LP Agent
Nvidia RTX 4070
Nvidia RTX 4070 每天净赚 $1.14 挖 FishHash 算力 31.3 Mh/s 功耗 180.0 W. 这是在扣除 $0.1/kWh 电费后的结果 — 按当前行情有利润。
每日预测
| 周期 | /日 | /月 |
|---|---|---|
| 收入 | $3.46 | $103.76 |
|
成本
$0.1/kWh
|
$0.43 | $12.90 |
| 利润 | $3.03 | $90.80 |
| Coin | Algorithm | 收入 | 成本 | 利润 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
IRON
⚠
Iron Fish
|
FishHash
31.3Mh · 180.0W
|
$1.16 | $0.43 | $0.73 |
CFX
⚠
Conflux
|
Octopus
58.2092Mh · 173.0W
|
$0.66 | $0.42 | $0.24 |
|
—
|
EquihashZEL
67Hh · 130.0W
|
— | $0.31 | — |
NEXA
⚠
Nexa
|
NexaPoW
104.7Mh · 140.0W
|
$0.17 | $0.34 | $-0.17 |
|
BEAM
⚠
Beam
|
BeamHashIII
48.56Hh · 188.0W
|
$0.16 | $0.45 | $-0.29 |
|
RVN
Ravencoin
|
KAWPOW
31.922Mh · 200.0W
|
$0.13 | $0.48 | $-0.35 |
|
FTC
⚠
Feathercoin
|
NeoScrypt
2.4749Mh · 184.0W
|
— | $0.44 | — |
|
—
|
Ethash
63.845Mh · 200.0W
|
— | $0.48 | — |
|
LTZ
⚠
Litecoinz
|
Zhash
90.9Hh · 199.0W
|
— | $0.48 | — |
ERG
⚠
Ergo
|
Autolykos2
131.199999Mh · 100.0W
|
$0.05 | $0.24 | $-0.19 |
|
ETC
Ethereum Classic
|
Etchash
63.845Mh · 200.0W
|
$0.03 | $0.48 | $-0.45 |
|
VRSC
⚠
Verus
|
VerusHash
16.8381Mh · 157.0W
|
— | $0.38 | — |
|
AE
⚠
Aeternity
|
CuckooCycle
10.11Hh · 186.0W
|
$0.02 | $0.45 | $-0.43 |
|
MONA
⚠
Monacoin
|
Lyra2REv2
110.7415Mh · 192.0W
|
— | $0.46 | — |
|
ZEC
Zcash
|
Equihash
103.2Hh · 130.0W
|
— | $0.31 | — |
|
—
|
Blake3
1.7553Gh · 99.0W
|
— | $0.24 | — |
KAS
Kaspa
|
KHeavyHash
881.922Mh · 200.0W
|
— | $0.48 | — |
|
—
|
X16Rv2
24.9943Mh · 187.0W
|
— | $0.45 | — |
|
—
|
Keccak
1.857Gh · 181.0W
|
— | $0.43 | — |
|
—
|
ProgPowSERO
29.7194Mh · 178.0W
|
— | $0.43 | — |
|
—
|
ProgPowZ
29.7195Mh · 175.0W
|
— | $0.42 | — |
|
—
|
Radiant
1.3103Gh · 187.0W
|
— | $0.45 | — |
|
—
|
SHA256DT
3.5833Gh · 199.0W
|
— | $0.48 | — |
|
—
|
Ubqhash
56.8672Mh · 166.0W
|
— | $0.40 | — |
|
—
|
X21S
18.5821Mh · 174.0W
|
— | $0.42 | — |
|
—
|
X25X
3.2302Mh · 108.0W
|
— | $0.26 | — |
|
—
|
Xevan
7.8252Mh · 168.0W
|
— | $0.40 | — |
|
—
|
Memehash
107.9657Mh · 180.0W
|
— | $0.43 | — |
|
—
|
HeavyHash
835.698149Mh · 198.0W
|
— | $0.48 | — |
|
—
|
EvrProgPow
19.4837Mh · 189.0W
|
— | $0.45 | — |
|
—
|
ProgPowVeil
29.9741Mh · 175.0W
|
— | $0.42 | — |
|
—
|
Skein2
1.1965Gh · 199.0W
|
— | $0.48 | — |
|
—
|
Tribus
129.0154Mh · 169.0W
|
— | $0.41 | — |
|
—
|
vProgPow
9.6892Mh · 193.0W
|
— | $0.46 | — |
|
—
|
Equihash(125,4)
68.381Hh · 186.0W
|
— | $0.45 | — |
|
—
|
BCD
31.8766Mh · 187.0W
|
— | $0.45 | — |
|
—
|
Blake (2s)
10.9595Gh · 199.0W
|
— | $0.48 | — |
|
—
|
Curvehash
6.8321Mh · 139.0W
|
— | $0.33 | — |
|
—
|
Equihash(144,5)
96.3Hh · 199.0W
|
— | $0.48 | — |
|
—
|
Equihash(192,7)
45Hh · 184.0W
|
— | $0.44 | — |
|
—
|
Equihash(210,9)
368.04Hh · 177.0W
|
— | $0.42 | — |
FIRO
Firo
|
FiroPoW
29.4972Mh · 176.0W
|
— | $0.42 | — |
|
ACM
⚠
Actinium
|
Lyra2z
8.2824Mh · 110.0W
|
— | $0.26 | — |
|
—
|
PHI1612
42.028Mh · 157.0W
|
— | $0.38 | — |
|
—
|
Skydoge
1.2Gh · 120.0W
|
— | $0.29 | — |
|
VTC
⚠
Vertcoin
|
Verthash
5.2Gh · 140.0W
|
— | $0.34 | — |
|
—
|
zkSNARK
870.0Mh · 120.0W
|
— | $0.29 | — |
|
—
|
GhostRider
1.266Kh · 102.0W
|
— | $0.24 | — |
|
—
|
Keccak-C
1.8529Gh · 185.0W
|
— | $0.44 | — |
|
—
|
X16R
26.9675Mh · 189.0W
|
— | $0.45 | — |
|
—
|
X16RT
26.9144Mh · 184.0W
|
— | $0.44 | — |
|
—
|
HMQ1725
12.7813Mh · 181.0W
|
— | $0.43 | — |
LP Agent
- Architecture
- Ada Lovelace
- Base Clock
- 1920 MHz
- Boost Clock
- 2480 MHz
- CUDA cores
- 5888
- GPU Power
- 200 W
- Max Memory Size
- 12 GB
- Memory Type
- GDDR6X
- Mining algos
- 12
- Model
- Nvidia RTX 4070
- Power
- 200 W
- Process
- 5 nm
- Release
- April 2023
- Release year
- 2023
- TDP
- 200 W
- Type
- GPU
- Vendor
- Nvidia
Nvidia RTX 4070 在 AI GPU 出租市场上的收益路径
Nvidia RTX 4070 出租给 AI 任务每日可赚 $1.14,明显超过挖 FishHash 的 $0.73/日。挖矿和出租互斥,此处 AI 市场是更优选择。
