Nvidia RTX 4060 Ti — 挖矿
Nvidia RTX 4060 Ti 每天净赚 最高 $1.16,最佳为 AI 出租 $0.06/小时,共 13 个挂单。 也可用于:挖 Octopus 算力 33.4158 Mh/s($0.19/天) and 出售 KAWPOW 算力($0.15/天)。 功耗 129 W — 按 $0.10/kWh 计算,按当前行情有利润。
每日预测
每日各收入流的胜出值 — 来自该矿机的历史记录,在 $0.1/kWh 下计算的平均值
| 周期 | /日 | /月 |
|---|---|---|
| 收入 | $1.47 | $44.14 |
|
成本
$0.1/kWh
|
$0.31 | $9.30 |
| 利润 | $1.16 | $34.84 |
| 算法 | 净收益 / 天 |
|---|---|
|
OCT
Octopus
★ 最佳
33.4158 Mh/s · 129.0 W
|
$0.19 |
|
KAW
KAWPOW
16.5489 Mh/s · 133.0 W
|
$-0.22 |
|
AUT
Autolykos2
77.5671 Mh/s · 96.0 W
|
$-0.26 |
|
ETC
Etchash
33.7155 Mh/s · 102.0 W
|
$-0.28 |
|
LYR
Lyra2REv2
79.7942 Mh/s · 170.0 W
|
$-0.30 |
|
NEX
NexaPoW
11.3222 Mh/s · 63.0 W
|
$-0.30 |
|
KHE
KHeavyHash
706.4096 Mh/s · 158.0 W
|
$-0.31 |
|
LYR
Lyra2z
6.2355 Mh/s · 95.0 W
|
$-0.31 |
|
X16
X16R
19.8281 Mh/s · 159.0 W
|
$-0.31 |
|
X16
X16Rv2
18.1676 Mh/s · 154.0 W
|
$-0.31 |
|
NEO
NeoScrypt
1.4938 Mh/s · 90.0 W
|
$-0.31 |
|
EQU
Equihash210_9
278 Hh/s · 153.0 W
|
$-0.31 |
|
KEC
Keccak
1.3643 Gh/s · 153.0 W
|
$-0.31 |
|
KAR
KarlsenHashV2
1.0555 Gh/s · 63.0 W
|
$-0.31 |
|
EQU
Equihash192_7
33 Hh/s · 149.0 W
|
$-0.31 |
|
ETH
Ethash
33.7155 Mh/s · 102.0 W
|
$-0.31 |
|
ZHA
Zhash
63 Hh/s · 157.0 W
|
$-0.31 |
|
BLA
Blake (2s)
7.6096 Gh/s · 175.0 W
|
$-0.31 |
|
VER
VerusHash
10.4735 Mh/s · 122.0 W
|
$-0.31 |
| Coin | Algorithm | 收入 | 成本 | 利润 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
CFX
⚠
Conflux
|
Octopus
33.4158Mh · 129.0W
|
$0.50 | $0.31 | $0.19 |
|
RVN
Ravencoin
|
KAWPOW
16.5489Mh · 133.0W
|
$0.09 | $0.32 | $-0.23 |
ERG
⚠
Ergo
|
Autolykos2
77.5671Mh · 96.0W
|
$0.05 | $0.23 | $-0.18 |
|
ETC
Ethereum Classic
|
Etchash
33.7155Mh · 102.0W
|
$0.03 | $0.24 | $-0.21 |
|
MONA
⚠
Monacoin
|
Lyra2REv2
79.7942Mh · 170.0W
|
$0.01 | $0.41 | $-0.40 |
NEXA
⚠
Nexa
|
NexaPoW
11.3222Mh · 63.0W
|
$0.01 | $0.15 | $-0.14 |
KAS
Kaspa
|
KHeavyHash
706.4096Mh · 158.0W
|
— | $0.38 | — |
ACM
⚠
Actinium
|
Lyra2z
6.2355Mh · 95.0W
|
— | $0.23 | — |
|
—
|
Ubqhash
33.487Mh · 114.0W
|
— | $0.27 | — |
|
—
|
Keccak-C
1.3367Gh · 155.0W
|
— | $0.37 | — |
|
—
|
X16R
19.8281Mh · 159.0W
|
— | $0.38 | — |
|
—
|
Curvehash
2.0578Mh · 99.0W
|
— | $0.24 | — |
|
—
|
X16Rv2
18.1676Mh · 154.0W
|
— | $0.37 | — |
|
—
|
Tribus
46.0465Mh · 168.0W
|
— | $0.40 | — |
|
FTC
