LP Agent
Nvidia RTX A2000 Laptop GPU — Minería cripto
Nvidia RTX A2000 Laptop GPU genera hasta $2.96 al día, mejor minando Lyra2REv3 a 19.76 Mh/s. También disponible: venta de hashpower KAWPOW ($0.02/día) and alquiler de IA a $0.00/h ($0.01/día). Consume 29 W de la red — a $0.10/kWh, rentable a los precios actuales.
Toca para cambiar · 8 secciones Minería cripto 2/8
Proyección diaria
Ganadores diarios entre todos los streams — promediados del historial registrado del rig a $0.1/kWh
| Período | /Día | /Mes |
|---|---|---|
| Ingresos | $2.98 | $89.33 |
|
Costo
$0.1/kWh
|
$0.07 | $2.10 |
| Ganancia | $2.91 | $87.23 |
Mezcla de consenso interno — derivada de fuentes externas, no una cotización directa de un solo mercado.
LP Agent
Cheapest cloud GPUs for AI
Compare staking yields across networks.
Live gold + precious-metal spot prices.
Vietnamese product price comparison.
Tech reviews and gadget deep-dives.
Live RSI screener across stocks and crypto.
¿Te resultó útil esta página?
¡Gracias por los comentarios!
¿Algo más que debamos saber? El formulario está abajo.
Historial de pagos de minería
| Período | /Día | /Mes |
|---|---|---|
| Ingresos | $2.98 | $89.40 |
|
Costo
$0.1/kWh
|
$0.07 | $2.10 |
| Ganancia | $2.91 | $87.30 |
Mezcla de consenso interno — derivada de fuentes externas, no una cotización directa de un solo mercado.
| Algoritmo | Neto / día |
|---|---|
|
LYR
Lyra2REv3
★ Mejor
19.76 Mh/s · 29.0 W
|
$2.91 |
|
NEO
NeoScrypt
348.15 Kh/s · 28.0 W
|
$0.01 |
|
OCT
Octopus
17.46 Mh/s · 38.0 W
|
$0.00 |
|
NEX
NexaPoW
9.29 Mh/s · 28.0 W
|
$-0.01 |
|
BEA
BeamHashIII
8.45 Hh/s · 31.0 W
|
$-0.03 |
|
KAW
KAWPOW
9.02 Mh/s · 38.0 W
|
$-0.03 |
|
AUT
Autolykos2
51.79 Mh/s · 30.0 W
|
$-0.04 |
|
VER
VerusHash
4.15 Mh/s · 30.0 W
|
$-0.05 |
|
ETC
Etchash
25.58 Mh/s · 36.0 W
|
$-0.06 |
|
ZHA
Zhash
22.1 Hh/s · 30.0 W
|
$-0.06 |
|
RAN
RandomX
213.85 Hh/s · 23.0 W
|
$-0.06 |
|
CUC
CuckooCycle
1.95 Hh/s · 28.0 W
|
$-0.06 |
|
LYR
Lyra2REv2
17.65 Mh/s · 23.0 W
|
$-0.07 |
|
KHE
KHeavyHash
119.89 Mh/s · 39.0 W
|
$-0.07 |
|
LYR
Lyra2z
1.29 Mh/s · 39.0 W
|
$-0.07 |
|
NIS
NIST5
10.12 Mh/s · 23.0 W
|
$-0.07 |
|
X16
X16R
4.94 Mh/s · 23.0 W
|
$-0.07 |
|
X16
X16Rv2
3.81 Mh/s · 24.0 W
|
$-0.07 |
|
CUC
Cuckatoo31
0 Hh/s · 25.0 W
|
$-0.07 |
|
CUC
Cuckarood29
0 Hh/s · 24.0 W
|
$-0.07 |
|
BEA
BeamHashII
10.4 Hh/s · 30.0 W
|
$-0.07 |
|
ETH
Ethash
25.58 Mh/s · 36.0 W
|
$-0.07 |
|
PYR
PyrinHash
1.07 Gh/s · 20.0 W
|
$-0.07 |
|
KAR
KarlsenHashV2
352.03 Mh/s · 37.0 W
|
$-0.07 |
|
EQU
Equihash210_9
89.05 Hh/s · 29.0 W
|
$-0.07 |
|
BLA
Blake (2s)
1.81 Gh/s · 25.0 W
|
$-0.07 |
|
KEC
Keccak
286.07 Mh/s · 23.0 W
|
$-0.07 |
| Coin | Algorithm | Ingresos | Costo | Ganancia |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
VTC
Vertcoin
|
Lyra2REv3
19.76Mh · 29.0W
|
$2.98 | $0.07 | $2.91 |
