Nvidia GeForce RTX 4070 — 挖矿
Nvidia GeForce RTX 4070 earns $1.15 per day renting on the AI GPU marketplace at a median rate of $0.07/h, drawing 200W. At $0.1/kWh electricity, the daily power cost is $0.42.
Nvidia GeForce RTX 4070 挖 Octopus 效率最高。本页包含完整的算法排行榜、联合挖矿选项、推荐矿池,以及可点击任意一行切换的历史收益图表。
每日预测
每日各收入流的胜出值 — 来自该矿机的历史记录,在 $0.1/kWh 下计算的平均值
| 周期 | /日 | /月 |
|---|---|---|
| 收入 | $1.57 | $47.02 |
|
成本
$0.1/kWh
|
$0.42 | $12.60 |
| 利润 | $1.15 | $34.42 |
算法收益历史 ▶ Octopus
若以 $0.1/kWh 持续挖该算法,每日净收益 $/天。点击上方任意算法可切换。
每日预测
| 周期 | /日 | /月 |
|---|---|---|
| 收入 | $0.87 | $26.10 |
|
成本
$0.1/kWh
|
$0.42 | $12.60 |
| 利润 | $0.45 | $13.50 |
| Coin | Algorithm | 收入 | 成本 | 利润 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
CFX
⚠
Conflux
|
Octopus
58.2092Mh · 173.0W
|
$0.87 | $0.42 | $0.45 |
|
BEAM
⚠
Beam
|
BeamHashIII
48.56Hh · 188.0W
|
$0.22 | $0.45 | $-0.23 |
|
RVN
Ravencoin
|
KAWPOW
31.922Mh · 0.0W
|
$0.19 | — | $0.19 |
|
AE
⚠
Aeternity
|
CuckooCycle
10.11Hh · 186.0W
|
$0.12 | $0.45 | $-0.33 |
ERG
⚠
Ergo
|
Autolykos2
131.199999Mh · 100.0W
|
$0.08 | $0.24 | $-0.16 |
NEXA
⚠
Nexa
|
NexaPoW
104.7Mh · 140.0W
|
$0.06 | $0.34 | $-0.28 |
|
ETC
Ethereum Classic
|
Etchash
63.845Mh · 0.0W
|
$0.05 | — | $0.05 |
|
MONA
⚠
Monacoin
|
Lyra2REv2
110.7415Mh · 192.0W
|
$0.01 | $0.46 | $-0.45 |
|
ZEC
Zcash
|
Equihash
103.2Hh · 130.0W
|
$0.01 | $0.31 | $-0.30 |
IRON
⚠
Iron Fish
|
IronFish
20Gh · 140.0W
|
$0.01 | $0.34 | $-0.33 |
KAS
Kaspa
|
KHeavyHash
881.922Mh · 0.0W
|
— | — | — |
|
BTC
Bitcoin
|
Sha256
1.2Gh · 120.0W
|
— | $0.29 | — |
|
—
|
MeowPow
31.3Mh · 160.0W
|
— | $0.38 | — |
|
—
|
KarlsenHashV2
1.55Gh · 120.0W
|
— | $0.29 | — |
|
—
|
Blake (2s)
10.9595Gh · 199.0W
|
— | $0.48 | — |
|
—
|
Blake3
1.7553Gh · 99.0W
|
— | $0.24 | — |
|
—
|
Equihash(210,9)
368.04Hh · 177.0W
|
— | $0.42 | — |
ACM
⚠
Actinium
|
Lyra2z
8.2824Mh · 110.0W
|
— | $0.26 | — |
|
—
|
Tribus
129.0154Mh · 169.0W
|
— | $0.41 | — |
|
—
|
X16R
26.9675Mh · 189.0W
|
— | $0.45 | — |
|
LTZ
⚠
Litecoinz
|
Zhash
90.9Hh · 199.0W
|
— | $0.48 | — |
|
—
|
Curvehash
6.8321Mh · 139.0W
|
— | $0.33 | — |
|
—
|
BCD
31.8766Mh · 187.0W
|
— | $0.45 | — |
|
—
|
Keccak
1.857Gh · 181.0W
|
— | $0.43 | — |
|
EPIC
⚠
Epic Cash
|
ProgPow
31Mh · 190.0W
|
— | $0.46 | — |
|
—
|
XelisHashV2
21Kh · 90.0W
|
— | $0.22 | — |
|
—
|
CryptoNightGPU
4.4Kh · 180.0W
|
— | $0.43 | — |
|
—
|
Cuckaroo29
7Hh · 110.0W
|
— | $0.26 | — |
|
GRIN
⚠
Grin
|
Cuckatoo32
0.8Hh · 140.0W
|
— | $0.34 | — |
|
—
|
EquihashZEL
67Hh · 130.0W
|
— | $0.31 | — |
FIRO
Firo
|
FiroPoW
29.4972Mh · 176.0W
|
— | $0.42 | — |
|
—
|
Radiant
1.3103Gh · 187.0W
|
— | $0.45 | — |
|
—
|
SHA256DT
3.5833Gh · 199.0W
|
— | $0.48 | — |
|
—
|
X25X
3.2302Mh · 108.0W
|
— | $0.26 | — |
|
—
|
EvrProgPow
19.4837Mh · 189.0W
|
— | $0.45 | — |
|
—
|
Abelhash
61Mh · 130.0W
|
— | $0.31 | — |
|
—
|
DynexSolve
5.8Kh · 120.0W
|
— | $0.29 | — |
|
—
|
Keccak-C
1.8529Gh · 185.0W
|
— | $0.44 | — |
|
—
|
ProgPowZ
29.7195Mh · 175.0W
|
— | $0.42 | — |
|
—
|
GhostRider
1.266Kh · 102.0W
|
— | $0.24 | — |
|
—
|
Qhash
190Mh · 140.0W
|
— | $0.34 | — |
|
—
|
Ton
5.2Gh · 140.0W
|
— | $0.34 | — |
|
—
|
PyrinHash
7Gh · 150.0W
|
— | $0.36 | — |
|
—
|
SHA3x
560Mh · 110.0W
|
— | $0.26 | — |
|
—
|
Meraki
62Mh · 140.0W
|
— | $0.34 | — |
|
—
|
vProgPow
9.6892Mh · 193.0W
