LP Agent
Nvidia RTX 4070
Nvidia RTX 4070 genera $1.02 al día minando Octopus a 58.2092 Mh/s y consumiendo 173.0 W de la red. Eso es tras descontar la electricidad a $0.1/kWh — rentable a los precios actuales.
Proyección diaria
| Período | /Día | /Mes |
|---|---|---|
| Ingresos | $3.45 | $103.44 |
|
Costo
$0.1/kWh
|
$0.42 | $12.60 |
| Ganancia | $3.03 | $90.98 |
| Coin | Algorithm | Ingresos | Costo | Ganancia |
|---|---|---|---|---|
CFX
⚠
Conflux
|
Octopus
58.2092Mh · 173.0W
|
$0.66 | $0.42 | $0.24 |
|
—
|
EquihashZEL
67Hh · 130.0W
|
— | $0.31 | — |
NEXA
⚠
Nexa
|
NexaPoW
104.7Mh · 140.0W
|
$0.17 | $0.34 | $-0.17 |
|
BEAM
⚠
Beam
|
BeamHashIII
48.56Hh · 188.0W
|
$0.16 | $0.45 | $-0.29 |
|
RVN
Ravencoin
|
KAWPOW
31.922Mh · 200.0W
|
$0.14 | $0.48 | $-0.34 |
|
FTC
⚠
Feathercoin
|
NeoScrypt
2.4749Mh · 184.0W
|
— | $0.44 | — |
|
—
|
Ethash
63.845Mh · 200.0W
|
— | $0.48 | — |
|
LTZ
⚠
Litecoinz
|
Zhash
90.9Hh · 199.0W
|
— | $0.48 | — |
ERG
⚠
Ergo
|
Autolykos2
131.199999Mh · 100.0W
|
$0.06 | $0.24 | $-0.18 |
|
ETC
Ethereum Classic
|
Etchash
63.845Mh · 200.0W
|
$0.03 | $0.48 | $-0.45 |
|
VRSC
⚠
Verus
|
VerusHash
16.8381Mh · 157.0W
|
— | $0.38 | — |
|
AE
⚠
Aeternity
|
CuckooCycle
10.11Hh · 186.0W
|
$0.02 | $0.45 | $-0.43 |
|
MONA
⚠
Monacoin
|
Lyra2REv2
110.7415Mh · 192.0W
|
— | $0.46 | — |
|
ZEC
Zcash
|
Equihash
103.2Hh · 130.0W
|
— | $0.31 | — |
|
—
|
Blake3
1.7553Gh · 99.0W
|
— | $0.24 | — |
KAS
Kaspa
|
KHeavyHash
881.922Mh · 200.0W
|
— | $0.48 | — |
|
IRON
⚠
Iron Fish
|
FishHash
31.3Mh · 180.0W
|
— | $0.43 | — |
|
—
|
X16Rv2
24.9943Mh · 187.0W
|
— | $0.45 | — |
|
—
|
Keccak
1.857Gh · 181.0W
|
— | $0.43 | — |
|
—
|
ProgPowSERO
29.7194Mh · 178.0W
|
— | $0.43 | — |
|
—
|
ProgPowZ
29.7195Mh · 175.0W
|
— | $0.42 | — |
|
—
|
Radiant
1.3103Gh · 187.0W
|
— | $0.45 | — |
|
—
|
SHA256DT
3.5833Gh · 199.0W
|
— | $0.48 | — |
|
—
|
Ubqhash
56.8672Mh · 166.0W
|
— | $0.40 | — |
|
—
|
X21S
18.5821Mh · 174.0W
|
— | $0.42 | — |
|
—
|
X25X
3.2302Mh · 108.0W
|
— | $0.26 | — |
|
—
|
Xevan
7.8252Mh · 168.0W
|
— | $0.40 | — |
|
—
|
Memehash
107.9657Mh · 180.0W
|
— | $0.43 | — |
|
—
|
HeavyHash
835.698149Mh · 198.0W
|
— | $0.48 | — |
|
—
|
EvrProgPow
19.4837Mh · 189.0W
|
— | $0.45 | — |
|
—
|
ProgPowVeil
29.9741Mh · 175.0W
|
— | $0.42 | — |
|
—
|
Skein2
1.1965Gh · 199.0W
|
— | $0.48 | — |
|
—
|
Tribus
129.0154Mh · 169.0W
|
— | $0.41 | — |
|
—
|
vProgPow
9.6892Mh · 193.0W
|
— | $0.46 | — |
|
—
|
Equihash(125,4)
68.381Hh · 186.0W
|
— | $0.45 | — |
|
—
|
BCD
31.8766Mh · 187.0W
|
— | $0.45 | — |
|
—
|
Blake (2s)
10.9595Gh · 199.0W
|
— | $0.48 | — |
|
—
|
Curvehash
6.8321Mh · 139.0W
|
— | $0.33 | — |
|
—
|
Equihash(144,5)
96.3Hh · 199.0W
|
— | $0.48 | — |
|
—
|
Equihash(192,7)
45Hh · 184.0W
|
— | $0.44 | — |
|
—
|
Equihash(210,9)
368.04Hh · 177.0W
|
— | $0.42 | — |
FIRO
Firo
|
FiroPoW
29.4972Mh · 176.0W
|
— | $0.42 | — |
|
ACM
⚠
Actinium
|
Lyra2z
8.2824Mh · 110.0W
|
— | $0.26 | — |
|
—
|
PHI1612
42.028Mh · 157.0W
|
— | $0.38 | — |
|
—
|
Skydoge
1.2Gh · 120.0W
|
— | $0.29 | — |
|
VTC
⚠
Vertcoin
|
Verthash
5.2Gh · 140.0W
|
— | $0.34 | — |
|
—
|
zkSNARK
870.0Mh · 120.0W
|
— | $0.29 | — |
|
—
|
GhostRider
1.266Kh · 102.0W
|
— | $0.24 | — |
|
—
|
Keccak-C
1.8529Gh · 185.0W
|
— | $0.44 | — |
|
—
|
X16R
26.9675Mh · 189.0W
|
— | $0.45 | — |
|
—
|
X16RT
26.9144Mh · 184.0W
|
— | $0.44 | — |
|
—
|
HMQ1725
12.7813Mh · 181.0W
|
— | $0.43 | — |
| Pool | Algoritmos soportados | Comisión | |
|---|---|---|---|
|
|
CuckooCycle (AE) · BeamHashIII (BEAM) · Autolykos2 (ERG) | 1.0% | Visit → |
|
|
BeamHashIII (BEAM) · Autolykos2 (ERG) · Etchash (ETC) | 0.9% | Visit → |
|
★
|
Autolykos2 (ERG) · Etchash (ETC) · KHeavyHash (KAS) | 1.0% | Visit → |
|
|
FiroPoW (FIRO) · NexaPoW (NEXA) | 1.0% | Visit → |
LP Agent
- Architecture
- Ada Lovelace
- Base Clock
- 1920 MHz
- Boost Clock
- 2480 MHz
- CUDA cores
- 5888
- GPU Power
- 200 W
- Max Memory Size
- 12 GB
- Memory Type
- GDDR6X
- Mining algos
- 12
- Model
- Nvidia RTX 4070
- Power
- 200 W
- Process
- 5 nm
- Release
- April 2023
- Release year
- 2023
- TDP
- 200 W
- Type
- GPU
- Vendor
- Nvidia
Cómo Nvidia RTX 4070 gana en el mercado de GPU para IA
Nvidia RTX 4070 gana $1.02/día alquilando para cargas IA — considerablemente más que los $0.24/día minando Octopus. Minería y alquiler son modos de uso mutuamente excluyentes; el mercado IA es la opción clara aquí.