|
FTC
⚠
Feathercoin
|
NeoScrypt
348.15Kh · 28.0W
|
$0.08 | $0.07 | $0.01 |
CFX
⚠
Conflux
|
Octopus
17.46Mh · 38.0W
|
$0.07 | $0.09 | $-0.02 |
NEXA
⚠
Nexa
|
NexaPoW
9.29Mh · 28.0W
|
$0.06 | $0.07 | $-0.01 |
|
BEAM
⚠
Beam
|
BeamHashIII
8.45Hh · 31.0W
|
$0.04 | $0.07 | $-0.03 |
|
RVN
Ravencoin
|
KAWPOW
9.02Mh · 38.0W
|
$0.04 | $0.09 | $-0.05 |
ERG
⚠
Ergo
|
Autolykos2
51.79Mh · 30.0W
|
$0.03 | $0.07 | $-0.04 |
|
VRSC
⚠
Verus
|
VerusHash
4.15Mh · 30.0W
|
$0.02 | $0.07 | $-0.05 |
|
ETC
Ethereum Classic
|
Etchash
25.58Mh · 36.0W
|
$0.01 | $0.09 | $-0.08 |
LTZ
⚠
Litecoinz
|
Zhash
22.1Hh · 30.0W
|
$0.01 | $0.07 | $-0.06 |
|
XMR
Monero
|
RandomX
213.85Hh · 23.0W
|
$0.01 | $0.06 | $-0.05 |
|
AE
⚠
Aeternity
|
CuckooCycle
1.95Hh · 28.0W
|
$0.01 | $0.07 | $-0.06 |
|
MONA
Monacoin
|
Lyra2REv2
17.65Mh · 23.0W
|
— | $0.06 | — |
KAS
Kaspa
|
KHeavyHash
119.89Mh · 39.0W
|
— | $0.09 | — |
|
—
|
Keccak-C
286.7Mh · 39.0W
|
— | $0.09 | — |
ACM
⚠
Actinium
|
Lyra2z
1.29Mh · 39.0W
|
— | $0.09 | — |
|
—
|
NIST5
10.12Mh · 23.0W
|
— | $0.06 | — |
|
—
|
PHI1612
10.74Mh · 37.0W
|
— | $0.09 | — |
|
—
|
ProgPowSERO
8.85Mh · 38.0W
|
— | $0.09 | — |
|
—
|
ProgPowZ
8.65Mh · 38.0W
|
— | $0.09 | — |
|
—
|
Skein2
180.31Mh · 24.0W
|
— | $0.06 | — |
|
—
|
Skunkhash
15.3Mh · 36.0W
|
— | $0.09 | — |
|
—
|
SonoA
613.04Kh · 23.0W
|
— | $0.06 | — |
|
—
|
TimeTravel10
8.42Mh · 39.0W
|
— | $0.09 | — |
|
—
|
Tribus
29.21Mh · 36.0W
|
— | $0.09 | — |
|
—
|
Ubqhash
26.61Mh · 38.0W
|
— | $0.09 | — |
|
—
|
X15
3.12Mh · 22.0W
|
— | $0.05 | — |
|
—
|
X16R
4.94Mh · 23.0W
|
— | $0.06 | — |
|
—
|
X16RT
4.03Mh · 23.0W
|
— | $0.06 | — |
|
—
|
X16Rv2
3.81Mh · 24.0W
|
— | $0.06 | — |
|
—
|
X16S
4.03Mh · 24.0W
|
— | $0.06 | — |
|
—
|
X17
4.01Mh · 23.0W
|
— | $0.06 | — |
|
—
|
Xevan
1.67Mh · 23.0W
|
— | $0.06 | — |
|
—
|
Cuckatoo31
0Hh · 25.0W
|
— | $0.06 | — |
|
—
|
vProgPow
4.27Mh · 38.0W
|
— | $0.09 | — |
|
—
|
X21S
2.91Mh · 23.0W
|
— | $0.06 | — |
|
—
|
Cuckarood29
0Hh · 24.0W
|
— | $0.06 | — |
|
—
|
HeavyHash
108.99Mh · 24.0W
|
— | $0.06 | — |
|
—
|
Chukwa
50.84Kh · 38.0W
|
— | $0.09 | — |
|
—
|
Curvehash
2.28Mh · 28.0W
|
— | $0.07 | — |
FIRO
Firo
|
FiroPoW
9.04Mh · 38.0W
|
— | $0.09 | — |
|
—
|
Radiant
169.48Mh · 39.0W
|
— | $0.09 | — |
|
—
|
SHA256DT
451.66Mh · 39.0W
|
— | $0.09 | — |
|
—
|
GhostRider
557.7Hh · 23.0W
|
— | $0.06 | — |
|
—
|
Equihash(96,5)
1.78Kh · 39.0W
|
— | $0.09 | — |
|
—
|
Equihash(150,5)
9.1Hh · 32.0W
|
— | $0.08 | — |
|
—
|
BeamHashII
10.4Hh · 30.0W
|
— | $0.07 | — |
|
—
|
Globalhash
13.14Mh · 39.0W
|
— | $0.09 | — |
|
—
|
Jeonghash
3.7Mh · 25.0W
|
— | $0.06 | — |
|
—
|
Lyra2vc0ban
17.99Mh · 24.0W
|
— | $0.06 | — |
|
—
|
X18
0.68Mh · 39.0W
|
— | $0.09 | — |
|
—
|
Memehash
13.69Mh · 24.0W
|
— | $0.06 | — |
|
—
|
Ethash
25.58Mh · 36.0W
|
— | $0.09 | — |
|
—
|