| 市场 | 算法 | 利润 /天 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
MRR floor
0% rented · matches cheapest seller
|
Lyra2REv2
0.00000030000 BTC/M/d
|
$2.09
★
$2.52 收入 · $0.43 成本
访问 →
|
|||
|
MRR recent
last 10 rentals · actual clearing price
|
Lyra2REv2
0.00002520563 BTC/M/d
|
$211.50
★
$211.93 收入 · $0.43 成本
访问 →
|
|||
|
MRR asking
aspirational — seller wish, not matched
|
Lyra2REv2
0.00000054154 BTC/M/d
|
$4.12
$4.55 收入 · $0.43 成本
|
|||
| Lyra2z | |||||
|
MRR floor
0% rented · matches cheapest seller
|
Lyra2z
0.00000550000 BTC/M/d
|
$3.03
★
$3.46 收入 · $0.43 成本
访问 →
|
|||
|
MRR recent
last 10 rentals · actual clearing price
|
Lyra2z
0.00000600172 BTC/M/d
|
$3.34
★
$3.77 收入 · $0.43 成本
访问 →
|
|||
|
MRR asking
aspirational — seller wish, not matched
|
Lyra2z
0.00000649688 BTC/M/d
|
$3.66
$4.09 收入 · $0.43 成本
|
|||
| Octopus | |||||
|
NiceHash
seller 24h-weighted avg
|
Octopus
0.00000003033 BTC/M/d
|
$-0.30
$0.13 收入 · $0.43 成本
访问 →
|
|||
|
MRR floor
0% rented · matches cheapest seller
|
Octopus
0.00000011000 BTC/M/d
|
$0.06
★
$0.49 收入 · $0.43 成本
访问 →
|
|||
|
MRR recent
last 10 rentals · actual clearing price
|
Octopus
0.00000064110 BTC/M/d
|
$2.40
★
$2.83 收入 · $0.43 成本
访问 →
|
|||
|
MRR asking
aspirational — seller wish, not matched
|
Octopus
0.00000014949 BTC/M/d
|
$0.23
$0.66 收入 · $0.43 成本
|
|||
| NexaPoW | |||||
|
NiceHash
seller 24h-weighted avg
|
NexaPoW
0.00000002182 BTC/M/d
|
$-0.26
$0.17 收入 · $0.43 成本
访问 →
|
|||
|
MRR floor
0% rented · matches cheapest seller
|
NexaPoW
0.00000006693 BTC/M/d
|
$0.10
★
$0.53 收入 · $0.43 成本
访问 →
|
|||
|
MRR recent
last 10 rentals · actual clearing price
|
NexaPoW
0.00000032850 BTC/M/d
|
$2.18
★
$2.61 收入 · $0.43 成本
访问 →
|
|||
|
MRR asking
aspirational — seller wish, not matched
|
NexaPoW
0.00000011682 BTC/M/d
|
$0.50
$0.93 收入 · $0.43 成本
|
|||
| X16Rv2 | |||||
|
MRR floor
0% rented · matches cheapest seller
|
X16Rv2
0.00000059952 BTC/M/d
|
$0.71
★
$1.14 收入 · $0.43 成本
访问 →
|
|||
|
MRR recent
last 10 rentals · actual clearing price
|
X16Rv2
0.00000063655 BTC/M/d
|
$0.78
★
$1.21 收入 · $0.43 成本
访问 →
|
|||
|
MRR asking
aspirational — seller wish, not matched
|
X16Rv2
0.00000081606 BTC/M/d
|
$1.12
$1.55 收入 · $0.43 成本
|
|||
| X16R | |||||
|
MRR floor
0% rented · matches cheapest seller
|
X16R
0.00000057241 BTC/M/d
|
$0.74
★
$1.17 收入 · $0.43 成本
访问 →
|
|||
|
MRR recent
last 10 rentals · actual clearing price
|
X16R
0.00000061118 BTC/M/d
|
$0.82
★
$1.25 收入 · $0.43 成本
访问 →
|
|||
|
MRR asking
aspirational — seller wish, not matched
|
X16R
0.00000057407 BTC/M/d
|
$0.75
$1.18 收入 · $0.43 成本
|
|||
| NeoScrypt | |||||
|
NiceHash
seller 24h-weighted avg
|
NeoScrypt
0.00000061787 BTC/M/d
|
$-0.31
$0.12 收入 · $0.43 成本
访问 →
|
|||
|
MRR floor
5% rented · matches cheapest seller
|
NeoScrypt
0.00000320000 BTC/M/d
|
$0.17
★
$0.60 收入 · $0.43 成本
访问 →
|
|||
|
MRR recent
last 10 rentals · actual clearing price
|
NeoScrypt
0.00000314000 BTC/M/d
|
$0.16
★
$0.59 收入 · $0.43 成本
访问 →
|
|||
|
MRR asking
aspirational — seller wish, not matched
|
NeoScrypt
0.00000359000 BTC/M/d
|
$0.24
$0.67 收入 · $0.43 成本
|
|||
| FishHash | |||||
|
NiceHash
seller 24h-weighted avg
|
FishHash
0.00000003165 BTC/M/d
|
$-0.35
$0.08 收入 · $0.43 成本
访问 →
|
|||
|
MRR floor
0% rented · matches cheapest seller
|
FishHash
0.00000012000 BTC/M/d
|
$-0.14
★
$0.29 收入 · $0.43 成本
访问 →
|
|||
|
MRR recent
last 10 rentals · actual clearing price
|
FishHash
0.00000015078 BTC/M/d
|
$-0.07
★
$0.36 收入 · $0.43 成本
访问 →
|
|||
|
MRR asking
aspirational — seller wish, not matched
|
FishHash
0.00000024326 BTC/M/d
|
$0.15
$0.58 收入 · $0.43 成本
|
|||
| Zhash | |||||
|
NiceHash
seller 24h-weighted avg
|
Zhash
0.00000000688 BTC/H/d
|
$-0.38
$0.05 收入 · $0.43 成本
访问 →
|
|||
|