| Mercado | Algoritmo | Beneficio /día | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
MRR floor
0% rented · matches cheapest seller
|
Lyra2REv2
0.00000030000 BTC/M/d
|
$2.09
★
$2.51 ingresos · $0.42 costo
Visitar →
|
|||
|
MRR recent
last 10 rentals · actual clearing price
|
Lyra2REv2
0.00002520563 BTC/M/d
|
$210.86
★
$211.28 ingresos · $0.42 costo
Visitar →
|
|||
|
MRR asking
aspirational — seller wish, not matched
|
Lyra2REv2
0.00000054154 BTC/M/d
|
$4.12
$4.54 ingresos · $0.42 costo
|
|||
| Lyra2z | |||||
|
MRR floor
0% rented · matches cheapest seller
|
Lyra2z
0.00000550000 BTC/M/d
|
$3.03
★
$3.45 ingresos · $0.42 costo
Visitar →
|
|||
|
MRR recent
last 10 rentals · actual clearing price
|
Lyra2z
0.00000600172 BTC/M/d
|
$3.34
★
$3.76 ingresos · $0.42 costo
Visitar →
|
|||
|
MRR asking
aspirational — seller wish, not matched
|
Lyra2z
0.00000716124 BTC/M/d
|
$4.07
$4.49 ingresos · $0.42 costo
|
|||
| Octopus | |||||
|
NiceHash
seller 24h-weighted avg
|
Octopus
0.00000002913 BTC/M/d
|
$-0.29
$0.13 ingresos · $0.42 costo
Visitar →
|
|||
|
MRR floor
0% rented · matches cheapest seller
|
Octopus
0.00000011000 BTC/M/d
|
$0.06
★
$0.48 ingresos · $0.42 costo
Visitar →
|
|||
|
MRR recent
last 10 rentals · actual clearing price
|
Octopus
0.00000064110 BTC/M/d
|
$2.40
★
$2.82 ingresos · $0.42 costo
Visitar →
|
|||
|
MRR asking
aspirational — seller wish, not matched
|
Octopus
0.00000014130 BTC/M/d
|
$0.20
$0.62 ingresos · $0.42 costo
|
|||
| NexaPoW | |||||
|
NiceHash
seller 24h-weighted avg
|
NexaPoW
0.00000002174 BTC/M/d
|
$-0.25
$0.17 ingresos · $0.42 costo
Visitar →
|
|||
|
MRR floor
0% rented · matches cheapest seller
|
NexaPoW
0.00000006365 BTC/M/d
|
$0.08
★
$0.50 ingresos · $0.42 costo
Visitar →
|
|||
|
MRR recent
last 10 rentals · actual clearing price
|
NexaPoW
0.00000032850 BTC/M/d
|
$2.18
★
$2.60 ingresos · $0.42 costo
Visitar →
|
|||
|
MRR asking
aspirational — seller wish, not matched
|
NexaPoW
0.00000011682 BTC/M/d
|
$0.51
$0.93 ingresos · $0.42 costo
|
|||
| X16Rv2 | |||||
|
MRR floor
0% rented · matches cheapest seller
|
X16Rv2
0.00000057870 BTC/M/d
|
$0.67
★
$1.09 ingresos · $0.42 costo
Visitar →
|
|||
|
MRR recent
last 10 rentals · actual clearing price
|
X16Rv2
0.00000063655 BTC/M/d
|
$0.78
★
$1.20 ingresos · $0.42 costo
Visitar →
|
|||
|
MRR asking
aspirational — seller wish, not matched
|
X16Rv2
0.00000083461 BTC/M/d
|
$1.16
$1.58 ingresos · $0.42 costo
|
|||
| X16R | |||||
|
MRR floor
0% rented · matches cheapest seller
|
X16R
0.00000036667 BTC/M/d
|
$0.33
★
$0.75 ingresos · $0.42 costo
Visitar →
|
|||
|
MRR recent
last 10 rentals · actual clearing price
|
X16R
0.00000061118 BTC/M/d
|
$0.83
★
$1.25 ingresos · $0.42 costo
Visitar →
|
|||
|
MRR asking
aspirational — seller wish, not matched
|
X16R
0.00000058710 BTC/M/d
|
$0.78
$1.20 ingresos · $0.42 costo
|
|||
| NeoScrypt | |||||
|
NiceHash
seller 24h-weighted avg
|
NeoScrypt
0.00000061948 BTC/M/d
|
$-0.30
$0.12 ingresos · $0.42 costo
Visitar →
|
|||
|
MRR floor
4% rented · matches cheapest seller
|
NeoScrypt
0.00000320000 BTC/M/d
|
$0.18
★
$0.60 ingresos · $0.42 costo
Visitar →
|
|||
|
MRR recent
last 10 rentals · actual clearing price
|
NeoScrypt
0.00000314000 BTC/M/d
|
$0.17
★
$0.59 ingresos · $0.42 costo
Visitar →
|
|||
|
MRR asking
aspirational — seller wish, not matched
|
NeoScrypt
0.00000359000 BTC/M/d
|
$0.25
$0.67 ingresos · $0.42 costo
|
|||
| FishHash | |||||
|
NiceHash
seller 24h-weighted avg
|
FishHash
0.00000003167 BTC/M/d
|
$-0.34
$0.08 ingresos · $0.42 costo
Visitar →
|
|||
|
MRR floor
0% rented · matches cheapest seller
|
FishHash
0.00000012000 BTC/M/d
|
$-0.14
★
$0.28 ingresos · $0.42 costo
Visitar →
|
|||
|
MRR recent
last 10 rentals · actual clearing price
|
FishHash
0.00000015078 BTC/M/d
|
$-0.06
★
$0.36 ingresos · $0.42 costo
Visitar →
|
|||
|
MRR asking
aspirational — seller wish, not matched
|
FishHash
0.00000024894 BTC/M/d
|
$0.17
$0.59 ingresos · $0.42 costo
|
|||
| Zhash | |||||
|
NiceHash
seller 24h-weighted avg
|
Zhash
0.00000000700 BTC/H/d
|
$-0.37
$0.05 ingresos · $0.42 costo
Visitar →