|
— | $0.46 | — |
|
—
|
X21S
18.5821Mh · 174.0W
|
— | $0.42 | — |
|
—
|
PHI1612
42.028Mh · 157.0W
|
— | $0.38 | — |
|
—
|
ProgPowSERO
29.7194Mh · 178.0W
|
— | $0.43 | — |
|
—
|
Xevan
7.8252Mh · 168.0W
|
— | $0.40 | — |
|
—
|
ProgPowVeil
29.9741Mh · 175.0W
|
— | $0.42 | — |
|
—
|
HMQ1725
12.7813Mh · 181.0W
|
— | $0.43 | — |
|
—
|
Ubqhash
56.8672Mh · 166.0W
|
— | $0.40 | — |
|
—
|
Memehash
107.9657Mh · 180.0W
|
— | $0.43 | — |
|
—
|
X16RT
26.9144Mh · 184.0W
|
— | $0.44 | — |
|
—
|
Equihash(125,4)
68.381Hh · 186.0W
|
— | $0.45 | — |
|
—
|
Skein2
1.1965Gh · 199.0W
|
— | $0.48 | — |
|
—
|
zkSNARK
870.0Mh · 120.0W
|
— | $0.29 | — |
|
—
|
Ethash
63.845Mh · 0.0W
|
— | — | — |
|
—
|
Equihash(192,7)
45Hh · 184.0W
|
— | $0.44 | — |
|
VRSC
⚠
Verus
|
VerusHash
16.8381Mh · 157.0W
|
— | $0.38 | — |
|
VTC
⚠
Vertcoin
|
Verthash
5.2Gh · 140.0W
|
— | $0.34 | — |
|
FTC
⚠
Feathercoin
|
NeoScrypt
2.4749Mh · 184.0W
|
— | $0.44 | — |
|
—
|
X16Rv2
24.9943Mh · 187.0W
|
— | $0.45 | — |
|
—
|
HeavyHash
835.698149Mh · 198.0W
|
— | $0.48 | — |
|
—
|
Hoohash
410Mh · 90.0W
|
— | $0.22 | — |
|
—
|
Skydoge
1.2Gh · 120.0W
|
— | $0.29 | — |
|
—
|
Equihash(144,5)
96.3Hh · 199.0W
|
— | $0.48 | — |
Nvidia GeForce RTX 4070 在 AI GPU 出租市场上的收益路径
| 平台 | GPU | 收入 | 成本 | 利润 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Clore Ai
GPU 市场
|
RTX 4070
$0.077/h ·
30 个报价
|
$1.57
820 CLORE/day
1 CLORE ≈ $0.00191
|
$0.42 |
$1.15
★
访问 →
|
Nvidia GeForce RTX 4070 出租给 AI 任务每日可赚 $1.15,明显超过挖 Octopus 的 $0.45/日。挖矿和出租互斥,此处 AI 市场是更优选择。
净租赁收入历史
| 周期 | /日 | /月 |
|---|---|---|
| 收入 | $1.57 | $47.10 |
|
成本
$0.1/kWh
|
$0.42 | $12.60 |
| 利润 | $1.15 | $34.50 |
| 市场 | 算法 | 利润 /天 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
NiceHash
seller 24h-weighted avg
|
KAWPOW
0.00000007541 BTC/M/d
|
$-0.23
$0.19 收入 · $0.42 成本
访问 →
|
|||
MRR floor
9% rented · matches cheapest seller
|
KAWPOW
0.00000012997 BTC/M/d
|
$-0.08
$0.34 收入 · $0.42 成本
访问 →
|
|||
MRR recent
last 10 rentals · actual clearing price
|
KAWPOW
0.00000026852 BTC/M/d
|
$0.27
★
$0.69 收入 · $0.42 成本
访问 →
|
|||
MRR asking
aspirational — seller wish, not matched
|
KAWPOW
0.00000012322 BTC/M/d
|
$-0.10
$0.32 收入 · $0.42 成本
|
|||
|
|
|||||
|
NiceHash
seller 24h-weighted avg
|
VerusHash
0.00000002328 BTC/M/d
|
$-0.39
$0.03 收入 · $0.42 成本
访问 →
|
|||
MRR floor
2% rented · matches cheapest seller
|
VerusHash
0.00000010999 BTC/M/d
|
$-0.27
$0.15 收入 · $0.42 成本
访问 →
|
|||
MRR recent
last 10 rentals · actual clearing price
|
VerusHash
0.00000023020 BTC/M/d
|
$-0.11
$0.31 收入 · $0.42 成本
访问 →
|
|||
MRR asking
aspirational — seller wish, not matched
|
VerusHash
0.00000013791 BTC/M/d
|
$-0.23
$0.19 收入 · $0.42 成本
|
|||
|
|
|||||
|
NiceHash
seller 24h-weighted avg
|
BeamHashIII
0.00000005042 BTC/H/d
|
$-0.22
$0.20 收入 · $0.42 成本
访问 →
|
|||
NexaPoW
|
|||||
|
NiceHash
seller 24h-weighted avg
|
NexaPoW
0.00000002148 BTC/M/d
|
$-0.24
$0.18 收入 · $0.42 成本
访问 →
|
|||
Octopus
|
|||||
|
NiceHash
seller 24h-weighted avg
|
Octopus
0.00000003664 BTC/M/d
|
$-0.25
$0.17 收入 · $0.42 成本
访问 →
|
|||
|
|
|||||
|
NiceHash
seller 24h-weighted avg
|
NeoScrypt
0.00000059245 BTC/M/d
|
$-0.30
$0.12 收入 · $0.42 成本
访问 →
|
|||
|
|
|||||
|
NiceHash
seller 24h-weighted avg
|
Etchash
0.00000001011 BTC/M/d
|
$-0.37
$0.05 收入 · $0.42 成本
访问 →
