LP Agent
Nvidia RTX 4070 Ti — Minería cripto
Nvidia RTX 4070 Ti genera hasta $3.76 al día, mejor en alquiler de IA a $0.18/h con 1 oferta. También disponible: minando PearlHash a 90 Th/s ($1.20/día) and venta de hashpower NeoScrypt ($0.09/día). Consume 200 W de la red — a $0.10/kWh, rentable a los precios actuales.
Toca para cambiar · 8 secciones Minería cripto 2/8
Proyección diaria
Ganadores diarios entre todos los streams — promediados del historial registrado del rig a $0.1/kWh
| Período | /Día | /Mes |
|---|---|---|
| Ingresos | $4.12 | $123.47 |
|
Costo
$0.1/kWh
|
$0.48 | $14.40 |
| Ganancia | $3.64 | $109.07 |
Mezcla de consenso interno — derivada de fuentes externas, no una cotización directa de un solo mercado.
LP Agent
Cheapest cloud GPUs for AI
Compare staking yields across networks.
Live gold + precious-metal spot prices.
Vietnamese product price comparison.
Tech reviews and gadget deep-dives.
Live RSI screener across stocks and crypto.
Our own 0% fee mining pool — your wallet address is your login, payouts on-chain.
¿Te resultó útil esta página?
¡Gracias por los comentarios!
¿Algo más que debamos saber? El formulario está abajo.
Historial de pagos de minería
| Período | /Día | /Mes |
|---|---|---|
| Ingresos | $1.68 | $50.40 |
|
Costo
$0.1/kWh
|
$0.48 | $14.40 |
| Ganancia | $1.20 | $36.00 |
Mezcla de consenso interno — derivada de fuentes externas, no una cotización directa de un solo mercado.
| Algoritmo | Neto / día |
|---|---|
|
PearlHash
★ Mejor
90 Th/s · 200.0 W
|
$1.20 |
|
KER
17 Mh/s · 120.0 W
|
$0.97 |
|
EVR
65.0 Mh/s · 120.0 W
|
$0.60 |
|
2.8241 Mh/s · 297.0 W
|
$0.14 |
|
1.1 Hh/s · 200.0 W
|
$0.00 |
|
29.4339 Mh/s · 252.0 W
|
$-0.05 |
|
58.4362 Mh/s · 220.0 W
|
$-0.22 |
|
149.714 Mh/s · 248.0 W
|
$-0.33 |
|
29.7784 Mh/s · 225.0 W
|
$-0.35 |
|
120.7661 Mh/s · 153.0 W
|
$-0.40 |
|
DYN
6 Kh/s · 130.0 W
|
$-0.40 |
|
108 Hh/s · 258.0 W
|
$-0.42 |
|
17.7031 Mh/s · 195.0 W
|
$-0.42 |
|
50.647 Mh/s · 165.0 W
|
$-0.45 |
|
142.7481 Mh/s · 294.0 W
|
$-0.47 |
|
103.2 Hh/s · 130.0 W
|
$-0.48 |
|
1.2893 Gh/s · 279.0 W
|
$-0.48 |
|
1.45 Gh/s · 120.0 W
|
$-0.48 |
|
CRY
4.6 Kh/s · 180.0 W
|
$-0.48 |
|
2.611 Gh/s · 141.0 W
|
$-0.48 |
|
50.647 Mh/s · 165.0 W
|
$-0.48 |
|
24 Gh/s · 150.0 W
|
$-0.48 |
|
32.5 Mh/s · 170.0 W
|
$-0.48 |
|
XEL
1.0 Mh/s · 100.0 W
|
$-0.48 |
|
PYR
9 Gh/s · 170.0 W
|
$-0.48 |
|
1.0 Gh/s · 120.0 W
|
$-0.48 |
|
KAR
1.9 Gh/s · 130.0 W
|
$-0.48 |
|
HOO
500 Mh/s · 110.0 W
|
$-0.48 |
|
ABE
64 Mh/s · 180.0 W
|
$-0.48 |
|
MER
65 Mh/s · 120.0 W
|
$-0.48 |
|
QHA
250 Mh/s · 220.0 W
|
$-0.48 |
|
TON
6.8 Gh/s · 170.0 W
|
$-0.48 |
|
MEO
32 Mh/s · 150.0 W
|
$-0.48 |
|
BLA
12.2248 Gh/s · 255.0 W
|
$-0.48 |
|
EQU
55 Hh/s · 250.0 W
|
$-0.48 |
|
EQU
435 Hh/s · 239.0 W