PyrinHash
1.07Gh · 20.0W
|
— | $0.05 | — |
|
—
|
KarlsenHashV2
352.03Mh · 37.0W
|
— | $0.09 | — |
|
—
|
Equihash210_9
89.05Hh · 29.0W
|
— | $0.07 | — |
|
—
|
Blake (2s)
1.81Gh · 25.0W
|
— | $0.06 | — |
|
—
|
Argon2d4096
19.4Kh · 34.0W
|
— | $0.08 | — |
|
—
|
BCD
4.51Mh · 23.0W
|
— | $0.06 | — |
|
—
|
C11
5.68Mh · 23.0W
|
— | $0.06 | — |
|
—
|
CNReverseWaltz
0.74Kh · 26.0W
|
— | $0.06 | — |
|
—
|
Chukwa2
18.01Kh · 38.0W
|
— | $0.09 | — |
|
—
|
Equihash(125,4)
13Hh · 28.0W
|
— | $0.07 | — |
|
—
|
Equihash(144,5)
18.85Hh · 30.0W
|
— | $0.07 | — |
|
—
|
Equihash(192,7)
11.05Hh · 37.0W
|
— | $0.09 | — |
|
—
|
Equihash(210,9)
89.05Hh · 29.0W
|
— | $0.07 | — |
|
—
|
HMQ1725
2.37Mh · 25.0W
|
— | $0.06 | — |
|
—
|
HoneyComb
170.36Kh · 39.0W
|
— | $0.09 | — |
|
—
|
Keccak
286.07Mh · 23.0W
|
— | $0.06 | — |
| Pool | Algoritmos soportados | Comisión | |
|---|---|---|---|
|
|
CuckooCycle (AE) · BeamHashIII (BEAM) · Autolykos2 (ERG) | 1.0% | Visit → |
|
★
AntPool
|
Etchash (ETC) · KHeavyHash (KAS) · KAWPOW (RVN) | 1.0% | Visit → |
|
C
Cedric Crispin Pools
|
BeamHashIII (BEAM) · FiroPoW (FIRO) · KHeavyHash (KAS) | — | Visit → |
HeroMiners
|
BeamHashIII (BEAM) · Autolykos2 (ERG) · Etchash (ETC) | 0.9% | Visit → |
K1Pool
|
Autolykos2 (ERG) · Etchash (ETC) · KHeavyHash (KAS) | 1.0% | Visit → |
|
M
Molepool
|
Etchash (ETC) · KAWPOW (RVN) | — | Visit → |
|
N
Nanopool
|
Octopus (CFX) · KAWPOW (RVN) · RandomX (XMR) | — | Visit → |
pool.kryptex.com
|
Octopus (CFX) · Autolykos2 (ERG) · Etchash (ETC) | — | Visit → |
Rplant
|
FiroPoW (FIRO) · NexaPoW (NEXA) · RandomX (XMR) | 1.0% | Visit → |
|
S
Solopool
|
Etchash (ETC) · KHeavyHash (KAS) · KAWPOW (RVN) | — | Visit → |
SupportXMR
|
RandomX (XMR) | 0.6% | Visit → |
|
S
Suprnova
|
KAWPOW (RVN) · Lyra2REv3 (VTC) · RandomX (XMR) | — | Visit → |
|
W
WoolyPooly
|
CuckooCycle (AE) · Octopus (CFX) · Autolykos2 (ERG) | — | Visit → |
Historial de ingresos netos por alquiler
| Período | /Día | /Mes |
|---|---|---|
| Ingresos | $0.08 | $2.40 |
|
Costo
$0.1/kWh
|
$0.07 | $2.10 |
| Ganancia | $0.01 | $0.30 |
Mezcla de consenso interno — derivada de fuentes externas, no una cotización directa de un solo mercado.
| Proveedor | GPU | Ingresos | Costo | Ganancia |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Clore Ai
Mercado de GPU
|
RTX A2000 Laptop GPU
$0.004/h ·
1 oferta
|
$0.08
17.0 CLORE/day
1 CLORE ≈ $0.00494
|
$0.07 |
$0.01
★
Visitar →
|
Flujo de ingresos Cómo Nvidia RTX A2000 Laptop GPU gana en el mercado de GPU para IA how we got $0.01/day · ▾
Historial de pagos del hashmarket
| Período | /Día | /Mes |
|---|---|---|
| Ingresos | $0.09 | $2.67 |
|
Costo
$0.1/kWh
|
$0.07 | $2.10 |
| Ganancia | $0.02 | $0.57 |
Mezcla de consenso interno — derivada de fuentes externas, no una cotización directa de un solo mercado.