|
|||
MRR floor
4% rented · matches cheapest seller
|
Etchash
0.00000001320 BTC/M/d
|
$-0.35
$0.07 收入 · $0.42 成本
访问 →
|
|||
MRR recent
last 10 rentals · actual clearing price
|
Etchash
0.00000001711 BTC/M/d
|
$-0.33
$0.09 收入 · $0.42 成本
访问 →
|
|||
MRR asking
aspirational — seller wish, not matched
|
Etchash
0.00000001333 BTC/M/d
|
$-0.35
$0.07 收入 · $0.42 成本
|
|||
FishHash
|
|||||
|
NiceHash
seller 24h-weighted avg
|
FishHash
0.00000003145 BTC/M/d
|
$-0.34
$0.08 收入 · $0.42 成本
访问 →
|
|||
Autolykos2
|
|||||
|
NiceHash
seller 24h-weighted avg
|
Autolykos2
0.00000000727 BTC/M/d
|
$-0.34
$0.08 收入 · $0.42 成本
访问 →
|
|||
|
Ethash
|
|||||
|
NiceHash
seller 24h-weighted avg
|
Ethash
0.00000001485 BTC/M/d
|
$-0.34
$0.08 收入 · $0.42 成本
访问 →
|
|||
|
|
|||||
|
NiceHash
seller 24h-weighted avg
|
Zhash
0.00000000761 BTC/H/d
|
$-0.36
$0.06 收入 · $0.42 成本
访问 →
|
|||
|
|
|||||
|
NiceHash
seller 24h-weighted avg
|
Equihash
0.00000000081 BTC/H/d
|
$-0.41
$0.01 收入 · $0.42 成本
访问 →
|
|||
MRR floor
21% rented · matches cheapest seller
|
Equihash
0.00000000069 BTC/H/d
|
$-0.41
$0.01 收入 · $0.42 成本
访问 →
|
|||
MRR recent
last 10 rentals · actual clearing price
|
Equihash
0.00000000089 BTC/H/d
|
$-0.41
$0.01 收入 · $0.42 成本
访问 →
|
|||
MRR asking
aspirational — seller wish, not matched
|
Equihash
0.00000000085 BTC/H/d
|
$-0.41
$0.01 收入 · $0.42 成本
|
|||
KHeavyHash
|
|||||
|
NiceHash
seller 24h-weighted avg
|
KHeavyHash
0.00000266261 BTC/T/d
|
$-0.42
$0.00 收入 · $0.42 成本
访问 →
|
|||
MRR floor
22% rented · matches cheapest seller
|
KHeavyHash
0.00000373000 BTC/T/d
|
$-0.42
$0.00 收入 · $0.42 成本
访问 →
|
|||
MRR asking
aspirational — seller wish, not matched
|
KHeavyHash
0.00000507000 BTC/T/d
|
$-0.42
$0.00 收入 · $0.42 成本
|
|||
|
Blake3
|
|||||
|
NiceHash
seller 24h-weighted avg
|
Blake3
0.00000000182 BTC/G/d
|
$-0.42
$0.00 收入 · $0.42 成本
访问 →
|
|||
|
|
|||||
|
NiceHash
seller 24h-weighted avg
|
Sha256
0.00000052658 BTC/T/d
|
$-0.42
$0.00 收入 · $0.42 成本
访问 →
|
|||
MRR floor
23% rented · matches cheapest seller
|
Sha256
0.00000066900 BTC/T/d
|
$-0.42
$0.00 收入 · $0.42 成本
访问 →
|
|||
MRR recent
last 10 rentals · actual clearing price
|
Sha256
0.00000082630 BTC/T/d
|
$-0.42
$0.00 收入 · $0.42 成本
访问 →
|
|||
MRR asking
aspirational — seller wish, not matched
|
Sha256
0.00000066190 BTC/T/d
|
$-0.42
$0.00 收入 · $0.42 成本
|
|||
净算力市场收入历史
| 周期 | /日 | /月 |
|---|---|---|
| 收入 | $0.34 | $10.07 |
|
成本
$0.1/kWh
|
$0.42 | $12.60 |
| 利润 | $-0.08 | $-2.53 |
| Rigs × Qty | Share | Rev /rig/day | Cost /rig/day | Profit /rig/day | Total profit /day |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| — | — | — | — | — | — |
Nvidia GeForce RTX 4070 的回本周期
测算此设备的回本周期、电费和首年收益。
曲线穿过零点即回本。之后全是利润。
| Month | Earned (mo) | Cost burned (mo) | Cumulative earned | Cumulative cost | Net | % ROI |
|---|
按能源来源的年度排放
基于年度耗电量和常见电网的碳强度。
| 能源来源 | CO₂e / 年 |
|---|---|
| Wind | 16.44 kg |
| Nuclear | 17.94 kg |
| Hydroelectric | 35.87 kg |
| Geothermal | 56.8 kg |
| Solar | 67.26 kg |
| Biofuels | 343.79 kg |
| Gas | 732.41 kg |
| Coal | 1,225.67 kg |
仅为估算 — 实际排放因硬件、冷却和电网而异。
这意味着什么?
At the world-average grid intensity of about 475 g CO₂e/kWh, Nvidia GeForce RTX 4070 running 24/7 for a year releases about 710 kg of carbon dioxide equivalent. Here's what that looks like in everyday terms:
