LP Agent
AMD Vega Frontier Edition
AMD Vega Frontier Edition pierde $0.36 al día minando Autolykos2 a 113.949913 Mh/s y consumiendo 169.0 W de la red. Eso es tras descontar la electricidad a $0.1/kWh — sin llegar a cubrir costos a los precios actuales.
Proyección diaria
| Período | /Día | /Mes |
|---|---|---|
| Ingresos | $1.57 | $47.00 |
|
Costo
$0.1/kWh
|
$0.41 | $12.30 |
| Ganancia | $1.16 | $34.84 |
| Coin | Algorithm | Ingresos | Costo | Ganancia |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
FTC
⚠
Feathercoin
|
NeoScrypt
2.123Mh · 330.0W
|
— | $0.79 | — |
|
—
|
Cuckatoo31
1Hh · 220.0W
|
— | $0.53 | — |
|
—
|
CryptoNightR
1.928Kh · 178.0W
|
— | $0.43 | — |
ERG
⚠
Ergo
|
Autolykos2
113.949913Mh · 169.0W
|
$0.05 | $0.41 | $-0.36 |
|
—
|
Ethash
31.1363Mh · 141.0W
|
— | $0.34 | — |
|
LTZ
⚠
Litecoinz
|
Zhash
33Hh · 205.0W
|
— | $0.49 | — |
|
ETC
Ethereum Classic
|
Etchash
31.1363Mh · 141.0W
|
$0.02 | $0.34 | $-0.32 |
|
VRSC
⚠
Verus
|
VerusHash
7.694584Mh · 212.0W
|
— | $0.51 | — |
|
MONA
⚠
Monacoin
|
Lyra2REv2
68.794324Mh · 221.0W
|
— | $0.53 | — |
|
—
|
X16R
18.68945Mh · 225.0W
|
— | $0.54 | — |
|
—
|
X16Rv2
15.76143Mh · 210.0W
|
— | $0.50 | — |
|
GRIN
⚠
Grin
|
Cuckatoo32
0Hh · 221.0W
|
— | $0.53 | — |
|
—
|
Blake (2s)
5.511151181Gh · 198.0W
|
— | $0.48 | — |
|
—
|
HMQ1725
11.716234Mh · 300.0W
|
— | $0.72 | — |
|
—
|
X22i
10.756195Mh · 220.0W
|
— | $0.53 | — |
|
—
|
ProgPowZ
17.270613Mh · 215.0W
|
— | $0.52 | — |
|
—
|
Skein2
541.990371Mh · 208.0W
|
— | $0.50 | — |
|
—
|
Skunkhash
50.573211Mh · 212.0W
|
— | $0.51 | — |
|
VTC
⚠
Vertcoin
|
Lyra2REv3
79.595843Mh · 218.0W
|
— | $0.52 | — |
|
—
|
SonoA
2.752325Mh · 189.0W
|
— | $0.45 | — |
|
—
|
X17
18.606086Mh · 218.0W
|
— | $0.52 | — |
|
—
|
ProgPowSERO
17.527843Mh · 212.0W
|
— | $0.51 | — |
|
—
|
HoneyComb
47.454488Mh · 220.0W
|
— | $0.53 | — |
|
—
|
Equihash(125,4)
25Hh · 197.0W
|
— | $0.47 | — |
|
—
|
Equihash(150,5)
26Hh · 300.0W
|
— | $0.72 | — |
|
—
|
Cuckarood29
3Hh · 175.0W
|
— | $0.42 | — |
|
—
|
Equihash(144,5)
34Hh · 198.0W
|
— | $0.48 | — |
|
—
|
CNReverseWaltz
2.581Kh · 197.0W
|
— | $0.47 | — |
|
—
|
KangarooTwelve
1.766766638Gh · 220.0W
|
— | $0.53 | — |
|
—
|
Argon2d-ninja
104.816Kh · 200.0W
|
— | $0.48 | — |
|
—
|
Chukwa
72.066Kh · 200.0W
|
— | $0.48 | — |
|
—
|
Tribus
89.67072Mh · 219.0W
|
— | $0.53 | — |
|
—
|
Ubqhash
41.05Mh · 222.0W
|
— | $0.53 | — |
|
—
|
X21S
13.236114Mh · 219.0W
|
— | $0.53 | — |
|
—
|
X25X
2.066313Mh · 121.0W
|
— | $0.29 | — |
|
—
|
X11k
3.788892Mh · 209.0W