MRR
· KAWPOW
· $0.14/day
Visitar on MRR →
Visitar on MRR →
MRR
Visitar on MRR →
| Rigs × Qty | Share | Rev /rig/day | Cost /rig/day | Profit /rig/day | Total profit /day |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| — | — | — | — | — | — |
Periodo de recuperación para Nvidia RTX A2000 Laptop GPU
Modela la recuperación de la inversión, el coste eléctrico y la rentabilidad del primer año para este equipo.
Hardware recuperado cuando la línea cruza cero. Después, todo ganancia.
| Month | Earned (mo) | Cost burned (mo) | Cumulative earned | Cumulative cost | Net | % ROI |
|---|
Emisiones anuales por fuente
Basado en el consumo eléctrico anual y la intensidad de carbono de redes comunes.
| Fuente de energía | CO₂e / año |
|---|---|
| Wind | 2.76 kg |
| Nuclear | 3.01 kg |
| Hydroelectric | 6.01 kg |
| Geothermal | 9.52 kg |
| Solar | 11.28 kg |
| Biofuels | 57.63 kg |
| Gas | 122.77 kg |
| Coal | 205.46 kg |
Solo estimaciones — las emisiones reales varían.
¿Qué significa eso realmente?
At the world-average grid intensity of about 475 g CO₂e/kWh, Nvidia RTX A2000 Laptop GPU running 24/7 for a year releases about 119 kg of carbon dioxide equivalent. Here's what that looks like in everyday terms:
Dónde lo enchufas importa
Electricity is not one thing. A kilowatt-hour from a coal plant carries roughly 820 g of CO₂; the same kilowatt-hour from a hydro reservoir carries about 24 g. That's a 34× difference — large enough that Nvidia RTX A2000 Laptop GPU's annual footprint swings from roughly 205 kg on coal-heavy grids down to about 6 kg on hydro-dominated grids. The single biggest lever a miner has on their carbon footprint is choosing where to plug in.
Regions commonly used for low-carbon crypto mining include Quebec and British Columbia (hydro-dominated, typically <50 g CO₂/kWh), Iceland and Norway (geothermal + hydro, often <30 g), Paraguay (Itaipú hydro), and parts of the US Pacific Northwest. Coal-heavy grids — Kazakhstan, Inner Mongolia, Poland, parts of Australia — sit at the opposite end, often above 700 g CO₂/kWh.
Some operators also reduce their net impact by using otherwise-wasted energy: flare gas at oil wells (burning methane that would be vented anyway), curtailed renewables (wind or solar that the grid can't absorb), or behind-the-meter hydro during off-peak hours. These arrangements can drop effective emissions below the local grid average because the energy would have been wasted or flared without the mining load.
Cómo reducir la huella de este equipo
- Pick a greener ASIC. The efficiency column above matters as much as the grid: a 15 J/TH rig emits roughly half the CO₂ of a 30 J/TH rig for the same hashrate.
- Choose a low-carbon host. Data centres advertising hydro, geothermal, or nuclear power typically sit at <100 g CO₂/kWh.
- Look for stranded or curtailed energy. Flare-gas miners, wind-curtailment co-location, and off-peak hydro arrangements use energy that would otherwise be wasted.
- Use heat recovery. Capturing the heat for greenhouse agriculture, pool heating, or district warmth offsets fossil-fuel heating that would have been burned anyway.
- Time-shift your uptime. In grids with high daytime solar, running more during the day and less at night lowers your effective intensity even if you don't switch providers.
- Purchase verifiable offsets. Treat this as a last resort, not a substitute — and favour additional, permanent, third-party-verified projects (Gold Standard, Verra VCS).
Preguntas frecuentes
Yearly electricity use = rig power (W) × 24 × 365 ÷ 1000. We multiply that by each row's grid intensity in grams CO₂-equivalent per kWh and convert to kilograms. Intensities are representative averages — real emissions depend on your specific utility mix, time of day, and local transmission losses.
It depends almost entirely on where the electricity comes from. A single rig plugged into hydro in Quebec emits less over a year than an average family's two cars in a month. The same rig on a coal-dominated grid can exceed that in a few days. The hardware is the same — the grid is what changes the answer.
