LP Agent
Nvidia RTX A2000 Laptop GPU — Krypto-Mining
Nvidia RTX A2000 Laptop GPU verdient bis zu $2.77 pro Tag, am besten beim Schürfen von Lyra2REv3 bei 19.76 Mh/s. Auch verfügbar: KAWPOW-Hashpower-Verkauf ($0.02/Tag) and KI-Vermietung zu $0.00/h ($0.01/Tag). Zieht 29 W aus der Steckdose — bei $0.10/kWh, bei heutigen Preisen profitabel.
Tippen zum Wechseln · 8 Abschnitte Krypto-Mining 2/8
Tägliche Prognose
Tägliche Sieger-Streams — gemittelt aus dem aufgezeichneten Verlauf des Rigs bei $0.1/kWh
| Zeitraum | /Tag | /Monat |
|---|---|---|
| Einnahmen | $2.84 | $85.16 |
|
Kosten
$0.1/kWh
|
$0.07 | $2.10 |
| Gewinn | $2.77 | $83.06 |
Interner Konsens-Mix — abgeleitet aus externen Quellen, kein Roh-Preis eines einzelnen Marktes.
LP Agent
Cheapest cloud GPUs for AI
Compare staking yields across networks.
Live gold + precious-metal spot prices.
Vietnamese product price comparison.
Tech reviews and gadget deep-dives.
Live RSI screener across stocks and crypto.
War diese Seite hilfreich?
Danke für das Feedback!
Noch etwas, das wir wissen sollten? Das Formular ist unten geöffnet.
Mining-Auszahlungen — Verlauf
| Zeitraum | /Tag | /Monat |
|---|---|---|
| Einnahmen | $2.84 | $85.20 |
|
Kosten
$0.1/kWh
|
$0.07 | $2.10 |
| Gewinn | $2.77 | $83.10 |
Interner Konsens-Mix — abgeleitet aus externen Quellen, kein Roh-Preis eines einzelnen Marktes.
| Algorithmus | Netto / Tag |
|---|---|
|
LYR
Lyra2REv3
★ Bester
19.76 Mh/s · 29.0 W
|
$2.77 |
|
OCT
Octopus
17.46 Mh/s · 38.0 W
|
$0.11 |
|
NEO
NeoScrypt
348.15 Kh/s · 28.0 W
|
$0.03 |
|
NEX
NexaPoW
9.29 Mh/s · 28.0 W
|
$-0.01 |
|
KAW
KAWPOW
9.02 Mh/s · 38.0 W
|
$-0.03 |
|
BEA
BeamHashIII
8.45 Hh/s · 31.0 W
|
$-0.03 |
|
AUT
Autolykos2
51.79 Mh/s · 30.0 W
|
$-0.04 |
|
ZHA
Zhash
22.1 Hh/s · 30.0 W
|
$-0.06 |
|
VER
VerusHash
4.15 Mh/s · 30.0 W
|
$-0.06 |
|
ETC
Etchash
25.58 Mh/s · 36.0 W
|
$-0.06 |
|
RAN
RandomX
213.85 Hh/s · 23.0 W
|
$-0.06 |
|
CUC
CuckooCycle
1.95 Hh/s · 28.0 W
|
$-0.06 |
|
LYR
Lyra2REv2
17.65 Mh/s · 23.0 W
|
$-0.07 |
|
KHE
KHeavyHash
119.89 Mh/s · 39.0 W
|
$-0.07 |
|
LYR
Lyra2z
1.29 Mh/s · 39.0 W
|
$-0.07 |
|
NIS
NIST5
10.12 Mh/s · 23.0 W
|
$-0.07 |
|
X16
X16R
4.94 Mh/s · 23.0 W
|
$-0.07 |
|
X16
X16Rv2
3.81 Mh/s · 24.0 W
|
$-0.07 |
|
CUC
Cuckatoo31
0 Hh/s · 25.0 W
|
$-0.07 |
|
CUC
Cuckarood29
0 Hh/s · 24.0 W
|
$-0.07 |
|
BEA
BeamHashII
10.4 Hh/s · 30.0 W
|
$-0.07 |
|
ETH
Ethash
25.58 Mh/s · 36.0 W
|
$-0.07 |
|
PYR
PyrinHash
1.07 Gh/s · 20.0 W
|
$-0.07 |
|
KAR
KarlsenHashV2
352.03 Mh/s · 37.0 W
|
$-0.07 |
|
EQU
Equihash210_9
89.05 Hh/s · 29.0 W
|
$-0.07 |
|
BLA
Blake (2s)
1.81 Gh/s · 25.0 W
|
$-0.07 |
|
KEC
Keccak