|
$-0.48 |
|
KEC
2.4386 Gh/s · 289.0 W
|
$-0.48 |
|
11.5488 Mh/s · 162.0 W
|
$-0.48 |
|
PRO
29.2322 Mh/s · 264.0 W
|
$-0.48 |
|
X16
33.4593 Mh/s · 254.0 W
|
$-0.48 |
|
X16
31.2667 Mh/s · 265.0 W
|
$-0.48 |
| Coin | Algorithm | Ingresos | Costo | Ganancia |
|---|---|---|---|---|
PRL
|
PearlHash
90Th · 200.0W
|
$1.68 | $0.48 | $1.20 |
KRX
|
KeryxHash
17Mh · 120.0W
|
$1.45 | $0.29 | $1.16 |
EVR
|
EvrProgPow
65.0Mh · 120.0W
|
$1.08 | $0.29 | $0.79 |
|
FTC
⚠
Feathercoin
|
NeoScrypt
2.8241Mh · 297.0W
|
$0.62 | $0.71 | $-0.09 |
|
GRIN
⚠
Grin
|
Cuckatoo32
1.1Hh · 200.0W
|
$0.48 | $0.48 | $0.00 |
Firo
|
FiroPoW
29.4339Mh · 252.0W
|
$0.43 | $0.60 | $-0.17 |
CFX
⚠
Conflux
|
Octopus
58.4362Mh · 220.0W
|
$0.26 | $0.53 | $-0.27 |
NEXA
⚠
Nexa
|
NexaPoW
149.714Mh · 248.0W
|
$0.15 | $0.60 | $-0.45 |
|
Ravencoin
|
KAWPOW
29.7784Mh · 225.0W
|
$0.13 | $0.54 | $-0.41 |
ERG
⚠
Ergo
|
Autolykos2
120.7661Mh · 153.0W
|
$0.08 | $0.37 | $-0.29 |
DNX
⚠
DNX
|
DynexSolve
6Kh · 130.0W
|
$0.08 | $0.31 | $-0.23 |
LTZ
⚠
Litecoinz
|
Zhash
108Hh · 258.0W
|
$0.06 | $0.62 | $-0.56 |
|
VRSC
⚠
Verus
|
VerusHash
17.7031Mh · 195.0W
|
$0.06 | $0.47 | $-0.41 |
|
Ethereum Classic
|
Etchash
50.647Mh · 165.0W
|
$0.03 | $0.40 | $-0.37 |
|
Monacoin
|
Lyra2REv2
142.7481Mh · 294.0W
|
$0.01 | $0.71 | $-0.70 |
|
Zcash
|
Equihash
103.2Hh · 130.0W
|
— | $0.31 | — |
Kaspa
|
KHeavyHash
1.2893Gh · 279.0W
|
— | $0.67 | — |
|
Bitcoin
|
Sha256
1.45Gh · 120.0W
|
— | $0.29 | — |
|
—
|
Xevan
10.7611Mh · 255.0W
|
— | $0.61 | — |
|
—
|
X21S
23.1561Mh · 248.0W
|
— | $0.60 | — |
|
—
|
HeavyHash
899.6252Mh · 279.0W
|
— | $0.67 | — |
|
—
|
Curvehash
8.1536Mh · 176.0W
|
— | $0.42 | — |
|
—
|
Radiant
1.4814Gh · 140.0W
|
— | $0.34 | — |
|
—
|
SHA256DT
4.7794Gh · 293.0W
|
— | $0.70 | — |
RTM
⚠
RTM
|
GhostRider
1.356Kh · 121.0W
|
— | $0.29 | — |
|
—
|
CryptoNightGPU
4.6Kh · 180.0W
|
— | $0.43 | — |
Epic Cash
|
ProgPow
32Mh · 190.0W
|
— | $0.46 | — |
|
—
|
X25X
4.1903Mh · 153.0W
|
— | $0.37 | — |
|
—
|
Skydoge
1.45Gh · 120.0W
|
— | $0.29 | — |
ALPH
|
Blake3
2.611Gh · 141.0W
|
— | $0.34 | — |
|
VTC
⚠
Vertcoin
|
Verthash
6.8Mh · 170.0W
|
— | $0.41 | — |
|
—
|
Memehash
140Mh · 230.0W
|
— | $0.55 | — |
|
—
|
Ethash
50.647Mh · 165.0W
|
— | $0.40 | — |
|
—
|
IronFish
24Gh · 150.0W
|
— | $0.36 | — |
IRON
⚠
Iron Fish
|
FishHash
32.5Mh · 170.0W
|
— | $0.41 | — |
|
—
|
XelisHashV2
1.0Mh · 100.0W
|
— | $0.24 | — |
|
—
|
PyrinHash
9Gh · 170.0W
|
— | $0.41 | — |
|
—
|
zkSNARK
1.0Gh · 120.0W
|
— | $0.29 | — |
|
—
|
SHA3x
730Mh · 170.0W
|
— | $0.41 | — |
|
—
|
KarlsenHashV2
1.9Gh · 130.0W
|
— | $0.31 | — |
|
—
|
Hoohash
500Mh · 110.0W
|
— | $0.26 | — |
|
—
|
Abelhash
64Mh · 180.0W
|
— | $0.43 | — |
|
—
|
Meraki
65Mh · 120.0W
|
— | $0.29 | — |
|
—
|
Qhash