Network-wide estimates vary by methodology; the Cambridge Centre for Alternative Finance's Bitcoin Electricity Consumption Index is the most widely cited reference. As of recent reporting, the network's sustainable-energy share has grown as more hashrate migrates to hydro, wind, solar, and stranded-gas sites. This page just estimates a single rig — for the big picture, CCAF's dashboard is the best source.
Not directly. The rig draws the same wattage regardless of which pool it joins or how difficulty trends — so its electricity use, and therefore its emissions, stay constant. Those factors change revenue, not power consumption.
Toca para cambiar · 8 secciones Minería cripto 2/8
Proyección diaria
Ganadores diarios entre todos los streams — promediados del historial registrado del rig a $0.1/kWh
| Período | /Día | /Mes |
|---|---|---|
| Ingresos | $2.98 | $89.33 |
|
Costo
$0.1/kWh
|
$0.07 | $2.10 |
| Ganancia | $2.91 | $87.23 |
Mezcla de consenso interno — derivada de fuentes externas, no una cotización directa de un solo mercado.
Historial de pagos de minería
| Período | /Día | /Mes |
|---|---|---|
| Ingresos | $2.98 | $89.40 |
|
Costo
$0.1/kWh
|
$0.07 | $2.10 |
| Ganancia | $2.91 | $87.30 |
Mezcla de consenso interno — derivada de fuentes externas, no una cotización directa de un solo mercado.
| Algoritmo | Neto / día |
|---|---|
|
LYR
Lyra2REv3
★ Mejor
19.76 Mh/s · 29.0 W
|
$2.91 |
|
NEO
NeoScrypt
348.15 Kh/s · 28.0 W
|
$0.01 |
|
OCT
Octopus
17.46 Mh/s · 38.0 W
|
$0.00 |
|
NEX
NexaPoW
9.29 Mh/s · 28.0 W
|
$-0.01 |
|
BEA
BeamHashIII
8.45 Hh/s · 31.0 W
|
$-0.03 |
|
KAW
KAWPOW
9.02 Mh/s · 38.0 W
|
$-0.03 |
|
AUT
Autolykos2
51.79 Mh/s · 30.0 W
|
$-0.04 |
|
VER
VerusHash
4.15 Mh/s · 30.0 W
|
$-0.05 |
|
ETC
Etchash
25.58 Mh/s · 36.0 W
|
$-0.06 |
|
ZHA
Zhash
22.1 Hh/s · 30.0 W
|
$-0.06 |
|
RAN
RandomX
213.85 Hh/s · 23.0 W
|
$-0.06 |
|
CUC
CuckooCycle
1.95 Hh/s · 28.0 W
|
$-0.06 |
|
LYR
Lyra2REv2
17.65 Mh/s · 23.0 W
|
$-0.07 |
|
KHE
KHeavyHash
119.89 Mh/s · 39.0 W
|
$-0.07 |
|
LYR
Lyra2z
1.29 Mh/s · 39.0 W
|
$-0.07 |
|
NIS
NIST5
10.12 Mh/s · 23.0 W
|
$-0.07 |
|
X16
X16R
4.94 Mh/s · 23.0 W
|
$-0.07 |
|
X16
X16Rv2
3.81 Mh/s · 24.0 W
|
$-0.07 |
|
CUC
Cuckatoo31
0 Hh/s · 25.0 W
|
$-0.07 |
|
CUC
Cuckarood29
0 Hh/s · 24.0 W
|
$-0.07 |
|
BEA
BeamHashII
10.4 Hh/s · 30.0 W
|
$-0.07 |
|
ETH
Ethash
25.58 Mh/s · 36.0 W
|
$-0.07 |
|
PYR
PyrinHash
1.07 Gh/s · 20.0 W
|
$-0.07 |
|
KAR
KarlsenHashV2
352.03 Mh/s · 37.0 W
|
$-0.07 |
|
EQU
Equihash210_9
89.05 Hh/s · 29.0 W
|
$-0.07 |
|
BLA
Blake (2s)
1.81 Gh/s · 25.0 W
|
$-0.07 |
|
KEC
Keccak
286.07 Mh/s · 23.0 W
|
$-0.07 |
| Coin | Algorithm | Ingresos | Costo | Ganancia |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
VTC
Vertcoin
|
Lyra2REv3
19.76Mh · 29.0W
|
$2.98 | $0.07 | $2.91 |
|
FTC
⚠