⚠
Feathercoin
|
NeoScrypt
1.4938Mh · 90.0W
|
— | $0.22 | — |
|
—
|
Equihash210_9
278Hh · 153.0W
|
— | $0.37 | — |
|
—
|
Equihash(125,4)
53.573Hh · 159.0W
|
— | $0.38 | — |
|
—
|
X25X
2.4172Mh · 77.0W
|
— | $0.18 | — |
|
VTC
⚠
Vertcoin
|
Verthash
583.5097Kh · 91.0W
|
— | $0.22 | — |
|
—
|
Keccak
1.3643Gh · 153.0W
|
— | $0.37 | — |
|
—
|
PHI1612
31.4102Mh · 140.0W
|
— | $0.34 | — |
|
—
|
KarlsenHashV2
1.0555Gh · 63.0W
|
— | $0.15 | — |
|
—
|
BCD
24.0577Mh · 160.0W
|
— | $0.38 | — |
|
—
|
HeavyHash
508.4924Mh · 160.0W
|
— | $0.38 | — |
|
—
|
Equihash192_7
33Hh · 149.0W
|
— | $0.36 | — |
FIRO
Firo
|
FiroPoW
16.8109Mh · 148.0W
|
— | $0.36 | — |
|
—
|
GhostRider
885Hh · 97.0W
|
— | $0.23 | — |
|
—
|
X16RT
19.7751Mh · 157.0W
|
— | $0.38 | — |
|
—
|
X21S
13.7849Mh · 150.0W
|
— | $0.36 | — |
|
—
|
Ethash
33.7155Mh · 102.0W
|
— | $0.24 | — |
|
LTZ
⚠
Litecoinz
|
Zhash
63Hh · 157.0W
|
— | $0.38 | — |
|
—
|
ProgPowSERO
16.9997Mh · 154.0W
|
— | $0.37 | — |
|
—
|
Radiant
752.9697Mh · 150.0W
|
— | $0.36 | — |
|
—
|
ProgPowZ
16.7331Mh · 153.0W
|
— | $0.37 | — |
|
—
|
Equihash(144,5)
62Hh · 150.0W
|
— | $0.36 | — |
|
—
|
Blake (2s)
7.6096Gh · 175.0W
|
— | $0.42 | — |
|
VRSC
⚠
Verus
|
VerusHash
10.4735Mh · 122.0W
|
— | $0.29 | — |
收入流 Nvidia RTX 4060 Ti 在 AI GPU 出租市场上的收益路径 how we got $1.16/day · ▾
Nvidia RTX 4060 Ti 出租给 AI 任务每日可赚 $1.16,明显超过挖 Octopus 的 $0.19/日。挖矿和出租互斥,此处 AI 市场是更优选择。
净租赁收入历史
| 周期 | /日 | /月 |
|---|---|---|
| 收入 | $1.47 | $44.10 |
|
成本
$0.1/kWh
|
$0.31 | $9.30 |
| 利润 | $1.16 | $34.80 |
净算力市场收入历史
| 周期 | /日 | /月 |
|---|---|---|
| 收入 | $0.16 | $4.86 |
|
成本
$0.1/kWh
|
$0.31 | $9.30 |
| 利润 | $-0.15 | $-4.44 |
| Rigs × Qty | Share | Rev /rig/day | Cost /rig/day | Profit /rig/day | Total profit /day |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| — | — | — | — | — | — |
Nvidia RTX 4060 Ti 的回本周期
测算此设备的回本周期、电费和首年收益。
曲线穿过零点即回本。之后全是利润。
| Month | Earned (mo) | Cost burned (mo) | Cumulative earned | Cumulative cost | Net | % ROI |
|---|
按能源来源的年度排放
基于年度耗电量和常见电网的碳强度。
| 能源来源 | CO₂e / 年 |
|---|---|
| Wind | 12.26 kg |
| Nuclear | 13.37 kg |
| Hydroelectric | 26.75 kg |
| Geothermal | 42.35 kg |
| Solar | 50.16 kg |
| Biofuels | 256.35 kg |
| Gas | 546.13 kg |
| Coal | 913.94 kg |
仅为估算 — 实际排放因硬件、冷却和电网而异。
这意味着什么?