你在哪里接电很重要
Electricity is not one thing. A kilowatt-hour from a coal plant carries roughly 820 g of CO₂; the same kilowatt-hour from a hydro reservoir carries about 24 g. That's a 34× difference — large enough that Nvidia GeForce RTX 4070's annual footprint swings from roughly 1,226 kg on coal-heavy grids down to about 36 kg on hydro-dominated grids. The single biggest lever a miner has on their carbon footprint is choosing where to plug in.
Regions commonly used for low-carbon crypto mining include Quebec and British Columbia (hydro-dominated, typically <50 g CO₂/kWh), Iceland and Norway (geothermal + hydro, often <30 g), Paraguay (Itaipú hydro), and parts of the US Pacific Northwest. Coal-heavy grids — Kazakhstan, Inner Mongolia, Poland, parts of Australia — sit at the opposite end, often above 700 g CO₂/kWh.
Some operators also reduce their net impact by using otherwise-wasted energy: flare gas at oil wells (burning methane that would be vented anyway), curtailed renewables (wind or solar that the grid can't absorb), or behind-the-meter hydro during off-peak hours. These arrangements can drop effective emissions below the local grid average because the energy would have been wasted or flared without the mining load.
如何减少该矿机的碳足迹
- Pick a greener ASIC. The efficiency column above matters as much as the grid: a 15 J/TH rig emits roughly half the CO₂ of a 30 J/TH rig for the same hashrate.
- Choose a low-carbon host. Data centres advertising hydro, geothermal, or nuclear power typically sit at <100 g CO₂/kWh.
- Look for stranded or curtailed energy. Flare-gas miners, wind-curtailment co-location, and off-peak hydro arrangements use energy that would otherwise be wasted.
- Use heat recovery. Capturing the heat for greenhouse agriculture, pool heating, or district warmth offsets fossil-fuel heating that would have been burned anyway.
- Time-shift your uptime. In grids with high daytime solar, running more during the day and less at night lowers your effective intensity even if you don't switch providers.
- Purchase verifiable offsets. Treat this as a last resort, not a substitute — and favour additional, permanent, third-party-verified projects (Gold Standard, Verra VCS).
常见问题
Yearly electricity use = rig power (W) × 24 × 365 ÷ 1000. We multiply that by each row's grid intensity in grams CO₂-equivalent per kWh and convert to kilograms. Intensities are representative averages — real emissions depend on your specific utility mix, time of day, and local transmission losses.
It depends almost entirely on where the electricity comes from. A single rig plugged into hydro in Quebec emits less over a year than an average family's two cars in a month. The same rig on a coal-dominated grid can exceed that in a few days. The hardware is the same — the grid is what changes the answer.
Network-wide estimates vary by methodology; the Cambridge Centre for Alternative Finance's Bitcoin Electricity Consumption Index is the most widely cited reference. As of recent reporting, the network's sustainable-energy share has grown as more hashrate migrates to hydro, wind, solar, and stranded-gas sites. This page just estimates a single rig — for the big picture, CCAF's dashboard is the best source.