Feathercoin
|
NeoScrypt
348.15Kh · 28.0W
|
$0.08 | $0.07 | $0.01 |
CFX
⚠
Conflux
|
Octopus
17.46Mh · 38.0W
|
$0.07 | $0.09 | $-0.02 |
NEXA
⚠
Nexa
|
NexaPoW
9.29Mh · 28.0W
|
$0.06 | $0.07 | $-0.01 |
|
BEAM
⚠
Beam
|
BeamHashIII
8.45Hh · 31.0W
|
$0.04 | $0.07 | $-0.03 |
|
RVN
Ravencoin
|
KAWPOW
9.02Mh · 38.0W
|
$0.04 | $0.09 | $-0.05 |
ERG
⚠
Ergo
|
Autolykos2
51.79Mh · 30.0W
|
$0.03 | $0.07 | $-0.04 |
|
VRSC
⚠
Verus
|
VerusHash
4.15Mh · 30.0W
|
$0.02 | $0.07 | $-0.05 |
|
ETC
Ethereum Classic
|
Etchash
25.58Mh · 36.0W
|
$0.01 | $0.09 | $-0.08 |
LTZ
⚠
Litecoinz
|
Zhash
22.1Hh · 30.0W
|
$0.01 | $0.07 | $-0.06 |
|
XMR
Monero
|
RandomX
213.85Hh · 23.0W
|
$0.01 | $0.06 | $-0.05 |
|
AE
⚠
Aeternity
|
CuckooCycle
1.95Hh · 28.0W
|
$0.01 | $0.07 | $-0.06 |
|
MONA
Monacoin
|
Lyra2REv2
17.65Mh · 23.0W
|
— | $0.06 | — |
KAS
Kaspa
|
KHeavyHash
119.89Mh · 39.0W
|
— | $0.09 | — |
|
—
|
Keccak-C
286.7Mh · 39.0W
|
— | $0.09 | — |
ACM
⚠
Actinium
|
Lyra2z
1.29Mh · 39.0W
|
— | $0.09 | — |
|
—
|
NIST5
10.12Mh · 23.0W
|
— | $0.06 | — |
|
—
|
PHI1612
10.74Mh · 37.0W
|
— | $0.09 | — |
|
—
|
ProgPowSERO
8.85Mh · 38.0W
|
— | $0.09 | — |
|
—
|
ProgPowZ
8.65Mh · 38.0W
|
— | $0.09 | — |
|
—
|
Skein2
180.31Mh · 24.0W
|
— | $0.06 | — |
|
—
|
Skunkhash
15.3Mh · 36.0W
|
— | $0.09 | — |
|
—
|
SonoA
613.04Kh · 23.0W
|
— | $0.06 | — |
|
—
|
TimeTravel10
8.42Mh · 39.0W
|
— | $0.09 | — |
|
—
|
Tribus
29.21Mh · 36.0W
|
— | $0.09 | — |
|
—
|
Ubqhash
26.61Mh · 38.0W
|
— | $0.09 | — |
|
—
|
X15
3.12Mh · 22.0W
|
— | $0.05 | — |
|
—
|
X16R
4.94Mh · 23.0W
|
— | $0.06 | — |
|
—
|
X16RT
4.03Mh · 23.0W
|
— | $0.06 | — |
|
—
|
X16Rv2
3.81Mh · 24.0W
|
— | $0.06 | — |
|
—
|
X16S
4.03Mh · 24.0W
|
— | $0.06 | — |
|
—
|
X17
4.01Mh · 23.0W
|
— | $0.06 | — |
|
—
|
Xevan
1.67Mh · 23.0W
|
— | $0.06 | — |
|
—
|
Cuckatoo31
0Hh · 25.0W
|
— | $0.06 | — |
|
—
|
vProgPow
4.27Mh · 38.0W
|
— | $0.09 | — |
|
—
|
X21S
2.91Mh · 23.0W
|
— | $0.06 | — |
|
—
|
Cuckarood29
0Hh · 24.0W
|
— | $0.06 | — |
|
—
|
HeavyHash
108.99Mh · 24.0W
|
— | $0.06 | — |
|
—
|
Chukwa
50.84Kh · 38.0W
|
— | $0.09 | — |
|
—
|
Curvehash
2.28Mh · 28.0W
|
— | $0.07 | — |
FIRO
Firo
|
FiroPoW
9.04Mh · 38.0W
|
— | $0.09 | — |
|
—
|
Radiant
169.48Mh · 39.0W
|
— | $0.09 | — |
|
—
|
SHA256DT
451.66Mh · 39.0W
|
— | $0.09 | — |
|
—
|
GhostRider
557.7Hh · 23.0W
|
— | $0.06 | — |
|
—
|
Equihash(96,5)
1.78Kh · 39.0W
|
— | $0.09 | — |
|
—
|
Equihash(150,5)
9.1Hh · 32.0W
|
— | $0.08 | — |
|
—
|
BeamHashII
10.4Hh · 30.0W
|
— | $0.07 | — |
|
—
|
Globalhash
13.14Mh · 39.0W
|
— | $0.09 | — |
|
—
|
Jeonghash
3.7Mh · 25.0W
|
— | $0.06 | — |
|
—
|
Lyra2vc0ban
17.99Mh · 24.0W
|
— | $0.06 | — |
|
—
|
X18
0.68Mh · 39.0W
|
— | $0.09 | — |
|
—
|
Memehash
13.69Mh · 24.0W
|
— | $0.06 | — |
|
—
|
Ethash
25.58Mh · 36.0W
|
— | $0.09 | — |
|
—
|
PyrinHash