At the world-average grid intensity of about 475 g CO₂e/kWh, Nvidia RTX 4060 Ti running 24/7 for a year releases about 529 kg of carbon dioxide equivalent. Here's what that looks like in everyday terms:
你在哪里接电很重要
Electricity is not one thing. A kilowatt-hour from a coal plant carries roughly 820 g of CO₂; the same kilowatt-hour from a hydro reservoir carries about 24 g. That's a 34× difference — large enough that Nvidia RTX 4060 Ti's annual footprint swings from roughly 914 kg on coal-heavy grids down to about 27 kg on hydro-dominated grids. The single biggest lever a miner has on their carbon footprint is choosing where to plug in.
Regions commonly used for low-carbon crypto mining include Quebec and British Columbia (hydro-dominated, typically <50 g CO₂/kWh), Iceland and Norway (geothermal + hydro, often <30 g), Paraguay (Itaipú hydro), and parts of the US Pacific Northwest. Coal-heavy grids — Kazakhstan, Inner Mongolia, Poland, parts of Australia — sit at the opposite end, often above 700 g CO₂/kWh.
Some operators also reduce their net impact by using otherwise-wasted energy: flare gas at oil wells (burning methane that would be vented anyway), curtailed renewables (wind or solar that the grid can't absorb), or behind-the-meter hydro during off-peak hours. These arrangements can drop effective emissions below the local grid average because the energy would have been wasted or flared without the mining load.
如何减少该矿机的碳足迹
- Pick a greener ASIC. The efficiency column above matters as much as the grid: a 15 J/TH rig emits roughly half the CO₂ of a 30 J/TH rig for the same hashrate.
- Choose a low-carbon host. Data centres advertising hydro, geothermal, or nuclear power typically sit at <100 g CO₂/kWh.
- Look for stranded or curtailed energy. Flare-gas miners, wind-curtailment co-location, and off-peak hydro arrangements use energy that would otherwise be wasted.
- Use heat recovery. Capturing the heat for greenhouse agriculture, pool heating, or district warmth offsets fossil-fuel heating that would have been burned anyway.
- Time-shift your uptime. In grids with high daytime solar, running more during the day and less at night lowers your effective intensity even if you don't switch providers.
- Purchase verifiable offsets. Treat this as a last resort, not a substitute — and favour additional, permanent, third-party-verified projects (Gold Standard, Verra VCS).
常见问题
Yearly electricity use = rig power (W) × 24 × 365 ÷ 1000. We multiply that by each row's grid intensity in grams CO₂-equivalent per kWh and convert to kilograms. Intensities are representative averages — real emissions depend on your specific utility mix, time of day, and local transmission losses.
It depends almost entirely on where the electricity comes from. A single rig plugged into hydro in Quebec emits less over a year than an average family's two cars in a month. The same rig on a coal-dominated grid can exceed that in a few days. The hardware is the same — the grid is what changes the answer.
Network-wide estimates vary by methodology; the Cambridge Centre for Alternative Finance's Bitcoin Electricity Consumption Index is the most widely cited reference. As of recent reporting, the network's sustainable-energy share has grown as more hashrate migrates to hydro, wind, solar, and stranded-gas sites. This page just estimates a single rig — for the big picture, CCAF's dashboard is the best source.