250Mh · 220.0W
|
— | $0.53 | — |
|
—
|
Ton
6.8Gh · 170.0W
|
— | $0.41 | — |
|
—
|
MeowPow
32Mh · 150.0W
|
— | $0.36 | — |
|
—
|
Blake (2s)
12.2248Gh · 255.0W
|
— | $0.61 | — |
|
—
|
BCD
40.1438Mh · 261.0W
|
— | $0.63 | — |
|
—
|
Equihash(125,4)
87.817Hh · 266.0W
|
— | $0.64 | — |
|
—
|
Equihash(144,5)
111Hh · 252.0W
|
— | $0.60 | — |
|
—
|
Equihash(192,7)
55Hh · 250.0W
|
— | $0.60 | — |
|
—
|
Equihash(210,9)
435Hh · 239.0W
|
— | $0.57 | — |
|
—
|
Keccak
2.4386Gh · 289.0W
|
— | $0.69 | — |
|
—
|
Keccak-C
2.3984Gh · 289.0W
|
— | $0.69 | — |
ACM
⚠
Actinium
|
Lyra2z
11.5488Mh · 162.0W
|
— | $0.39 | — |
|
—
|
PHI1612
55.1996Mh · 210.0W
|
— | $0.50 | — |
|
—
|
ProgPowSERO
29.8814Mh · 266.0W
|
— | $0.64 | — |
|
—
|
ProgPowZ
29.2322Mh · 264.0W
|
— | $0.63 | — |
|
—
|
Tribus
161.522Mh · 240.0W
|
— | $0.58 | — |
|
—
|
Ubqhash
56.5981Mh · 189.0W
|
— | $0.45 | — |
|
—
|
X16R
33.4593Mh · 254.0W
|
— | $0.61 | — |
|
—
|
X16RT
33.5292Mh · 252.0W
|
— | $0.60 | — |
|
—
|
X16Rv2
31.2667Mh · 265.0W
|
— | $0.64 | — |
| Pool | Algoritmos soportados | Comisión | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Autolykos2 (ERG) · Etchash (ETC) · KHeavyHash (KAS) | 1.0% | Visit → | |
| Sha256 (BTC) | 0.0% | Visit → | |
| Blake3 (ALPH) · Sha256 (BTC) · Etchash (ETC) | — | Visit → | |
| Sha256 (BTC) | — | Visit → | |
| Blake3 (ALPH) · Sha256 (BTC) · FiroPoW (FIRO) | — | Visit → | |
| Sha256 (BTC) | — | Visit → | |
| Sha256 (BTC) | — | Visit → | |
| Sha256 (BTC) | — | Visit → | |
| Autolykos2 (ERG) · Etchash (ETC) | 0.9% | Visit → | |
| Sha256 (BTC) · Autolykos2 (ERG) · Etchash (ETC) | 1.0% | Visit → | |
| Autolykos2 (ERG) · GhostRider (RTM) · Verthash (VTC) | — | Visit → | |
| Sha256 (BTC) · Etchash (ETC) · KAWPOW (RVN) | — | Visit → | |
|
N
Nanopool
|
Octopus (CFX) · KAWPOW (RVN) | — | Visit → |
| Sha256 (BTC) | 0.0% | Visit → | |
| Sha256 (BTC) | — | Visit → | |
| PearlHash (PRL) | — | Visit → | |
| PearlHash (PRL) | — | Visit → | |
| Sha256 (BTC) | — | Visit → | |
| Blake3 (ALPH) · Sha256 (BTC) · Octopus (CFX) | — | Visit → | |
| PearlHash (PRL) | — | Visit → | |
| FiroPoW (FIRO) · NexaPoW (NEXA) | 1.0% | Visit → | |
| Sha256 (BTC) | — | Visit → | |
| Sha256 (BTC) | — | Visit → | |
| Sha256 (BTC) | — | Visit → | |
| GhostRider (RTM) · KAWPOW (RVN) · Verthash (VTC) | — | Visit → | |
| Sha256 (BTC) | — | Visit → | |
| Sha256 (BTC) | — | Visit → | |
| Blake3 (ALPH) · Octopus (CFX) · Autolykos2 (ERG) | — | Visit → |
Historial de ingresos netos por alquiler
| Período | /Día | /Mes |
|---|---|---|
| Ingresos | $4.25 | $127.50 |
|
Costo
$0.1/kWh
|
$0.48 | $14.40 |
| Ganancia | $3.77 | $113.10 |
Mezcla de consenso interno — derivada de fuentes externas, no una cotización directa de un solo mercado.