|
— | $0.50 | — |
|
—
|
vProgPow
8.408578Mh · 217.0W
|
— | $0.52 | — |
|
—
|
PHI1612
33.371896Mh · 220.0W
|
— | $0.53 | — |
|
—
|
X16S
18.547876Mh · 203.0W
|
— | $0.49 | — |
|
—
|
Cuckaroo29S
3Hh · 196.0W
|
— | $0.47 | — |
|
—
|
Cuckaroo29b
3Hh · 198.0W
|
— | $0.48 | — |
|
—
|
Chukwa2
11.301Kh · 180.0W
|
— | $0.43 | — |
|
—
|
Xevan
6.016623Mh · 221.0W
|
— | $0.53 | — |
|
—
|
Equihash(192,7)
21Hh · 198.0W
|
— | $0.48 | — |
|
—
|
BCD
22.041642Mh · 195.0W
|
— | $0.47 | — |
|
—
|
C11
25.922235Mh · 194.0W
|
— | $0.47 | — |
|
—
|
X16RT
18.63596Mh · 224.0W
|
— | $0.54 | — |
LP Agent
- Architecture
- Vega (GCN 5)
- Max Memory Bandwidth
- 484 GB/s
- Max Memory Size
- 16 GB
- Memory Type
- HBM2
- Model
- AMD Vega Frontier Edition
- Power
- 330 W
- Process
- 14 nm
- Release
- June 2017
- Release year
- 2017
- TDP
- 330 W
- Type
- GPU
- Vendor
- AMD
| Mercado | Algoritmo | Beneficio /día | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
MRR floor
0% rented · matches cheapest seller
|
Lyra2REv2
0.00000030000 BTC/M/d
|
$1.16
★
$1.57 ingresos · $0.41 costo
Visitar →
|
|||
|
MRR recent
last 10 rentals · actual clearing price
|
Lyra2REv2
0.00002520563 BTC/M/d
|
$131.23
★
$131.64 ingresos · $0.41 costo
Visitar →
|
|||
|
MRR asking
aspirational — seller wish, not matched
|
Lyra2REv2
0.00000054154 BTC/M/d
|
$2.42
$2.83 ingresos · $0.41 costo
|
|||
| X16Rv2 | |||||
|
MRR floor
0% rented · matches cheapest seller
|
X16Rv2
0.00000056954 BTC/M/d
|
$0.27
★
$0.68 ingresos · $0.41 costo
Visitar →
|
|||
|
MRR recent
last 10 rentals · actual clearing price
|
X16Rv2
0.00000063655 BTC/M/d
|
$0.35
★
$0.76 ingresos · $0.41 costo
Visitar →
|
|||
|
MRR asking
aspirational — seller wish, not matched
|
X16Rv2
0.00000077820 BTC/M/d
|
$0.52
$0.93 ingresos · $0.41 costo
|
|||
| X16R | |||||
|
MRR floor
0% rented · matches cheapest seller
|
X16R
0.00000056954 BTC/M/d
|
$0.40
★
$0.81 ingresos · $0.41 costo
Visitar →
|
|||
|
MRR recent
last 10 rentals · actual clearing price
|
X16R
0.00000061118 BTC/M/d
|
$0.46
★
$0.87 ingresos · $0.41 costo
Visitar →
|
|||
|
MRR asking
aspirational — seller wish, not matched
|
X16R
0.00000061541 BTC/M/d
|
$0.46
$0.87 ingresos · $0.41 costo
|
|||
| NeoScrypt | |||||
|
NiceHash
seller 24h-weighted avg
|
NeoScrypt
0.00000061820 BTC/M/d
|
$-0.31
$0.10 ingresos · $0.41 costo
Visitar →
|
|||
|
MRR floor
5% rented · matches cheapest seller
|
NeoScrypt
0.00000320000 BTC/M/d
|
$0.11
★
$0.52 ingresos · $0.41 costo
Visitar →
|
|||
|
MRR recent
last 10 rentals · actual clearing price
