LP Agent
AI-powered DeFi automation for Solana liquidity providers
Copy Top LPs Now →
●
Goldshell
·
ASIC
·
Handshake
·
RELEASED JUL 2020
Goldshell HS3
Ganancia /day
$-0.41
Ingresos /day
$1.99
Costo $2.40 @ $0.1/kWh
Hashrate
4Th/s
Handshake
Power · Efficiency
1000.0W
0.25 j/Gh
Goldshell HS3 pierde $0.41 al día minando Handshake a 4 Th/s y consumiendo 1000.0 W de la red. Eso es tras descontar la electricidad a $0.1/kWh — sin llegar a cubrir costos a los precios actuales.
●
4 minutes ago
Similar miners ↓
Rentabilidad en el tiempo
Proyección diaria
Loading...
| Período | /Día | /Mes |
|---|---|---|
| Ingresos | $1.99 | $59.57 |
|
Costo
$0.1/kWh
|
$2.40 | $72.00 |
| Ganancia | $-0.41 | $-12.43 |
Mineable coins
2 algos
| Coin | Algorithm | Ingresos | Costo | Ganancia |
|---|---|---|---|---|
HNS
⚠
Handshake
|
Handshake
4Th · 1000.0W
|
$1.99 | $2.40 | $-0.41 |
|
—
|
Blake2B-Sia
2Th · 2000.0W
|
— | $4.80 | — |
Dónde minar
Datos en vivo cuando estén disponibles
Todavía no hay pools de minería rastreados para las monedas de este equipo.
Ganancia vs costo
cost 120.6%
Prueba tu propio hashrate
Th/s
W
Income/d
$0.00
Cost/d
$0.00
Profit/d
$0.00
Especificaciones
- Algorithm
- Handshake
- Also known as
- HS3 Handshake miner 2000Gh/s
- Fan(s)
- 2
- Hashrate
- 4 Th/s
- Humidity
- 5 - 95 %
- Interface
- Ethernet
- Manufacturer
- Goldshell
- Model
- HS3
- Noise level
- 75db
- Power
- 2000W
- Release
- Oct 2020
- Release date
- July 2020
- Size
- 31 x 18 x 28 cm
- Temperature
- 5 - 45 °C
- Voltage
- 12V
- Weight
- 7 kg
Profitability Simulator · Handshake
Network hashrate
1.86 PH/s
This rig
4 Th/s
Network ≈
464 rigs
Your share · 1 rig
—
Scenario · add 1 of this rig
vs Handshake network: 1.86 PH/s
| Rigs × Qty | Share | Rev /rig/day | Cost /rig/day | Profit /rig/day | Total profit /day |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| — | — | — | — | — | — |
Profit vs quantity added
Adjust the Quantity slider to see how adding more of this rig affects earnings.
Price vs Profitability
No live price data for HNS.
This view needs a fresh price for the canonical coin. Once one is available it will populate automatically.
Periodo de recuperación
Periodo de recuperación para Goldshell HS3
Modela la recuperación de la inversión, el coste eléctrico y la rentabilidad del primer año para este equipo.
Precio de compra
$5,000
Electricidad
$0.10/kWh
Horas/día
24
Comisión pool
2.0%
Crecimiento de dificultad/año
+0%
Ganancia diaria
$0.00
neto de electricidad + comisiones
Recuperación
—
—
Ganancia 12 meses
$0
—
Proyección de ganancia acumulada
Hardware recuperado cuando la línea cruza cero. Después, todo ganancia.
Monthly P&L · 3-year horizon
Capital cost is booked in month 1. Cumulative columns include the rig purchase, so Net goes positive at true breakeven.
| Month | Earned (mo) | Cost burned (mo) | Cumulative earned | Cumulative cost | Net | % ROI |
|---|
Huella de carbono
Emisiones anuales por fuente
Basado en el consumo eléctrico anual y la intensidad de carbono de redes comunes.
| Fuente de energía | CO₂e / año |
|---|---|
| Wind | 95.04 kg |
| Nuclear | 103.68 kg |
| Hydroelectric | 207.36 kg |
| Geothermal | 328.32 kg |
| Solar | 388.8 kg |
| Biofuels | 1,987.2 kg |
| Gas | 4,233.6 kg |
| Coal | 7,084.8 kg |
Solo estimaciones — las emisiones reales varían.