|
|||
|
MRR floor
0% rented · matches cheapest seller
|
Zhash
0.00000007080 BTC/H/d
|
$0.07
★
$0.49 ingresos · $0.42 costo
Visitar →
|
|||
|
MRR recent
last 10 rentals · actual clearing price
|
Zhash
0.00000008185 BTC/H/d
|
$0.14
★
$0.56 ingresos · $0.42 costo
Visitar →
|
|||
|
MRR asking
aspirational — seller wish, not matched
|
Zhash
0.00000007080 BTC/H/d
|
$0.07
$0.49 ingresos · $0.42 costo
|
|||
| KAWPOW | |||||
|
NiceHash
seller 24h-weighted avg
|
KAWPOW
0.00000005619 BTC/M/d
|
$-0.28
$0.14 ingresos · $0.42 costo
Visitar →
|
|||
|
MRR floor
7% rented · matches cheapest seller
|
KAWPOW
0.00000010622 BTC/M/d
|
$-0.16
★
$0.26 ingresos · $0.42 costo
Visitar →
|
|||
|
MRR recent
last 10 rentals · actual clearing price
|
KAWPOW
0.00000013186 BTC/M/d
|
$-0.10
★
$0.32 ingresos · $0.42 costo
Visitar →
|
|||
|
MRR asking
aspirational — seller wish, not matched
|
KAWPOW
0.00000012423 BTC/M/d
|
$-0.12
$0.30 ingresos · $0.42 costo
|
|||
| VerusHash | |||||
|
NiceHash
seller 24h-weighted avg
|
VerusHash
0.00000002400 BTC/M/d
|
$-0.39
$0.03 ingresos · $0.42 costo
Visitar →
|
|||
|
MRR floor
0% rented · matches cheapest seller
|
VerusHash
0.00000010999 BTC/M/d
|
$-0.28
★
$0.14 ingresos · $0.42 costo
Visitar →
|
|||
|
MRR recent
last 10 rentals · actual clearing price
|
VerusHash
0.00000023020 BTC/M/d
|
$-0.13
★
$0.29 ingresos · $0.42 costo
Visitar →
|
|||
|
MRR asking
aspirational — seller wish, not matched
|
VerusHash
0.00000015453 BTC/M/d
|
$-0.22
$0.20 ingresos · $0.42 costo
|
|||
| BeamHashIII | |||||
|
NiceHash
seller 24h-weighted avg
|
BeamHashIII
0.00000004245 BTC/H/d
|
$-0.26
★
$0.16 ingresos · $0.42 costo
Visitar →
|
|||
| Ethash | |||||
|
NiceHash
seller 24h-weighted avg
|
Ethash
0.00000002000 BTC/M/d
|
$-0.32
★
$0.10 ingresos · $0.42 costo
Visitar →
|
|||
| Etchash | |||||
|
NiceHash
seller 24h-weighted avg
|
Etchash
0.00000000500 BTC/M/d
|
$-0.40
$0.02 ingresos · $0.42 costo
Visitar →
|
|||
|
MRR floor
3% rented · matches cheapest seller
|
Etchash
0.00000001223 BTC/M/d
|
$-0.36
★
$0.06 ingresos · $0.42 costo
Visitar →
|
|||
|
MRR recent
last 10 rentals · actual clearing price
|
Etchash
0.00000001610 BTC/M/d
|
$-0.34
★
$0.08 ingresos · $0.42 costo
Visitar →
|
|||
|
MRR asking
aspirational — seller wish, not matched
|
Etchash
0.00000001213 BTC/M/d
|
$-0.36
$0.06 ingresos · $0.42 costo
|
|||
| Autolykos2 | |||||
|
NiceHash
seller 24h-weighted avg
|
Autolykos2
0.00000000586 BTC/M/d
|
$-0.36
★
$0.06 ingresos · $0.42 costo
Visitar →
|
|||
| Equihash | |||||
|
NiceHash
seller 24h-weighted avg
|
Equihash
0.00000000047 BTC/H/d
|
$-0.42
★
$0.00 ingresos · $0.42 costo
Visitar →
|
|||
|
MRR floor
7% rented · matches cheapest seller
|
Equihash
0.00000000027 BTC/H/d
|
$-0.42
$0.00 ingresos · $0.42 costo
Visitar →
|
|||
|
MRR recent
last 10 rentals · actual clearing price
|
Equihash
0.00000000067 BTC/H/d
|
$-0.41
$0.01 ingresos · $0.42 costo
Visitar →
|
|||
|
MRR asking
aspirational — seller wish, not matched
|
Equihash
0.00000000063 BTC/H/d
|
$-0.42
$0.00 ingresos · $0.42 costo
|
|||
| KHeavyHash | |||||
|
NiceHash
seller 24h-weighted avg
|
KHeavyHash
0.00000261920 BTC/T/d
|
$-0.42
$0.00 ingresos · $0.42 costo
Visitar →
|
|||
|
MRR floor
5% rented · matches cheapest seller
|
KHeavyHash
0.00000280000 BTC/T/d
|
$-0.42
★
$0.00 ingresos · $0.42 costo
Visitar →
|
|||
|
MRR recent
last 10 rentals · actual clearing price
|
KHeavyHash
0.00000387000 BTC/T/d
|
$-0.42
★
$0.00 ingresos · $0.42 costo
Visitar →
|
|||
|
MRR asking
aspirational — seller wish, not matched
|
KHeavyHash
0.00000528000 BTC/T/d
|
$-0.42
$0.00 ingresos · $0.42 costo
|
|||
| Blake3 | |||||
|
NiceHash
seller 24h-weighted avg
|
Blake3
0.00000000182 BTC/G/d
|
$-0.42
★
$0.00 ingresos · $0.42 costo
Visitar →
|
|||
| Rigs × Qty | Share | Rev /rig/day | Cost /rig/day | Profit /rig/day | Total profit /day |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| — | — | — | — | — | — |
Periodo de recuperación para Nvidia RTX 4070
Modela la recuperación de la inversión, el coste eléctrico y la rentabilidad del primer año para este equipo.