286.07 Mh/s · 23.0 W
|
$-0.07 |
| Coin | Algorithm | Einnahmen | Kosten | Gewinn |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
VTC
Vertcoin
|
Lyra2REv3
19.76Mh · 29.0W
|
$2.84 | $0.07 | $2.77 |
CFX
⚠
Conflux
|
Octopus
17.46Mh · 38.0W
|
$0.18 | $0.09 | $0.09 |
|
FTC
⚠
Feathercoin
|
NeoScrypt
348.15Kh · 28.0W
|
$0.10 | $0.07 | $0.03 |
NEXA
⚠
Nexa
|
NexaPoW
9.29Mh · 28.0W
|
$0.06 | $0.07 | $-0.01 |
|
RVN
Ravencoin
|
KAWPOW
9.02Mh · 38.0W
|
$0.04 | $0.09 | $-0.05 |
|
BEAM
⚠
Beam
|
BeamHashIII
8.45Hh · 31.0W
|
$0.04 | $0.07 | $-0.03 |
ERG
⚠
Ergo
|
Autolykos2
51.79Mh · 30.0W
|
$0.03 | $0.07 | $-0.04 |
LTZ
⚠
Litecoinz
|
Zhash
22.1Hh · 30.0W
|
$0.01 | $0.07 | $-0.06 |
|
VRSC
⚠
Verus
|
VerusHash
4.15Mh · 30.0W
|
$0.01 | $0.07 | $-0.06 |
|
ETC
Ethereum Classic
|
Etchash
25.58Mh · 36.0W
|
$0.01 | $0.09 | $-0.08 |
|
XMR
Monero
|
RandomX
213.85Hh · 23.0W
|
$0.01 | $0.06 | $-0.05 |
|
AE
⚠
Aeternity
|
CuckooCycle
1.95Hh · 28.0W
|
$0.01 | $0.07 | $-0.06 |
|
MONA
Monacoin
|
Lyra2REv2
17.65Mh · 23.0W
|
— | $0.06 | — |
KAS
Kaspa
|
KHeavyHash
119.89Mh · 39.0W
|
— | $0.09 | — |
|
—
|
Keccak-C
286.7Mh · 39.0W
|
— | $0.09 | — |
ACM
⚠
Actinium
|
Lyra2z
1.29Mh · 39.0W
|
— | $0.09 | — |
|
—
|
NIST5
10.12Mh · 23.0W
|
— | $0.06 | — |
|
—
|
PHI1612
10.74Mh · 37.0W
|
— | $0.09 | — |
|
—
|
ProgPowSERO
8.85Mh · 38.0W
|
— | $0.09 | — |
|
—
|
ProgPowZ
8.65Mh · 38.0W
|
— | $0.09 | — |
|
—
|
Skein2
180.31Mh · 24.0W
|
— | $0.06 | — |
|
—
|
Skunkhash
15.3Mh · 36.0W
|
— | $0.09 | — |
|
—
|
SonoA
613.04Kh · 23.0W
|
— | $0.06 | — |
|
—
|
TimeTravel10
8.42Mh · 39.0W
|
— | $0.09 | — |
|
—
|
Tribus
29.21Mh · 36.0W
|
— | $0.09 | — |
|
—
|
Ubqhash
26.61Mh · 38.0W
|
— | $0.09 | — |
|
—
|
X15
3.12Mh · 22.0W
|
— | $0.05 | — |
|
—
|
X16R
4.94Mh · 23.0W
|
— | $0.06 | — |
|
—
|
X16RT
4.03Mh · 23.0W
|
— | $0.06 | — |
|
—
|
X16Rv2
3.81Mh · 24.0W
|
— | $0.06 | — |
|
—
|
X16S
4.03Mh · 24.0W
|
— | $0.06 | — |
|
—
|
X17
4.01Mh · 23.0W
|
— | $0.06 | — |
|
—
|
Xevan
1.67Mh · 23.0W
|
— | $0.06 | — |
|
—
|
Cuckatoo31
0Hh · 25.0W
|
— | $0.06 | — |
|
—
|
vProgPow
4.27Mh · 38.0W
|
— | $0.09 | — |
|
—
|
X21S
2.91Mh · 23.0W
|
— | $0.06 | — |
|
—
|
Cuckarood29
0Hh · 24.0W
|
— | $0.06 | — |
|
—
|
HeavyHash
108.99Mh · 24.0W
|
— | $0.06 | — |
|
—
|
Chukwa
50.84Kh · 38.0W
|
— | $0.09 | — |
|
—
|
Curvehash
2.28Mh · 28.0W
|
— | $0.07 | — |
FIRO
Firo
|
FiroPoW
9.04Mh · 38.0W
|
— | $0.09 | — |
|
—
|
Radiant
169.48Mh · 39.0W
|
— | $0.09 | — |
|
—
|
SHA256DT
451.66Mh · 39.0W
|
— | $0.09 | — |
|
—
|
GhostRider
557.7Hh · 23.0W
|
— | $0.06 | — |
|
—
|
Equihash(96,5)
1.78Kh · 39.0W
|
— | $0.09 | — |
|
—
|
Equihash(150,5)
9.1Hh · 32.0W