|
NeoScrypt
0.00000314000 BTC/M/d
|
$0.10
★
$0.51 ingresos · $0.41 costo
Visitar →
|
|||
|
MRR asking
aspirational — seller wish, not matched
|
NeoScrypt
0.00000359000 BTC/M/d
|
$0.17
$0.58 ingresos · $0.41 costo
|
|||
| Zhash | |||||
|
NiceHash
seller 24h-weighted avg
|
Zhash
0.00000000691 BTC/H/d
|
$-0.39
$0.02 ingresos · $0.41 costo
Visitar →
|
|||
|
MRR floor
0% rented · matches cheapest seller
|
Zhash
0.00000007080 BTC/H/d
|
$-0.23
★
$0.18 ingresos · $0.41 costo
Visitar →
|
|||
|
MRR recent
last 10 rentals · actual clearing price
|
Zhash
0.00000008185 BTC/H/d
|
$-0.20
★
$0.21 ingresos · $0.41 costo
Visitar →
|
|||
|
MRR asking
aspirational — seller wish, not matched
|
Zhash
0.00000007080 BTC/H/d
|
$-0.23
$0.18 ingresos · $0.41 costo
|
|||
| VerusHash | |||||
|
NiceHash
seller 24h-weighted avg
|
VerusHash
0.00000002490 BTC/M/d
|
$-0.40
$0.01 ingresos · $0.41 costo
Visitar →
|
|||
|
MRR floor
0% rented · matches cheapest seller
|
VerusHash
0.00000010999 BTC/M/d
|
$-0.35
★
$0.06 ingresos · $0.41 costo
Visitar →
|
|||
|
MRR recent
last 10 rentals · actual clearing price
|
VerusHash
0.00000023020 BTC/M/d
|
$-0.28
★
$0.13 ingresos · $0.41 costo
Visitar →
|
|||
|
MRR asking
aspirational — seller wish, not matched
|
VerusHash
0.00000015580 BTC/M/d
|
$-0.32
$0.09 ingresos · $0.41 costo
|
|||
| Autolykos2 | |||||
|
NiceHash
seller 24h-weighted avg
|
Autolykos2
0.00000000548 BTC/M/d
|
$-0.36
★
$0.05 ingresos · $0.41 costo
Visitar →
|
|||
| Ethash | |||||
|
NiceHash
seller 24h-weighted avg
|
Ethash
0.00000002000 BTC/M/d
|
$-0.36
★
$0.05 ingresos · $0.41 costo
Visitar →
|
|||
| Etchash | |||||
|
NiceHash
seller 24h-weighted avg
|
Etchash
0.00000000502 BTC/M/d
|
$-0.40
$0.01 ingresos · $0.41 costo
Visitar →
|
|||
|
MRR floor
10% rented · matches cheapest seller
|
Etchash
0.00000001320 BTC/M/d
|
$-0.38
★
$0.03 ingresos · $0.41 costo
Visitar →
|
|||
|
MRR recent
last 10 rentals · actual clearing price
|
Etchash
0.00000001625 BTC/M/d
|
$-0.37
★
$0.04 ingresos · $0.41 costo
Visitar →
|
|||
|
MRR asking
aspirational — seller wish, not matched
|
Etchash
0.00000001394 BTC/M/d
|
$-0.38
$0.03 ingresos · $0.41 costo
|
|||
| Rigs × Qty | Share | Rev /rig/day | Cost /rig/day | Profit /rig/day | Total profit /day |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| — | — | — | — | — | — |
Periodo de recuperación para AMD Vega Frontier Edition
Modela la recuperación de la inversión, el coste eléctrico y la rentabilidad del primer año para este equipo.
