LP Agent
AMD RX 6650 XT — Periodo de recuperación
AMD RX 6650 XT pierde hasta $0.22 al día, mejor vendiendo hashpower de KAWPOW. También disponible: minando KAWPOW a 16.1754 Mh/s ($-0.31/día). Consume 157 W de la red — a $0.10/kWh, sin llegar a cubrir costos a los precios actuales.
Toca para cambiar · 7 secciones Periodo de recuperación 6/7
Esta GPU tiene ? GB de VRAM — la mayoría de los mercados de IA requieren al menos 12 GB.
Proyección diaria
Ganadores diarios entre todos los streams — promediados del historial registrado del rig a $0.1/kWh
| Período | /Día | /Mes |
|---|---|---|
| Ingresos | $0.16 | $4.80 |
|
Costo
$0.1/kWh
|
$0.38 | $11.40 |
| Ganancia | $-0.22 | $-6.60 |
Mezcla de consenso interno — derivada de fuentes externas, no una cotización directa de un solo mercado.
LP Agent
Cheapest cloud GPUs for AI
Compare staking yields across networks.
Live gold + precious-metal spot prices.
Vietnamese product price comparison.
Tech reviews and gadget deep-dives.
Live RSI screener across stocks and crypto.
¿Te resultó útil esta página?
¡Gracias por los comentarios!
¿Algo más que debamos saber? El formulario está abajo.
Historial de pagos de minería
| Período | /Día | /Mes |
|---|---|---|
| Ingresos | $0.07 | $2.10 |
|
Costo
$0.1/kWh
|
$0.38 | $11.40 |
| Ganancia | $-0.31 | $-9.30 |
Mezcla de consenso interno — derivada de fuentes externas, no una cotización directa de un solo mercado.
| Algoritmo | Neto / día |
|---|---|
|
KAW
KAWPOW
★ Mejor
16.1754 Mh/s · 157.0 W
|
$-0.31 |
|
AUT
Autolykos2
48.644 Mh/s · 99.0 W
|
$-0.35 |
|
NEX
NexaPoW
3.8253 Mh/s · 69.0 W
|
$-0.36 |
|
VER
VerusHash
6.8455 Mh/s · 127.0 W
|
$-0.36 |
|
ETC
Etchash
25.47 Mh/s · 66.0 W
|
$-0.36 |
|
LYR
Lyra2REv2
53.2468 Mh/s · 155.0 W
|
$-0.38 |
|
KHE
KHeavyHash
360.448 Mh/s · 154.0 W
|
$-0.38 |
|
X16
X16R
17.8611 Mh/s · 156.0 W
|
$-0.38 |
|
X16
X16Rv2
17.1544 Mh/s · 156.0 W
|
$-0.38 |
|
ETH
Ethash
25.47 Mh/s · 66.0 W
|
$-0.38 |
|
KAR
KarlsenHashV2
722.603 Mh/s · 143.0 W
|
$-0.38 |
|
EQU
Equihash192_7
19.503 Hh/s · 66.0 W
|
$-0.38 |
|
EQU
Equihash210_9
129.288 Hh/s · 60.0 W
|
$-0.38 |
|
BLA
Blake (2s)
3.6068 Gh/s · 51.0 W
|
$-0.38 |
| Coin | Algorithm | Ingresos | Costo | Ganancia |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
RVN
Ravencoin
|
KAWPOW
16.1754Mh · 157.0W
|
$0.07 | $0.38 | $-0.31 |
ERG
⚠
Ergo
|
Autolykos2
48.644Mh · 99.0W
|
$0.03 | $0.24 | $-0.21 |
NEXA
⚠
Nexa