|
— | $0.08 | — |
|
—
|
BeamHashII
10.4Hh · 30.0W
|
— | $0.07 | — |
|
—
|
Globalhash
13.14Mh · 39.0W
|
— | $0.09 | — |
|
—
|
Jeonghash
3.7Mh · 25.0W
|
— | $0.06 | — |
|
—
|
Lyra2vc0ban
17.99Mh · 24.0W
|
— | $0.06 | — |
|
—
|
X18
0.68Mh · 39.0W
|
— | $0.09 | — |
|
—
|
Memehash
13.69Mh · 24.0W
|
— | $0.06 | — |
|
—
|
Ethash
25.58Mh · 36.0W
|
— | $0.09 | — |
|
—
|
PyrinHash
1.07Gh · 20.0W
|
— | $0.05 | — |
|
—
|
KarlsenHashV2
352.03Mh · 37.0W
|
— | $0.09 | — |
|
—
|
Equihash210_9
89.05Hh · 29.0W
|
— | $0.07 | — |
|
—
|
Blake (2s)
1.81Gh · 25.0W
|
— | $0.06 | — |
|
—
|
Argon2d4096
19.4Kh · 34.0W
|
— | $0.08 | — |
|
—
|
BCD
4.51Mh · 23.0W
|
— | $0.06 | — |
|
—
|
C11
5.68Mh · 23.0W
|
— | $0.06 | — |
|
—
|
CNReverseWaltz
0.74Kh · 26.0W
|
— | $0.06 | — |
|
—
|
Chukwa2
18.01Kh · 38.0W
|
— | $0.09 | — |
|
—
|
Equihash(125,4)
13Hh · 28.0W
|
— | $0.07 | — |
|
—
|
Equihash(144,5)
18.85Hh · 30.0W
|
— | $0.07 | — |
|
—
|
Equihash(192,7)
11.05Hh · 37.0W
|
— | $0.09 | — |
|
—
|
Equihash(210,9)
89.05Hh · 29.0W
|
— | $0.07 | — |
|
—
|
HMQ1725
2.37Mh · 25.0W
|
— | $0.06 | — |
|
—
|
HoneyComb
170.36Kh · 39.0W
|
— | $0.09 | — |
|
—
|
Keccak
286.07Mh · 23.0W
|
— | $0.06 | — |
| Pool | Unterstützte Algos | Gebühr | |
|---|---|---|---|
|
|
CuckooCycle (AE) · BeamHashIII (BEAM) · Autolykos2 (ERG) | 1.0% | Visit → |
|
★
AntPool
|
Etchash (ETC) · KHeavyHash (KAS) · KAWPOW (RVN) | 1.0% | Visit → |
|
C
Cedric Crispin Pools
|
BeamHashIII (BEAM) · FiroPoW (FIRO) · KHeavyHash (KAS) | — | Visit → |
|
G
grandpool.io
|
NexaPoW (NEXA) | — | Visit → |
|
H
hashbay.io
|
KHeavyHash (KAS) | — | Visit → |
HeroMiners
|
BeamHashIII (BEAM) · Autolykos2 (ERG) · Etchash (ETC) | 0.9% | Visit → |
K1Pool
|
Autolykos2 (ERG) · Etchash (ETC) · KHeavyHash (KAS) | 1.0% | Visit → |
|
M
Molepool
|
Etchash (ETC) · KAWPOW (RVN) | — | Visit → |
|
N
Nanopool
|
Octopus (CFX) · KAWPOW (RVN) · RandomX (XMR) | — | Visit → |
pool.kryptex.com
|
Octopus (CFX) · Autolykos2 (ERG) · Etchash (ETC) | — | Visit → |
Rplant
|
FiroPoW (FIRO) · NexaPoW (NEXA) · RandomX (XMR) | 1.0% | Visit → |
|
S
Solopool
|
Etchash (ETC) · KHeavyHash (KAS) · KAWPOW (RVN) | — | Visit → |
SupportXMR
|
RandomX (XMR) | 0.6% | Visit → |
|
S
Suprnova
|
KAWPOW (RVN) · Lyra2REv3 (VTC) · RandomX (XMR) | — | Visit → |
|
W
WoolyPooly
|
CuckooCycle (AE) · Octopus (CFX) · Autolykos2 (ERG) | — | Visit → |
Verlauf der Netto-Mieteinnahmen
| Zeitraum | /Tag | /Monat |
|---|---|---|
| Einnahmen | $0.08 | $2.40 |
|
Kosten
$0.1/kWh
|
$0.07 | $2.10 |
| Gewinn | $0.01 | $0.30 |
Interner Konsens-Mix — abgeleitet aus externen Quellen, kein Roh-Preis eines einzelnen Marktes.
