AMD Radeon RX 7900 XT — 挖矿
AMD Radeon RX 7900 XT 每天净赚 $0.60 挖 Octopus 算力 90.0 Mh/s 功耗 290.0 W. 这是在扣除 $0.1/kWh 电费后的结果 — 按当前行情有利润。
AMD Radeon RX 7900 XT 挖 Octopus 效率最高。本页包含完整的算法排行榜、联合挖矿选项、推荐矿池,以及可点击任意一行切换的历史收益图表。
此 GPU 仅有 ? GB 显存 — 大多数 AI 市场要求至少 12 GB。
每日预测
每日各收入流的胜出值 — 来自该矿机的历史记录,在 $0.1/kWh 下计算的平均值
| 周期 | /日 | /月 |
|---|---|---|
| 收入 | $1.30 | $38.93 |
|
成本
$0.1/kWh
|
$0.70 | $21.00 |
| 利润 | $0.60 | $17.93 |
算法收益历史 ▶ Octopus
若以 $0.1/kWh 持续挖该算法,每日净收益 $/天。点击上方任意算法可切换。
每日预测
| 周期 | /日 | /月 |
|---|---|---|
| 收入 | $1.30 | $39.00 |
|
成本
$0.1/kWh
|
$0.70 | $21.00 |
| 利润 | $0.60 | $18.00 |
| Coin | Algorithm | 收入 | 成本 | 利润 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
CFX
⚠
Conflux
|
Octopus
90.0Mh · 290.0W
|
$1.30 | $0.70 | $0.60 |
|
RVN
Ravencoin
|
KAWPOW
46.1056Mh · 0.0W
|
$0.28 | — | $0.28 |
|
BEAM
⚠
Beam
|
BeamHashIII
32.874Hh · 0.0W
|
$0.13 | — | $0.13 |
ERG
⚠
Ergo
|
Autolykos2
158.6778Mh · 0.0W
|
$0.09 | — | $0.09 |
|
ETC
Ethereum Classic
|
Etchash
82.0249Mh · 0.0W
|
$0.07 | — | $0.07 |
|
MONA
⚠
Monacoin
|
Lyra2REv2
166.2568Mh · 0.0W
|
$0.02 | — | $0.02 |
NEXA
⚠
Nexa
|
NexaPoW
2.6959Mh · 0.0W
|
— | — | — |
KAS
Kaspa
|
KHeavyHash
720.3732Mh · 0.0W
|
— | — | — |
|
BTC
Bitcoin
|
Sha256
1.5Gh · 290.0W
|
— | $0.70 | — |
IRON
⚠
Iron Fish
|
FishHash
83.0Mh · 300.0W
|
— | $0.72 | — |
|
—
|
ProgPowSERO
49.2662Mh · 0.0W
|
— | — | — |
|
—
|
GhostRider
2.319Kh · 0.0W
|
— | — | — |
|
—
|
Ubqhash
78.6713Mh · 0.0W
|
— | — | — |
|
—
|
C11
68.6271Mh · 0.0W
|
— | — | — |
|
—
|
Equihash(192,7)
78.207Hh · 0.0W
|
— | — | — |
|
—
|
X25X
5.1192Mh · 0.0W
|
— | — | — |
|
—
|
Equihash(144,5)
121.9Hh · 0.0W
|
— | — | — |
|
—
|
Abelhash
83Mh · 200.0W
|
— | $0.48 | — |
|
—
|
Equihash(210,9)
409.077Hh · 0.0W
|
— | — | — |
|
—
|
CNReverseWaltz
2.637Kh · 0.0W
|
— | — | — |
|
—
|
Meraki
100Mh · 270.0W
|
— | $0.65 | — |
|
—
|
BCD
43.2516Mh · 0.0W
|
— | — | — |
|
—
|
Blake (2s)
13.0273Gh · 0.0W
|
— | — | — |
|
—
|
Equihash(125,4)
87.595Hh · 0.0W
|
— | — | — |
|
—
|
Radiant
1.521153728Gh · 0.0W
|
— | — | — |
|
—
|
Blake3
160.0Mh · 220.0W
|
— | $0.53 | — |
|
—
|
Curvehash
25.1473Mh · 0.0W
|
— | — | — |
FIRO
Firo
|
FiroPoW
45.1854Mh · 0.0W
|
— | — | — |
|
—
|
SHA256DT
5.2037Gh · 0.0W
|
— | — | — |
|
—
|
X16RT
46.3329Mh · 0.0W
|
— | — | — |
|
—
|
X21S
33.7228Mh · 0.0W
|
— | — | — |
|
—
|
Hex
45.5658Mh · 0.0W
|
— | — | — |
|
—
|
HeavyHash
976.5348Mh · 0.0W
|
— | — | — |
|
—
|
DynexSolve
1.95Kh · 190.0W
|
— | $0.46 | — |
|
—
|
PyrinHash
5.2Gh · 140.0W
|
— | $0.34 | — |
|
—
|
Skydoge
1.5Gh · 290.0W
|
— | $0.70 | — |
|
—
|
SHA512256d
1.95Gh · 200.0W
|
— | $0.48 | — |
|
—
|
X16Rv2
43.0399Mh · 0.0W
|
— | — | — |
|