1.07Gh · 20.0W
|
— | $0.05 | — |
|
—
|
KarlsenHashV2
352.03Mh · 37.0W
|
— | $0.09 | — |
|
—
|
Equihash210_9
89.05Hh · 29.0W
|
— | $0.07 | — |
|
—
|
Blake (2s)
1.81Gh · 25.0W
|
— | $0.06 | — |
|
—
|
Argon2d4096
19.4Kh · 34.0W
|
— | $0.08 | — |
|
—
|
BCD
4.51Mh · 23.0W
|
— | $0.06 | — |
|
—
|
C11
5.68Mh · 23.0W
|
— | $0.06 | — |
|
—
|
CNReverseWaltz
0.74Kh · 26.0W
|
— | $0.06 | — |
|
—
|
Chukwa2
18.01Kh · 38.0W
|
— | $0.09 | — |
|
—
|
Equihash(125,4)
13Hh · 28.0W
|
— | $0.07 | — |
|
—
|
Equihash(144,5)
18.85Hh · 30.0W
|
— | $0.07 | — |
|
—
|
Equihash(192,7)
11.05Hh · 37.0W
|
— | $0.09 | — |
|
—
|
Equihash(210,9)
89.05Hh · 29.0W
|
— | $0.07 | — |
|
—
|
HMQ1725
2.37Mh · 25.0W
|
— | $0.06 | — |
|
—
|
HoneyComb
170.36Kh · 39.0W
|
— | $0.09 | — |
|
—
|
Keccak
286.07Mh · 23.0W
|
— | $0.06 | — |
| Pool | Algoritmos soportados | Comisión | |
|---|---|---|---|
|
|
CuckooCycle (AE) · BeamHashIII (BEAM) · Autolykos2 (ERG) | 1.0% | Visit → |
|
★
AntPool
|
Etchash (ETC) · KHeavyHash (KAS) · KAWPOW (RVN) | 1.0% | Visit → |
|
C
Cedric Crispin Pools
|
BeamHashIII (BEAM) · FiroPoW (FIRO) · KHeavyHash (KAS) | — | Visit → |
HeroMiners
|
BeamHashIII (BEAM) · Autolykos2 (ERG) · Etchash (ETC) | 0.9% | Visit → |
K1Pool
|
Autolykos2 (ERG) · Etchash (ETC) · KHeavyHash (KAS) | 1.0% | Visit → |
|
M
Molepool
|
Etchash (ETC) · KAWPOW (RVN) | — | Visit → |
|
N
Nanopool
|
Octopus (CFX) · KAWPOW (RVN) · RandomX (XMR) | — | Visit → |
pool.kryptex.com
|
Octopus (CFX) · Autolykos2 (ERG) · Etchash (ETC) | — | Visit → |
Rplant
|
FiroPoW (FIRO) · NexaPoW (NEXA) · RandomX (XMR) | 1.0% | Visit → |
|
S
Solopool
|
Etchash (ETC) · KHeavyHash (KAS) · KAWPOW (RVN) | — | Visit → |
SupportXMR
|
RandomX (XMR) | 0.6% | Visit → |
|
S
Suprnova
|
KAWPOW (RVN) · Lyra2REv3 (VTC) · RandomX (XMR) | — | Visit → |
|
W
WoolyPooly
|
CuckooCycle (AE) · Octopus (CFX) · Autolykos2 (ERG) | — | Visit → |
Historial de ingresos netos por alquiler
| Período | /Día | /Mes |
|---|---|---|
| Ingresos | $0.08 | $2.40 |
|
Costo
$0.1/kWh
|
$0.07 | $2.10 |
| Ganancia | $0.01 | $0.30 |
Mezcla de consenso interno — derivada de fuentes externas, no una cotización directa de un solo mercado.
| Proveedor | GPU | Ingresos | Costo | Ganancia |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Clore Ai
Mercado de GPU
|
RTX A2000 Laptop GPU
$0.004/h ·
1 oferta
|
$0.08
17.0 CLORE/day
1 CLORE ≈ $0.00494
|
$0.07 |
$0.01
★
Visitar →
|
Flujo de ingresos Cómo Nvidia RTX A2000 Laptop GPU gana en el mercado de GPU para IA how we got $0.01/day · ▾
Historial de pagos del hashmarket
| Período | /Día | /Mes |
|---|---|---|
| Ingresos | $0.09 | $2.67 |
|
Costo
$0.1/kWh
|
$0.07 | $2.10 |
| Ganancia | $0.02 | $0.57 |
Mezcla de consenso interno — derivada de fuentes externas, no una cotización directa de un solo mercado.