Not directly. The rig draws the same wattage regardless of which pool it joins or how difficulty trends — so its electricity use, and therefore its emissions, stay constant. Those factors change revenue, not power consumption.
每日预测
每日各收入流的胜出值 — 来自该矿机的历史记录,在 $0.1/kWh 下计算的平均值
| 周期 | /日 | /月 |
|---|---|---|
| 收入 | $1.47 | $44.14 |
|
成本
$0.1/kWh
|
$0.31 | $9.30 |
| 利润 | $1.16 | $34.84 |
| 算法 | 净收益 / 天 |
|---|---|
|
OCT
Octopus
★ 最佳
33.4158 Mh/s · 129.0 W
|
$0.19 |
|
KAW
KAWPOW
16.5489 Mh/s · 133.0 W
|
$-0.22 |
|
AUT
Autolykos2
77.5671 Mh/s · 96.0 W
|
$-0.26 |
|
ETC
Etchash
33.7155 Mh/s · 102.0 W
|
$-0.28 |
|
LYR
Lyra2REv2
79.7942 Mh/s · 170.0 W
|
$-0.30 |
|
NEX
NexaPoW
11.3222 Mh/s · 63.0 W
|
$-0.30 |
|
KHE
KHeavyHash
706.4096 Mh/s · 158.0 W
|
$-0.31 |
|
LYR
Lyra2z
6.2355 Mh/s · 95.0 W
|
$-0.31 |
|
X16
X16R
19.8281 Mh/s · 159.0 W
|
$-0.31 |
|
X16
X16Rv2
18.1676 Mh/s · 154.0 W
|
$-0.31 |
|
NEO
NeoScrypt
1.4938 Mh/s · 90.0 W
|
$-0.31 |
|
EQU
Equihash210_9
278 Hh/s · 153.0 W
|
$-0.31 |
|
KEC
Keccak
1.3643 Gh/s · 153.0 W
|
$-0.31 |
|
KAR
KarlsenHashV2
1.0555 Gh/s · 63.0 W
|
$-0.31 |
|
EQU
Equihash192_7
33 Hh/s · 149.0 W
|
$-0.31 |
|
ETH
Ethash
33.7155 Mh/s · 102.0 W
|
$-0.31 |
|
ZHA
Zhash
63 Hh/s · 157.0 W
|
$-0.31 |
|
BLA
Blake (2s)
7.6096 Gh/s · 175.0 W
|
$-0.31 |
|
VER
VerusHash
10.4735 Mh/s · 122.0 W
|
$-0.31 |
| Coin | Algorithm | 收入 | 成本 | 利润 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
CFX
⚠
Conflux
|
Octopus
33.4158Mh · 129.0W
|
$0.50 | $0.31 | $0.19 |
|
RVN
Ravencoin
|
KAWPOW
16.5489Mh · 133.0W
|
$0.09 | $0.32 | $-0.23 |
ERG
⚠
Ergo
|
Autolykos2
77.5671Mh · 96.0W
|
$0.05 | $0.23 | $-0.18 |
|
ETC
Ethereum Classic
|
Etchash
33.7155Mh · 102.0W
|
$0.03 | $0.24 | $-0.21 |
|
MONA
⚠
Monacoin
|
Lyra2REv2
79.7942Mh · 170.0W
|
$0.01 | $0.41 | $-0.40 |
NEXA
⚠
Nexa
|
NexaPoW
11.3222Mh · 63.0W
|
$0.01 | $0.15 | $-0.14 |
KAS
Kaspa
|
KHeavyHash
706.4096Mh · 158.0W
|
— | $0.38 | — |
ACM
⚠
Actinium
|
Lyra2z
6.2355Mh · 95.0W
|
— | $0.23 | — |
|
—
|
Ubqhash
33.487Mh · 114.0W
|
— | $0.27 | — |
|
—
|
Keccak-C
1.3367Gh · 155.0W
|
— | $0.37 | — |
|
—
|
X16R
19.8281Mh · 159.0W
|
— | $0.38 | — |
|
—
|
Curvehash
2.0578Mh · 99.0W
|
— | $0.24 | — |
|
—
|
X16Rv2
18.1676Mh · 154.0W
|
— | $0.37 | — |
|
—
|
Tribus
46.0465Mh · 168.0W
|