¿Qué significa eso realmente?
At the world-average grid intensity of about 475 g CO₂e/kWh, Goldshell HS3 running 24/7 for a year releases about 4,104 kg of carbon dioxide equivalent. Here's what that looks like in everyday terms:
Driving a gas car
10,158 mi
EPA average passenger car emissions ≈ 404 g CO₂/mile.
Trees to absorb it
186 trees
A mature tree absorbs roughly 22 kg CO₂ per year.
Household electricity
1.0 yrs
Equivalent to the yearly emissions of an average household's electricity.
Dónde lo enchufas importa
Electricity is not one thing. A kilowatt-hour from a coal plant carries roughly 820 g of CO₂; the same kilowatt-hour from a hydro reservoir carries about 24 g. That's a 34× difference — large enough that Goldshell HS3's annual footprint swings from roughly 7,085 kg on coal-heavy grids down to about 207 kg on hydro-dominated grids. The single biggest lever a miner has on their carbon footprint is choosing where to plug in.
Regions commonly used for low-carbon crypto mining include Quebec and British Columbia (hydro-dominated, typically <50 g CO₂/kWh), Iceland and Norway (geothermal + hydro, often <30 g), Paraguay (Itaipú hydro), and parts of the US Pacific Northwest. Coal-heavy grids — Kazakhstan, Inner Mongolia, Poland, parts of Australia — sit at the opposite end, often above 700 g CO₂/kWh.
Some operators also reduce their net impact by using otherwise-wasted energy: flare gas at oil wells (burning methane that would be vented anyway), curtailed renewables (wind or solar that the grid can't absorb), or behind-the-meter hydro during off-peak hours. These arrangements can drop effective emissions below the local grid average because the energy would have been wasted or flared without the mining load.
Cómo reducir la huella de este equipo
- Pick a greener ASIC. The efficiency column above matters as much as the grid: a 15 J/TH rig emits roughly half the CO₂ of a 30 J/TH rig for the same hashrate.
- Choose a low-carbon host. Data centres advertising hydro, geothermal, or nuclear power typically sit at <100 g CO₂/kWh.
- Look for stranded or curtailed energy. Flare-gas miners, wind-curtailment co-location, and off-peak hydro arrangements use energy that would otherwise be wasted.
- Use heat recovery. Capturing the heat for greenhouse agriculture, pool heating, or district warmth offsets fossil-fuel heating that would have been burned anyway.
- Time-shift your uptime. In grids with high daytime solar, running more during the day and less at night lowers your effective intensity even if you don't switch providers.
- Purchase verifiable offsets. Treat this as a last resort, not a substitute — and favour additional, permanent, third-party-verified projects (Gold Standard, Verra VCS).
Preguntas frecuentes
How do you calculate these numbers?
Yearly electricity use = rig power (W) × 24 × 365 ÷ 1000. We multiply that by each row's grid intensity in grams CO₂-equivalent per kWh and convert to kilograms. Intensities are representative averages — real emissions depend on your specific utility mix, time of day, and local transmission losses.
Is crypto mining bad for the environment?
It depends almost entirely on where the electricity comes from. A single rig plugged into hydro in Quebec emits less over a year than an average family's two cars in a month. The same rig on a coal-dominated grid can exceed that in a few days. The hardware is the same — the grid is what changes the answer.
What about the Bitcoin network as a whole?
Network-wide estimates vary by methodology; the Cambridge Centre for Alternative Finance's Bitcoin Electricity Consumption Index is the most widely cited reference. As of recent reporting, the network's sustainable-energy share has grown as more hashrate migrates to hydro, wind, solar, and stranded-gas sites. This page just estimates a single rig — for the big picture, CCAF's dashboard is the best source.
Do pool fees or mining difficulty affect the footprint?
Not directly. The rig draws the same wattage regardless of which pool it joins or how difficulty trends — so its electricity use, and therefore its emissions, stay constant. Those factors change revenue, not power consumption.