Hardware recuperado cuando la línea cruza cero. Después, todo ganancia.
| Month | Earned (mo) | Cost burned (mo) | Cumulative earned | Cumulative cost | Net | % ROI |
|---|
Emisiones anuales por fuente
Basado en el consumo eléctrico anual y la intensidad de carbono de redes comunes.
| Fuente de energía | CO₂e / año |
|---|---|
| Wind | 16.06 kg |
| Nuclear | 17.52 kg |
| Hydroelectric | 35.04 kg |
| Geothermal | 55.49 kg |
| Solar | 65.71 kg |
| Biofuels | 335.84 kg |
| Gas | 715.48 kg |
| Coal | 1,197.33 kg |
Solo estimaciones — las emisiones reales varían.
¿Qué significa eso realmente?
At the world-average grid intensity of about 475 g CO₂e/kWh, AMD Vega Frontier Edition running 24/7 for a year releases about 694 kg of carbon dioxide equivalent. Here's what that looks like in everyday terms:
Dónde lo enchufas importa
Electricity is not one thing. A kilowatt-hour from a coal plant carries roughly 820 g of CO₂; the same kilowatt-hour from a hydro reservoir carries about 24 g. That's a 34× difference — large enough that AMD Vega Frontier Edition's annual footprint swings from roughly 1,197 kg on coal-heavy grids down to about 35 kg on hydro-dominated grids. The single biggest lever a miner has on their carbon footprint is choosing where to plug in.
Regions commonly used for low-carbon crypto mining include Quebec and British Columbia (hydro-dominated, typically <50 g CO₂/kWh), Iceland and Norway (geothermal + hydro, often <30 g), Paraguay (Itaipú hydro), and parts of the US Pacific Northwest. Coal-heavy grids — Kazakhstan, Inner Mongolia, Poland, parts of Australia — sit at the opposite end, often above 700 g CO₂/kWh.
Some operators also reduce their net impact by using otherwise-wasted energy: flare gas at oil wells (burning methane that would be vented anyway), curtailed renewables (wind or solar that the grid can't absorb), or behind-the-meter hydro during off-peak hours. These arrangements can drop effective emissions below the local grid average because the energy would have been wasted or flared without the mining load.
Cómo reducir la huella de este equipo
- Pick a greener ASIC. The efficiency column above matters as much as the grid: a 15 J/TH rig emits roughly half the CO₂ of a 30 J/TH rig for the same hashrate.
- Choose a low-carbon host. Data centres advertising hydro, geothermal, or nuclear power typically sit at <100 g CO₂/kWh.
- Look for stranded or curtailed energy. Flare-gas miners, wind-curtailment co-location, and off-peak hydro arrangements use energy that would otherwise be wasted.
- Use heat recovery. Capturing the heat for greenhouse agriculture, pool heating, or district warmth offsets fossil-fuel heating that would have been burned anyway.
- Time-shift your uptime. In grids with high daytime solar, running more during the day and less at night lowers your effective intensity even if you don't switch providers.
- Purchase verifiable offsets. Treat this as a last resort, not a substitute — and favour additional, permanent, third-party-verified projects (Gold Standard, Verra VCS).
Preguntas frecuentes
Yearly electricity use = rig power (W) × 24 × 365 ÷ 1000. We multiply that by each row's grid intensity in grams CO₂-equivalent per kWh and convert to kilograms. Intensities are representative averages — real emissions depend on your specific utility mix, time of day, and local transmission losses.
It depends almost entirely on where the electricity comes from. A single rig plugged into hydro in Quebec emits less over a year than an average family's two cars in a month. The same rig on a coal-dominated grid can exceed that in a few days. The hardware is the same — the grid is what changes the answer.
Network-wide estimates vary by methodology; the Cambridge Centre for Alternative Finance's Bitcoin Electricity Consumption Index is the most widely cited reference. As of recent reporting, the network's sustainable-energy share has grown as more hashrate migrates to hydro, wind, solar, and stranded-gas sites. This page just estimates a single rig — for the big picture, CCAF's dashboard is the best source.