— | $0.40 | — |
|
FTC
⚠
Feathercoin
|
NeoScrypt
1.4938Mh · 90.0W
|
— | $0.22 | — |
|
—
|
Equihash210_9
278Hh · 153.0W
|
— | $0.37 | — |
|
—
|
Equihash(125,4)
53.573Hh · 159.0W
|
— | $0.38 | — |
|
—
|
X25X
2.4172Mh · 77.0W
|
— | $0.18 | — |
|
VTC
⚠
Vertcoin
|
Verthash
583.5097Kh · 91.0W
|
— | $0.22 | — |
|
—
|
Keccak
1.3643Gh · 153.0W
|
— | $0.37 | — |
|
—
|
PHI1612
31.4102Mh · 140.0W
|
— | $0.34 | — |
|
—
|
KarlsenHashV2
1.0555Gh · 63.0W
|
— | $0.15 | — |
|
—
|
BCD
24.0577Mh · 160.0W
|
— | $0.38 | — |
|
—
|
HeavyHash
508.4924Mh · 160.0W
|
— | $0.38 | — |
|
—
|
Equihash192_7
33Hh · 149.0W
|
— | $0.36 | — |
FIRO
Firo
|
FiroPoW
16.8109Mh · 148.0W
|
— | $0.36 | — |
|
—
|
GhostRider
885Hh · 97.0W
|
— | $0.23 | — |
|
—
|
X16RT
19.7751Mh · 157.0W
|
— | $0.38 | — |
|
—
|
X21S
13.7849Mh · 150.0W
|
— | $0.36 | — |
|
—
|
Ethash
33.7155Mh · 102.0W
|
— | $0.24 | — |
|
LTZ
⚠
Litecoinz
|
Zhash
63Hh · 157.0W
|
— | $0.38 | — |
|
—
|
ProgPowSERO
16.9997Mh · 154.0W
|
— | $0.37 | — |
|
—
|
Radiant
752.9697Mh · 150.0W
|
— | $0.36 | — |
|
—
|
ProgPowZ
16.7331Mh · 153.0W
|
— | $0.37 | — |
|
—
|
Equihash(144,5)
62Hh · 150.0W
|
— | $0.36 | — |
|
—
|
Blake (2s)
7.6096Gh · 175.0W
|
— | $0.42 | — |
|
VRSC
⚠
Verus
|
VerusHash
10.4735Mh · 122.0W
|
— | $0.29 | — |
收入流 Nvidia RTX 4060 Ti 在 AI GPU 出租市场上的收益路径 how we got $1.16/day · ▾
Nvidia RTX 4060 Ti 出租给 AI 任务每日可赚 $1.16,明显超过挖 Octopus 的 $0.19/日。挖矿和出租互斥,此处 AI 市场是更优选择。
净租赁收入历史
| 周期 | /日 | /月 |
|---|---|---|
| 收入 | $1.47 | $44.10 |
|
成本
$0.1/kWh
|
$0.31 | $9.30 |
| 利润 | $1.16 | $34.80 |
净算力市场收入历史
| 周期 | /日 | /月 |
|---|---|---|
| 收入 | $0.16 | $4.86 |
|
成本
$0.1/kWh
|
$0.31 | $9.30 |
| 利润 | $-0.15 | $-4.44 |
| Rigs × Qty | Share | Rev /rig/day | Cost /rig/day | Profit /rig/day | Total profit /day |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| — | — | — | — | — | — |
Nvidia RTX 4060 Ti 的回本周期
测算此设备的回本周期、电费和首年收益。
曲线穿过零点即回本。之后全是利润。
| Month | Earned (mo) | Cost burned (mo) | Cumulative earned | Cumulative cost | Net | % ROI |
|---|
按能源来源的年度排放
基于年度耗电量和常见电网的碳强度。
| 能源来源 | CO₂e / 年 |
|---|---|
| Wind | 12.26 kg |
| Nuclear | 13.37 kg |
| Hydroelectric | 26.75 kg |
| Geothermal | 42.35 kg |
| Solar | 50.16 kg |
| Biofuels | 256.35 kg |
| Gas | 546.13 kg |
| Coal | 913.94 kg |
仅为估算 — 实际排放因硬件、冷却和电网而异。
这意味着什么?