Hardware recuperado cuando la línea cruza cero. Después, todo ganancia.
| Month | Earned (mo) | Cost burned (mo) | Cumulative earned | Cumulative cost | Net | % ROI |
|---|
Emisiones anuales por fuente
Basado en el consumo eléctrico anual y la intensidad de carbono de redes comunes.
| Fuente de energía | CO₂e / año |
|---|---|
| Wind | 16.44 kg |
| Nuclear | 17.94 kg |
| Hydroelectric | 35.87 kg |
| Geothermal | 56.8 kg |
| Solar | 67.26 kg |
| Biofuels | 343.79 kg |
| Gas | 732.41 kg |
| Coal | 1,225.67 kg |
Solo estimaciones — las emisiones reales varían.
¿Qué significa eso realmente?
At the world-average grid intensity of about 475 g CO₂e/kWh, Nvidia RTX 4070 running 24/7 for a year releases about 710 kg of carbon dioxide equivalent. Here's what that looks like in everyday terms:
Dónde lo enchufas importa
Electricity is not one thing. A kilowatt-hour from a coal plant carries roughly 820 g of CO₂; the same kilowatt-hour from a hydro reservoir carries about 24 g. That's a 34× difference — large enough that Nvidia RTX 4070's annual footprint swings from roughly 1,226 kg on coal-heavy grids down to about 36 kg on hydro-dominated grids. The single biggest lever a miner has on their carbon footprint is choosing where to plug in.
Regions commonly used for low-carbon crypto mining include Quebec and British Columbia (hydro-dominated, typically <50 g CO₂/kWh), Iceland and Norway (geothermal + hydro, often <30 g), Paraguay (Itaipú hydro), and parts of the US Pacific Northwest. Coal-heavy grids — Kazakhstan, Inner Mongolia, Poland, parts of Australia — sit at the opposite end, often above 700 g CO₂/kWh.
Some operators also reduce their net impact by using otherwise-wasted energy: flare gas at oil wells (burning methane that would be vented anyway), curtailed renewables (wind or solar that the grid can't absorb), or behind-the-meter hydro during off-peak hours. These arrangements can drop effective emissions below the local grid average because the energy would have been wasted or flared without the mining load.
Cómo reducir la huella de este equipo
- Pick a greener ASIC. The efficiency column above matters as much as the grid: a 15 J/TH rig emits roughly half the CO₂ of a 30 J/TH rig for the same hashrate.
- Choose a low-carbon host. Data centres advertising hydro, geothermal, or nuclear power typically sit at <100 g CO₂/kWh.
- Look for stranded or curtailed energy. Flare-gas miners, wind-curtailment co-location, and off-peak hydro arrangements use energy that would otherwise be wasted.
- Use heat recovery. Capturing the heat for greenhouse agriculture, pool heating, or district warmth offsets fossil-fuel heating that would have been burned anyway.
- Time-shift your uptime. In grids with high daytime solar, running more during the day and less at night lowers your effective intensity even if you don't switch providers.
- Purchase verifiable offsets. Treat this as a last resort, not a substitute — and favour additional, permanent, third-party-verified projects (Gold Standard, Verra VCS).
Preguntas frecuentes
Yearly electricity use = rig power (W) × 24 × 365 ÷ 1000. We multiply that by each row's grid intensity in grams CO₂-equivalent per kWh and convert to kilograms. Intensities are representative averages — real emissions depend on your specific utility mix, time of day, and local transmission losses.
It depends almost entirely on where the electricity comes from. A single rig plugged into hydro in Quebec emits less over a year than an average family's two cars in a month. The same rig on a coal-dominated grid can exceed that in a few days. The hardware is the same — the grid is what changes the answer.
Network-wide estimates vary by methodology; the Cambridge Centre for Alternative Finance's Bitcoin Electricity Consumption Index is the most widely cited reference. As of recent reporting, the network's sustainable-energy share has grown as more hashrate migrates to hydro, wind, solar, and stranded-gas sites. This page just estimates a single rig — for the big picture, CCAF's dashboard is the best source.
