Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 LHR — 挖矿
Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 LHR 每天净赚 最高 $0.44,最佳为挖 Octopus 算力 44.0 Mh/s。 也可用于:出售 KAWPOW 算力($0.00/天)。 功耗 90 W — 按 $0.10/kWh 计算,按当前行情有利润。
此 GPU 仅有 ? GB 显存 — 大多数 AI 市场要求至少 12 GB。
每日预测
每日各收入流的胜出值 — 来自该矿机的历史记录,在 $0.1/kWh 下计算的平均值
| 周期 | /日 | /月 |
|---|---|---|
| 收入 | $0.66 | $19.84 |
|
成本
$0.1/kWh
|
$0.22 | $6.60 |
| 利润 | $0.44 | $13.24 |
挖矿收益历史
| 算法 | 净收益 / 天 |
|---|---|
|
OCT
Octopus
★ 最佳
44.0 Mh/s · 90.0 W
|
$0.44 |
|
KAW
KAWPOW
22 Mh/s · 140.0 W
|
$-0.10 |
|
CUC
CuckooCycle
7 Hh/s · 140.0 W
|
$-0.12 |
|
BEA
BeamHashIII
22 Hh/s · 140.0 W
|
$-0.13 |
|
AUT
Autolykos2
115 Mh/s · 130.0 W
|
$-0.15 |
|
ETC
Etchash
48 Mh/s · 120.0 W
|
$-0.18 |
|
NEX
NexaPoW
47 Mh/s · 85.0 W
|
$-0.19 |
|
EQU
Equihash
61 Hh/s · 115.0 W
|
$-0.22 |
|
SHA
Sha256
420 Mh/s · 70.0 W
|
$-0.22 |
|
EQU
Equihash210_9
250 Hh/s · 140.0 W
|
$-0.22 |
|
BLA
Blake3
800 Mh/s · 90.0 W
|
$-0.22 |
|
XEL
XelisHashV2
20.0 Mh/s · 140.0 W
|
$-0.22 |
|
CUC
Cuckatoo31
1.2 Hh/s · 140.0 W
|
$-0.22 |
|
CUC
Cuckatoo32
0.45 Hh/s · 140.0 W
|
$-0.22 |
|
ZHA
Zhash
44 Hh/s · 140.0 W
|
$-0.22 |
|
TON
Ton
1.8 Gh/s · 120.0 W
|
$-0.22 |
|
KHE
KHeavyHash
60.0 Hh/s · 130.0 W
|
$-0.22 |
|
FIS
FishHash
20.5 Mh/s · 140.0 W
|
$-0.22 |
|
ETH
Ethash
48 Mh/s · 120.0 W
|
$-0.22 |
|
MER
Meraki
48 Mh/s · 120.0 W
|
$-0.22 |
| Coin | Algorithm | 收入 | 成本 | 利润 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
CFX
⚠
Conflux
|
Octopus
44.0Mh · 90.0W
|
$0.66 | $0.22 | $0.44 |
|
RVN
Ravencoin
|
KAWPOW
22Mh · 140.0W
|
$0.12 | $0.34 | $-0.22 |
|
AE
⚠
Aeternity
|
CuckooCycle
7Hh · 140.0W
|
$0.10 | $0.34 | $-0.24 |
|
BEAM
⚠
Beam
|
BeamHashIII
22Hh · 140.0W
|
$0.09 | $0.34 | $-0.25 |
ERG
⚠
Ergo
|
Autolykos2
115Mh · 130.0W
|
$0.07 | $0.31 | $-0.24 |
|
ETC
Ethereum Classic
|
Etchash
48Mh · 120.0W
|
$0.04 | $0.29 | $-0.25 |
NEXA
⚠
Nexa
|
NexaPoW
47Mh · 85.0W
|
$0.03 | $0.20 | $-0.17 |
|
ZEC
Zcash
|
Equihash
61Hh · 115.0W
|
— | $0.28 | — |
|
BTC
Bitcoin
|
Sha256
420Mh · 70.0W
|
— | $0.17 | — |
|
—
|
CryptoNightGPU
2.3Hh · 120.0W
|
— | $0.29 | — |
|
—
|
Equihash210_9
250Hh · 140.0W
|
— | $0.34 | — |
|
—
|
Blake3
800Mh · 90.0W
|
— | $0.22 | — |
|
—
|
Memehash
2.6Mh · 140.0W
|
— | $0.34 | — |
|
—
|
zkSNARK
370.0Mh · 80.0W
|
— | $0.19 | — |
|
—
|
Skydoge
450.0Mh · 60.0W
|
— | $0.14 | — |
|
—
|
XelisHashV2
20.0Mh · 140.0W
|
— | $0.34 | — |
|
—
|
Cuckatoo31
1.2Hh · 140.0W
|
— | $0.34 | — |
FIRO
Firo
|
FiroPoW
20.5Mh · 140.0W
|
— | $0.34 | — |
|
—
|
MTP