Not directly. The rig draws the same wattage regardless of which pool it joins or how difficulty trends — so its electricity use, and therefore its emissions, stay constant. Those factors change revenue, not power consumption.
每日预测
每日各收入流的胜出值 — 来自该矿机的历史记录,在 $0.1/kWh 下计算的平均值
| 周期 | /日 | /月 |
|---|---|---|
| 收入 | $1.57 | $47.02 |
|
成本
$0.1/kWh
|
$0.42 | $12.60 |
| 利润 | $1.15 | $34.42 |
算法收益历史 ▶ Octopus
若以 $0.1/kWh 持续挖该算法,每日净收益 $/天。点击上方任意算法可切换。
每日预测
| 周期 | /日 | /月 |
|---|---|---|
| 收入 | $0.87 | $26.10 |
|
成本
$0.1/kWh
|
$0.42 | $12.60 |
| 利润 | $0.45 | $13.50 |
| Coin | Algorithm | 收入 | 成本 | 利润 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
CFX
⚠
Conflux
|
Octopus
58.2092Mh · 173.0W
|
$0.87 | $0.42 | $0.45 |
|
BEAM
⚠
Beam
|
BeamHashIII
48.56Hh · 188.0W
|
$0.22 | $0.45 | $-0.23 |
|
RVN
Ravencoin
|
KAWPOW
31.922Mh · 0.0W
|
$0.19 | — | $0.19 |
|
AE
⚠
Aeternity
|
CuckooCycle
10.11Hh · 186.0W
|
$0.12 | $0.45 | $-0.33 |
ERG
⚠
Ergo
|
Autolykos2
131.199999Mh · 100.0W
|
$0.08 | $0.24 | $-0.16 |
NEXA
⚠
Nexa
|
NexaPoW
104.7Mh · 140.0W
|
$0.06 | $0.34 | $-0.28 |
|
ETC
Ethereum Classic
|
Etchash
63.845Mh · 0.0W
|
$0.05 | — | $0.05 |
|
MONA
⚠
Monacoin
|
Lyra2REv2
110.7415Mh · 192.0W
|
$0.01 | $0.46 | $-0.45 |
|
ZEC
Zcash
|
Equihash
103.2Hh · 130.0W
|
$0.01 | $0.31 | $-0.30 |
IRON
⚠
Iron Fish
|
IronFish
20Gh · 140.0W
|
$0.01 | $0.34 | $-0.33 |
KAS
Kaspa
|
KHeavyHash
881.922Mh · 0.0W
|
— | — | — |
|
BTC
Bitcoin
|
Sha256
1.2Gh · 120.0W
|
— | $0.29 | — |
|
—
|
MeowPow
31.3Mh · 160.0W
|
— | $0.38 | — |
|
—
|
KarlsenHashV2
1.55Gh · 120.0W
|
— | $0.29 | — |
|
—
|
Blake (2s)
10.9595Gh · 199.0W
|
— | $0.48 | — |
|
—
|
Blake3
1.7553Gh · 99.0W
|
— | $0.24 | — |
|
—
|
Equihash(210,9)
368.04Hh · 177.0W
|
— | $0.42 | — |
ACM
⚠
Actinium
|
Lyra2z
8.2824Mh · 110.0W
|
— | $0.26 | — |
|
—
|
Tribus
129.0154Mh · 169.0W
|
— | $0.41 | — |
|
—
|
X16R
26.9675Mh · 189.0W
|
— | $0.45 | — |
|
LTZ
⚠
Litecoinz
|
Zhash
90.9Hh · 199.0W
|
— | $0.48 | — |
|
—
|
Curvehash
6.8321Mh · 139.0W
|
— | $0.33 | — |
|
—
|
BCD
31.8766Mh · 187.0W
|
— | $0.45 | — |
|
—
|
Keccak
1.857Gh · 181.0W
|
— | $0.43 | — |
|
EPIC
⚠
Epic Cash
|
ProgPow
31Mh · 190.0W
|
— | $0.46 | — |
|
—
|
XelisHashV2
21Kh · 90.0W
|
— | $0.22 | — |
|
—
|
CryptoNightGPU
4.4Kh · 180.0W
|
— | $0.43 | — |
|
—
|
Cuckaroo29
7Hh · 110.0W
|
— | $0.26 | — |
|
GRIN
⚠
Grin
|
Cuckatoo32
0.8Hh · 140.0W
|
— | $0.34 | — |
|
—
|
EquihashZEL
67Hh · 130.0W
|
— | $0.31 | — |
FIRO
Firo
|
FiroPoW
29.4972Mh · 176.0W
|
— | $0.42 | — |
|
—
|
Radiant
1.3103Gh · 187.0W
|
— | $0.45 | — |
|
—
|
SHA256DT
3.5833Gh · 199.0W
|
— | $0.48 | — |
|
—
|
X25X
3.2302Mh · 108.0W
|
— | $0.26 | — |
|
—
|
EvrProgPow
19.4837Mh · 189.0W
|
— | $0.45 | — |
|
—
|
Abelhash
61Mh · 130.0W
|
— | $0.31 | — |
|
—
|
DynexSolve
5.8Kh · 120.0W
|
— | $0.29 | — |
|
—
|
Keccak-C
1.8529Gh · 185.0W
|
— | $0.44 | — |
|
—
|
ProgPowZ
29.7195Mh · 175.0W
|
— | $0.42 | — |
|
—
|
GhostRider
1.266Kh · 102.0W
|
— | $0.24 | — |
|
—
|
Qhash
190Mh · 140.0W
|
— | $0.34 | — |
|
—
|
Ton
5.2Gh · 140.0W
|
— | $0.34 | — |
|
—
|
PyrinHash
7Gh · 150.0W
|
— | $0.36 | — |
|
—
|
SHA3x
560Mh · 110.0W
|
— | $0.26 | — |
|
—
|
Meraki
62Mh · 140.0W
|
— | $0.34 | — |
|
—
|
vProgPow
9.6892Mh · 193.0W
|
— | $0.46 | — |
|
—
|
X21S
18.5821Mh · 174.0W
|
— | $0.42 | — |
|
—
|
PHI1612
42.028Mh · 157.0W
|