MRR floor
0% rented · matches cheapest seller
|
Zhash
0.00000007080 BTC/H/d
|
$0.06
★
$0.49 收入 · $0.43 成本
访问 →
|
|||
|
MRR recent
last 10 rentals · actual clearing price
|
Zhash
0.00000008185 BTC/H/d
|
$0.13
★
$0.56 收入 · $0.43 成本
访问 →
|
|||
|
MRR asking
aspirational — seller wish, not matched
|
Zhash
0.00000007080 BTC/H/d
|
$0.06
$0.49 收入 · $0.43 成本
|
|||
| KAWPOW | |||||
|
NiceHash
seller 24h-weighted avg
|
KAWPOW
0.00000005555 BTC/M/d
|
$-0.30
$0.13 收入 · $0.43 成本
访问 →
|
|||
|
MRR floor
6% rented · matches cheapest seller
|
KAWPOW
0.00000010622 BTC/M/d
|
$-0.17
★
$0.26 收入 · $0.43 成本
访问 →
|
|||
|
MRR recent
last 10 rentals · actual clearing price
|
KAWPOW
0.00000018826 BTC/M/d
|
$0.03
★
$0.46 收入 · $0.43 成本
访问 →
|
|||
|
MRR asking
aspirational — seller wish, not matched
|
KAWPOW
0.00000012485 BTC/M/d
|
$-0.13
$0.30 收入 · $0.43 成本
|
|||
| VerusHash | |||||
|
NiceHash
seller 24h-weighted avg
|
VerusHash
0.00000002523 BTC/M/d
|
$-0.40
$0.03 收入 · $0.43 成本
访问 →
|
|||
|
MRR floor
0% rented · matches cheapest seller
|
VerusHash
0.00000010999 BTC/M/d
|
$-0.29
★
$0.14 收入 · $0.43 成本
访问 →
|
|||
|
MRR recent
last 10 rentals · actual clearing price
|
VerusHash
0.00000023020 BTC/M/d
|
$-0.14
★
$0.29 收入 · $0.43 成本
访问 →
|
|||
|
MRR asking
aspirational — seller wish, not matched
|
VerusHash
0.00000015580 BTC/M/d
|
$-0.23
$0.20 收入 · $0.43 成本
|
|||
| BeamHashIII | |||||
|
NiceHash
seller 24h-weighted avg
|
BeamHashIII
0.00000004248 BTC/H/d
|
$-0.27
★
$0.16 收入 · $0.43 成本
访问 →
|
|||
| Ethash | |||||
|
NiceHash
seller 24h-weighted avg
|
Ethash
0.00000002000 BTC/M/d
|
$-0.33
★
$0.10 收入 · $0.43 成本
访问 →
|
|||
| Etchash | |||||
|
NiceHash
seller 24h-weighted avg
|
Etchash
0.00000000503 BTC/M/d
|
$-0.41
$0.02 收入 · $0.43 成本
访问 →
|
|||
|
MRR floor
1% rented · matches cheapest seller
|
Etchash
0.00000001223 BTC/M/d
|
$-0.37
★
$0.06 收入 · $0.43 成本
访问 →
|
|||
|
MRR recent
last 10 rentals · actual clearing price
|
Etchash
0.00000001578 BTC/M/d
|
$-0.35
★
$0.08 收入 · $0.43 成本
访问 →
|
|||
|
MRR asking
aspirational — seller wish, not matched
|
Etchash
0.00000001214 BTC/M/d
|
$-0.37
$0.06 收入 · $0.43 成本
|
|||
| Autolykos2 | |||||
|
NiceHash
seller 24h-weighted avg
|
Autolykos2
0.00000000547 BTC/M/d
|
$-0.38
★
$0.05 收入 · $0.43 成本
访问 →
|
|||
| Equihash | |||||
|
NiceHash
seller 24h-weighted avg
|
Equihash
0.00000000048 BTC/H/d
|
$-0.43
$0.00 收入 · $0.43 成本
访问 →
|
|||
|
MRR floor
24% rented · matches cheapest seller
|
Equihash
0.00000000061 BTC/H/d
|
$-0.43
★
$0.00 收入 · $0.43 成本
访问 →
|
|||
|
MRR recent
last 10 rentals · actual clearing price
|
Equihash
0.00000000072 BTC/H/d
|
$-0.42
★
$0.01 收入 · $0.43 成本
访问 →
|
|||
|
MRR asking
aspirational — seller wish, not matched
|
Equihash
0.00000000072 BTC/H/d
|
$-0.42
$0.01 收入 · $0.43 成本
|
|||
| KHeavyHash | |||||
|
NiceHash
seller 24h-weighted avg
|
KHeavyHash
0.00000263526 BTC/T/d
|
$-0.43
$0.00 收入 · $0.43 成本
访问 →
|
|||
|
MRR floor
6% rented · matches cheapest seller
|
KHeavyHash
0.00000280000 BTC/T/d
|
$-0.43
★
$0.00 收入 · $0.43 成本
访问 →
|
|||
|
MRR recent
last 10 rentals · actual clearing price
|
KHeavyHash
0.00000387000 BTC/T/d
|
$-0.43
★
$0.00 收入 · $0.43 成本
访问 →
|
|||
|
MRR asking
aspirational — seller wish, not matched
|
KHeavyHash
0.00000528000 BTC/T/d
|
$-0.43
$0.00 收入 · $0.43 成本
|
|||
| Blake3 | |||||
|
NiceHash
seller 24h-weighted avg
|
Blake3
0.00000000178 BTC/G/d
|
$-0.43
★
$0.00 收入 · $0.43 成本
访问 →
|
|||
| Rigs × Qty | Share | Rev /rig/day | Cost /rig/day | Profit /rig/day | Total profit /day |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| — | — | — | — | — | — |
Nvidia RTX 4070 的回本周期
测算此设备的回本周期、电费和首年收益。
曲线穿过零点即回本。之后全是利润。
| Month | Earned (mo) | Cost burned (mo) | Cumulative earned | Cumulative cost | Net | % ROI |
|---|