Flujo de ingresos Cómo Nvidia RTX 4070 Ti gana en el mercado de GPU para IA how we got $3.77/day · ▾
Historial de pagos del hashmarket
| Período | /Día | /Mes |
|---|---|---|
| Ingresos | $0.57 | $17.10 |
|
Costo
$0.1/kWh
|
$0.48 | $14.40 |
| Ganancia | $0.09 | $2.70 |
Mezcla de consenso interno — derivada de fuentes externas, no una cotización directa de un solo mercado.
MRR
· KAWPOW
· $0.38/day
Visitar on MRR →
Visitar on MRR →
MRR
Visitar on MRR →
| Rigs × Qty | Share | Rev /rig/day | Cost /rig/day | Profit /rig/day | Total profit /day |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| — | — | — | — | — | — |
Periodo de recuperación para Nvidia RTX 4070 Ti
Modela la recuperación de la inversión, el coste eléctrico y la rentabilidad del primer año para este equipo.
Hardware recuperado cuando la línea cruza cero. Después, todo ganancia.
| Month | Earned (mo) | Cost burned (mo) | Cumulative earned | Cumulative cost | Net | % ROI |
|---|
Emisiones anuales por fuente
Basado en el consumo eléctrico anual y la intensidad de carbono de redes comunes.
| Fuente de energía | CO₂e / año |
|---|---|
| Wind | 19.01 kg |
| Nuclear | 20.74 kg |
| Hydroelectric | 41.47 kg |
| Geothermal | 65.66 kg |
| Solar | 77.76 kg |
| Biofuels | 397.44 kg |
| Gas | 846.72 kg |
| Coal | 1,416.96 kg |
Solo estimaciones — las emisiones reales varían.
¿Qué significa eso realmente?
At the world-average grid intensity of about 475 g CO₂e/kWh, Nvidia RTX 4070 Ti running 24/7 for a year releases about 821 kg of carbon dioxide equivalent. Here's what that looks like in everyday terms:
Dónde lo enchufas importa
Electricity is not one thing. A kilowatt-hour from a coal plant carries roughly 820 g of CO₂; the same kilowatt-hour from a hydro reservoir carries about 24 g. That's a 34× difference — large enough that Nvidia RTX 4070 Ti's annual footprint swings from roughly 1,417 kg on coal-heavy grids down to about 41 kg on hydro-dominated grids. The single biggest lever a miner has on their carbon footprint is choosing where to plug in.
Regions commonly used for low-carbon crypto mining include Quebec and British Columbia (hydro-dominated, typically <50 g CO₂/kWh), Iceland and Norway (geothermal + hydro, often <30 g), Paraguay (Itaipú hydro), and parts of the US Pacific Northwest. Coal-heavy grids — Kazakhstan, Inner Mongolia, Poland, parts of Australia — sit at the opposite end, often above 700 g CO₂/kWh.
Some operators also reduce their net impact by using otherwise-wasted energy: flare gas at oil wells (burning methane that would be vented anyway), curtailed renewables (wind or solar that the grid can't absorb), or behind-the-meter hydro during off-peak hours. These arrangements can drop effective emissions below the local grid average because the energy would have been wasted or flared without the mining load.
Cómo reducir la huella de este equipo
- Pick a greener ASIC. The efficiency column above matters as much as the grid: a 15 J/TH rig emits roughly half the CO₂ of a 30 J/TH rig for the same hashrate.
- Choose a low-carbon host. Data centres advertising hydro, geothermal, or nuclear power typically sit at <100 g CO₂/kWh.
- Look for stranded or curtailed energy. Flare-gas miners, wind-curtailment co-location, and off-peak hydro arrangements use energy that would otherwise be wasted.
- Use heat recovery. Capturing the heat for greenhouse agriculture, pool heating, or district warmth offsets fossil-fuel heating that would have been burned anyway.
- Time-shift your uptime. In grids with high daytime solar, running more during the day and less at night lowers your effective intensity even if you don't switch providers.
- Purchase verifiable offsets. Treat this as a last resort, not a substitute — and favour additional, permanent, third-party-verified projects (Gold Standard, Verra VCS).
Preguntas frecuentes
Yearly electricity use = rig power (W) × 24 × 365 ÷ 1000. We multiply that by each row's grid intensity in grams CO₂-equivalent per kWh and convert to kilograms. Intensities are representative averages — real emissions depend on your specific utility mix, time of day, and local transmission losses.
It depends almost entirely on where the electricity comes from. A single rig plugged into hydro in Quebec emits less over a year than an average family's two cars in a month. The same rig on a coal-dominated grid can exceed that in a few days. The hardware is the same — the grid is what changes the answer.