— | $0.38 | — |
|
—
|
ProgPowSERO
29.7194Mh · 178.0W
|
— | $0.43 | — |
|
—
|
Xevan
7.8252Mh · 168.0W
|
— | $0.40 | — |
|
—
|
ProgPowVeil
29.9741Mh · 175.0W
|
— | $0.42 | — |
|
—
|
HMQ1725
12.7813Mh · 181.0W
|
— | $0.43 | — |
|
—
|
Ubqhash
56.8672Mh · 166.0W
|
— | $0.40 | — |
|
—
|
Memehash
107.9657Mh · 180.0W
|
— | $0.43 | — |
|
—
|
X16RT
26.9144Mh · 184.0W
|
— | $0.44 | — |
|
—
|
Equihash(125,4)
68.381Hh · 186.0W
|
— | $0.45 | — |
|
—
|
Skein2
1.1965Gh · 199.0W
|
— | $0.48 | — |
|
—
|
zkSNARK
870.0Mh · 120.0W
|
— | $0.29 | — |
|
—
|
Ethash
63.845Mh · 0.0W
|
— | — | — |
|
—
|
Equihash(192,7)
45Hh · 184.0W
|
— | $0.44 | — |
|
VRSC
⚠
Verus
|
VerusHash
16.8381Mh · 157.0W
|
— | $0.38 | — |
|
VTC
⚠
Vertcoin
|
Verthash
5.2Gh · 140.0W
|
— | $0.34 | — |
|
FTC
⚠
Feathercoin
|
NeoScrypt
2.4749Mh · 184.0W
|
— | $0.44 | — |
|
—
|
X16Rv2
24.9943Mh · 187.0W
|
— | $0.45 | — |
|
—
|
HeavyHash
835.698149Mh · 198.0W
|
— | $0.48 | — |
|
—
|
Hoohash
410Mh · 90.0W
|
— | $0.22 | — |
|
—
|
Skydoge
1.2Gh · 120.0W
|
— | $0.29 | — |
|
—
|
Equihash(144,5)
96.3Hh · 199.0W
|
— | $0.48 | — |
Nvidia GeForce RTX 4070 在 AI GPU 出租市场上的收益路径
| 平台 | GPU | 收入 | 成本 | 利润 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Clore Ai
GPU 市场
|
RTX 4070
$0.077/h ·
30 个报价
|
$1.57
820 CLORE/day
1 CLORE ≈ $0.00191
|
$0.42 |
$1.15
★
访问 →
|
Nvidia GeForce RTX 4070 出租给 AI 任务每日可赚 $1.15,明显超过挖 Octopus 的 $0.45/日。挖矿和出租互斥,此处 AI 市场是更优选择。
净租赁收入历史
| 周期 | /日 | /月 |
|---|---|---|
| 收入 | $1.57 | $47.10 |
|
成本
$0.1/kWh
|
$0.42 | $12.60 |
| 利润 | $1.15 | $34.50 |
| 市场 | 算法 | 利润 /天 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
NiceHash
seller 24h-weighted avg
|
KAWPOW
0.00000007541 BTC/M/d
|
$-0.23
$0.19 收入 · $0.42 成本
访问 →
|
|||
MRR floor
9% rented · matches cheapest seller
|
KAWPOW
0.00000012997 BTC/M/d
|
$-0.08
$0.34 收入 · $0.42 成本
访问 →
|
|||
MRR recent
last 10 rentals · actual clearing price
|
KAWPOW
0.00000026852 BTC/M/d
|
$0.27
★
$0.69 收入 · $0.42 成本
访问 →
|
|||
MRR asking
aspirational — seller wish, not matched
|
KAWPOW
0.00000012322 BTC/M/d
|
$-0.10
$0.32 收入 · $0.42 成本
|
|||
|
|
|||||
|
NiceHash
seller 24h-weighted avg
|
VerusHash
0.00000002328 BTC/M/d
|
$-0.39
$0.03 收入 · $0.42 成本
访问 →
|
|||
MRR floor
2% rented · matches cheapest seller
|
VerusHash
0.00000010999 BTC/M/d
|
$-0.27
$0.15 收入 · $0.42 成本
访问 →
|
|||
MRR recent
last 10 rentals · actual clearing price
|
VerusHash
0.00000023020 BTC/M/d
|
$-0.11
$0.31 收入 · $0.42 成本
访问 →
|
|||
MRR asking
aspirational — seller wish, not matched
|
VerusHash
0.00000013791 BTC/M/d
|
$-0.23
$0.19 收入 · $0.42 成本
|
|||
|
|
|||||
|
NiceHash
seller 24h-weighted avg
|
BeamHashIII
0.00000005042 BTC/H/d
|
$-0.22
$0.20 收入 · $0.42 成本
访问 →
|
|||
NexaPoW
|
|||||
|
NiceHash
seller 24h-weighted avg
|
NexaPoW
0.00000002148 BTC/M/d
|
$-0.24
$0.18 收入 · $0.42 成本
访问 →
|
|||
Octopus
|
|||||
|
NiceHash
seller 24h-weighted avg
|
Octopus
0.00000003664 BTC/M/d
|
$-0.25
$0.17 收入 · $0.42 成本
访问 →
|
|||
|
|
|||||
|
NiceHash
seller 24h-weighted avg
|
NeoScrypt
0.00000059245 BTC/M/d
|
$-0.30
$0.12 收入 · $0.42 成本
访问 →
|
|||
|
|
|||||
|
NiceHash
seller 24h-weighted avg
|
Etchash
0.00000001011 BTC/M/d
|
$-0.37
$0.05 收入 · $0.42 成本
访问 →
|
|||
MRR floor
4% rented · matches cheapest seller
|
Etchash
0.00000001320 BTC/M/d
|
$-0.35
$0.07 收入 · $0.42 成本
访问 →
|
|||
MRR recent