Not directly. The rig draws the same wattage regardless of which pool it joins or how difficulty trends — so its electricity use, and therefore its emissions, stay constant. Those factors change revenue, not power consumption.
Proyección diaria
| Período | /Día | /Mes |
|---|---|---|
| Ingresos | $1.57 | $47.00 |
|
Costo
$0.1/kWh
|
$0.41 | $12.30 |
| Ganancia | $1.16 | $34.84 |
| Coin | Algorithm | Ingresos | Costo | Ganancia |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
FTC
⚠
Feathercoin
|
NeoScrypt
2.123Mh · 330.0W
|
— | $0.79 | — |
|
—
|
Cuckatoo31
1Hh · 220.0W
|
— | $0.53 | — |
|
—
|
CryptoNightR
1.928Kh · 178.0W
|
— | $0.43 | — |
ERG
⚠
Ergo
|
Autolykos2
113.949913Mh · 169.0W
|
$0.05 | $0.41 | $-0.36 |
|
—
|
Ethash
31.1363Mh · 141.0W
|
— | $0.34 | — |
|
LTZ
⚠
Litecoinz
|
Zhash
33Hh · 205.0W
|
— | $0.49 | — |
|
ETC
Ethereum Classic
|
Etchash
31.1363Mh · 141.0W
|
$0.02 | $0.34 | $-0.32 |
|
VRSC
⚠
Verus
|
VerusHash
7.694584Mh · 212.0W
|
— | $0.51 | — |
|
MONA
⚠
Monacoin
|
Lyra2REv2
68.794324Mh · 221.0W
|
— | $0.53 | — |
|
—
|
X16R
18.68945Mh · 225.0W
|
— | $0.54 | — |
|
—
|
X16Rv2
15.76143Mh · 210.0W
|
— | $0.50 | — |
|
GRIN
⚠
Grin
|
Cuckatoo32
0Hh · 221.0W
|
— | $0.53 | — |
|
—
|
Blake (2s)
5.511151181Gh · 198.0W
|
— | $0.48 | — |
|
—
|
HMQ1725
11.716234Mh · 300.0W
|
— | $0.72 | — |
|
—
|
X22i
10.756195Mh · 220.0W
|
— | $0.53 | — |
|
—
|
ProgPowZ
17.270613Mh · 215.0W
|
— | $0.52 | — |
|
—
|
Skein2
541.990371Mh · 208.0W
|
— | $0.50 | — |
|
—
|
Skunkhash
50.573211Mh · 212.0W
|
— | $0.51 | — |
|
VTC
⚠
Vertcoin
|
Lyra2REv3
79.595843Mh · 218.0W
|
— | $0.52 | — |
|
—
|
SonoA
2.752325Mh · 189.0W
|
— | $0.45 | — |
|
—
|
X17
18.606086Mh · 218.0W
|
— | $0.52 | — |
|
—
|
ProgPowSERO
17.527843Mh · 212.0W
|
— | $0.51 | — |
|
—
|
HoneyComb
47.454488Mh · 220.0W
|
— | $0.53 | — |
|
—
|
Equihash(125,4)
25Hh · 197.0W
|
— | $0.47 | — |
|
—
|
Equihash(150,5)
26Hh · 300.0W
|
— | $0.72 | — |
|
—
|
Cuckarood29
3Hh · 175.0W
|
— | $0.42 | — |
|
—
|
Equihash(144,5)
34Hh · 198.0W
|
— | $0.48 | — |
|
—
|
CNReverseWaltz
2.581Kh · 197.0W
|
— | $0.47 | — |
|
—
|
KangarooTwelve
1.766766638Gh · 220.0W
|
— | $0.53 | — |
|
—
|
Argon2d-ninja
104.816Kh · 200.0W
|
— | $0.48 | — |
|
—
|
Chukwa
72.066Kh · 200.0W
|
— | $0.48 | — |
|
—
|
Tribus
89.67072Mh · 219.0W
|
— | $0.53 | — |
|
—
|
Ubqhash
41.05Mh · 222.0W
|
— | $0.53 | — |
|
—
|
X21S
13.236114Mh · 219.0W
|
— | $0.53 | — |
|
—
|
X25X
2.066313Mh · 121.0W
|
— | $0.29 | — |
|
—
|
X11k
3.788892Mh · 209.0W
|
— | $0.50 | — |