Not directly. The rig draws the same wattage regardless of which pool it joins or how difficulty trends — so its electricity use, and therefore its emissions, stay constant. Those factors change revenue, not power consumption.
Proyección diaria
| Período | /Día | /Mes |
|---|---|---|
| Ingresos | $3.45 | $103.44 |
|
Costo
$0.1/kWh
|
$0.42 | $12.60 |
| Ganancia | $3.03 | $90.98 |
| Coin | Algorithm | Ingresos | Costo | Ganancia |
|---|---|---|---|---|
CFX
⚠
Conflux
|
Octopus
58.2092Mh · 173.0W
|
$0.66 | $0.42 | $0.24 |
|
—
|
EquihashZEL
67Hh · 130.0W
|
— | $0.31 | — |
NEXA
⚠
Nexa
|
NexaPoW
104.7Mh · 140.0W
|
$0.17 | $0.34 | $-0.17 |
|
BEAM
⚠
Beam
|
BeamHashIII
48.56Hh · 188.0W
|
$0.16 | $0.45 | $-0.29 |
|
RVN
Ravencoin
|
KAWPOW
31.922Mh · 200.0W
|
$0.14 | $0.48 | $-0.34 |
|
FTC
⚠
Feathercoin
|
NeoScrypt
2.4749Mh · 184.0W
|
— | $0.44 | — |
|
—
|
Ethash
63.845Mh · 200.0W
|
— | $0.48 | — |
|
LTZ
⚠
Litecoinz
|
Zhash
90.9Hh · 199.0W
|
— | $0.48 | — |
ERG
⚠
Ergo
|
Autolykos2
131.199999Mh · 100.0W
|
$0.06 | $0.24 | $-0.18 |
|
ETC
Ethereum Classic
|
Etchash
63.845Mh · 200.0W
|
$0.03 | $0.48 | $-0.45 |
|
VRSC
⚠
Verus
|
VerusHash
16.8381Mh · 157.0W
|
— | $0.38 | — |
|
AE
⚠
Aeternity
|
CuckooCycle
10.11Hh · 186.0W
|
$0.02 | $0.45 | $-0.43 |
|
MONA
⚠
Monacoin
|
Lyra2REv2
110.7415Mh · 192.0W
|
— | $0.46 | — |
|
ZEC
Zcash
|
Equihash
103.2Hh · 130.0W
|
— | $0.31 | — |
|
—
|
Blake3
1.7553Gh · 99.0W
|
— | $0.24 | — |
KAS
Kaspa
|
KHeavyHash
881.922Mh · 200.0W
|
— | $0.48 | — |
|
IRON
⚠
Iron Fish
|
FishHash
31.3Mh · 180.0W
|
— | $0.43 | — |
|
—
|
X16Rv2
24.9943Mh · 187.0W
|
— | $0.45 | — |
|
—
|
Keccak
1.857Gh · 181.0W
|
— | $0.43 | — |
|
—
|
ProgPowSERO
29.7194Mh · 178.0W
|
— | $0.43 | — |
|
—
|
ProgPowZ
29.7195Mh · 175.0W
|
— | $0.42 | — |
|
—
|
Radiant
1.3103Gh · 187.0W
|
— | $0.45 | — |
|
—
|
SHA256DT
3.5833Gh · 199.0W
|
— | $0.48 | — |
|
—
|
Ubqhash
56.8672Mh · 166.0W
|
— | $0.40 | — |
|
—
|
X21S
18.5821Mh · 174.0W
|
— | $0.42 | — |
|
—
|
X25X
3.2302Mh · 108.0W
|
— | $0.26 | — |
|
—
|
Xevan
7.8252Mh · 168.0W
|
— | $0.40 | — |
|
—
|
Memehash
107.9657Mh · 180.0W
|
— | $0.43 | — |
|
—
|
HeavyHash
835.698149Mh · 198.0W
|
— | $0.48 | — |
|
—
|
EvrProgPow
19.4837Mh · 189.0W
|
— | $0.45 | — |
|
—
|
ProgPowVeil
29.9741Mh · 175.0W
|
— | $0.42 | — |
|
—
|
Skein2
1.1965Gh · 199.0W
|
— | $0.48 | — |
|
—
|
Tribus
129.0154Mh · 169.0W
|
— | $0.41 | — |
|
—
|
vProgPow
9.6892Mh · 193.0W
|
— | $0.46 | — |
|
—
|
Equihash(125,4)
68.381Hh · 186.0W
|
— | $0.45 | — |
|
—
|
BCD
31.8766Mh · 187.0W
|
— | $0.45 | — |
|
—
|
Blake (2s)
10.9595Gh · 199.0W
|
— | $0.48 | — |
|
—
|
Curvehash
6.8321Mh · 139.0W
|
— | $0.33 | — |
|
—
|
Equihash(144,5)
96.3Hh · 199.0W
|
— | $0.48 | — |
|
—
|
Equihash(192,7)
45Hh · 184.0W
|
— | $0.44 | — |
|
—
|
Equihash(210,9)
368.04Hh · 177.0W
|
— | $0.42 | — |
FIRO
Firo
|
FiroPoW
29.4972Mh · 176.0W
|
— | $0.42 | — |
|
ACM
⚠
Actinium
|
Lyra2z
8.2824Mh · 110.0W
|
— | $0.26 | — |
|
—
|
PHI1612
42.028Mh · 157.0W
|
— | $0.38 | — |
|
—
|
Skydoge
1.2Gh · 120.0W
|
— | $0.29 | — |
|
VTC
⚠
Vertcoin
|
Verthash
5.2Gh · 140.0W
|
— | $0.34 | — |
|
—
|
zkSNARK
870.0Mh · 120.0W
|
— | $0.29 | — |
|
—
|
GhostRider
1.266Kh · 102.0W
|
— | $0.24 | — |
|
—
|
Keccak-C
1.8529Gh · 185.0W
|
— | $0.44 | — |
|
—
|
X16R
26.9675Mh · 189.0W
|
— | $0.45 | — |
|
—
|
X16RT
26.9144Mh · 184.0W
|
— | $0.44 | — |
|
—
|
HMQ1725
12.7813Mh · 181.0W
|
— | $0.43 | — |
| Pool | Algoritmos soportados | Comisión | |
|---|---|---|---|
|
|
CuckooCycle (AE) · BeamHashIII (BEAM) · Autolykos2 (ERG) | 1.0% | Visit → |
|
|
BeamHashIII (BEAM) · Autolykos2 (ERG) · Etchash (ETC) | 0.9% | Visit → |
|
★
|
Autolykos2 (ERG) · Etchash (ETC) · KHeavyHash (KAS) | 1.0% | Visit → |
|
|
FiroPoW (FIRO) · NexaPoW (NEXA) | 1.0% | Visit → |
- Architecture
- Ada Lovelace
- Base Clock
- 1920 MHz
- Boost Clock
- 2480 MHz
- CUDA cores
- 5888
- GPU Power
- 200 W
- Max Memory Size
- 12 GB
- Memory Type
- GDDR6X
- Mining algos
- 12
- Model
- Nvidia RTX 4070
- Power
- 200 W
- Process
- 5 nm
- Release
- April 2023
- Release year
- 2023
- TDP
- 200 W
- Type
- GPU
- Vendor
- Nvidia
Cómo Nvidia RTX 4070 gana en el mercado de GPU para IA
Nvidia RTX 4070 gana $1.02/día alquilando para cargas IA — considerablemente más que los $0.24/día minando Octopus. Minería y alquiler son modos de uso mutuamente excluyentes; el mercado IA es la opción clara aquí.