按能源来源的年度排放
基于年度耗电量和常见电网的碳强度。
| 能源来源 | CO₂e / 年 |
|---|---|
| Wind | 17.11 kg |
| Nuclear | 18.66 kg |
| Hydroelectric | 37.32 kg |
| Geothermal | 59.1 kg |
| Solar | 69.98 kg |
| Biofuels | 357.7 kg |
| Gas | 762.05 kg |
| Coal | 1,275.26 kg |
仅为估算 — 实际排放因硬件、冷却和电网而异。
这意味着什么?
At the world-average grid intensity of about 475 g CO₂e/kWh, Nvidia RTX 4070 running 24/7 for a year releases about 739 kg of carbon dioxide equivalent. Here's what that looks like in everyday terms:
你在哪里接电很重要
Electricity is not one thing. A kilowatt-hour from a coal plant carries roughly 820 g of CO₂; the same kilowatt-hour from a hydro reservoir carries about 24 g. That's a 34× difference — large enough that Nvidia RTX 4070's annual footprint swings from roughly 1,275 kg on coal-heavy grids down to about 37 kg on hydro-dominated grids. The single biggest lever a miner has on their carbon footprint is choosing where to plug in.
Regions commonly used for low-carbon crypto mining include Quebec and British Columbia (hydro-dominated, typically <50 g CO₂/kWh), Iceland and Norway (geothermal + hydro, often <30 g), Paraguay (Itaipú hydro), and parts of the US Pacific Northwest. Coal-heavy grids — Kazakhstan, Inner Mongolia, Poland, parts of Australia — sit at the opposite end, often above 700 g CO₂/kWh.
Some operators also reduce their net impact by using otherwise-wasted energy: flare gas at oil wells (burning methane that would be vented anyway), curtailed renewables (wind or solar that the grid can't absorb), or behind-the-meter hydro during off-peak hours. These arrangements can drop effective emissions below the local grid average because the energy would have been wasted or flared without the mining load.
如何减少该矿机的碳足迹
- Pick a greener ASIC. The efficiency column above matters as much as the grid: a 15 J/TH rig emits roughly half the CO₂ of a 30 J/TH rig for the same hashrate.
- Choose a low-carbon host. Data centres advertising hydro, geothermal, or nuclear power typically sit at <100 g CO₂/kWh.
- Look for stranded or curtailed energy. Flare-gas miners, wind-curtailment co-location, and off-peak hydro arrangements use energy that would otherwise be wasted.
- Use heat recovery. Capturing the heat for greenhouse agriculture, pool heating, or district warmth offsets fossil-fuel heating that would have been burned anyway.
- Time-shift your uptime. In grids with high daytime solar, running more during the day and less at night lowers your effective intensity even if you don't switch providers.
- Purchase verifiable offsets. Treat this as a last resort, not a substitute — and favour additional, permanent, third-party-verified projects (Gold Standard, Verra VCS).
常见问题
Yearly electricity use = rig power (W) × 24 × 365 ÷ 1000. We multiply that by each row's grid intensity in grams CO₂-equivalent per kWh and convert to kilograms. Intensities are representative averages — real emissions depend on your specific utility mix, time of day, and local transmission losses.
It depends almost entirely on where the electricity comes from. A single rig plugged into hydro in Quebec emits less over a year than an average family's two cars in a month. The same rig on a coal-dominated grid can exceed that in a few days. The hardware is the same — the grid is what changes the answer.
Network-wide estimates vary by methodology; the Cambridge Centre for Alternative Finance's Bitcoin Electricity Consumption Index is the most widely cited reference. As of recent reporting, the network's sustainable-energy share has grown as more hashrate migrates to hydro, wind, solar, and stranded-gas sites. This page just estimates a single rig — for the big picture, CCAF's dashboard is the best source.