|
—
|
vProgPow
8.408578Mh · 217.0W
|
— | $0.52 | — |
|
—
|
PHI1612
33.371896Mh · 220.0W
|
— | $0.53 | — |
|
—
|
X16S
18.547876Mh · 203.0W
|
— | $0.49 | — |
|
—
|
Cuckaroo29S
3Hh · 196.0W
|
— | $0.47 | — |
|
—
|
Cuckaroo29b
3Hh · 198.0W
|
— | $0.48 | — |
|
—
|
Chukwa2
11.301Kh · 180.0W
|
— | $0.43 | — |
|
—
|
Xevan
6.016623Mh · 221.0W
|
— | $0.53 | — |
|
—
|
Equihash(192,7)
21Hh · 198.0W
|
— | $0.48 | — |
|
—
|
BCD
22.041642Mh · 195.0W
|
— | $0.47 | — |
|
—
|
C11
25.922235Mh · 194.0W
|
— | $0.47 | — |
|
—
|
X16RT
18.63596Mh · 224.0W
|
— | $0.54 | — |
- Architecture
- Vega (GCN 5)
- Max Memory Bandwidth
- 484 GB/s
- Max Memory Size
- 16 GB
- Memory Type
- HBM2
- Model
- AMD Vega Frontier Edition
- Power
- 330 W
- Process
- 14 nm
- Release
- June 2017
- Release year
- 2017
- TDP
- 330 W
- Type
- GPU
- Vendor
- AMD
| Mercado | Algoritmo | Beneficio /día | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
MRR floor
0% rented · matches cheapest seller
|
Lyra2REv2
0.00000030000 BTC/M/d
|
$1.16
★
$1.57 ingresos · $0.41 costo
Visitar →
|
|||
|
MRR recent
last 10 rentals · actual clearing price
|
Lyra2REv2
0.00002520563 BTC/M/d
|
$131.23
★
$131.64 ingresos · $0.41 costo
Visitar →
|
|||
|
MRR asking
aspirational — seller wish, not matched
|
Lyra2REv2
0.00000054154 BTC/M/d
|
$2.42
$2.83 ingresos · $0.41 costo
|
|||
| X16Rv2 | |||||
|
MRR floor
0% rented · matches cheapest seller
|
X16Rv2
0.00000056954 BTC/M/d
|
$0.27
★
$0.68 ingresos · $0.41 costo
Visitar →
|
|||
|
MRR recent
last 10 rentals · actual clearing price
|
X16Rv2
0.00000063655 BTC/M/d
|
$0.35
★
$0.76 ingresos · $0.41 costo
Visitar →
|
|||
|
MRR asking
aspirational — seller wish, not matched
|
X16Rv2
0.00000077820 BTC/M/d
|
$0.52
$0.93 ingresos · $0.41 costo
|
|||
| X16R | |||||
|
MRR floor
0% rented · matches cheapest seller
|
X16R
0.00000056954 BTC/M/d
|
$0.40
★
$0.81 ingresos · $0.41 costo
Visitar →
|
|||
|
MRR recent
last 10 rentals · actual clearing price
|
X16R
0.00000061118 BTC/M/d
|
$0.46
★
$0.87 ingresos · $0.41 costo
Visitar →
|
|||
|
MRR asking
aspirational — seller wish, not matched
|
X16R
0.00000061541 BTC/M/d
|
$0.46
$0.87 ingresos · $0.41 costo
|
|||
| NeoScrypt | |||||
|
NiceHash
seller 24h-weighted avg
|
NeoScrypt
0.00000061820 BTC/M/d
|
$-0.31
$0.10 ingresos · $0.41 costo
Visitar →
|
|||
|
MRR floor
5% rented · matches cheapest seller
|
NeoScrypt
0.00000320000 BTC/M/d
|
$0.11
★
$0.52 ingresos · $0.41 costo
Visitar →
|
|||
|
MRR recent
last 10 rentals · actual clearing price