| Anbieter | GPU | Einnahmen | Kosten | Gewinn |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Clore Ai
GPU-Marktplatz
|
RTX A2000 Laptop GPU
$0.004/h ·
1 Angebot
|
$0.08
17.0 CLORE/day
1 CLORE ≈ $0.00494
|
$0.07 |
$0.01
★
Besuchen →
|
Einnahmenfluss So verdient Nvidia RTX A2000 Laptop GPU auf dem KI-GPU-Marktplatz how we got $0.01/day · ▾
Hashmarket-Auszahlungen — Verlauf
| Zeitraum | /Tag | /Monat |
|---|---|---|
| Einnahmen | $0.09 | $2.57 |
|
Kosten
$0.1/kWh
|
$0.07 | $2.10 |
| Gewinn | $0.02 | $0.47 |
Interner Konsens-Mix — abgeleitet aus externen Quellen, kein Roh-Preis eines einzelnen Marktes.
| Markt | Bestes Netto / Tag | |
|---|---|---|
|
|
$-0.01 | Besuchen → |
MRR
|
$0.14 | Besuchen → |
MRR
· KAWPOW
· $0.14/day
Besuchen on MRR →
Besuchen on MRR →
MRR
Besuchen on MRR →
| Rigs × Qty | Share | Rev /rig/day | Cost /rig/day | Profit /rig/day | Total profit /day |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| — | — | — | — | — | — |
Amortisation für Nvidia RTX A2000 Laptop GPU
Modelliere Amortisation, Stromkosten und Erstjahresrendite für dieses Gerät.
Hardware-Kosten amortisiert, wenn die Linie 0 kreuzt. Danach reiner Gewinn.
| Month | Earned (mo) | Cost burned (mo) | Cumulative earned | Cumulative cost | Net | % ROI |
|---|
Jährliche Emissionen pro Energiequelle
Basierend auf dem jährlichen Stromverbrauch und der CO₂-Intensität verschiedener Stromnetze.
| Energiequelle | CO₂e / Jahr |
|---|---|
| Wind | 2.76 kg |
| Nuclear | 3.01 kg |
| Hydroelectric | 6.01 kg |
| Geothermal | 9.52 kg |
| Solar | 11.28 kg |
| Biofuels | 57.63 kg |
| Gas | 122.77 kg |
| Coal | 205.46 kg |
Nur Schätzungen — tatsächliche Emissionen variieren.
Was bedeutet das konkret?
At the world-average grid intensity of about 475 g CO₂e/kWh, Nvidia RTX A2000 Laptop GPU running 24/7 for a year releases about 119 kg of carbon dioxide equivalent. Here's what that looks like in everyday terms:
Wo du einsteckst, zählt
Electricity is not one thing. A kilowatt-hour from a coal plant carries roughly 820 g of CO₂; the same kilowatt-hour from a hydro reservoir carries about 24 g. That's a 34× difference — large enough that Nvidia RTX A2000 Laptop GPU's annual footprint swings from roughly 205 kg on coal-heavy grids down to about 6 kg on hydro-dominated grids. The single biggest lever a miner has on their carbon footprint is choosing where to plug in.
Regions commonly used for low-carbon crypto mining include Quebec and British Columbia (hydro-dominated, typically <50 g CO₂/kWh), Iceland and Norway (geothermal + hydro, often <30 g), Paraguay (Itaipú hydro), and parts of the US Pacific Northwest. Coal-heavy grids — Kazakhstan, Inner Mongolia, Poland, parts of Australia — sit at the opposite end, often above 700 g CO₂/kWh.
Some operators also reduce their net impact by using otherwise-wasted energy: flare gas at oil wells (burning methane that would be vented anyway), curtailed renewables (wind or solar that the grid can't absorb), or behind-the-meter hydro during off-peak hours. These arrangements can drop effective emissions below the local grid average because the energy would have been wasted or flared without the mining load.
So reduzierst du den Fußabdruck dieses Rigs
- Pick a greener ASIC. The efficiency column above matters as much as the grid: a 15 J/TH rig emits roughly half the CO₂ of a 30 J/TH rig for the same hashrate.
- Choose a low-carbon host. Data centres advertising hydro, geothermal, or nuclear power typically sit at <100 g CO₂/kWh.
- Look for stranded or curtailed energy. Flare-gas miners, wind-curtailment co-location, and off-peak hydro arrangements use energy that would otherwise be wasted.
- Use heat recovery. Capturing the heat for greenhouse agriculture, pool heating, or district warmth offsets fossil-fuel heating that would have been burned anyway.
- Time-shift your uptime. In grids with high daytime solar, running more during the day and less at night lowers your effective intensity even if you don't switch providers.
- Purchase verifiable offsets. Treat this as a last resort, not a substitute — and favour additional, permanent, third-party-verified projects (Gold Standard, Verra VCS).
Häufig gestellte Fragen
Yearly electricity use = rig power (W) × 24 × 365 ÷ 1000. We multiply that by each row's grid intensity in grams CO₂-equivalent per kWh and convert to kilograms. Intensities are representative averages — real emissions depend on your specific utility mix, time of day, and local transmission losses.
It depends almost entirely on where the electricity comes from. A single rig plugged into hydro in Quebec emits less over a year than an average family's two cars in a month. The same rig on a coal-dominated grid can exceed that in a few days. The hardware is the same — the grid is what changes the answer.