Not directly. The rig draws the same wattage regardless of which pool it joins or how difficulty trends — so its electricity use, and therefore its emissions, stay constant. Those factors change revenue, not power consumption.
每日预测
| 周期 | /日 | /月 |
|---|---|---|
| 收入 | $3.46 | $103.76 |
|
成本
$0.1/kWh
|
$0.43 | $12.90 |
| 利润 | $3.03 | $90.80 |
| Coin | Algorithm | 收入 | 成本 | 利润 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
IRON
⚠
Iron Fish
|
FishHash
31.3Mh · 180.0W
|
$1.16 | $0.43 | $0.73 |
CFX
⚠
Conflux
|
Octopus
58.2092Mh · 173.0W
|
$0.66 | $0.42 | $0.24 |
|
—
|
EquihashZEL
67Hh · 130.0W
|
— | $0.31 | — |
NEXA
⚠
Nexa
|
NexaPoW
104.7Mh · 140.0W
|
$0.17 | $0.34 | $-0.17 |
|
BEAM
⚠
Beam
|
BeamHashIII
48.56Hh · 188.0W
|
$0.16 | $0.45 | $-0.29 |
|
RVN
Ravencoin
|
KAWPOW
31.922Mh · 200.0W
|
$0.13 | $0.48 | $-0.35 |
|
FTC
⚠
Feathercoin
|
NeoScrypt
2.4749Mh · 184.0W
|
— | $0.44 | — |
|
—
|
Ethash
63.845Mh · 200.0W
|
— | $0.48 | — |
|
LTZ
⚠
Litecoinz
|
Zhash
90.9Hh · 199.0W
|
— | $0.48 | — |
ERG
⚠
Ergo
|
Autolykos2
131.199999Mh · 100.0W
|
$0.05 | $0.24 | $-0.19 |
|
ETC
Ethereum Classic
|
Etchash
63.845Mh · 200.0W
|
$0.03 | $0.48 | $-0.45 |
|
VRSC
⚠
Verus
|
VerusHash
16.8381Mh · 157.0W
|
— | $0.38 | — |
|
AE
⚠
Aeternity
|
CuckooCycle
10.11Hh · 186.0W
|
$0.02 | $0.45 | $-0.43 |
|
MONA
⚠
Monacoin
|
Lyra2REv2
110.7415Mh · 192.0W
|
— | $0.46 | — |
|
ZEC
Zcash
|
Equihash
103.2Hh · 130.0W
|
— | $0.31 | — |
|
—
|
Blake3
1.7553Gh · 99.0W
|
— | $0.24 | — |
KAS
Kaspa
|
KHeavyHash
881.922Mh · 200.0W
|
— | $0.48 | — |
|
—
|
X16Rv2
24.9943Mh · 187.0W
|
— | $0.45 | — |
|
—
|
Keccak
1.857Gh · 181.0W
|
— | $0.43 | — |
|
—
|
ProgPowSERO
29.7194Mh · 178.0W
|
— | $0.43 | — |
|
—
|
ProgPowZ
29.7195Mh · 175.0W
|
— | $0.42 | — |
|
—
|
Radiant
1.3103Gh · 187.0W
|
— | $0.45 | — |
|
—
|
SHA256DT
3.5833Gh · 199.0W
|
— | $0.48 | — |
|
—
|
Ubqhash
56.8672Mh · 166.0W
|
— | $0.40 | — |
|
—
|
X21S
18.5821Mh · 174.0W
|
— | $0.42 | — |
|
—
|
X25X
3.2302Mh · 108.0W
|
— | $0.26 | — |
|
—
|
Xevan
7.8252Mh · 168.0W
|
— | $0.40 | — |
|
—
|
Memehash
107.9657Mh · 180.0W
|
— | $0.43 | — |
|
—
|
HeavyHash
835.698149Mh · 198.0W
|
— | $0.48 | — |
|
—
|
EvrProgPow
19.4837Mh · 189.0W
|
— | $0.45 | — |
|
—
|
ProgPowVeil
29.9741Mh · 175.0W
|
— | $0.42 | — |
|
—
|
Skein2
1.1965Gh · 199.0W
|
— | $0.48 | — |
|
—
|
Tribus
129.0154Mh · 169.0W
|
— | $0.41 | — |
|
—
|
vProgPow
9.6892Mh · 193.0W
|
— | $0.46 | — |
|
—
|
Equihash(125,4)
68.381Hh · 186.0W
|
— | $0.45 | — |
|
—
|
BCD
31.8766Mh · 187.0W
|
— | $0.45 | — |
|
—
|
Blake (2s)
10.9595Gh · 199.0W
|
— | $0.48 | — |
|
—
|
Curvehash
6.8321Mh · 139.0W
|
— | $0.33 | — |
|
—
|
Equihash(144,5)
96.3Hh · 199.0W
|
— | $0.48 | — |
|
—
|
Equihash(192,7)
45Hh · 184.0W
|
— | $0.44 | — |
|
—
|
Equihash(210,9)
368.04Hh · 177.0W
|
— | $0.42 | — |
FIRO
Firo
|
FiroPoW
29.4972Mh · 176.0W
|
— | $0.42 | — |
|
ACM
⚠
Actinium
|
Lyra2z
8.2824Mh · 110.0W
|
— | $0.26 | — |
|
—
|
PHI1612
42.028Mh · 157.0W
|
— | $0.38 | — |
|
—
|
Skydoge
1.2Gh · 120.0W
|
— | $0.29 | — |
|
VTC
⚠
Vertcoin
|
Verthash
5.2Gh · 140.0W
|
— | $0.34 | — |
|
—
|
zkSNARK
870.0Mh · 120.0W
|
— | $0.29 | — |
|
—
|
GhostRider
1.266Kh · 102.0W
|
— | $0.24 | — |
|
—
|
Keccak-C
1.8529Gh · 185.0W
|
— | $0.44 | — |
|
—
|
X16R
26.9675Mh · 189.0W
|
— | $0.45 | — |
|
—
|
X16RT
26.9144Mh · 184.0W
|
— | $0.44 | — |
|
—
|
HMQ1725
12.7813Mh · 181.0W
|
— | $0.43 | — |
- Architecture
- Ada Lovelace
- Base Clock
- 1920 MHz
- Boost Clock
- 2480 MHz
- CUDA cores
- 5888
- GPU Power
- 200 W
- Max Memory Size
- 12 GB
- Memory Type
- GDDR6X
- Mining algos
- 12
- Model
- Nvidia RTX 4070
- Power
- 200 W
- Process
- 5 nm
- Release
- April 2023
- Release year
- 2023
- TDP
- 200 W
- Type
- GPU
- Vendor
- Nvidia
Nvidia RTX 4070 在 AI GPU 出租市场上的收益路径
Nvidia RTX 4070 出租给 AI 任务每日可赚 $1.14,明显超过挖 FishHash 的 $0.73/日。挖矿和出租互斥,此处 AI 市场是更优选择。