2.6Mh · 140.0W
|
— | $0.34 | — |
|
VTC
⚠
Vertcoin
|
Verthash
850Kh · 130.0W
|
— | $0.31 | — |
|
—
|
GhostRider
1.15Kh · 120.0W
|
— | $0.29 | — |
|
—
|
EvrProgPow
22Mh · 140.0W
|
— | $0.34 | — |
|
GRIN
⚠
Grin
|
Cuckatoo32
0.45Hh · 140.0W
|
— | $0.34 | — |
|
LTZ
⚠
Litecoinz
|
Zhash
44Hh · 140.0W
|
— | $0.34 | — |
|
—
|
Ton
1.8Gh · 120.0W
|
— | $0.29 | — |
KAS
Kaspa
|
KHeavyHash
60.0Hh · 130.0W
|
— | $0.31 | — |
IRON
⚠
Iron Fish
|
FishHash
20.5Mh · 140.0W
|
— | $0.34 | — |
|
—
|
Ethash
48Mh · 120.0W
|
— | $0.29 | — |
|
EPIC
⚠
Epic Cash
|
ProgPow
21.5Mh · 140.0W
|
— | $0.34 | — |
|
—
|
Meraki
48Mh · 120.0W
|
— | $0.29 | — |
净算力市场收入历史
| 周期 | /日 | /月 |
|---|---|---|
| 收入 | $0.22 | $6.46 |
|
成本
$0.1/kWh
|
$0.22 | $6.60 |
| 利润 | $0.00 | $-0.14 |
| Rigs × Qty | Share | Rev /rig/day | Cost /rig/day | Profit /rig/day | Total profit /day |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| — | — | — | — | — | — |
Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 LHR 的回本周期
测算此设备的回本周期、电费和首年收益。
曲线穿过零点即回本。之后全是利润。
| Month | Earned (mo) | Cost burned (mo) | Cumulative earned | Cumulative cost | Net | % ROI |
|---|
按能源来源的年度排放
基于年度耗电量和常见电网的碳强度。
| 能源来源 | CO₂e / 年 |
|---|---|
| Wind | 8.55 kg |
| Nuclear | 9.33 kg |
| Hydroelectric | 18.66 kg |
| Geothermal | 29.55 kg |
| Solar | 34.99 kg |
| Biofuels | 178.85 kg |
| Gas | 381.02 kg |
| Coal | 637.63 kg |
仅为估算 — 实际排放因硬件、冷却和电网而异。
这意味着什么?
At the world-average grid intensity of about 475 g CO₂e/kWh, Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 LHR running 24/7 for a year releases about 369 kg of carbon dioxide equivalent. Here's what that looks like in everyday terms:
你在哪里接电很重要
Electricity is not one thing. A kilowatt-hour from a coal plant carries roughly 820 g of CO₂; the same kilowatt-hour from a hydro reservoir carries about 24 g. That's a 34× difference — large enough that Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 LHR's annual footprint swings from roughly 638 kg on coal-heavy grids down to about 19 kg on hydro-dominated grids. The single biggest lever a miner has on their carbon footprint is choosing where to plug in.
Regions commonly used for low-carbon crypto mining include Quebec and British Columbia (hydro-dominated, typically <50 g CO₂/kWh), Iceland and Norway (geothermal + hydro, often <30 g), Paraguay (Itaipú hydro), and parts of the US Pacific Northwest. Coal-heavy grids — Kazakhstan, Inner Mongolia, Poland, parts of Australia — sit at the opposite end, often above 700 g CO₂/kWh.