At the world-average grid intensity of about 475 g CO₂e/kWh, Nvidia RTX 4060 Ti running 24/7 for a year releases about 529 kg of carbon dioxide equivalent. Here's what that looks like in everyday terms:
你在哪里接电很重要
Electricity is not one thing. A kilowatt-hour from a coal plant carries roughly 820 g of CO₂; the same kilowatt-hour from a hydro reservoir carries about 24 g. That's a 34× difference — large enough that Nvidia RTX 4060 Ti's annual footprint swings from roughly 914 kg on coal-heavy grids down to about 27 kg on hydro-dominated grids. The single biggest lever a miner has on their carbon footprint is choosing where to plug in.
Regions commonly used for low-carbon crypto mining include Quebec and British Columbia (hydro-dominated, typically <50 g CO₂/kWh), Iceland and Norway (geothermal + hydro, often <30 g), Paraguay (Itaipú hydro), and parts of the US Pacific Northwest. Coal-heavy grids — Kazakhstan, Inner Mongolia, Poland, parts of Australia — sit at the opposite end, often above 700 g CO₂/kWh.
Some operators also reduce their net impact by using otherwise-wasted energy: flare gas at oil wells (burning methane that would be vented anyway), curtailed renewables (wind or solar that the grid can't absorb), or behind-the-meter hydro during off-peak hours. These arrangements can drop effective emissions below the local grid average because the energy would have been wasted or flared without the mining load.
如何减少该矿机的碳足迹
- Pick a greener ASIC. The efficiency column above matters as much as the grid: a 15 J/TH rig emits roughly half the CO₂ of a 30 J/TH rig for the same hashrate.
- Choose a low-carbon host. Data centres advertising hydro, geothermal, or nuclear power typically sit at <100 g CO₂/kWh.
- Look for stranded or curtailed energy. Flare-gas miners, wind-curtailment co-location, and off-peak hydro arrangements use energy that would otherwise be wasted.
- Use heat recovery. Capturing the heat for greenhouse agriculture, pool heating, or district warmth offsets fossil-fuel heating that would have been burned anyway.
- Time-shift your uptime. In grids with high daytime solar, running more during the day and less at night lowers your effective intensity even if you don't switch providers.
- Purchase verifiable offsets. Treat this as a last resort, not a substitute — and favour additional, permanent, third-party-verified projects (Gold Standard, Verra VCS).
常见问题
Yearly electricity use = rig power (W) × 24 × 365 ÷ 1000. We multiply that by each row's grid intensity in grams CO₂-equivalent per kWh and convert to kilograms. Intensities are representative averages — real emissions depend on your specific utility mix, time of day, and local transmission losses.
It depends almost entirely on where the electricity comes from. A single rig plugged into hydro in Quebec emits less over a year than an average family's two cars in a month. The same rig on a coal-dominated grid can exceed that in a few days. The hardware is the same — the grid is what changes the answer.
Network-wide estimates vary by methodology; the Cambridge Centre for Alternative Finance's Bitcoin Electricity Consumption Index is the most widely cited reference. As of recent reporting, the network's sustainable-energy share has grown as more hashrate migrates to hydro, wind, solar, and stranded-gas sites. This page just estimates a single rig — for the big picture, CCAF's dashboard is the best source.
Not directly. The rig draws the same wattage regardless of which pool it joins or how difficulty trends — so its electricity use, and therefore its emissions, stay constant. Those factors change revenue, not power consumption.