—
|
Ethash
82.0249Mh · 0.0W
|
— | — | — |
|
—
|
MeowPow
46Mh · 260.0W
|
— | $0.62 | — |
|
—
|
CryptoNightGPU
2.7Gh · 270.0W
|
— | $0.65 | — |
|
VRSC
⚠
Verus
|
VerusHash
25.233Mh · 0.0W
|
— | — | — |
|
—
|
X16R
46.2143Mh · 0.0W
|
— | — | — |
|
—
|
Tribus
229.5734Mh · 0.0W
|
— | — | — |
|
GRIN
⚠
Grin
|
Cuckatoo32
12.0Hh · 220.0W
|
— | $0.53 | — |
|
—
|
HMQ1725
29.762Mh · 0.0W
|
— | — | — |
|
EPIC
⚠
Epic Cash
|
ProgPow
81.0Mh · 250.0W
|
— | $0.60 | — |
|
—
|
PHI1612
84.6276Mh · 0.0W
|
— | — | — |
|
—
|
Astralhash
73.2261Mh · 0.0W
|
— | — | — |
|
—
|
ProgPowZ
47.8636Mh · 0.0W
|
— | — | — |
|
LTZ
⚠
Litecoinz
|
Zhash
126.5Hh · 0.0W
|
— | — | — |
|
—
|
Qhash
175Mh · 200.0W
|
— | $0.48 | — |
|
—
|
KarlsenHashV2
1.5Gh · 140.0W
|
— | $0.34 | — |
|
VTC
⚠
Vertcoin
|
Verthash
1.1707Mh · 0.0W
|
— | — | — |
|
—
|
EvrProgPow
47.4985Mh · 0.0W
|
— | — | — |
净算力市场收入历史
| 周期 | /日 | /月 |
|---|---|---|
| 收入 | $0.48 | $14.53 |
|
成本
$0.1/kWh
|
$0.70 | $21.00 |
| 利润 | $-0.22 | $-6.47 |
| Rigs × Qty | Share | Rev /rig/day | Cost /rig/day | Profit /rig/day | Total profit /day |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| — | — | — | — | — | — |
AMD Radeon RX 7900 XT 的回本周期
测算此设备的回本周期、电费和首年收益。
曲线穿过零点即回本。之后全是利润。
| Month | Earned (mo) | Cost burned (mo) | Cumulative earned | Cumulative cost | Net | % ROI |
|---|
按能源来源的年度排放
基于年度耗电量和常见电网的碳强度。
| 能源来源 | CO₂e / 年 |
|---|---|
| Wind | 27.56 kg |
| Nuclear | 30.07 kg |
| Hydroelectric | 60.13 kg |
| Geothermal | 95.21 kg |
| Solar | 112.75 kg |
| Biofuels | 576.29 kg |
| Gas | 1,227.74 kg |
| Coal | 2,054.59 kg |
仅为估算 — 实际排放因硬件、冷却和电网而异。
这意味着什么?
At the world-average grid intensity of about 475 g CO₂e/kWh, AMD Radeon RX 7900 XT running 24/7 for a year releases about 1,190 kg of carbon dioxide equivalent. Here's what that looks like in everyday terms:
你在哪里接电很重要
Electricity is not one thing. A kilowatt-hour from a coal plant carries roughly 820 g of CO₂; the same kilowatt-hour from a hydro reservoir carries about 24 g. That's a 34× difference — large enough that AMD Radeon RX 7900 XT's annual footprint swings from roughly 2,055 kg on coal-heavy grids down to about 60 kg on hydro-dominated grids. The single biggest lever a miner has on their carbon footprint is choosing where to plug in.
Regions commonly used for low-carbon crypto mining include Quebec and British Columbia (hydro-dominated, typically <50 g CO₂/kWh), Iceland and Norway (geothermal + hydro, often <30 g), Paraguay (Itaipú hydro), and parts of the US Pacific Northwest. Coal-heavy grids — Kazakhstan, Inner Mongolia, Poland, parts of Australia — sit at the opposite end, often above 700 g CO₂/kWh.