| Mercado | Algoritmo | Beneficio /día | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
MRR floor
0% rented · matches cheapest seller
|
Lyra2REv2
0.00000030000 BTC/M/d
|
$2.09
★
$2.51 ingresos · $0.42 costo
Visitar →
|
|||
|
MRR recent
last 10 rentals · actual clearing price
|
Lyra2REv2
0.00002520563 BTC/M/d
|
$210.86
★
$211.28 ingresos · $0.42 costo
Visitar →
|
|||
|
MRR asking
aspirational — seller wish, not matched
|
Lyra2REv2
0.00000054154 BTC/M/d
|
$4.12
$4.54 ingresos · $0.42 costo
|
|||
| Lyra2z | |||||
|
MRR floor
0% rented · matches cheapest seller
|
Lyra2z
0.00000550000 BTC/M/d
|
$3.03
★
$3.45 ingresos · $0.42 costo
Visitar →
|
|||
|
MRR recent
last 10 rentals · actual clearing price
|
Lyra2z
0.00000600172 BTC/M/d
|
$3.34
★
$3.76 ingresos · $0.42 costo
Visitar →
|
|||
|
MRR asking
aspirational — seller wish, not matched
|
Lyra2z
0.00000716124 BTC/M/d
|
$4.07
$4.49 ingresos · $0.42 costo
|
|||
| Octopus | |||||
|
NiceHash
seller 24h-weighted avg
|
Octopus
0.00000002913 BTC/M/d
|
$-0.29
$0.13 ingresos · $0.42 costo
Visitar →
|
|||
|
MRR floor
0% rented · matches cheapest seller
|
Octopus
0.00000011000 BTC/M/d
|
$0.06
★
$0.48 ingresos · $0.42 costo
Visitar →
|
|||
|
MRR recent
last 10 rentals · actual clearing price
|
Octopus
0.00000064110 BTC/M/d
|
$2.40
★
$2.82 ingresos · $0.42 costo
Visitar →
|
|||
|
MRR asking
aspirational — seller wish, not matched
|
Octopus
0.00000014130 BTC/M/d
|
$0.20
$0.62 ingresos · $0.42 costo
|
|||
| NexaPoW | |||||
|
NiceHash
seller 24h-weighted avg
|
NexaPoW
0.00000002174 BTC/M/d
|
$-0.25
$0.17 ingresos · $0.42 costo
Visitar →
|
|||
|
MRR floor
0% rented · matches cheapest seller
|
NexaPoW
0.00000006365 BTC/M/d
|
$0.08
★
$0.50 ingresos · $0.42 costo
Visitar →
|
|||
|
MRR recent
last 10 rentals · actual clearing price
|
NexaPoW
0.00000032850 BTC/M/d
|
$2.18
★
$2.60 ingresos · $0.42 costo
Visitar →
|
|||
|
MRR asking
aspirational — seller wish, not matched
|
NexaPoW
0.00000011682 BTC/M/d
|
$0.51
$0.93 ingresos · $0.42 costo
|
|||
| X16Rv2 | |||||
|
MRR floor
0% rented · matches cheapest seller
|
X16Rv2
0.00000057870 BTC/M/d
|
$0.67
★
$1.09 ingresos · $0.42 costo
Visitar →
|
|||
|
MRR recent
last 10 rentals · actual clearing price
|
X16Rv2
0.00000063655 BTC/M/d
|
$0.78
★
$1.20 ingresos · $0.42 costo
Visitar →
|
|||
|
MRR asking
aspirational — seller wish, not matched
|
X16Rv2
0.00000083461 BTC/M/d
|
$1.16
$1.58 ingresos · $0.42 costo
|
|||
| X16R | |||||
|
MRR floor
0% rented · matches cheapest seller
|
X16R
0.00000036667 BTC/M/d
|
$0.33
★
$0.75 ingresos · $0.42 costo
Visitar →
|
|||
|
MRR recent
last 10 rentals · actual clearing price
|
X16R
0.00000061118 BTC/M/d
|
$0.83
★
$1.25 ingresos · $0.42 costo
Visitar →
|
|||
|
MRR asking
aspirational — seller wish, not matched
|
X16R
0.00000058710 BTC/M/d
|
$0.78
$1.20 ingresos · $0.42 costo
|
|||
| NeoScrypt | |||||
|
NiceHash
seller 24h-weighted avg
|
NeoScrypt
0.00000061948 BTC/M/d
|
$-0.30
$0.12 ingresos · $0.42 costo
Visitar →
|
|||
|
MRR floor
4% rented · matches cheapest seller
|
NeoScrypt
0.00000320000 BTC/M/d
|
$0.18
★
$0.60 ingresos · $0.42 costo
Visitar →
|
|||
|
MRR recent
last 10 rentals · actual clearing price
|
NeoScrypt
0.00000314000 BTC/M/d
|
$0.17
★
$0.59 ingresos · $0.42 costo
Visitar →
|
|||
|
MRR asking
aspirational — seller wish, not matched
|
NeoScrypt
0.00000359000 BTC/M/d
|
$0.25
$0.67 ingresos · $0.42 costo
|
|||
| FishHash | |||||
|
NiceHash
seller 24h-weighted avg
|
FishHash
0.00000003167 BTC/M/d
|
$-0.34
$0.08 ingresos · $0.42 costo
Visitar →
|
|||
|
MRR floor
0% rented · matches cheapest seller
|
FishHash
0.00000012000 BTC/M/d
|
$-0.14
★
$0.28 ingresos · $0.42 costo
Visitar →
|
|||
|
MRR recent
last 10 rentals · actual clearing price
|
FishHash
0.00000015078 BTC/M/d
|
$-0.06
★
$0.36 ingresos · $0.42 costo
Visitar →
|
|||
|
MRR asking
aspirational — seller wish, not matched
|
FishHash
0.00000024894 BTC/M/d
|
$0.17
$0.59 ingresos · $0.42 costo
|
|||
| Zhash | |||||
|
NiceHash
seller 24h-weighted avg
|
Zhash
0.00000000700 BTC/H/d
|
$-0.37
$0.05 ingresos · $0.42 costo
Visitar →
|
|||
|
MRR floor
0% rented · matches cheapest seller
|
Zhash
0.00000007080 BTC/H/d
