · Sha256 (BTC) · Octopus (CFX) | — | Visit → | |
| PearlHash (PRL) | — | Visit → | |
| FiroPoW (FIRO) · NexaPoW (NEXA) | 1.0% | Visit → | |
| Sha256 (BTC) | — | Visit → | |
| Sha256 (BTC) | — | Visit → | |
| Sha256 (BTC) | — | Visit → | |
| GhostRider (RTM) · KAWPOW (RVN) · Verthash (VTC) | — | Visit → | |
| Sha256 (BTC) | — | Visit → | |
| Sha256 (BTC) | — | Visit → | |
| Sha256 (BTC) | — | Visit → | |
| CuckooCycle (AE) · Blake3 (ALPH) · Octopus (CFX) | — | Visit → |
净租赁收入历史
| 周期 | /日 | /月 |
|---|---|---|
| 收入 | $6.03 | $180.90 |
|
成本
$0.1/kWh
|
$0.77 | $23.10 |
| 利润 | $5.26 | $157.80 |
内部共识混合值 — 来自多个外部来源,不是任何单一市场的原始报价。
收入流 Nvidia GeForce RTX 3090 Ti 在 AI GPU 出租市场上的收益路径 how we got $5.26/day · ▾
出售算力收益历史
| 周期 | /日 | /月 |
|---|---|---|
| 收入 | $0.56 | $16.91 |
|
成本
$0.1/kWh
|
$0.77 | $23.10 |
| 利润 | $-0.21 | $-6.19 |
内部共识混合值 — 来自多个外部来源,不是任何单一市场的原始报价。
MRR
· KAWPOW
· $0.48/day
访问 on MRR →
MRR
访问 on MRR →
| Rigs × Qty | Share | Rev /rig/day | Cost /rig/day | Profit /rig/day | Total profit /day |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| — | — | — | — | — | — |
Nvidia GeForce RTX 3090 Ti 的回本周期
测算此设备的回本周期、电费和首年收益。
曲线穿过零点即回本。之后全是利润。
| Month | Earned (mo) | Cost burned (mo) | Cumulative earned | Cumulative cost | Net | % ROI |
|---|
按能源来源的年度排放
基于年度耗电量和常见电网的碳强度。
| 能源来源 | CO₂e / 年 |
|---|---|
| Wind | 30.41 kg |
| Nuclear | 33.18 kg |
| Hydroelectric | 66.36 kg |
| Geothermal | 105.06 kg |
| Solar | 124.42 kg |
| Biofuels | 635.9 kg |
| Gas | 1,354.75 kg |
| Coal | 2,267.14 kg |
仅为估算 — 实际排放因硬件、冷却和电网而异。
这意味着什么?
At the world-average grid intensity of about 475 g CO₂e/kWh, Nvidia GeForce RTX 3090 Ti running 24/7 for a year releases about 1,313 kg of carbon dioxide equivalent. Here's what that looks like in everyday terms:
你在哪里接电很重要
Electricity is not one thing. A kilowatt-hour from a coal plant carries roughly 820 g of CO₂; the same kilowatt-hour from a hydro reservoir carries about 24 g. That's a 34× difference — large enough that Nvidia GeForce RTX 3090 Ti's annual footprint swings from roughly 2,267 kg on coal-heavy grids down to about 66 kg on hydro-dominated grids. The single biggest lever a miner has on their carbon footprint is choosing where to plug in.
Regions commonly used for low-carbon crypto mining include Quebec and British Columbia (hydro-dominated, typically <50 g CO₂/kWh), Iceland and Norway (geothermal + hydro, often <30 g), Paraguay (Itaipú hydro), and parts of the US Pacific Northwest. Coal-heavy grids — Kazakhstan, Inner Mongolia, Poland, parts of Australia — sit at the opposite end, often above 700 g CO₂/kWh.
Some operators also reduce their net impact by using otherwise-wasted energy: flare gas at oil wells (burning methane that would be vented anyway), curtailed renewables (wind or solar that the grid can't absorb), or behind-the-meter hydro during off-peak hours. These arrangements can drop effective emissions below the local grid average because the energy would have been wasted or flared without the mining load.
如何减少该矿机的碳足迹
- Pick a greener ASIC. The efficiency column above matters as much as the grid: a 15 J/TH rig emits roughly half the CO₂ of a 30 J/TH rig for the same hashrate.
- Choose a low-carbon host. Data centres advertising hydro, geothermal, or nuclear power typically sit at <100 g CO₂/kWh.
- Look for stranded or curtailed energy. Flare-gas miners, wind-curtailment co-location, and off-peak hydro arrangements use energy that would otherwise be wasted.
- Use heat recovery. Capturing the heat for greenhouse agriculture, pool heating, or district warmth offsets fossil-fuel heating that would have been burned anyway.
- Time-shift your uptime. In grids with high daytime solar, running more during the day and less at night lowers your effective intensity even if you don't switch providers.
- Purchase verifiable offsets. Treat this as a last resort, not a substitute — and favour additional, permanent, third-party-verified projects (Gold Standard, Verra VCS).
常见问题
Yearly electricity use = rig power (W) × 24 × 365 ÷ 1000. We multiply that by each row's grid intensity in grams CO₂-equivalent per kWh and convert to kilograms. Intensities are representative averages — real emissions depend on your specific utility mix, time of day, and local transmission losses.
It depends almost entirely on where the electricity comes from. A single rig plugged into hydro in Quebec emits less over a year than an average family's two cars in a month. The same rig on a coal-dominated grid can exceed that in a few days. The hardware is the same — the grid is what changes the answer.
Network-wide estimates vary by methodology; the Cambridge Centre for Alternative Finance's Bitcoin Electricity Consumption Index is the most widely cited reference. As of recent reporting, the network's sustainable-energy share has grown as more hashrate migrates to hydro, wind, solar, and stranded-gas sites. This page just estimates a single rig — for the big picture, CCAF's dashboard is the best source.
Not directly. The rig draws the same wattage regardless of which pool it joins or how difficulty trends — so its electricity use, and therefore its emissions, stay constant. Those factors change revenue, not power consumption.