Some operators also reduce their net impact by using otherwise-wasted energy: flare gas at oil wells (burning methane that would be vented anyway), curtailed renewables (wind or solar that the grid can't absorb), or behind-the-meter hydro during off-peak hours. These arrangements can drop effective emissions below the local grid average because the energy would have been wasted or flared without the mining load.
如何减少该矿机的碳足迹
- Pick a greener ASIC. The efficiency column above matters as much as the grid: a 15 J/TH rig emits roughly half the CO₂ of a 30 J/TH rig for the same hashrate.
- Choose a low-carbon host. Data centres advertising hydro, geothermal, or nuclear power typically sit at <100 g CO₂/kWh.
- Look for stranded or curtailed energy. Flare-gas miners, wind-curtailment co-location, and off-peak hydro arrangements use energy that would otherwise be wasted.
- Use heat recovery. Capturing the heat for greenhouse agriculture, pool heating, or district warmth offsets fossil-fuel heating that would have been burned anyway.
- Time-shift your uptime. In grids with high daytime solar, running more during the day and less at night lowers your effective intensity even if you don't switch providers.
- Purchase verifiable offsets. Treat this as a last resort, not a substitute — and favour additional, permanent, third-party-verified projects (Gold Standard, Verra VCS).
常见问题
Yearly electricity use = rig power (W) × 24 × 365 ÷ 1000. We multiply that by each row's grid intensity in grams CO₂-equivalent per kWh and convert to kilograms. Intensities are representative averages — real emissions depend on your specific utility mix, time of day, and local transmission losses.
It depends almost entirely on where the electricity comes from. A single rig plugged into hydro in Quebec emits less over a year than an average family's two cars in a month. The same rig on a coal-dominated grid can exceed that in a few days. The hardware is the same — the grid is what changes the answer.
Network-wide estimates vary by methodology; the Cambridge Centre for Alternative Finance's Bitcoin Electricity Consumption Index is the most widely cited reference. As of recent reporting, the network's sustainable-energy share has grown as more hashrate migrates to hydro, wind, solar, and stranded-gas sites. This page just estimates a single rig — for the big picture, CCAF's dashboard is the best source.
Not directly. The rig draws the same wattage regardless of which pool it joins or how difficulty trends — so its electricity use, and therefore its emissions, stay constant. Those factors change revenue, not power consumption.
此 GPU 仅有 ? GB 显存 — 大多数 AI 市场要求至少 12 GB。
每日预测
每日各收入流的胜出值 — 来自该矿机的历史记录,在 $0.1/kWh 下计算的平均值
| 周期 | /日 | /月 |
|---|---|---|
| 收入 | $1.30 | $38.93 |
|
成本
$0.1/kWh
|
$0.70 | $21.00 |
| 利润 | $0.60 | $17.93 |
算法收益历史 ▶ Octopus
若以 $0.1/kWh 持续挖该算法,每日净收益 $/天。点击上方任意算法可切换。
每日预测
| 周期 | /日 | /月 |
|---|---|---|
| 收入 | $1.30 | $39.00 |
|
成本
$0.1/kWh
|
$0.70 | $21.00 |
| 利润 | $0.60 | $18.00 |
| Coin | Algorithm | 收入 | 成本 | 利润 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
CFX
⚠
Conflux
|
Octopus
90.0Mh · 290.0W
|
$1.30 | $0.70 | $0.60 |
|
RVN
Ravencoin
|
KAWPOW
46.1056Mh · 0.0W
|
$0.28 | — | $0.28 |
|
BEAM
⚠
Beam
|
BeamHashIII
32.874Hh · 0.0W
|
$0.13 | — | $0.13 |
ERG
⚠
Ergo
|
Autolykos2