Some operators also reduce their net impact by using otherwise-wasted energy: flare gas at oil wells (burning methane that would be vented anyway), curtailed renewables (wind or solar that the grid can't absorb), or behind-the-meter hydro during off-peak hours. These arrangements can drop effective emissions below the local grid average because the energy would have been wasted or flared without the mining load.
如何减少该矿机的碳足迹
- Pick a greener ASIC. The efficiency column above matters as much as the grid: a 15 J/TH rig emits roughly half the CO₂ of a 30 J/TH rig for the same hashrate.
- Choose a low-carbon host. Data centres advertising hydro, geothermal, or nuclear power typically sit at <100 g CO₂/kWh.
- Look for stranded or curtailed energy. Flare-gas miners, wind-curtailment co-location, and off-peak hydro arrangements use energy that would otherwise be wasted.
- Use heat recovery. Capturing the heat for greenhouse agriculture, pool heating, or district warmth offsets fossil-fuel heating that would have been burned anyway.
- Time-shift your uptime. In grids with high daytime solar, running more during the day and less at night lowers your effective intensity even if you don't switch providers.
- Purchase verifiable offsets. Treat this as a last resort, not a substitute — and favour additional, permanent, third-party-verified projects (Gold Standard, Verra VCS).
常见问题
Yearly electricity use = rig power (W) × 24 × 365 ÷ 1000. We multiply that by each row's grid intensity in grams CO₂-equivalent per kWh and convert to kilograms. Intensities are representative averages — real emissions depend on your specific utility mix, time of day, and local transmission losses.
It depends almost entirely on where the electricity comes from. A single rig plugged into hydro in Quebec emits less over a year than an average family's two cars in a month. The same rig on a coal-dominated grid can exceed that in a few days. The hardware is the same — the grid is what changes the answer.
Network-wide estimates vary by methodology; the Cambridge Centre for Alternative Finance's Bitcoin Electricity Consumption Index is the most widely cited reference. As of recent reporting, the network's sustainable-energy share has grown as more hashrate migrates to hydro, wind, solar, and stranded-gas sites. This page just estimates a single rig — for the big picture, CCAF's dashboard is the best source.
Not directly. The rig draws the same wattage regardless of which pool it joins or how difficulty trends — so its electricity use, and therefore its emissions, stay constant. Those factors change revenue, not power consumption.
此 GPU 仅有 ? GB 显存 — 大多数 AI 市场要求至少 12 GB。
每日预测
每日各收入流的胜出值 — 来自该矿机的历史记录,在 $0.1/kWh 下计算的平均值
| 周期 | /日 | /月 |
|---|---|---|
| 收入 | $0.66 | $19.84 |
|
成本
$0.1/kWh
|
$0.22 | $6.60 |
| 利润 | $0.44 | $13.24 |
挖矿收益历史
| 算法 | 净收益 / 天 |
|---|---|
|
OCT
Octopus
★ 最佳
44.0 Mh/s · 90.0 W
|
$0.44 |
|
KAW
KAWPOW
22 Mh/s · 140.0 W
|
$-0.10 |
|
CUC
CuckooCycle
7 Hh/s · 140.0 W
|
$-0.12 |
|
BEA
BeamHashIII
22 Hh/s · 140.0 W
|
$-0.13 |
|
AUT
Autolykos2
115 Mh/s · 130.0 W
|
$-0.15 |
|
ETC
Etchash
48 Mh/s · 120.0 W
|
$-0.18 |
|
NEX