Network-wide estimates vary by methodology; the Cambridge Centre for Alternative Finance's Bitcoin Electricity Consumption Index is the most widely cited reference. As of recent reporting, the network's sustainable-energy share has grown as more hashrate migrates to hydro, wind, solar, and stranded-gas sites. This page just estimates a single rig — for the big picture, CCAF's dashboard is the best source.
Not directly. The rig draws the same wattage regardless of which pool it joins or how difficulty trends — so its electricity use, and therefore its emissions, stay constant. Those factors change revenue, not power consumption.
Tippen zum Wechseln · 8 Abschnitte Krypto-Mining 2/8
Tägliche Prognose
Tägliche Sieger-Streams — gemittelt aus dem aufgezeichneten Verlauf des Rigs bei $0.1/kWh
| Zeitraum | /Tag | /Monat |
|---|---|---|
| Einnahmen | $2.84 | $85.16 |
|
Kosten
$0.1/kWh
|
$0.07 | $2.10 |
| Gewinn | $2.77 | $83.06 |
Interner Konsens-Mix — abgeleitet aus externen Quellen, kein Roh-Preis eines einzelnen Marktes.
Mining-Auszahlungen — Verlauf
| Zeitraum | /Tag | /Monat |
|---|---|---|
| Einnahmen | $2.84 | $85.20 |
|
Kosten
$0.1/kWh
|
$0.07 | $2.10 |
| Gewinn | $2.77 | $83.10 |
Interner Konsens-Mix — abgeleitet aus externen Quellen, kein Roh-Preis eines einzelnen Marktes.
| Algorithmus | Netto / Tag |
|---|---|
|
LYR
Lyra2REv3
★ Bester
19.76 Mh/s · 29.0 W
|
$2.77 |
|
OCT
Octopus
17.46 Mh/s · 38.0 W
|
$0.11 |
|
NEO
NeoScrypt
348.15 Kh/s · 28.0 W
|
$0.03 |
|
NEX
NexaPoW
9.29 Mh/s · 28.0 W
|
$-0.01 |
|
KAW
KAWPOW
9.02 Mh/s · 38.0 W
|
$-0.03 |
|
BEA
BeamHashIII
8.45 Hh/s · 31.0 W
|
$-0.03 |
|
AUT
Autolykos2
51.79 Mh/s · 30.0 W
|
$-0.04 |
|
ZHA
Zhash
22.1 Hh/s · 30.0 W
|
$-0.06 |
|
VER
VerusHash
4.15 Mh/s · 30.0 W
|
$-0.06 |
|
ETC
Etchash
25.58 Mh/s · 36.0 W
|
$-0.06 |
|
RAN
RandomX
213.85 Hh/s · 23.0 W
|
$-0.06 |
|
CUC
CuckooCycle
1.95 Hh/s · 28.0 W
|
$-0.06 |
|
LYR
Lyra2REv2
17.65 Mh/s · 23.0 W
|
$-0.07 |
|
KHE
KHeavyHash
119.89 Mh/s · 39.0 W
|
$-0.07 |
|
LYR
Lyra2z
1.29 Mh/s · 39.0 W
|
$-0.07 |
|
NIS
NIST5
10.12 Mh/s · 23.0 W
|
$-0.07 |
|
X16
X16R
4.94 Mh/s · 23.0 W
|
$-0.07 |
|
X16
X16Rv2
3.81 Mh/s · 24.0 W
|
$-0.07 |
|
CUC
Cuckatoo31
0 Hh/s · 25.0 W
|
$-0.07 |
|
CUC
Cuckarood29
0 Hh/s · 24.0 W
|
$-0.07 |
|
BEA
BeamHashII
10.4 Hh/s · 30.0 W
|
$-0.07 |
|
ETH
Ethash
25.58 Mh/s · 36.0 W
|
$-0.07 |
|
PYR
PyrinHash
1.07 Gh/s · 20.0 W
|
$-0.07 |
|
KAR
KarlsenHashV2
352.03 Mh/s · 37.0 W
|
$-0.07 |
|
EQU
Equihash210_9
89.05 Hh/s · 29.0 W
|
$-0.07 |
|
BLA
Blake (2s)
1.81 Gh/s · 25.0 W
|
$-0.07 |
|
KEC
Keccak
286.07 Mh/s · 23.0 W
|
$-0.07 |
| Coin | Algorithm | Einnahmen | Kosten | Gewinn |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
VTC
Vertcoin
|
Lyra2REv3
19.76Mh · 29.0W
|
$2.84 | $0.07 | $2.77 |
CFX
⚠
Conflux
|
Octopus
17.46Mh · 38.0W
|
$0.18 | $0.09 | $0.09 |
|
FTC
⚠
Feathercoin
|
NeoScrypt
348.15Kh · 28.0W
|
$0.10 | $0.07 | $0.03 |
NEXA
⚠
Nexa
|
NexaPoW
9.29Mh · 28.0W
|
$0.06 | $0.07 | $-0.01 |