158.6778Mh · 0.0W
|
$0.09 | — | $0.09 |
|
ETC
Ethereum Classic
|
Etchash
82.0249Mh · 0.0W
|
$0.07 | — | $0.07 |
|
MONA
⚠
Monacoin
|
Lyra2REv2
166.2568Mh · 0.0W
|
$0.02 | — | $0.02 |
NEXA
⚠
Nexa
|
NexaPoW
2.6959Mh · 0.0W
|
— | — | — |
KAS
Kaspa
|
KHeavyHash
720.3732Mh · 0.0W
|
— | — | — |
|
BTC
Bitcoin
|
Sha256
1.5Gh · 290.0W
|
— | $0.70 | — |
IRON
⚠
Iron Fish
|
FishHash
83.0Mh · 300.0W
|
— | $0.72 | — |
|
—
|
ProgPowSERO
49.2662Mh · 0.0W
|
— | — | — |
|
—
|
GhostRider
2.319Kh · 0.0W
|
— | — | — |
|
—
|
Ubqhash
78.6713Mh · 0.0W
|
— | — | — |
|
—
|
C11
68.6271Mh · 0.0W
|
— | — | — |
|
—
|
Equihash(192,7)
78.207Hh · 0.0W
|
— | — | — |
|
—
|
X25X
5.1192Mh · 0.0W
|
— | — | — |
|
—
|
Equihash(144,5)
121.9Hh · 0.0W
|
— | — | — |
|
—
|
Abelhash
83Mh · 200.0W
|
— | $0.48 | — |
|
—
|
Equihash(210,9)
409.077Hh · 0.0W
|
— | — | — |
|
—
|
CNReverseWaltz
2.637Kh · 0.0W
|
— | — | — |
|
—
|
Meraki
100Mh · 270.0W
|
— | $0.65 | — |
|
—
|
BCD
43.2516Mh · 0.0W
|
— | — | — |
|
—
|
Blake (2s)
13.0273Gh · 0.0W
|
— | — | — |
|
—
|
Equihash(125,4)
87.595Hh · 0.0W
|
— | — | — |
|
—
|
Radiant
1.521153728Gh · 0.0W
|
— | — | — |
|
—
|
Blake3
160.0Mh · 220.0W
|
— | $0.53 | — |
|
—
|
Curvehash
25.1473Mh · 0.0W
|
— | — | — |
FIRO
Firo
|
FiroPoW
45.1854Mh · 0.0W
|
— | — | — |
|
—
|
SHA256DT
5.2037Gh · 0.0W
|
— | — | — |
|
—
|
X16RT
46.3329Mh · 0.0W
|
— | — | — |
|
—
|
X21S
33.7228Mh · 0.0W
|
— | — | — |
|
—
|
Hex
45.5658Mh · 0.0W
|
— | — | — |
|
—
|
HeavyHash
976.5348Mh · 0.0W
|
— | — | — |
|
—
|
DynexSolve
1.95Kh · 190.0W
|
— | $0.46 | — |
|
—
|
PyrinHash
5.2Gh · 140.0W
|
— | $0.34 | — |
|
—
|
Skydoge
1.5Gh · 290.0W
|
— | $0.70 | — |
|
—
|
SHA512256d
1.95Gh · 200.0W
|
— | $0.48 | — |
|
—
|
X16Rv2
43.0399Mh · 0.0W
|
— | — | — |
|
—
|
Ethash
82.0249Mh · 0.0W
|
— | — | — |
|
—
|
MeowPow
46Mh · 260.0W
|
— | $0.62 | — |
|
—
|
CryptoNightGPU
2.7Gh · 270.0W
|
— | $0.65 | — |
|
VRSC
⚠
Verus
|
VerusHash
25.233Mh · 0.0W
|
— | — | — |
|
—
|
X16R
46.2143Mh · 0.0W
|
— | — | — |
|
—
|
Tribus
229.5734Mh · 0.0W
|
— | — | — |
|
GRIN
⚠
Grin
|
Cuckatoo32
12.0Hh · 220.0W
|
— | $0.53 | — |
|
—
|
HMQ1725
29.762Mh · 0.0W
|
— | — | — |
|
EPIC
⚠
Epic Cash
|
ProgPow
81.0Mh · 250.0W
|
— | $0.60 | — |
|
—
|
PHI1612
84.6276Mh · 0.0W
|
— | — | — |
|
—
|
Astralhash
73.2261Mh · 0.0W
|
— | — | — |
|
—
|
ProgPowZ
47.8636Mh · 0.0W
|
— | — | — |
|
LTZ
⚠
Litecoinz
|
Zhash
126.5Hh · 0.0W
|
— | — | — |
|
—
|
Qhash
175Mh · 200.0W
|
— | $0.48 | — |
|
—
|
KarlsenHashV2
1.5Gh · 140.0W
|
— | $0.34 | — |
|
VTC
⚠
Vertcoin
|
Verthash
1.1707Mh · 0.0W
|
— | — | — |
|
—
|
EvrProgPow
47.4985Mh · 0.0W
|
— | — | — |
净算力市场收入历史
| 周期 | /日 | /月 |
|---|---|---|
| 收入 | $0.48 | $14.53 |
|
成本
$0.1/kWh
|
$0.70 | $21.00 |
| 利润 | $-0.22 | $-6.47 |
| Rigs × Qty | Share | Rev /rig/day | Cost /rig/day | Profit /rig/day | Total profit /day |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| — | — | — | — | — | — |
AMD Radeon RX 7900 XT 的回本周期
测算此设备的回本周期、电费和首年收益。
曲线穿过零点即回本。之后全是利润。
| Month | Earned (mo) | Cost burned (mo) | Cumulative earned | Cumulative cost | Net | % ROI |
|---|
按能源来源的年度排放
基于年度耗电量和常见电网的碳强度。
| 能源来源 | CO₂e / 年 |
|---|---|
| Wind | 27.56 kg |
| Nuclear | 30.07 kg |
| Hydroelectric | 60.13 kg |
| Geothermal | 95.21 kg |
| Solar | 112.75 kg |
| Biofuels | 576.29 kg |
| Gas | 1,227.74 kg |
| Coal | 2,054.59 kg |
仅为估算 — 实际排放因硬件、冷却和电网而异。
这意味着什么?