Network-wide estimates vary by methodology; the Cambridge Centre for Alternative Finance's Bitcoin Electricity Consumption Index is the most widely cited reference. As of recent reporting, the network's sustainable-energy share has grown as more hashrate migrates to hydro, wind, solar, and stranded-gas sites. This page just estimates a single rig — for the big picture, CCAF's dashboard is the best source.
Not directly. The rig draws the same wattage regardless of which pool it joins or how difficulty trends — so its electricity use, and therefore its emissions, stay constant. Those factors change revenue, not power consumption.
Toca para cambiar · 8 secciones Minería cripto 2/8
Proyección diaria
Ganadores diarios entre todos los streams — promediados del historial registrado del rig a $0.1/kWh
| Período | /Día | /Mes |
|---|---|---|
| Ingresos | $4.12 | $123.47 |
|
Costo
$0.1/kWh
|
$0.48 | $14.40 |
| Ganancia | $3.64 | $109.07 |
Mezcla de consenso interno — derivada de fuentes externas, no una cotización directa de un solo mercado.
Historial de pagos de minería
| Período | /Día | /Mes |
|---|---|---|
| Ingresos | $1.68 | $50.40 |
|
Costo
$0.1/kWh
|
$0.48 | $14.40 |
| Ganancia | $1.20 | $36.00 |
Mezcla de consenso interno — derivada de fuentes externas, no una cotización directa de un solo mercado.
| Algoritmo | Neto / día |
|---|---|
|
PearlHash
★ Mejor
90 Th/s · 200.0 W
|
$1.20 |
|
KER
17 Mh/s · 120.0 W
|
$0.97 |
|
EVR
65.0 Mh/s · 120.0 W
|
$0.60 |
|
2.8241 Mh/s · 297.0 W
|
$0.14 |
|
1.1 Hh/s · 200.0 W
|
$0.00 |
|
29.4339 Mh/s · 252.0 W
|
$-0.05 |
|
58.4362 Mh/s · 220.0 W
|
$-0.22 |
|
149.714 Mh/s · 248.0 W
|
$-0.33 |
|
29.7784 Mh/s · 225.0 W
|
$-0.35 |
|
120.7661 Mh/s · 153.0 W
|
$-0.40 |
|
DYN
6 Kh/s · 130.0 W
|
$-0.40 |
|
108 Hh/s · 258.0 W
|
$-0.42 |
|
17.7031 Mh/s · 195.0 W
|
$-0.42 |
|
50.647 Mh/s · 165.0 W
|
$-0.45 |
|
142.7481 Mh/s · 294.0 W
|
$-0.47 |
|
103.2 Hh/s · 130.0 W
|
$-0.48 |
|
1.2893 Gh/s · 279.0 W
|
$-0.48 |
|
1.45 Gh/s · 120.0 W
|
$-0.48 |
|
CRY
4.6 Kh/s · 180.0 W
|
$-0.48 |
|
2.611 Gh/s · 141.0 W
|
$-0.48 |
|
50.647 Mh/s · 165.0 W
|
$-0.48 |
|
24 Gh/s · 150.0 W
|
$-0.48 |
|
32.5 Mh/s · 170.0 W
|
$-0.48 |
|
XEL
1.0 Mh/s · 100.0 W
|
$-0.48 |
|
PYR
9 Gh/s · 170.0 W
|
$-0.48 |
|
1.0 Gh/s · 120.0 W
|
$-0.48 |
|
KAR
1.9 Gh/s · 130.0 W
|
$-0.48 |
|
HOO
500 Mh/s · 110.0 W
|
$-0.48 |
|
ABE
64 Mh/s · 180.0 W
|
$-0.48 |
|
MER
65 Mh/s · 120.0 W
|
$-0.48 |
|
QHA
250 Mh/s · 220.0 W
|
$-0.48 |
|
TON
6.8 Gh/s · 170.0 W
|
$-0.48 |
|
MEO
32 Mh/s · 150.0 W
|
$-0.48 |
|
BLA
12.2248 Gh/s · 255.0 W
|
$-0.48 |
|
EQU
55 Hh/s · 250.0 W
|
$-0.48 |
|
EQU
435 Hh/s · 239.0 W
|
$-0.48 |
|
KEC
2.4386 Gh/s · 289.0 W
|
$-0.48 |
|
11.5488 Mh/s · 162.0 W
|
$-0.48 |
|
PRO
29.2322 Mh/s · 264.0 W
|
$-0.48 |
|
X16
33.4593 Mh/s · 254.0 W
|
$-0.48 |
|
X16
31.2667 Mh/s · 265.0 W