|
NeoScrypt
0.00000314000 BTC/M/d
|
$0.10
★
$0.51 ingresos · $0.41 costo
Visitar →
|
|||
|
MRR asking
aspirational — seller wish, not matched
|
NeoScrypt
0.00000359000 BTC/M/d
|
$0.17
$0.58 ingresos · $0.41 costo
|
|||
| Zhash | |||||
|
NiceHash
seller 24h-weighted avg
|
Zhash
0.00000000691 BTC/H/d
|
$-0.39
$0.02 ingresos · $0.41 costo
Visitar →
|
|||
|
MRR floor
0% rented · matches cheapest seller
|
Zhash
0.00000007080 BTC/H/d
|
$-0.23
★
$0.18 ingresos · $0.41 costo
Visitar →
|
|||
|
MRR recent
last 10 rentals · actual clearing price
|
Zhash
0.00000008185 BTC/H/d
|
$-0.20
★
$0.21 ingresos · $0.41 costo
Visitar →
|
|||
|
MRR asking
aspirational — seller wish, not matched
|
Zhash
0.00000007080 BTC/H/d
|
$-0.23
$0.18 ingresos · $0.41 costo
|
|||
| VerusHash | |||||
|
NiceHash
seller 24h-weighted avg
|
VerusHash
0.00000002490 BTC/M/d
|
$-0.40
$0.01 ingresos · $0.41 costo
Visitar →
|
|||
|
MRR floor
0% rented · matches cheapest seller
|
VerusHash
0.00000010999 BTC/M/d
|
$-0.35
★
$0.06 ingresos · $0.41 costo
Visitar →
|
|||
|
MRR recent
last 10 rentals · actual clearing price
|
VerusHash
0.00000023020 BTC/M/d
|
$-0.28
★
$0.13 ingresos · $0.41 costo
Visitar →
|
|||
|
MRR asking
aspirational — seller wish, not matched
|
VerusHash
0.00000015580 BTC/M/d
|
$-0.32
$0.09 ingresos · $0.41 costo
|
|||
| Autolykos2 | |||||
|
NiceHash
seller 24h-weighted avg
|
Autolykos2
0.00000000548 BTC/M/d
|
$-0.36
★
$0.05 ingresos · $0.41 costo
Visitar →
|
|||
| Ethash | |||||
|
NiceHash
seller 24h-weighted avg
|
Ethash
0.00000002000 BTC/M/d
|
$-0.36
★
$0.05 ingresos · $0.41 costo
Visitar →
|
|||
| Etchash | |||||
|
NiceHash
seller 24h-weighted avg
|
Etchash
0.00000000502 BTC/M/d
|
$-0.40
$0.01 ingresos · $0.41 costo
Visitar →
|
|||
|
MRR floor
10% rented · matches cheapest seller
|
Etchash
0.00000001320 BTC/M/d
|
$-0.38
★
$0.03 ingresos · $0.41 costo
Visitar →
|
|||
|
MRR recent
last 10 rentals · actual clearing price
|
Etchash
0.00000001625 BTC/M/d
|
$-0.37
★
$0.04 ingresos · $0.41 costo
Visitar →
|
|||
|
MRR asking
aspirational — seller wish, not matched
|
Etchash
0.00000001394 BTC/M/d
|
$-0.38
$0.03 ingresos · $0.41 costo
|
|||
| Rigs × Qty | Share | Rev /rig/day | Cost /rig/day | Profit /rig/day | Total profit /day |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| — | — | — | — | — | — |
Periodo de recuperación para AMD Vega Frontier Edition
Modela la recuperación de la inversión, el coste eléctrico y la rentabilidad del primer año para este equipo.