|
$0.07
★
$0.49 ingresos · $0.42 costo
Visitar →
|
|||
|
MRR recent
last 10 rentals · actual clearing price
|
Zhash
0.00000008185 BTC/H/d
|
$0.14
★
$0.56 ingresos · $0.42 costo
Visitar →
|
|||
|
MRR asking
aspirational — seller wish, not matched
|
Zhash
0.00000007080 BTC/H/d
|
$0.07
$0.49 ingresos · $0.42 costo
|
|||
| KAWPOW | |||||
|
NiceHash
seller 24h-weighted avg
|
KAWPOW
0.00000005619 BTC/M/d
|
$-0.28
$0.14 ingresos · $0.42 costo
Visitar →
|
|||
|
MRR floor
7% rented · matches cheapest seller
|
KAWPOW
0.00000010622 BTC/M/d
|
$-0.16
★
$0.26 ingresos · $0.42 costo
Visitar →
|
|||
|
MRR recent
last 10 rentals · actual clearing price
|
KAWPOW
0.00000013186 BTC/M/d
|
$-0.10
★
$0.32 ingresos · $0.42 costo
Visitar →
|
|||
|
MRR asking
aspirational — seller wish, not matched
|
KAWPOW
0.00000012423 BTC/M/d
|
$-0.12
$0.30 ingresos · $0.42 costo
|
|||
| VerusHash | |||||
|
NiceHash
seller 24h-weighted avg
|
VerusHash
0.00000002400 BTC/M/d
|
$-0.39
$0.03 ingresos · $0.42 costo
Visitar →
|
|||
|
MRR floor
0% rented · matches cheapest seller
|
VerusHash
0.00000010999 BTC/M/d
|
$-0.28
★
$0.14 ingresos · $0.42 costo
Visitar →
|
|||
|
MRR recent
last 10 rentals · actual clearing price
|
VerusHash
0.00000023020 BTC/M/d
|
$-0.13
★
$0.29 ingresos · $0.42 costo
Visitar →
|
|||
|
MRR asking
aspirational — seller wish, not matched
|
VerusHash
0.00000015453 BTC/M/d
|
$-0.22
$0.20 ingresos · $0.42 costo
|
|||
| BeamHashIII | |||||
|
NiceHash
seller 24h-weighted avg
|
BeamHashIII
0.00000004245 BTC/H/d
|
$-0.26
★
$0.16 ingresos · $0.42 costo
Visitar →
|
|||
| Ethash | |||||
|
NiceHash
seller 24h-weighted avg
|
Ethash
0.00000002000 BTC/M/d
|
$-0.32
★
$0.10 ingresos · $0.42 costo
Visitar →
|
|||
| Etchash | |||||
|
NiceHash
seller 24h-weighted avg
|
Etchash
0.00000000500 BTC/M/d
|
$-0.40
$0.02 ingresos · $0.42 costo
Visitar →
|
|||
|
MRR floor
3% rented · matches cheapest seller
|
Etchash
0.00000001223 BTC/M/d
|
$-0.36
★
$0.06 ingresos · $0.42 costo
Visitar →
|
|||
|
MRR recent
last 10 rentals · actual clearing price
|
Etchash
0.00000001610 BTC/M/d
|
$-0.34
★
$0.08 ingresos · $0.42 costo
Visitar →
|
|||
|
MRR asking
aspirational — seller wish, not matched
|
Etchash
0.00000001213 BTC/M/d
|
$-0.36
$0.06 ingresos · $0.42 costo
|
|||
| Autolykos2 | |||||
|
NiceHash
seller 24h-weighted avg
|
Autolykos2
0.00000000586 BTC/M/d
|
$-0.36
★
$0.06 ingresos · $0.42 costo
Visitar →
|
|||
| Equihash | |||||
|
NiceHash
seller 24h-weighted avg
|
Equihash
0.00000000047 BTC/H/d
|
$-0.42
★
$0.00 ingresos · $0.42 costo
Visitar →
|
|||
|
MRR floor
7% rented · matches cheapest seller
|
Equihash
0.00000000027 BTC/H/d
|
$-0.42
$0.00 ingresos · $0.42 costo
Visitar →
|
|||
|
MRR recent
last 10 rentals · actual clearing price
|
Equihash
0.00000000067 BTC/H/d
|
$-0.41
$0.01 ingresos · $0.42 costo
Visitar →
|
|||
|
MRR asking
aspirational — seller wish, not matched
|
Equihash
0.00000000063 BTC/H/d
|
$-0.42
$0.00 ingresos · $0.42 costo
|
|||
| KHeavyHash | |||||
|
NiceHash
seller 24h-weighted avg
|
KHeavyHash
0.00000261920 BTC/T/d
|
$-0.42
$0.00 ingresos · $0.42 costo
Visitar →
|
|||
|
MRR floor
5% rented · matches cheapest seller
|
KHeavyHash
0.00000280000 BTC/T/d
|
$-0.42
★
$0.00 ingresos · $0.42 costo
Visitar →
|
|||
|
MRR recent
last 10 rentals · actual clearing price
|
KHeavyHash
0.00000387000 BTC/T/d
|
$-0.42
★
$0.00 ingresos · $0.42 costo
Visitar →
|
|||
|
MRR asking
aspirational — seller wish, not matched
|
KHeavyHash
0.00000528000 BTC/T/d
|
$-0.42
$0.00 ingresos · $0.42 costo
|
|||
| Blake3 | |||||
|
NiceHash
seller 24h-weighted avg
|
Blake3
0.00000000182 BTC/G/d
|
$-0.42
★
$0.00 ingresos · $0.42 costo
Visitar →
|
|||
| Rigs × Qty | Share | Rev /rig/day | Cost /rig/day | Profit /rig/day | Total profit /day |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| — | — | — | — | — | — |
Periodo de recuperación para Nvidia RTX 4070
Modela la recuperación de la inversión, el coste eléctrico y la rentabilidad del primer año para este equipo.
Hardware recuperado cuando la línea cruza cero. Después, todo ganancia.
| Month | Earned (mo) | Cost burned (mo) | Cumulative earned | Cumulative cost | Net | % ROI |