|
$-0.48 |
| Coin | Algorithm | Ingresos | Costo | Ganancia |
|---|---|---|---|---|
PRL
|
PearlHash
90Th · 200.0W
|
$1.68 | $0.48 | $1.20 |
KRX
|
KeryxHash
17Mh · 120.0W
|
$1.45 | $0.29 | $1.16 |
EVR
|
EvrProgPow
65.0Mh · 120.0W
|
$1.08 | $0.29 | $0.79 |
|
FTC
⚠
Feathercoin
|
NeoScrypt
2.8241Mh · 297.0W
|
$0.62 | $0.71 | $-0.09 |
|
GRIN
⚠
Grin
|
Cuckatoo32
1.1Hh · 200.0W
|
$0.48 | $0.48 | $0.00 |
Firo
|
FiroPoW
29.4339Mh · 252.0W
|
$0.43 | $0.60 | $-0.17 |
CFX
⚠
Conflux
|
Octopus
58.4362Mh · 220.0W
|
$0.26 | $0.53 | $-0.27 |
NEXA
⚠
Nexa
|
NexaPoW
149.714Mh · 248.0W
|
$0.15 | $0.60 | $-0.45 |
|
Ravencoin
|
KAWPOW
29.7784Mh · 225.0W
|
$0.13 | $0.54 | $-0.41 |
ERG
⚠
Ergo
|
Autolykos2
120.7661Mh · 153.0W
|
$0.08 | $0.37 | $-0.29 |
DNX
⚠
DNX
|
DynexSolve
6Kh · 130.0W
|
$0.08 | $0.31 | $-0.23 |
LTZ
⚠
Litecoinz
|
Zhash
108Hh · 258.0W
|
$0.06 | $0.62 | $-0.56 |
|
VRSC
⚠
Verus
|
VerusHash
17.7031Mh · 195.0W
|
$0.06 | $0.47 | $-0.41 |
|
Ethereum Classic
|
Etchash
50.647Mh · 165.0W
|
$0.03 | $0.40 | $-0.37 |
|
Monacoin
|
Lyra2REv2
142.7481Mh · 294.0W
|
$0.01 | $0.71 | $-0.70 |
|
Zcash
|
Equihash
103.2Hh · 130.0W
|
— | $0.31 | — |
Kaspa
|
KHeavyHash
1.2893Gh · 279.0W
|
— | $0.67 | — |
|
Bitcoin
|
Sha256
1.45Gh · 120.0W
|
— | $0.29 | — |
|
—
|
Xevan
10.7611Mh · 255.0W
|
— | $0.61 | — |
|
—
|
X21S
23.1561Mh · 248.0W
|
— | $0.60 | — |
|
—
|
HeavyHash
899.6252Mh · 279.0W
|
— | $0.67 | — |
|
—
|
Curvehash
8.1536Mh · 176.0W
|
— | $0.42 | — |
|
—
|
Radiant
1.4814Gh · 140.0W
|
— | $0.34 | — |
|
—
|
SHA256DT
4.7794Gh · 293.0W
|
— | $0.70 | — |
RTM
⚠
RTM
|
GhostRider
1.356Kh · 121.0W
|
— | $0.29 | — |
|
—
|
CryptoNightGPU
4.6Kh · 180.0W
|
— | $0.43 | — |
Epic Cash
|
ProgPow
32Mh · 190.0W
|
— | $0.46 | — |
|
—
|
X25X
4.1903Mh · 153.0W
|
— | $0.37 | — |
|
—
|
Skydoge
1.45Gh · 120.0W
|
— | $0.29 | — |
ALPH
|
Blake3
2.611Gh · 141.0W
|
— | $0.34 | — |
|
VTC
⚠
Vertcoin
|
Verthash
6.8Mh · 170.0W
|
— | $0.41 | — |
|
—
|
Memehash
140Mh · 230.0W
|
— | $0.55 | — |
|
—
|
Ethash
50.647Mh · 165.0W
|
— | $0.40 | — |
|
—
|
IronFish
24Gh · 150.0W
|
— | $0.36 | — |
IRON
⚠
Iron Fish
|
FishHash
32.5Mh · 170.0W
|
— | $0.41 | — |
|
—
|
XelisHashV2
1.0Mh · 100.0W
|
— | $0.24 | — |
|
—
|
PyrinHash
9Gh · 170.0W
|
— | $0.41 | — |
|
—
|
zkSNARK
1.0Gh · 120.0W
|
— | $0.29 | — |
|
—
|
SHA3x
730Mh · 170.0W
|
— | $0.41 | — |
|
—
|
KarlsenHashV2
1.9Gh · 130.0W
|
— | $0.31 | — |
|
—
|
Hoohash
500Mh · 110.0W
|
— | $0.26 | — |
|
—
|
Abelhash
64Mh · 180.0W
|
— | $0.43 | — |
|
—
|
Meraki
65Mh · 120.0W
|
— | $0.29 | — |
|
—
|
Qhash
250Mh · 220.0W
|
— | $0.53 | — |
|
—
|
Ton
6.8Gh · 170.0W
|
— | $0.41 | — |
|
—
|
MeowPow
32Mh · 150.0W
|
— | $0.36 | — |
|
—
|
Blake (2s)
12.2248Gh · 255.0W
|
— | $0.61 | — |
|
—
|
BCD
40.1438Mh · 261.0W
|
— | $0.63 | — |
|
—
|
Equihash(125,4)
87.817Hh · 266.0W
|
— | $0.64 | — |
|
—
|