| 市场 | 算法 | 利润 /天 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
MRR floor
0% rented · matches cheapest seller
|
Lyra2REv2
0.00000030000 BTC/M/d
|
$2.09
★
$2.52 收入 · $0.43 成本
访问 →
|
|||
|
MRR recent
last 10 rentals · actual clearing price
|
Lyra2REv2
0.00002520563 BTC/M/d
|
$211.50
★
$211.93 收入 · $0.43 成本
访问 →
|
|||
|
MRR asking
aspirational — seller wish, not matched
|
Lyra2REv2
0.00000054154 BTC/M/d
|
$4.12
$4.55 收入 · $0.43 成本
|
|||
| Lyra2z | |||||
|
MRR floor
0% rented · matches cheapest seller
|
Lyra2z
0.00000550000 BTC/M/d
|
$3.03
★
$3.46 收入 · $0.43 成本
访问 →
|
|||
|
MRR recent
last 10 rentals · actual clearing price
|
Lyra2z
0.00000600172 BTC/M/d
|
$3.34
★
$3.77 收入 · $0.43 成本
访问 →
|
|||
|
MRR asking
aspirational — seller wish, not matched
|
Lyra2z
0.00000649688 BTC/M/d
|
$3.66
$4.09 收入 · $0.43 成本
|
|||
| Octopus | |||||
|
NiceHash
seller 24h-weighted avg
|
Octopus
0.00000003033 BTC/M/d
|
$-0.30
$0.13 收入 · $0.43 成本
访问 →
|
|||
|
MRR floor
0% rented · matches cheapest seller
|
Octopus
0.00000011000 BTC/M/d
|
$0.06
★
$0.49 收入 · $0.43 成本
访问 →
|
|||
|
MRR recent
last 10 rentals · actual clearing price
|
Octopus
0.00000064110 BTC/M/d
|
$2.40
★
$2.83 收入 · $0.43 成本
访问 →
|
|||
|
MRR asking
aspirational — seller wish, not matched
|
Octopus
0.00000014949 BTC/M/d
|
$0.23
$0.66 收入 · $0.43 成本
|
|||
| NexaPoW | |||||
|
NiceHash
seller 24h-weighted avg
|
NexaPoW
0.00000002182 BTC/M/d
|
$-0.26
$0.17 收入 · $0.43 成本
访问 →
|
|||
|
MRR floor
0% rented · matches cheapest seller
|
NexaPoW
0.00000006693 BTC/M/d
|
$0.10
★
$0.53 收入 · $0.43 成本
访问 →
|
|||
|
MRR recent
last 10 rentals · actual clearing price
|
NexaPoW
0.00000032850 BTC/M/d
|
$2.18
★
$2.61 收入 · $0.43 成本
访问 →
|
|||
|
MRR asking
aspirational — seller wish, not matched
|
NexaPoW
0.00000011682 BTC/M/d
|
$0.50
$0.93 收入 · $0.43 成本
|
|||
| X16Rv2 | |||||
|
MRR floor
0% rented · matches cheapest seller
|
X16Rv2
0.00000059952 BTC/M/d
|
$0.71
★
$1.14 收入 · $0.43 成本
访问 →
|
|||
|
MRR recent
last 10 rentals · actual clearing price
|
X16Rv2
0.00000063655 BTC/M/d
|
$0.78
★
$1.21 收入 · $0.43 成本
访问 →
|
|||
|
MRR asking
aspirational — seller wish, not matched
|
X16Rv2
0.00000081606 BTC/M/d
|
$1.12
$1.55 收入 · $0.43 成本
|
|||
| X16R | |||||
|
MRR floor
0% rented · matches cheapest seller
|
X16R
0.00000057241 BTC/M/d
|
$0.74
★
$1.17 收入 · $0.43 成本
访问 →
|
|||
|
MRR recent
last 10 rentals · actual clearing price
|
X16R
0.00000061118 BTC/M/d
|
$0.82
★
$1.25 收入 · $0.43 成本
访问 →
|
|||
|
MRR asking
aspirational — seller wish, not matched
|
X16R
0.00000057407 BTC/M/d
|
$0.75
$1.18 收入 · $0.43 成本
|
|||
| NeoScrypt | |||||
|
NiceHash
seller 24h-weighted avg
|
NeoScrypt
0.00000061787 BTC/M/d
|
$-0.31
$0.12 收入 · $0.43 成本
访问 →
|
|||
|
MRR floor
5% rented · matches cheapest seller
|
NeoScrypt
0.00000320000 BTC/M/d
|
$0.17
★
$0.60 收入 · $0.43 成本
访问 →
|
|||
|
MRR recent
last 10 rentals · actual clearing price
|
NeoScrypt
0.00000314000 BTC/M/d
|
$0.16
★
$0.59 收入 · $0.43 成本
访问 →
|
|||
|
MRR asking
aspirational — seller wish, not matched
|
NeoScrypt
0.00000359000 BTC/M/d
|
$0.24
$0.67 收入 · $0.43 成本
|
|||
| FishHash | |||||
|
NiceHash
seller 24h-weighted avg
|
FishHash
0.00000003165 BTC/M/d
|
$-0.35
$0.08 收入 · $0.43 成本
访问 →
|
|||
|
MRR floor
0% rented · matches cheapest seller
|
FishHash
0.00000012000 BTC/M/d
|
$-0.14
★
$0.29 收入 · $0.43 成本
访问 →
|
|||
|
MRR recent
last 10 rentals · actual clearing price
|
FishHash
0.00000015078 BTC/M/d
|
$-0.07
★
$0.36 收入 · $0.43 成本
访问 →
|
|||
|
MRR asking
aspirational — seller wish, not matched
|
FishHash
0.00000024326 BTC/M/d
|
$0.15
$0.58 收入 · $0.43 成本
|
|||
| Zhash | |||||
|
NiceHash
seller 24h-weighted avg
|
Zhash
0.00000000688 BTC/H/d
|
$-0.38
$0.05 收入 · $0.43 成本
访问 →
|
|||
|
MRR floor
0% rented · matches cheapest seller
|
Zhash