Hardware recuperado cuando la línea cruza cero. Después, todo ganancia.
| Month | Earned (mo) | Cost burned (mo) | Cumulative earned | Cumulative cost | Net | % ROI |
|---|
Emisiones anuales por fuente
Basado en el consumo eléctrico anual y la intensidad de carbono de redes comunes.
| Fuente de energía | CO₂e / año |
|---|---|
| Wind | 16.06 kg |
| Nuclear | 17.52 kg |
| Hydroelectric | 35.04 kg |
| Geothermal | 55.49 kg |
| Solar | 65.71 kg |
| Biofuels | 335.84 kg |
| Gas | 715.48 kg |
| Coal | 1,197.33 kg |
Solo estimaciones — las emisiones reales varían.
¿Qué significa eso realmente?
At the world-average grid intensity of about 475 g CO₂e/kWh, AMD Vega Frontier Edition running 24/7 for a year releases about 694 kg of carbon dioxide equivalent. Here's what that looks like in everyday terms:
Dónde lo enchufas importa
Electricity is not one thing. A kilowatt-hour from a coal plant carries roughly 820 g of CO₂; the same kilowatt-hour from a hydro reservoir carries about 24 g. That's a 34× difference — large enough that AMD Vega Frontier Edition's annual footprint swings from roughly 1,197 kg on coal-heavy grids down to about 35 kg on hydro-dominated grids. The single biggest lever a miner has on their carbon footprint is choosing where to plug in.
Regions commonly used for low-carbon crypto mining include Quebec and British Columbia (hydro-dominated, typically <50 g CO₂/kWh), Iceland and Norway (geothermal + hydro, often <30 g), Paraguay (Itaipú hydro), and parts of the US Pacific Northwest. Coal-heavy grids — Kazakhstan, Inner Mongolia, Poland, parts of Australia — sit at the opposite end, often above 700 g CO₂/kWh.
Some operators also reduce their net impact by using otherwise-wasted energy: flare gas at oil wells (burning methane that would be vented anyway), curtailed renewables (wind or solar that the grid can't absorb), or behind-the-meter hydro during off-peak hours. These arrangements can drop effective emissions below the local grid average because the energy would have been wasted or flared without the mining load.
Cómo reducir la huella de este equipo
- Pick a greener ASIC. The efficiency column above matters as much as the grid: a 15 J/TH rig emits roughly half the CO₂ of a 30 J/TH rig for the same hashrate.
- Choose a low-carbon host. Data centres advertising hydro, geothermal, or nuclear power typically sit at <100 g CO₂/kWh.
- Look for stranded or curtailed energy. Flare-gas miners, wind-curtailment co-location, and off-peak hydro arrangements use energy that would otherwise be wasted.
- Use heat recovery. Capturing the heat for greenhouse agriculture, pool heating, or district warmth offsets fossil-fuel heating that would have been burned anyway.
- Time-shift your uptime. In grids with high daytime solar, running more during the day and less at night lowers your effective intensity even if you don't switch providers.
- Purchase verifiable offsets. Treat this as a last resort, not a substitute — and favour additional, permanent, third-party-verified projects (Gold Standard, Verra VCS).
Preguntas frecuentes
Yearly electricity use = rig power (W) × 24 × 365 ÷ 1000. We multiply that by each row's grid intensity in grams CO₂-equivalent per kWh and convert to kilograms. Intensities are representative averages — real emissions depend on your specific utility mix, time of day, and local transmission losses.
It depends almost entirely on where the electricity comes from. A single rig plugged into hydro in Quebec emits less over a year than an average family's two cars in a month. The same rig on a coal-dominated grid can exceed that in a few days. The hardware is the same — the grid is what changes the answer.
Network-wide estimates vary by methodology; the Cambridge Centre for Alternative Finance's Bitcoin Electricity Consumption Index is the most widely cited reference. As of recent reporting, the network's sustainable-energy share has grown as more hashrate migrates to hydro, wind, solar, and stranded-gas sites. This page just estimates a single rig — for the big picture, CCAF's dashboard is the best source.
Not directly. The rig draws the same wattage regardless of which pool it joins or how difficulty trends — so its electricity use, and therefore its emissions, stay constant. Those factors change revenue, not power consumption.