Equihash(144,5)
111Hh · 252.0W
|
— | $0.60 | — |
|
—
|
Equihash(192,7)
55Hh · 250.0W
|
— | $0.60 | — |
|
—
|
Equihash(210,9)
435Hh · 239.0W
|
— | $0.57 | — |
|
—
|
Keccak
2.4386Gh · 289.0W
|
— | $0.69 | — |
|
—
|
Keccak-C
2.3984Gh · 289.0W
|
— | $0.69 | — |
ACM
⚠
Actinium
|
Lyra2z
11.5488Mh · 162.0W
|
— | $0.39 | — |
|
—
|
PHI1612
55.1996Mh · 210.0W
|
— | $0.50 | — |
|
—
|
ProgPowSERO
29.8814Mh · 266.0W
|
— | $0.64 | — |
|
—
|
ProgPowZ
29.2322Mh · 264.0W
|
— | $0.63 | — |
|
—
|
Tribus
161.522Mh · 240.0W
|
— | $0.58 | — |
|
—
|
Ubqhash
56.5981Mh · 189.0W
|
— | $0.45 | — |
|
—
|
X16R
33.4593Mh · 254.0W
|
— | $0.61 | — |
|
—
|
X16RT
33.5292Mh · 252.0W
|
— | $0.60 | — |
|
—
|
X16Rv2
31.2667Mh · 265.0W
|
— | $0.64 | — |
| Pool | Algoritmos soportados | Comisión | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Autolykos2 (ERG) · Etchash (ETC) · KHeavyHash (KAS) | 1.0% | Visit → | |
| Sha256 (BTC) | 0.0% | Visit → | |
| Blake3 (ALPH) · Sha256 (BTC) · Etchash (ETC) | — | Visit → | |
| Sha256 (BTC) | — | Visit → | |
| Blake3 (ALPH) · Sha256 (BTC) · FiroPoW (FIRO) | — | Visit → | |
| Sha256 (BTC) | — | Visit → | |
| Sha256 (BTC) | — | Visit → | |
| Sha256 (BTC) | — | Visit → | |
| Autolykos2 (ERG) · Etchash (ETC) | 0.9% | Visit → | |
| Sha256 (BTC) · Autolykos2 (ERG) · Etchash (ETC) | 1.0% | Visit → | |
| Autolykos2 (ERG) · GhostRider (RTM) · Verthash (VTC) | — | Visit → | |
| Sha256 (BTC) · Etchash (ETC) · KAWPOW (RVN) | — | Visit → | |
|
N
Nanopool
|
Octopus (CFX) · KAWPOW (RVN) | — | Visit → |
| Sha256 (BTC) | 0.0% | Visit → | |
| Sha256 (BTC) | — | Visit → | |
| PearlHash (PRL) | — | Visit → | |
| PearlHash (PRL) | — | Visit → | |
| Sha256 (BTC) | — | Visit → | |
| Blake3 (ALPH) · Sha256 (BTC) · Octopus (CFX) | — | Visit → | |
| PearlHash (PRL) | — | Visit → | |
| FiroPoW (FIRO) · NexaPoW (NEXA) | 1.0% | Visit → | |
| Sha256 (BTC) | — | Visit → | |
| Sha256 (BTC) | — | Visit → | |
| Sha256 (BTC) | — | Visit → | |
| GhostRider (RTM) · KAWPOW (RVN) · Verthash (VTC) | — | Visit → | |
| Sha256 (BTC) | — | Visit → | |
| Sha256 (BTC) | — | Visit → | |
| Blake3 (ALPH) · Octopus (CFX) · Autolykos2 (ERG) | — | Visit → |
Historial de ingresos netos por alquiler
| Período | /Día | /Mes |
|---|---|---|
| Ingresos | $4.25 | $127.50 |
|
Costo
$0.1/kWh
|
$0.48 | $14.40 |
| Ganancia | $3.77 | $113.10 |
Mezcla de consenso interno — derivada de fuentes externas, no una cotización directa de un solo mercado.
Flujo de ingresos Cómo Nvidia RTX 4070 Ti gana en el mercado de GPU para IA how we got $3.77/day · ▾
Historial de pagos del hashmarket
| Período | /Día | /Mes |
|---|---|---|
| Ingresos | $0.57 | $17.10 |
|
Costo
$0.1/kWh
|
$0.48 | $14.40 |
| Ganancia | $0.09 | $2.70 |
Mezcla de consenso interno — derivada de fuentes externas, no una cotización directa de un solo mercado.