Similar Miners
Rentabilidad en el tiempo
Proyección diaria
Loading...
| Período | /Día | /Mes |
|---|---|---|
| Ingresos | $1.99 | $59.57 |
|
Costo
$0.1/kWh
|
$2.40 | $72.00 |
| Ganancia | $-0.41 | $-12.43 |
Mineable coins
2 algos
| Coin | Algorithm | Ingresos | Costo | Ganancia |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
HNS
⚠
Handshake
|
Handshake
4Th · 1000.0W
|
$1.99 | $2.40 | $-0.41 |
|
—
|
Blake2B-Sia
2Th · 2000.0W
|
— | $4.80 | — |
Dónde minar
Datos en vivo cuando estén disponibles
Todavía no hay pools de minería rastreados para las monedas de este equipo.
Ganancia vs costo
cost 120.6%
Prueba tu propio hashrate
Th/s
W
Income/d
$0.00
Cost/d
$0.00
Profit/d
$0.00
Especificaciones
- Algorithm
- Handshake
- Also known as
- HS3 Handshake miner 2000Gh/s
- Fan(s)
- 2
- Hashrate
- 4 Th/s
- Humidity
- 5 - 95 %
- Interface
- Ethernet
- Manufacturer
- Goldshell
- Model
- HS3
- Noise level
- 75db
- Power
- 2000W
- Release
- Oct 2020
- Release date
- July 2020
- Size
- 31 x 18 x 28 cm
- Temperature
- 5 - 45 °C
- Voltage
- 12V
- Weight
- 7 kg
Profitability Simulator · Handshake
Network hashrate
1.86 PH/s
This rig
4 Th/s
Network ≈
464 rigs
Your share · 1 rig
—
Scenario · add 1 of this rig
vs Handshake network: 1.86 PH/s
| Rigs × Qty | Share | Rev /rig/day | Cost /rig/day | Profit /rig/day | Total profit /day |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| — | — | — | — | — | — |
Profit vs quantity added
Adjust the Quantity slider to see how adding more of this rig affects earnings.
Price vs Profitability
No live price data for HNS.
This view needs a fresh price for the canonical coin. Once one is available it will populate automatically.
Periodo de recuperación
Periodo de recuperación para Goldshell HS3
Modela la recuperación de la inversión, el coste eléctrico y la rentabilidad del primer año para este equipo.
Precio de compra
$5,000
Electricidad
$0.10/kWh
Horas/día
24
Comisión pool
2.0%
Crecimiento de dificultad/año
+0%
Ganancia diaria
$0.00
neto de electricidad + comisiones
Recuperación
—
—
Ganancia 12 meses
$0
—
Proyección de ganancia acumulada
Hardware recuperado cuando la línea cruza cero. Después, todo ganancia.
Monthly P&L · 3-year horizon
Capital cost is booked in month 1. Cumulative columns include the rig purchase, so Net goes positive at true breakeven.
| Month | Earned (mo) | Cost burned (mo) | Cumulative earned | Cumulative cost | Net | % ROI |
|---|
Huella de carbono
Emisiones anuales por fuente
Basado en el consumo eléctrico anual y la intensidad de carbono de redes comunes.
| Fuente de energía | CO₂e / año |
|---|---|
| Wind | 95.04 kg |
| Nuclear | 103.68 kg |
| Hydroelectric | 207.36 kg |
| Geothermal | 328.32 kg |
| Solar | 388.8 kg |
| Biofuels | 1,987.2 kg |
| Gas | 4,233.6 kg |
| Coal | 7,084.8 kg |
Solo estimaciones — las emisiones reales varían.
¿Qué significa eso realmente?
At the world-average grid intensity of about 475 g CO₂e/kWh, Goldshell HS3 running 24/7 for a year releases about 4,104 kg of carbon dioxide equivalent. Here's what that looks like in everyday terms:
Driving a gas car
10,158 mi
EPA average passenger car emissions ≈ 404 g CO₂/mile.
Trees to absorb it
186 trees
A mature tree absorbs roughly 22 kg CO₂ per year.
Household electricity
1.0 yrs
Equivalent to the yearly emissions of an average household's electricity.
Dónde lo enchufas importa
Electricity is not one thing. A kilowatt-hour from a coal plant carries roughly 820 g of CO₂; the same kilowatt-hour from a hydro reservoir carries about 24 g. That's a 34× difference — large enough that Goldshell HS3's annual footprint swings from roughly 7,085 kg on coal-heavy grids down to about 207 kg on hydro-dominated grids. The single biggest lever a miner has on their carbon footprint is choosing where to plug in.