NexaPoW
47 Mh/s · 85.0 W
|
$-0.19 |
|
EQU
Equihash
61 Hh/s · 115.0 W
|
$-0.22 |
|
SHA
Sha256
420 Mh/s · 70.0 W
|
$-0.22 |
|
EQU
Equihash210_9
250 Hh/s · 140.0 W
|
$-0.22 |
|
BLA
Blake3
800 Mh/s · 90.0 W
|
$-0.22 |
|
XEL
XelisHashV2
20.0 Mh/s · 140.0 W
|
$-0.22 |
|
CUC
Cuckatoo31
1.2 Hh/s · 140.0 W
|
$-0.22 |
|
CUC
Cuckatoo32
0.45 Hh/s · 140.0 W
|
$-0.22 |
|
ZHA
Zhash
44 Hh/s · 140.0 W
|
$-0.22 |
|
TON
Ton
1.8 Gh/s · 120.0 W
|
$-0.22 |
|
KHE
KHeavyHash
60.0 Hh/s · 130.0 W
|
$-0.22 |
|
FIS
FishHash
20.5 Mh/s · 140.0 W
|
$-0.22 |
|
ETH
Ethash
48 Mh/s · 120.0 W
|
$-0.22 |
|
MER
Meraki
48 Mh/s · 120.0 W
|
$-0.22 |
| Coin | Algorithm | 收入 | 成本 | 利润 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
CFX
⚠
Conflux
|
Octopus
44.0Mh · 90.0W
|
$0.66 | $0.22 | $0.44 |
|
RVN
Ravencoin
|
KAWPOW
22Mh · 140.0W
|
$0.12 | $0.34 | $-0.22 |
|
AE
⚠
Aeternity
|
CuckooCycle
7Hh · 140.0W
|
$0.10 | $0.34 | $-0.24 |
|
BEAM
⚠
Beam
|
BeamHashIII
22Hh · 140.0W
|
$0.09 | $0.34 | $-0.25 |
ERG
⚠
Ergo
|
Autolykos2
115Mh · 130.0W
|
$0.07 | $0.31 | $-0.24 |
|
ETC
Ethereum Classic
|
Etchash
48Mh · 120.0W
|
$0.04 | $0.29 | $-0.25 |
NEXA
⚠
Nexa
|
NexaPoW
47Mh · 85.0W
|
$0.03 | $0.20 | $-0.17 |
|
ZEC
Zcash
|
Equihash
61Hh · 115.0W
|
— | $0.28 | — |
|
BTC
Bitcoin
|
Sha256
420Mh · 70.0W
|
— | $0.17 | — |
|
—
|
CryptoNightGPU
2.3Hh · 120.0W
|
— | $0.29 | — |
|
—
|
Equihash210_9
250Hh · 140.0W
|
— | $0.34 | — |
|
—
|
Blake3
800Mh · 90.0W
|
— | $0.22 | — |
|
—
|
Memehash
2.6Mh · 140.0W
|
— | $0.34 | — |
|
—
|
zkSNARK
370.0Mh · 80.0W
|
— | $0.19 | — |
|
—
|
Skydoge
450.0Mh · 60.0W
|
— | $0.14 | — |
|
—
|
XelisHashV2
20.0Mh · 140.0W
|
— | $0.34 | — |
|
—
|
Cuckatoo31
1.2Hh · 140.0W
|
— | $0.34 | — |
FIRO
Firo
|
FiroPoW
20.5Mh · 140.0W
|
— | $0.34 | — |
|
—
|
MTP
2.6Mh · 140.0W
|
— | $0.34 | — |
|
VTC
⚠
Vertcoin
|
Verthash
850Kh · 130.0W
|
— | $0.31 | — |
|
—
|
GhostRider
1.15Kh · 120.0W
|
— | $0.29 | — |
|
—
|
EvrProgPow
22Mh · 140.0W
|
— | $0.34 | — |
|
GRIN
⚠
Grin
|
Cuckatoo32
0.45Hh · 140.0W
|
— | $0.34 | — |
|
LTZ
⚠
Litecoinz
|
Zhash
44Hh · 140.0W
|
— | $0.34 | — |
|
—
|
Ton
1.8Gh · 120.0W
|
— | $0.29 | — |
KAS
Kaspa
|
KHeavyHash
60.0Hh · 130.0W
|
— | $0.31 | — |
IRON
⚠
Iron Fish
|
FishHash
20.5Mh · 140.0W
|
— | $0.34 | — |
|
—
|
Ethash
48Mh · 120.0W
|
— | $0.29 | — |
|
EPIC
⚠
Epic Cash
|
ProgPow
21.5Mh · 140.0W
|
— | $0.34 | — |
|
—
|
Meraki
48Mh · 120.0W
|
— | $0.29 | — |
净算力市场收入历史
| 周期 | /日 | /月 |
|---|---|---|
| 收入 | $0.22 | $6.46 |
|
成本
$0.1/kWh
|
$0.22 | $6.60 |
| 利润 | $0.00 | $-0.14 |
| Rigs × Qty | Share | Rev /rig/day | Cost /rig/day | Profit /rig/day | Total profit /day |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| — | — | — | — | — | — |
Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 LHR 的回本周期
测算此设备的回本周期、电费和首年收益。
曲线穿过零点即回本。之后全是利润。
| Month | Earned (mo) | Cost burned (mo) | Cumulative earned | Cumulative cost | Net | % ROI |
|---|
按能源来源的年度排放
基于年度耗电量和常见电网的碳强度。
| 能源来源 | CO₂e / 年 |
|---|---|
| Wind | 8.55 kg |
| Nuclear | 9.33 kg |
| Hydroelectric | 18.66 kg |
| Geothermal | 29.55 kg |
| Solar | 34.99 kg |
| Biofuels | 178.85 kg |
| Gas | 381.02 kg |
| Coal | 637.63 kg |
仅为估算 — 实际排放因硬件、冷却和电网而异。
这意味着什么?