MRR
· KAWPOW
· $0.38/day
Visitar on MRR →
Visitar on MRR →
MRR
Visitar on MRR →
| Rigs × Qty | Share | Rev /rig/day | Cost /rig/day | Profit /rig/day | Total profit /day |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| — | — | — | — | — | — |
Periodo de recuperación para Nvidia RTX 4070 Ti
Modela la recuperación de la inversión, el coste eléctrico y la rentabilidad del primer año para este equipo.
Hardware recuperado cuando la línea cruza cero. Después, todo ganancia.
| Month | Earned (mo) | Cost burned (mo) | Cumulative earned | Cumulative cost | Net | % ROI |
|---|
Emisiones anuales por fuente
Basado en el consumo eléctrico anual y la intensidad de carbono de redes comunes.
| Fuente de energía | CO₂e / año |
|---|---|
| Wind | 19.01 kg |
| Nuclear | 20.74 kg |
| Hydroelectric | 41.47 kg |
| Geothermal | 65.66 kg |
| Solar | 77.76 kg |
| Biofuels | 397.44 kg |
| Gas | 846.72 kg |
| Coal | 1,416.96 kg |
Solo estimaciones — las emisiones reales varían.
¿Qué significa eso realmente?
At the world-average grid intensity of about 475 g CO₂e/kWh, Nvidia RTX 4070 Ti running 24/7 for a year releases about 821 kg of carbon dioxide equivalent. Here's what that looks like in everyday terms:
Dónde lo enchufas importa
Electricity is not one thing. A kilowatt-hour from a coal plant carries roughly 820 g of CO₂; the same kilowatt-hour from a hydro reservoir carries about 24 g. That's a 34× difference — large enough that Nvidia RTX 4070 Ti's annual footprint swings from roughly 1,417 kg on coal-heavy grids down to about 41 kg on hydro-dominated grids. The single biggest lever a miner has on their carbon footprint is choosing where to plug in.
Regions commonly used for low-carbon crypto mining include Quebec and British Columbia (hydro-dominated, typically <50 g CO₂/kWh), Iceland and Norway (geothermal + hydro, often <30 g), Paraguay (Itaipú hydro), and parts of the US Pacific Northwest. Coal-heavy grids — Kazakhstan, Inner Mongolia, Poland, parts of Australia — sit at the opposite end, often above 700 g CO₂/kWh.
Some operators also reduce their net impact by using otherwise-wasted energy: flare gas at oil wells (burning methane that would be vented anyway), curtailed renewables (wind or solar that the grid can't absorb), or behind-the-meter hydro during off-peak hours. These arrangements can drop effective emissions below the local grid average because the energy would have been wasted or flared without the mining load.
Cómo reducir la huella de este equipo
- Pick a greener ASIC. The efficiency column above matters as much as the grid: a 15 J/TH rig emits roughly half the CO₂ of a 30 J/TH rig for the same hashrate.
- Choose a low-carbon host. Data centres advertising hydro, geothermal, or nuclear power typically sit at <100 g CO₂/kWh.
- Look for stranded or curtailed energy. Flare-gas miners, wind-curtailment co-location, and off-peak hydro arrangements use energy that would otherwise be wasted.
- Use heat recovery. Capturing the heat for greenhouse agriculture, pool heating, or district warmth offsets fossil-fuel heating that would have been burned anyway.
- Time-shift your uptime. In grids with high daytime solar, running more during the day and less at night lowers your effective intensity even if you don't switch providers.
- Purchase verifiable offsets. Treat this as a last resort, not a substitute — and favour additional, permanent, third-party-verified projects (Gold Standard, Verra VCS).
Preguntas frecuentes
Yearly electricity use = rig power (W) × 24 × 365 ÷ 1000. We multiply that by each row's grid intensity in grams CO₂-equivalent per kWh and convert to kilograms. Intensities are representative averages — real emissions depend on your specific utility mix, time of day, and local transmission losses.
It depends almost entirely on where the electricity comes from. A single rig plugged into hydro in Quebec emits less over a year than an average family's two cars in a month. The same rig on a coal-dominated grid can exceed that in a few days. The hardware is the same — the grid is what changes the answer.
Network-wide estimates vary by methodology; the Cambridge Centre for Alternative Finance's Bitcoin Electricity Consumption Index is the most widely cited reference. As of recent reporting, the network's sustainable-energy share has grown as more hashrate migrates to hydro, wind, solar, and stranded-gas sites. This page just estimates a single rig — for the big picture, CCAF's dashboard is the best source.
Not directly. The rig draws the same wattage regardless of which pool it joins or how difficulty trends — so its electricity use, and therefore its emissions, stay constant. Those factors change revenue, not power consumption.