0.00000007080 BTC/H/d
|
$0.06
★
$0.49 收入 · $0.43 成本
访问 →
|
|||
|
MRR recent
last 10 rentals · actual clearing price
|
Zhash
0.00000008185 BTC/H/d
|
$0.13
★
$0.56 收入 · $0.43 成本
访问 →
|
|||
|
MRR asking
aspirational — seller wish, not matched
|
Zhash
0.00000007080 BTC/H/d
|
$0.06
$0.49 收入 · $0.43 成本
|
|||
| KAWPOW | |||||
|
NiceHash
seller 24h-weighted avg
|
KAWPOW
0.00000005555 BTC/M/d
|
$-0.30
$0.13 收入 · $0.43 成本
访问 →
|
|||
|
MRR floor
6% rented · matches cheapest seller
|
KAWPOW
0.00000010622 BTC/M/d
|
$-0.17
★
$0.26 收入 · $0.43 成本
访问 →
|
|||
|
MRR recent
last 10 rentals · actual clearing price
|
KAWPOW
0.00000018826 BTC/M/d
|
$0.03
★
$0.46 收入 · $0.43 成本
访问 →
|
|||
|
MRR asking
aspirational — seller wish, not matched
|
KAWPOW
0.00000012485 BTC/M/d
|
$-0.13
$0.30 收入 · $0.43 成本
|
|||
| VerusHash | |||||
|
NiceHash
seller 24h-weighted avg
|
VerusHash
0.00000002523 BTC/M/d
|
$-0.40
$0.03 收入 · $0.43 成本
访问 →
|
|||
|
MRR floor
0% rented · matches cheapest seller
|
VerusHash
0.00000010999 BTC/M/d
|
$-0.29
★
$0.14 收入 · $0.43 成本
访问 →
|
|||
|
MRR recent
last 10 rentals · actual clearing price
|
VerusHash
0.00000023020 BTC/M/d
|
$-0.14
★
$0.29 收入 · $0.43 成本
访问 →
|
|||
|
MRR asking
aspirational — seller wish, not matched
|
VerusHash
0.00000015580 BTC/M/d
|
$-0.23
$0.20 收入 · $0.43 成本
|
|||
| BeamHashIII | |||||
|
NiceHash
seller 24h-weighted avg
|
BeamHashIII
0.00000004248 BTC/H/d
|
$-0.27
★
$0.16 收入 · $0.43 成本
访问 →
|
|||
| Ethash | |||||
|
NiceHash
seller 24h-weighted avg
|
Ethash
0.00000002000 BTC/M/d
|
$-0.33
★
$0.10 收入 · $0.43 成本
访问 →
|
|||
| Etchash | |||||
|
NiceHash
seller 24h-weighted avg
|
Etchash
0.00000000503 BTC/M/d
|
$-0.41
$0.02 收入 · $0.43 成本
访问 →
|
|||
|
MRR floor
1% rented · matches cheapest seller
|
Etchash
0.00000001223 BTC/M/d
|
$-0.37
★
$0.06 收入 · $0.43 成本
访问 →
|
|||
|
MRR recent
last 10 rentals · actual clearing price
|
Etchash
0.00000001578 BTC/M/d
|
$-0.35
★
$0.08 收入 · $0.43 成本
访问 →
|
|||
|
MRR asking
aspirational — seller wish, not matched
|
Etchash
0.00000001214 BTC/M/d
|
$-0.37
$0.06 收入 · $0.43 成本
|
|||
| Autolykos2 | |||||
|
NiceHash
seller 24h-weighted avg
|
Autolykos2
0.00000000547 BTC/M/d
|
$-0.38
★
$0.05 收入 · $0.43 成本
访问 →
|
|||
| Equihash | |||||
|
NiceHash
seller 24h-weighted avg
|
Equihash
0.00000000048 BTC/H/d
|
$-0.43
$0.00 收入 · $0.43 成本
访问 →
|
|||
|
MRR floor
24% rented · matches cheapest seller
|
Equihash
0.00000000061 BTC/H/d
|
$-0.43
★
$0.00 收入 · $0.43 成本
访问 →
|
|||
|
MRR recent
last 10 rentals · actual clearing price
|
Equihash
0.00000000072 BTC/H/d
|
$-0.42
★
$0.01 收入 · $0.43 成本
访问 →
|
|||
|
MRR asking
aspirational — seller wish, not matched
|
Equihash
0.00000000072 BTC/H/d
|
$-0.42
$0.01 收入 · $0.43 成本
|
|||
| KHeavyHash | |||||
|
NiceHash
seller 24h-weighted avg
|
KHeavyHash
0.00000263526 BTC/T/d
|
$-0.43
$0.00 收入 · $0.43 成本
访问 →
|
|||
|
MRR floor
6% rented · matches cheapest seller
|
KHeavyHash
0.00000280000 BTC/T/d
|
$-0.43
★
$0.00 收入 · $0.43 成本
访问 →
|
|||
|
MRR recent
last 10 rentals · actual clearing price
|
KHeavyHash
0.00000387000 BTC/T/d
|
$-0.43
★
$0.00 收入 · $0.43 成本
访问 →
|
|||
|
MRR asking
aspirational — seller wish, not matched
|
KHeavyHash
0.00000528000 BTC/T/d
|
$-0.43
$0.00 收入 · $0.43 成本
|
|||
| Blake3 | |||||
|
NiceHash
seller 24h-weighted avg
|
Blake3
0.00000000178 BTC/G/d
|
$-0.43
★
$0.00 收入 · $0.43 成本
访问 →
|
|||
| Rigs × Qty | Share | Rev /rig/day | Cost /rig/day | Profit /rig/day | Total profit /day |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| — | — | — | — | — | — |
Nvidia RTX 4070 的回本周期
测算此设备的回本周期、电费和首年收益。
曲线穿过零点即回本。之后全是利润。
| Month | Earned (mo) | Cost burned (mo) | Cumulative earned | Cumulative cost | Net | % ROI |
|---|
按能源来源的年度排放
基于年度耗电量和常见电网的碳强度。
| 能源来源 | CO₂e / 年 |
|---|---|
| Wind | 17.11 kg |
| Nuclear | 18.66 kg |
| Hydroelectric | 37.32 kg |