|
RVN
Ravencoin
|
KAWPOW
9.02Mh · 38.0W
|
$0.04 | $0.09 | $-0.05 |
|
BEAM
⚠
Beam
|
BeamHashIII
8.45Hh · 31.0W
|
$0.04 | $0.07 | $-0.03 |
ERG
⚠
Ergo
|
Autolykos2
51.79Mh · 30.0W
|
$0.03 | $0.07 | $-0.04 |
LTZ
⚠
Litecoinz
|
Zhash
22.1Hh · 30.0W
|
$0.01 | $0.07 | $-0.06 |
|
VRSC
⚠
Verus
|
VerusHash
4.15Mh · 30.0W
|
$0.01 | $0.07 | $-0.06 |
|
ETC
Ethereum Classic
|
Etchash
25.58Mh · 36.0W
|
$0.01 | $0.09 | $-0.08 |
|
XMR
Monero
|
RandomX
213.85Hh · 23.0W
|
$0.01 | $0.06 | $-0.05 |
|
AE
⚠
Aeternity
|
CuckooCycle
1.95Hh · 28.0W
|
$0.01 | $0.07 | $-0.06 |
|
MONA
Monacoin
|
Lyra2REv2
17.65Mh · 23.0W
|
— | $0.06 | — |
KAS
Kaspa
|
KHeavyHash
119.89Mh · 39.0W
|
— | $0.09 | — |
|
—
|
Keccak-C
286.7Mh · 39.0W
|
— | $0.09 | — |
ACM
⚠
Actinium
|
Lyra2z
1.29Mh · 39.0W
|
— | $0.09 | — |
|
—
|
NIST5
10.12Mh · 23.0W
|
— | $0.06 | — |
|
—
|
PHI1612
10.74Mh · 37.0W
|
— | $0.09 | — |
|
—
|
ProgPowSERO
8.85Mh · 38.0W
|
— | $0.09 | — |
|
—
|
ProgPowZ
8.65Mh · 38.0W
|
— | $0.09 | — |
|
—
|
Skein2
180.31Mh · 24.0W
|
— | $0.06 | — |
|
—
|
Skunkhash
15.3Mh · 36.0W
|
— | $0.09 | — |
|
—
|
SonoA
613.04Kh · 23.0W
|
— | $0.06 | — |
|
—
|
TimeTravel10
8.42Mh · 39.0W
|
— | $0.09 | — |
|
—
|
Tribus
29.21Mh · 36.0W
|
— | $0.09 | — |
|
—
|
Ubqhash
26.61Mh · 38.0W
|
— | $0.09 | — |
|
—
|
X15
3.12Mh · 22.0W
|
— | $0.05 | — |
|
—
|
X16R
4.94Mh · 23.0W
|
— | $0.06 | — |
|
—
|
X16RT
4.03Mh · 23.0W
|
— | $0.06 | — |
|
—
|
X16Rv2
3.81Mh · 24.0W
|
— | $0.06 | — |
|
—
|
X16S
4.03Mh · 24.0W
|
— | $0.06 | — |
|
—
|
X17
4.01Mh · 23.0W
|
— | $0.06 | — |
|
—
|
Xevan
1.67Mh · 23.0W
|
— | $0.06 | — |
|
—
|
Cuckatoo31
0Hh · 25.0W
|
— | $0.06 | — |
|
—
|
vProgPow
4.27Mh · 38.0W
|
— | $0.09 | — |
|
—
|
X21S
2.91Mh · 23.0W
|
— | $0.06 | — |
|
—
|
Cuckarood29
0Hh · 24.0W
|
— | $0.06 | — |
|
—
|
HeavyHash
108.99Mh · 24.0W
|
— | $0.06 | — |
|
—
|
Chukwa
50.84Kh · 38.0W
|
— | $0.09 | — |
|
—
|
Curvehash
2.28Mh · 28.0W
|
— | $0.07 | — |
FIRO
Firo
|
FiroPoW
9.04Mh · 38.0W
|
— | $0.09 | — |
|
—
|
Radiant
169.48Mh · 39.0W
|
— | $0.09 | — |
|
—
|
SHA256DT
451.66Mh · 39.0W
|
— | $0.09 | — |
|
—
|
GhostRider
557.7Hh · 23.0W
|
— | $0.06 | — |
|
—
|
Equihash(96,5)
1.78Kh · 39.0W
|
— | $0.09 | — |
|
—
|
Equihash(150,5)
9.1Hh · 32.0W
|
— | $0.08 | — |
|
—
|
BeamHashII
10.4Hh · 30.0W
|
— | $0.07 | — |
|
—
|
Globalhash
13.14Mh · 39.0W
|
— | $0.09 | — |
|
—
|
Jeonghash
3.7Mh · 25.0W
|
— | $0.06 | — |
|
—
|
Lyra2vc0ban
17.99Mh · 24.0W
|
— | $0.06 | — |
|
—
|
X18
0.68Mh · 39.0W
|
— | $0.09 | — |
|
—
|
Memehash
13.69Mh · 24.0W
|
— | $0.06 | — |
|
—
|
Ethash
25.58Mh · 36.0W
|
— | $0.09 | — |
|
—
|
PyrinHash
1.07Gh · 20.0W
|
— | $0.05 | — |
|
—
|
KarlsenHashV2
352.03Mh · 37.0W
|
— | $0.09 | — |
|
—
|
Equihash210_9
89.05Hh · 29.0W
|
— | $0.07 | — |
|
—
|
Blake (2s)
1.81Gh · 25.0W
|
— | $0.06 | — |
|
—
|
Argon2d4096
19.4Kh · 34.0W
|
— | $0.08 | — |
|
—
|
BCD
4.51Mh · 23.0W
|
— | $0.06 | — |
|
—
|
C11
5.68Mh · 23.0W
|
— | $0.06 | — |
|
—
|
CNReverseWaltz
0.74Kh · 26.0W
|