last 10 rentals · actual clearing price
|
Etchash
0.00000001711 BTC/M/d
|
$-0.33
$0.09 收入 · $0.42 成本
访问 →
|
|||
MRR asking
aspirational — seller wish, not matched
|
Etchash
0.00000001333 BTC/M/d
|
$-0.35
$0.07 收入 · $0.42 成本
|
|||
FishHash
|
|||||
|
NiceHash
seller 24h-weighted avg
|
FishHash
0.00000003145 BTC/M/d
|
$-0.34
$0.08 收入 · $0.42 成本
访问 →
|
|||
Autolykos2
|
|||||
|
NiceHash
seller 24h-weighted avg
|
Autolykos2
0.00000000727 BTC/M/d
|
$-0.34
$0.08 收入 · $0.42 成本
访问 →
|
|||
|
Ethash
|
|||||
|
NiceHash
seller 24h-weighted avg
|
Ethash
0.00000001485 BTC/M/d
|
$-0.34
$0.08 收入 · $0.42 成本
访问 →
|
|||
|
|
|||||
|
NiceHash
seller 24h-weighted avg
|
Zhash
0.00000000761 BTC/H/d
|
$-0.36
$0.06 收入 · $0.42 成本
访问 →
|
|||
|
|
|||||
|
NiceHash
seller 24h-weighted avg
|
Equihash
0.00000000081 BTC/H/d
|
$-0.41
$0.01 收入 · $0.42 成本
访问 →
|
|||
MRR floor
21% rented · matches cheapest seller
|
Equihash
0.00000000069 BTC/H/d
|
$-0.41
$0.01 收入 · $0.42 成本
访问 →
|
|||
MRR recent
last 10 rentals · actual clearing price
|
Equihash
0.00000000089 BTC/H/d
|
$-0.41
$0.01 收入 · $0.42 成本
访问 →
|
|||
MRR asking
aspirational — seller wish, not matched
|
Equihash
0.00000000085 BTC/H/d
|
$-0.41
$0.01 收入 · $0.42 成本
|
|||
KHeavyHash
|
|||||
|
NiceHash
seller 24h-weighted avg
|
KHeavyHash
0.00000266261 BTC/T/d
|
$-0.42
$0.00 收入 · $0.42 成本
访问 →
|
|||
MRR floor
22% rented · matches cheapest seller
|
KHeavyHash
0.00000373000 BTC/T/d
|
$-0.42
$0.00 收入 · $0.42 成本
访问 →
|
|||
MRR asking
aspirational — seller wish, not matched
|
KHeavyHash
0.00000507000 BTC/T/d
|
$-0.42
$0.00 收入 · $0.42 成本
|
|||
|
Blake3
|
|||||
|
NiceHash
seller 24h-weighted avg
|
Blake3
0.00000000182 BTC/G/d
|
$-0.42
$0.00 收入 · $0.42 成本
访问 →
|
|||
|
|
|||||
|
NiceHash
seller 24h-weighted avg
|
Sha256
0.00000052658 BTC/T/d
|
$-0.42
$0.00 收入 · $0.42 成本
访问 →
|
|||
MRR floor
23% rented · matches cheapest seller
|
Sha256
0.00000066900 BTC/T/d
|
$-0.42
$0.00 收入 · $0.42 成本
访问 →
|
|||
MRR recent
last 10 rentals · actual clearing price
|
Sha256
0.00000082630 BTC/T/d
|
$-0.42
$0.00 收入 · $0.42 成本
访问 →
|
|||
MRR asking
aspirational — seller wish, not matched
|
Sha256
0.00000066190 BTC/T/d
|
$-0.42
$0.00 收入 · $0.42 成本
|
|||
净算力市场收入历史
| 周期 | /日 | /月 |
|---|---|---|
| 收入 | $0.34 | $10.07 |
|
成本
$0.1/kWh
|
$0.42 | $12.60 |
| 利润 | $-0.08 | $-2.53 |
| Rigs × Qty | Share | Rev /rig/day | Cost /rig/day | Profit /rig/day | Total profit /day |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| — | — | — | — | — | — |
Nvidia GeForce RTX 4070 的回本周期
测算此设备的回本周期、电费和首年收益。
曲线穿过零点即回本。之后全是利润。
| Month | Earned (mo) | Cost burned (mo) | Cumulative earned | Cumulative cost | Net | % ROI |
|---|
按能源来源的年度排放
基于年度耗电量和常见电网的碳强度。
| 能源来源 | CO₂e / 年 |
|---|---|
| Wind | 16.44 kg |
| Nuclear | 17.94 kg |
| Hydroelectric | 35.87 kg |
| Geothermal | 56.8 kg |
| Solar | 67.26 kg |
| Biofuels | 343.79 kg |
| Gas | 732.41 kg |
| Coal | 1,225.67 kg |
仅为估算 — 实际排放因硬件、冷却和电网而异。
这意味着什么?
At the world-average grid intensity of about 475 g CO₂e/kWh, Nvidia GeForce RTX 4070 running 24/7 for a year releases about 710 kg of carbon dioxide equivalent. Here's what that looks like in everyday terms:
你在哪里接电很重要