MRR
· KAWPOW
· $0.14/day
Visitar on MRR →
Visitar on MRR →
MRR
Visitar on MRR →
| Rigs × Qty | Share | Rev /rig/day | Cost /rig/day | Profit /rig/day | Total profit /day |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| — | — | — | — | — | — |
Periodo de recuperación para Nvidia RTX A2000 Laptop GPU
Modela la recuperación de la inversión, el coste eléctrico y la rentabilidad del primer año para este equipo.
Hardware recuperado cuando la línea cruza cero. Después, todo ganancia.
| Month | Earned (mo) | Cost burned (mo) | Cumulative earned | Cumulative cost | Net | % ROI |
|---|
Emisiones anuales por fuente
Basado en el consumo eléctrico anual y la intensidad de carbono de redes comunes.
| Fuente de energía | CO₂e / año |
|---|---|
| Wind | 2.76 kg |
| Nuclear | 3.01 kg |
| Hydroelectric | 6.01 kg |
| Geothermal | 9.52 kg |
| Solar | 11.28 kg |
| Biofuels | 57.63 kg |
| Gas | 122.77 kg |
| Coal | 205.46 kg |
Solo estimaciones — las emisiones reales varían.
¿Qué significa eso realmente?
At the world-average grid intensity of about 475 g CO₂e/kWh, Nvidia RTX A2000 Laptop GPU running 24/7 for a year releases about 119 kg of carbon dioxide equivalent. Here's what that looks like in everyday terms:
Dónde lo enchufas importa
Electricity is not one thing. A kilowatt-hour from a coal plant carries roughly 820 g of CO₂; the same kilowatt-hour from a hydro reservoir carries about 24 g. That's a 34× difference — large enough that Nvidia RTX A2000 Laptop GPU's annual footprint swings from roughly 205 kg on coal-heavy grids down to about 6 kg on hydro-dominated grids. The single biggest lever a miner has on their carbon footprint is choosing where to plug in.
Regions commonly used for low-carbon crypto mining include Quebec and British Columbia (hydro-dominated, typically <50 g CO₂/kWh), Iceland and Norway (geothermal + hydro, often <30 g), Paraguay (Itaipú hydro), and parts of the US Pacific Northwest. Coal-heavy grids — Kazakhstan, Inner Mongolia, Poland, parts of Australia — sit at the opposite end, often above 700 g CO₂/kWh.
Some operators also reduce their net impact by using otherwise-wasted energy: flare gas at oil wells (burning methane that would be vented anyway), curtailed renewables (wind or solar that the grid can't absorb), or behind-the-meter hydro during off-peak hours. These arrangements can drop effective emissions below the local grid average because the energy would have been wasted or flared without the mining load.
Cómo reducir la huella de este equipo
- Pick a greener ASIC. The efficiency column above matters as much as the grid: a 15 J/TH rig emits roughly half the CO₂ of a 30 J/TH rig for the same hashrate.
- Choose a low-carbon host. Data centres advertising hydro, geothermal, or nuclear power typically sit at <100 g CO₂/kWh.
- Look for stranded or curtailed energy. Flare-gas miners, wind-curtailment co-location, and off-peak hydro arrangements use energy that would otherwise be wasted.
- Use heat recovery. Capturing the heat for greenhouse agriculture, pool heating, or district warmth offsets fossil-fuel heating that would have been burned anyway.
- Time-shift your uptime. In grids with high daytime solar, running more during the day and less at night lowers your effective intensity even if you don't switch providers.
- Purchase verifiable offsets. Treat this as a last resort, not a substitute — and favour additional, permanent, third-party-verified projects (Gold Standard, Verra VCS).
Preguntas frecuentes
Yearly electricity use = rig power (W) × 24 × 365 ÷ 1000. We multiply that by each row's grid intensity in grams CO₂-equivalent per kWh and convert to kilograms. Intensities are representative averages — real emissions depend on your specific utility mix, time of day, and local transmission losses.
It depends almost entirely on where the electricity comes from. A single rig plugged into hydro in Quebec emits less over a year than an average family's two cars in a month. The same rig on a coal-dominated grid can exceed that in a few days. The hardware is the same — the grid is what changes the answer.
Network-wide estimates vary by methodology; the Cambridge Centre for Alternative Finance's Bitcoin Electricity Consumption Index is the most widely cited reference. As of recent reporting, the network's sustainable-energy share has grown as more hashrate migrates to hydro, wind, solar, and stranded-gas sites. This page just estimates a single rig — for the big picture, CCAF's dashboard is the best source.
Not directly. The rig draws the same wattage regardless of which pool it joins or how difficulty trends — so its electricity use, and therefore its emissions, stay constant. Those factors change revenue, not power consumption.