— | $0.06 | — |
|
—
|
Chukwa2
18.01Kh · 38.0W
|
— | $0.09 | — |
|
—
|
Equihash(125,4)
13Hh · 28.0W
|
— | $0.07 | — |
|
—
|
Equihash(144,5)
18.85Hh · 30.0W
|
— | $0.07 | — |
|
—
|
Equihash(192,7)
11.05Hh · 37.0W
|
— | $0.09 | — |
|
—
|
Equihash(210,9)
89.05Hh · 29.0W
|
— | $0.07 | — |
|
—
|
HMQ1725
2.37Mh · 25.0W
|
— | $0.06 | — |
|
—
|
HoneyComb
170.36Kh · 39.0W
|
— | $0.09 | — |
|
—
|
Keccak
286.07Mh · 23.0W
|
— | $0.06 | — |
| Pool | Unterstützte Algos | Gebühr | |
|---|---|---|---|
|
|
CuckooCycle (AE) · BeamHashIII (BEAM) · Autolykos2 (ERG) | 1.0% | Visit → |
|
★
AntPool
|
Etchash (ETC) · KHeavyHash (KAS) · KAWPOW (RVN) | 1.0% | Visit → |
|
C
Cedric Crispin Pools
|
BeamHashIII (BEAM) · FiroPoW (FIRO) · KHeavyHash (KAS) | — | Visit → |
|
G
grandpool.io
|
NexaPoW (NEXA) | — | Visit → |
|
H
hashbay.io
|
KHeavyHash (KAS) | — | Visit → |
HeroMiners
|
BeamHashIII (BEAM) · Autolykos2 (ERG) · Etchash (ETC) | 0.9% | Visit → |
K1Pool
|
Autolykos2 (ERG) · Etchash (ETC) · KHeavyHash (KAS) | 1.0% | Visit → |
|
M
Molepool
|
Etchash (ETC) · KAWPOW (RVN) | — | Visit → |
|
N
Nanopool
|
Octopus (CFX) · KAWPOW (RVN) · RandomX (XMR) | — | Visit → |
pool.kryptex.com
|
Octopus (CFX) · Autolykos2 (ERG) · Etchash (ETC) | — | Visit → |
Rplant
|
FiroPoW (FIRO) · NexaPoW (NEXA) · RandomX (XMR) | 1.0% | Visit → |
|
S
Solopool
|
Etchash (ETC) · KHeavyHash (KAS) · KAWPOW (RVN) | — | Visit → |
SupportXMR
|
RandomX (XMR) | 0.6% | Visit → |
|
S
Suprnova
|
KAWPOW (RVN) · Lyra2REv3 (VTC) · RandomX (XMR) | — | Visit → |
|
W
WoolyPooly
|
CuckooCycle (AE) · Octopus (CFX) · Autolykos2 (ERG) | — | Visit → |
Verlauf der Netto-Mieteinnahmen
| Zeitraum | /Tag | /Monat |
|---|---|---|
| Einnahmen | $0.08 | $2.40 |
|
Kosten
$0.1/kWh
|
$0.07 | $2.10 |
| Gewinn | $0.01 | $0.30 |
Interner Konsens-Mix — abgeleitet aus externen Quellen, kein Roh-Preis eines einzelnen Marktes.
| Anbieter | GPU | Einnahmen | Kosten | Gewinn |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Clore Ai
GPU-Marktplatz
|
RTX A2000 Laptop GPU
$0.004/h ·
1 Angebot
|
$0.08
17.0 CLORE/day
1 CLORE ≈ $0.00494
|
$0.07 |
$0.01
★
Besuchen →
|
Einnahmenfluss So verdient Nvidia RTX A2000 Laptop GPU auf dem KI-GPU-Marktplatz how we got $0.01/day · ▾
Hashmarket-Auszahlungen — Verlauf
| Zeitraum | /Tag | /Monat |
|---|---|---|
| Einnahmen | $0.09 | $2.57 |
|
Kosten
$0.1/kWh
|
$0.07 | $2.10 |
| Gewinn | $0.02 | $0.47 |
Interner Konsens-Mix — abgeleitet aus externen Quellen, kein Roh-Preis eines einzelnen Marktes.
| Markt | Bestes Netto / Tag | |
|---|---|---|
|
|
$-0.01 | Besuchen → |
MRR
|
$0.14 | Besuchen → |
MRR
· KAWPOW
· $0.14/day
Besuchen on MRR →
Besuchen on MRR →
MRR
Besuchen on MRR →
| Rigs × Qty | Share | Rev /rig/day | Cost /rig/day | Profit /rig/day | Total profit /day |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| — | — | — | — | — | — |
Amortisation für Nvidia RTX A2000 Laptop GPU
Modelliere Amortisation, Stromkosten und Erstjahresrendite für dieses Gerät.