|---|
Emisiones anuales por fuente
Basado en el consumo eléctrico anual y la intensidad de carbono de redes comunes.
| Fuente de energía | CO₂e / año |
|---|---|
| Wind | 16.44 kg |
| Nuclear | 17.94 kg |
| Hydroelectric | 35.87 kg |
| Geothermal | 56.8 kg |
| Solar | 67.26 kg |
| Biofuels | 343.79 kg |
| Gas | 732.41 kg |
| Coal | 1,225.67 kg |
Solo estimaciones — las emisiones reales varían.
¿Qué significa eso realmente?
At the world-average grid intensity of about 475 g CO₂e/kWh, Nvidia RTX 4070 running 24/7 for a year releases about 710 kg of carbon dioxide equivalent. Here's what that looks like in everyday terms:
Dónde lo enchufas importa
Electricity is not one thing. A kilowatt-hour from a coal plant carries roughly 820 g of CO₂; the same kilowatt-hour from a hydro reservoir carries about 24 g. That's a 34× difference — large enough that Nvidia RTX 4070's annual footprint swings from roughly 1,226 kg on coal-heavy grids down to about 36 kg on hydro-dominated grids. The single biggest lever a miner has on their carbon footprint is choosing where to plug in.
Regions commonly used for low-carbon crypto mining include Quebec and British Columbia (hydro-dominated, typically <50 g CO₂/kWh), Iceland and Norway (geothermal + hydro, often <30 g), Paraguay (Itaipú hydro), and parts of the US Pacific Northwest. Coal-heavy grids — Kazakhstan, Inner Mongolia, Poland, parts of Australia — sit at the opposite end, often above 700 g CO₂/kWh.
Some operators also reduce their net impact by using otherwise-wasted energy: flare gas at oil wells (burning methane that would be vented anyway), curtailed renewables (wind or solar that the grid can't absorb), or behind-the-meter hydro during off-peak hours. These arrangements can drop effective emissions below the local grid average because the energy would have been wasted or flared without the mining load.
Cómo reducir la huella de este equipo
- Pick a greener ASIC. The efficiency column above matters as much as the grid: a 15 J/TH rig emits roughly half the CO₂ of a 30 J/TH rig for the same hashrate.
- Choose a low-carbon host. Data centres advertising hydro, geothermal, or nuclear power typically sit at <100 g CO₂/kWh.
- Look for stranded or curtailed energy. Flare-gas miners, wind-curtailment co-location, and off-peak hydro arrangements use energy that would otherwise be wasted.
- Use heat recovery. Capturing the heat for greenhouse agriculture, pool heating, or district warmth offsets fossil-fuel heating that would have been burned anyway.
- Time-shift your uptime. In grids with high daytime solar, running more during the day and less at night lowers your effective intensity even if you don't switch providers.
- Purchase verifiable offsets. Treat this as a last resort, not a substitute — and favour additional, permanent, third-party-verified projects (Gold Standard, Verra VCS).
Preguntas frecuentes
Yearly electricity use = rig power (W) × 24 × 365 ÷ 1000. We multiply that by each row's grid intensity in grams CO₂-equivalent per kWh and convert to kilograms. Intensities are representative averages — real emissions depend on your specific utility mix, time of day, and local transmission losses.
It depends almost entirely on where the electricity comes from. A single rig plugged into hydro in Quebec emits less over a year than an average family's two cars in a month. The same rig on a coal-dominated grid can exceed that in a few days. The hardware is the same — the grid is what changes the answer.
Network-wide estimates vary by methodology; the Cambridge Centre for Alternative Finance's Bitcoin Electricity Consumption Index is the most widely cited reference. As of recent reporting, the network's sustainable-energy share has grown as more hashrate migrates to hydro, wind, solar, and stranded-gas sites. This page just estimates a single rig — for the big picture, CCAF's dashboard is the best source.
Not directly. The rig draws the same wattage regardless of which pool it joins or how difficulty trends — so its electricity use, and therefore its emissions, stay constant. Those factors change revenue, not power consumption.