Electricity is not one thing. A kilowatt-hour from a coal plant carries roughly 820 g of CO₂; the same kilowatt-hour from a hydro reservoir carries about 24 g. That's a 34× difference — large enough that Nvidia GeForce RTX 4070's annual footprint swings from roughly 1,226 kg on coal-heavy grids down to about 36 kg on hydro-dominated grids. The single biggest lever a miner has on their carbon footprint is choosing where to plug in.
Regions commonly used for low-carbon crypto mining include Quebec and British Columbia (hydro-dominated, typically <50 g CO₂/kWh), Iceland and Norway (geothermal + hydro, often <30 g), Paraguay (Itaipú hydro), and parts of the US Pacific Northwest. Coal-heavy grids — Kazakhstan, Inner Mongolia, Poland, parts of Australia — sit at the opposite end, often above 700 g CO₂/kWh.
Some operators also reduce their net impact by using otherwise-wasted energy: flare gas at oil wells (burning methane that would be vented anyway), curtailed renewables (wind or solar that the grid can't absorb), or behind-the-meter hydro during off-peak hours. These arrangements can drop effective emissions below the local grid average because the energy would have been wasted or flared without the mining load.
如何减少该矿机的碳足迹
- Pick a greener ASIC. The efficiency column above matters as much as the grid: a 15 J/TH rig emits roughly half the CO₂ of a 30 J/TH rig for the same hashrate.
- Choose a low-carbon host. Data centres advertising hydro, geothermal, or nuclear power typically sit at <100 g CO₂/kWh.
- Look for stranded or curtailed energy. Flare-gas miners, wind-curtailment co-location, and off-peak hydro arrangements use energy that would otherwise be wasted.
- Use heat recovery. Capturing the heat for greenhouse agriculture, pool heating, or district warmth offsets fossil-fuel heating that would have been burned anyway.
- Time-shift your uptime. In grids with high daytime solar, running more during the day and less at night lowers your effective intensity even if you don't switch providers.
- Purchase verifiable offsets. Treat this as a last resort, not a substitute — and favour additional, permanent, third-party-verified projects (Gold Standard, Verra VCS).
常见问题
Yearly electricity use = rig power (W) × 24 × 365 ÷ 1000. We multiply that by each row's grid intensity in grams CO₂-equivalent per kWh and convert to kilograms. Intensities are representative averages — real emissions depend on your specific utility mix, time of day, and local transmission losses.
It depends almost entirely on where the electricity comes from. A single rig plugged into hydro in Quebec emits less over a year than an average family's two cars in a month. The same rig on a coal-dominated grid can exceed that in a few days. The hardware is the same — the grid is what changes the answer.
Network-wide estimates vary by methodology; the Cambridge Centre for Alternative Finance's Bitcoin Electricity Consumption Index is the most widely cited reference. As of recent reporting, the network's sustainable-energy share has grown as more hashrate migrates to hydro, wind, solar, and stranded-gas sites. This page just estimates a single rig — for the big picture, CCAF's dashboard is the best source.
Not directly. The rig draws the same wattage regardless of which pool it joins or how difficulty trends — so its electricity use, and therefore its emissions, stay constant. Those factors change revenue, not power consumption.