At the world-average grid intensity of about 475 g CO₂e/kWh, Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 LHR running 24/7 for a year releases about 369 kg of carbon dioxide equivalent. Here's what that looks like in everyday terms:
你在哪里接电很重要
Electricity is not one thing. A kilowatt-hour from a coal plant carries roughly 820 g of CO₂; the same kilowatt-hour from a hydro reservoir carries about 24 g. That's a 34× difference — large enough that Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 LHR's annual footprint swings from roughly 638 kg on coal-heavy grids down to about 19 kg on hydro-dominated grids. The single biggest lever a miner has on their carbon footprint is choosing where to plug in.
Regions commonly used for low-carbon crypto mining include Quebec and British Columbia (hydro-dominated, typically <50 g CO₂/kWh), Iceland and Norway (geothermal + hydro, often <30 g), Paraguay (Itaipú hydro), and parts of the US Pacific Northwest. Coal-heavy grids — Kazakhstan, Inner Mongolia, Poland, parts of Australia — sit at the opposite end, often above 700 g CO₂/kWh.
Some operators also reduce their net impact by using otherwise-wasted energy: flare gas at oil wells (burning methane that would be vented anyway), curtailed renewables (wind or solar that the grid can't absorb), or behind-the-meter hydro during off-peak hours. These arrangements can drop effective emissions below the local grid average because the energy would have been wasted or flared without the mining load.
如何减少该矿机的碳足迹
- Pick a greener ASIC. The efficiency column above matters as much as the grid: a 15 J/TH rig emits roughly half the CO₂ of a 30 J/TH rig for the same hashrate.
- Choose a low-carbon host. Data centres advertising hydro, geothermal, or nuclear power typically sit at <100 g CO₂/kWh.
- Look for stranded or curtailed energy. Flare-gas miners, wind-curtailment co-location, and off-peak hydro arrangements use energy that would otherwise be wasted.
- Use heat recovery. Capturing the heat for greenhouse agriculture, pool heating, or district warmth offsets fossil-fuel heating that would have been burned anyway.
- Time-shift your uptime. In grids with high daytime solar, running more during the day and less at night lowers your effective intensity even if you don't switch providers.
- Purchase verifiable offsets. Treat this as a last resort, not a substitute — and favour additional, permanent, third-party-verified projects (Gold Standard, Verra VCS).
常见问题
Yearly electricity use = rig power (W) × 24 × 365 ÷ 1000. We multiply that by each row's grid intensity in grams CO₂-equivalent per kWh and convert to kilograms. Intensities are representative averages — real emissions depend on your specific utility mix, time of day, and local transmission losses.
It depends almost entirely on where the electricity comes from. A single rig plugged into hydro in Quebec emits less over a year than an average family's two cars in a month. The same rig on a coal-dominated grid can exceed that in a few days. The hardware is the same — the grid is what changes the answer.
Network-wide estimates vary by methodology; the Cambridge Centre for Alternative Finance's Bitcoin Electricity Consumption Index is the most widely cited reference. As of recent reporting, the network's sustainable-energy share has grown as more hashrate migrates to hydro, wind, solar, and stranded-gas sites. This page just estimates a single rig — for the big picture, CCAF's dashboard is the best source.
Not directly. The rig draws the same wattage regardless of which pool it joins or how difficulty trends — so its electricity use, and therefore its emissions, stay constant. Those factors change revenue, not power consumption.