Hardware-Kosten amortisiert, wenn die Linie 0 kreuzt. Danach reiner Gewinn.
| Month | Earned (mo) | Cost burned (mo) | Cumulative earned | Cumulative cost | Net | % ROI |
|---|
Jährliche Emissionen pro Energiequelle
Basierend auf dem jährlichen Stromverbrauch und der CO₂-Intensität verschiedener Stromnetze.
| Energiequelle | CO₂e / Jahr |
|---|---|
| Wind | 2.76 kg |
| Nuclear | 3.01 kg |
| Hydroelectric | 6.01 kg |
| Geothermal | 9.52 kg |
| Solar | 11.28 kg |
| Biofuels | 57.63 kg |
| Gas | 122.77 kg |
| Coal | 205.46 kg |
Nur Schätzungen — tatsächliche Emissionen variieren.
Was bedeutet das konkret?
At the world-average grid intensity of about 475 g CO₂e/kWh, Nvidia RTX A2000 Laptop GPU running 24/7 for a year releases about 119 kg of carbon dioxide equivalent. Here's what that looks like in everyday terms:
Wo du einsteckst, zählt
Electricity is not one thing. A kilowatt-hour from a coal plant carries roughly 820 g of CO₂; the same kilowatt-hour from a hydro reservoir carries about 24 g. That's a 34× difference — large enough that Nvidia RTX A2000 Laptop GPU's annual footprint swings from roughly 205 kg on coal-heavy grids down to about 6 kg on hydro-dominated grids. The single biggest lever a miner has on their carbon footprint is choosing where to plug in.
Regions commonly used for low-carbon crypto mining include Quebec and British Columbia (hydro-dominated, typically <50 g CO₂/kWh), Iceland and Norway (geothermal + hydro, often <30 g), Paraguay (Itaipú hydro), and parts of the US Pacific Northwest. Coal-heavy grids — Kazakhstan, Inner Mongolia, Poland, parts of Australia — sit at the opposite end, often above 700 g CO₂/kWh.
Some operators also reduce their net impact by using otherwise-wasted energy: flare gas at oil wells (burning methane that would be vented anyway), curtailed renewables (wind or solar that the grid can't absorb), or behind-the-meter hydro during off-peak hours. These arrangements can drop effective emissions below the local grid average because the energy would have been wasted or flared without the mining load.
So reduzierst du den Fußabdruck dieses Rigs
- Pick a greener ASIC. The efficiency column above matters as much as the grid: a 15 J/TH rig emits roughly half the CO₂ of a 30 J/TH rig for the same hashrate.
- Choose a low-carbon host. Data centres advertising hydro, geothermal, or nuclear power typically sit at <100 g CO₂/kWh.
- Look for stranded or curtailed energy. Flare-gas miners, wind-curtailment co-location, and off-peak hydro arrangements use energy that would otherwise be wasted.
- Use heat recovery. Capturing the heat for greenhouse agriculture, pool heating, or district warmth offsets fossil-fuel heating that would have been burned anyway.
- Time-shift your uptime. In grids with high daytime solar, running more during the day and less at night lowers your effective intensity even if you don't switch providers.
- Purchase verifiable offsets. Treat this as a last resort, not a substitute — and favour additional, permanent, third-party-verified projects (Gold Standard, Verra VCS).
Häufig gestellte Fragen
Yearly electricity use = rig power (W) × 24 × 365 ÷ 1000. We multiply that by each row's grid intensity in grams CO₂-equivalent per kWh and convert to kilograms. Intensities are representative averages — real emissions depend on your specific utility mix, time of day, and local transmission losses.
It depends almost entirely on where the electricity comes from. A single rig plugged into hydro in Quebec emits less over a year than an average family's two cars in a month. The same rig on a coal-dominated grid can exceed that in a few days. The hardware is the same — the grid is what changes the answer.
Network-wide estimates vary by methodology; the Cambridge Centre for Alternative Finance's Bitcoin Electricity Consumption Index is the most widely cited reference. As of recent reporting, the network's sustainable-energy share has grown as more hashrate migrates to hydro, wind, solar, and stranded-gas sites. This page just estimates a single rig — for the big picture, CCAF's dashboard is the best source.
Not directly. The rig draws the same wattage regardless of which pool it joins or how difficulty trends — so its electricity use, and therefore its emissions, stay constant. Those factors change revenue, not power consumption.