At the world-average grid intensity of about 475 g CO₂e/kWh, AMD Radeon RX 7900 XT running 24/7 for a year releases about 1,190 kg of carbon dioxide equivalent. Here's what that looks like in everyday terms:
你在哪里接电很重要
Electricity is not one thing. A kilowatt-hour from a coal plant carries roughly 820 g of CO₂; the same kilowatt-hour from a hydro reservoir carries about 24 g. That's a 34× difference — large enough that AMD Radeon RX 7900 XT's annual footprint swings from roughly 2,055 kg on coal-heavy grids down to about 60 kg on hydro-dominated grids. The single biggest lever a miner has on their carbon footprint is choosing where to plug in.
Regions commonly used for low-carbon crypto mining include Quebec and British Columbia (hydro-dominated, typically <50 g CO₂/kWh), Iceland and Norway (geothermal + hydro, often <30 g), Paraguay (Itaipú hydro), and parts of the US Pacific Northwest. Coal-heavy grids — Kazakhstan, Inner Mongolia, Poland, parts of Australia — sit at the opposite end, often above 700 g CO₂/kWh.
Some operators also reduce their net impact by using otherwise-wasted energy: flare gas at oil wells (burning methane that would be vented anyway), curtailed renewables (wind or solar that the grid can't absorb), or behind-the-meter hydro during off-peak hours. These arrangements can drop effective emissions below the local grid average because the energy would have been wasted or flared without the mining load.
如何减少该矿机的碳足迹
- Pick a greener ASIC. The efficiency column above matters as much as the grid: a 15 J/TH rig emits roughly half the CO₂ of a 30 J/TH rig for the same hashrate.
- Choose a low-carbon host. Data centres advertising hydro, geothermal, or nuclear power typically sit at <100 g CO₂/kWh.
- Look for stranded or curtailed energy. Flare-gas miners, wind-curtailment co-location, and off-peak hydro arrangements use energy that would otherwise be wasted.
- Use heat recovery. Capturing the heat for greenhouse agriculture, pool heating, or district warmth offsets fossil-fuel heating that would have been burned anyway.
- Time-shift your uptime. In grids with high daytime solar, running more during the day and less at night lowers your effective intensity even if you don't switch providers.
- Purchase verifiable offsets. Treat this as a last resort, not a substitute — and favour additional, permanent, third-party-verified projects (Gold Standard, Verra VCS).
常见问题
Yearly electricity use = rig power (W) × 24 × 365 ÷ 1000. We multiply that by each row's grid intensity in grams CO₂-equivalent per kWh and convert to kilograms. Intensities are representative averages — real emissions depend on your specific utility mix, time of day, and local transmission losses.
It depends almost entirely on where the electricity comes from. A single rig plugged into hydro in Quebec emits less over a year than an average family's two cars in a month. The same rig on a coal-dominated grid can exceed that in a few days. The hardware is the same — the grid is what changes the answer.
Network-wide estimates vary by methodology; the Cambridge Centre for Alternative Finance's Bitcoin Electricity Consumption Index is the most widely cited reference. As of recent reporting, the network's sustainable-energy share has grown as more hashrate migrates to hydro, wind, solar, and stranded-gas sites. This page just estimates a single rig — for the big picture, CCAF's dashboard is the best source.
Not directly. The rig draws the same wattage regardless of which pool it joins or how difficulty trends — so its electricity use, and therefore its emissions, stay constant. Those factors change revenue, not power consumption.