| Geothermal | 59.1 kg |
| Solar | 69.98 kg |
| Biofuels | 357.7 kg |
| Gas | 762.05 kg |
| Coal | 1,275.26 kg |
仅为估算 — 实际排放因硬件、冷却和电网而异。
这意味着什么?
At the world-average grid intensity of about 475 g CO₂e/kWh, Nvidia RTX 4070 running 24/7 for a year releases about 739 kg of carbon dioxide equivalent. Here's what that looks like in everyday terms:
你在哪里接电很重要
Electricity is not one thing. A kilowatt-hour from a coal plant carries roughly 820 g of CO₂; the same kilowatt-hour from a hydro reservoir carries about 24 g. That's a 34× difference — large enough that Nvidia RTX 4070's annual footprint swings from roughly 1,275 kg on coal-heavy grids down to about 37 kg on hydro-dominated grids. The single biggest lever a miner has on their carbon footprint is choosing where to plug in.
Regions commonly used for low-carbon crypto mining include Quebec and British Columbia (hydro-dominated, typically <50 g CO₂/kWh), Iceland and Norway (geothermal + hydro, often <30 g), Paraguay (Itaipú hydro), and parts of the US Pacific Northwest. Coal-heavy grids — Kazakhstan, Inner Mongolia, Poland, parts of Australia — sit at the opposite end, often above 700 g CO₂/kWh.
Some operators also reduce their net impact by using otherwise-wasted energy: flare gas at oil wells (burning methane that would be vented anyway), curtailed renewables (wind or solar that the grid can't absorb), or behind-the-meter hydro during off-peak hours. These arrangements can drop effective emissions below the local grid average because the energy would have been wasted or flared without the mining load.
如何减少该矿机的碳足迹
- Pick a greener ASIC. The efficiency column above matters as much as the grid: a 15 J/TH rig emits roughly half the CO₂ of a 30 J/TH rig for the same hashrate.
- Choose a low-carbon host. Data centres advertising hydro, geothermal, or nuclear power typically sit at <100 g CO₂/kWh.
- Look for stranded or curtailed energy. Flare-gas miners, wind-curtailment co-location, and off-peak hydro arrangements use energy that would otherwise be wasted.
- Use heat recovery. Capturing the heat for greenhouse agriculture, pool heating, or district warmth offsets fossil-fuel heating that would have been burned anyway.
- Time-shift your uptime. In grids with high daytime solar, running more during the day and less at night lowers your effective intensity even if you don't switch providers.
- Purchase verifiable offsets. Treat this as a last resort, not a substitute — and favour additional, permanent, third-party-verified projects (Gold Standard, Verra VCS).
常见问题
Yearly electricity use = rig power (W) × 24 × 365 ÷ 1000. We multiply that by each row's grid intensity in grams CO₂-equivalent per kWh and convert to kilograms. Intensities are representative averages — real emissions depend on your specific utility mix, time of day, and local transmission losses.
It depends almost entirely on where the electricity comes from. A single rig plugged into hydro in Quebec emits less over a year than an average family's two cars in a month. The same rig on a coal-dominated grid can exceed that in a few days. The hardware is the same — the grid is what changes the answer.
Network-wide estimates vary by methodology; the Cambridge Centre for Alternative Finance's Bitcoin Electricity Consumption Index is the most widely cited reference. As of recent reporting, the network's sustainable-energy share has grown as more hashrate migrates to hydro, wind, solar, and stranded-gas sites. This page just estimates a single rig — for the big picture, CCAF's dashboard is the best source.
Not directly. The rig draws the same wattage regardless of which pool it joins or how difficulty trends — so its electricity use, and therefore its emissions, stay constant. Those factors change revenue, not power consumption.