Regions commonly used for low-carbon crypto mining include Quebec and British Columbia (hydro-dominated, typically <50 g CO₂/kWh), Iceland and Norway (geothermal + hydro, often <30 g), Paraguay (Itaipú hydro), and parts of the US Pacific Northwest. Coal-heavy grids — Kazakhstan, Inner Mongolia, Poland, parts of Australia — sit at the opposite end, often above 700 g CO₂/kWh.
Some operators also reduce their net impact by using otherwise-wasted energy: flare gas at oil wells (burning methane that would be vented anyway), curtailed renewables (wind or solar that the grid can't absorb), or behind-the-meter hydro during off-peak hours. These arrangements can drop effective emissions below the local grid average because the energy would have been wasted or flared without the mining load.
Cómo reducir la huella de este equipo
- Pick a greener ASIC. The efficiency column above matters as much as the grid: a 15 J/TH rig emits roughly half the CO₂ of a 30 J/TH rig for the same hashrate.
- Choose a low-carbon host. Data centres advertising hydro, geothermal, or nuclear power typically sit at <100 g CO₂/kWh.
- Look for stranded or curtailed energy. Flare-gas miners, wind-curtailment co-location, and off-peak hydro arrangements use energy that would otherwise be wasted.
- Use heat recovery. Capturing the heat for greenhouse agriculture, pool heating, or district warmth offsets fossil-fuel heating that would have been burned anyway.
- Time-shift your uptime. In grids with high daytime solar, running more during the day and less at night lowers your effective intensity even if you don't switch providers.
- Purchase verifiable offsets. Treat this as a last resort, not a substitute — and favour additional, permanent, third-party-verified projects (Gold Standard, Verra VCS).
Preguntas frecuentes
How do you calculate these numbers?
Yearly electricity use = rig power (W) × 24 × 365 ÷ 1000. We multiply that by each row's grid intensity in grams CO₂-equivalent per kWh and convert to kilograms. Intensities are representative averages — real emissions depend on your specific utility mix, time of day, and local transmission losses.
Is crypto mining bad for the environment?
It depends almost entirely on where the electricity comes from. A single rig plugged into hydro in Quebec emits less over a year than an average family's two cars in a month. The same rig on a coal-dominated grid can exceed that in a few days. The hardware is the same — the grid is what changes the answer.
What about the Bitcoin network as a whole?
Network-wide estimates vary by methodology; the Cambridge Centre for Alternative Finance's Bitcoin Electricity Consumption Index is the most widely cited reference. As of recent reporting, the network's sustainable-energy share has grown as more hashrate migrates to hydro, wind, solar, and stranded-gas sites. This page just estimates a single rig — for the big picture, CCAF's dashboard is the best source.
Do pool fees or mining difficulty affect the footprint?
Not directly. The rig draws the same wattage regardless of which pool it joins or how difficulty trends — so its electricity use, and therefore its emissions, stay constant. Those factors change revenue, not power consumption.
Similar Miners
Preguntas frecuentes
Sobre el Goldshell HS3
¿Es rentable el Goldshell HS3?
A fecha de April 2026, el Goldshell HS3 genera $-0.41/día minando Handshake con un costo eléctrico de $0.1/kWh. A esta tarifa eléctrica no es rentable.
¿Cuánta electricidad consume el Goldshell HS3?
El Goldshell HS3 consume 1000W de electricidad. A $0.1/kWh, eso cuesta aproximadamente $2.40/día en electricidad.
¿Puede el Goldshell HS3 ganar con alquiler IA?
No. El Goldshell HS3 es un ASIC de minería — sin núcleos de cómputo de propósito general, no ejecuta cargas IA. El alquiler IA es exclusivo de GPU.
¿Qué algoritmos cripto puede minar el Goldshell HS3?
El Goldshell HS3 puede minar 2 algoritmo(s); Handshake es el más rentable, generando $1.99/día en ingresos de minería directa antes de electricidad. Apuntas la máquina a una pool y recibes pagos en la moneda nativa.
¿Puede el Goldshell HS3 vender hashrate en NiceHash?
Sí. NiceHash y otros mercados de hashrate (Mining Rig Rentals, etc.) permiten al Goldshell HS3 vender directamente su potencia Handshake — los compradores alquilan la computación, tú recibes BTC por hash entregado. Es similar a minar, pero elimina el riesgo del precio de la moneda ya que cobras en BTC al tipo de NiceHash.