|
NexaPoW
3.8253Mh · 69.0W
|
$0.02 | $0.17 | $-0.15 |
|
VRSC
⚠
Verus
|
VerusHash
6.8455Mh · 127.0W
|
$0.02 | $0.30 | $-0.28 |
|
ETC
Ethereum Classic
|
Etchash
25.47Mh · 66.0W
|
$0.02 | $0.16 | $-0.14 |
|
MONA
Monacoin
|
Lyra2REv2
53.2468Mh · 155.0W
|
— | $0.37 | — |
KAS
Kaspa
|
KHeavyHash
360.448Mh · 154.0W
|
— | $0.37 | — |
|
—
|
ProgPowSERO
16.6392Mh · 157.0W
|
— | $0.38 | — |
|
—
|
ProgPowZ
16.6799Mh · 157.0W
|
— | $0.38 | — |
|
—
|
Tribus
90.8062Mh · 154.0W
|
— | $0.37 | — |
|
—
|
Ubqhash
3.1429Mh · 59.0W
|
— | $0.14 | — |
|
—
|
X16R
17.8611Mh · 156.0W
|
— | $0.37 | — |
|
—
|
X16RT
17.9245Mh · 155.0W
|
— | $0.37 | — |
|
—
|
X16Rv2
17.1544Mh · 156.0W
|
— | $0.37 | — |
|
—
|
X21S
11.7941Mh · 155.0W
|
— | $0.37 | — |
|
—
|
HeavyHash
427.1167Mh · 156.0W
|
— | $0.37 | — |
|
—
|
Curvehash
1.9125Mh · 40.0W
|
— | $0.10 | — |
FIRO
Firo
|
FiroPoW
16.7152Mh · 157.0W
|
— | $0.38 | — |
|
—
|
Radiant
653.9427Mh · 157.0W
|
— | $0.38 | — |
|
—
|
SHA256DT
1.9517Gh · 157.0W
|
— | $0.38 | — |
|
—
|
GhostRider
783Hh · 104.0W
|
— | $0.25 | — |
|
—
|
BMW512
1.5068Gh · 150.0W
|
— | $0.36 | — |
|
VTC
Vertcoin
|
Verthash
372.5145Kh · 97.0W
|
— | $0.23 | — |
|
—
|
Ethash
25.47Mh · 66.0W
|
— | $0.16 | — |
|
—
|
KarlsenHashV2
722.603Mh · 143.0W
|
— | $0.34 | — |
|
—
|
Equihash192_7
19.503Hh · 66.0W
|
— | $0.16 | — |
|
—
|
Equihash210_9
129.288Hh · 60.0W
|
— | $0.14 | — |
|
—
|
Blake (2s)
3.6068Gh · 51.0W
|
— | $0.12 | — |
|
—
|
BCD
12.1299Mh · 58.0W
|
— | $0.14 | — |
|
—
|
C11
14.6807Mh · 53.0W
|
— | $0.13 | — |
|
—
|
Equihash(125,4)
22.5Hh · 131.0W
|
— | $0.31 | — |
|
—
|
Equihash(144,5)
32.924Hh · 65.0W
|
— | $0.16 | — |
|
—
|
PHI1612
31.8178Mh · 154.0W
|
— | $0.37 | — |
| Pool | Algoritmos soportados | Comisión | |
|---|---|---|---|
|
|
Autolykos2 (ERG) · Etchash (ETC) · KHeavyHash (KAS) | 1.0% | Visit → |
|
★
AntPool
|
Etchash (ETC) · KHeavyHash (KAS) · KAWPOW (RVN) | 1.0% | Visit → |
|
G
getablocks.com
|
KAWPOW (RVN) | — | Visit → |
HeroMiners
|
Autolykos2 (ERG) · Etchash (ETC) | 0.9% | Visit → |
hitablock.com
|
KHeavyHash (KAS) | — | Visit → |
K1Pool
|
Autolykos2 (ERG) · Etchash (ETC) · KHeavyHash (KAS) | 1.0% | Visit → |
|
N
norpool.io
|
Etchash (ETC) | — | Visit → |
pool.kryptex.com
|
Autolykos2 (ERG) · Etchash (ETC) · KHeavyHash (KAS) | — | Visit → |
|
R
rkstratum.rustykaspa.org
|
KHeavyHash (KAS) | — | Visit → |
Rplant
|
FiroPoW (FIRO) · NexaPoW (NEXA) | 1.0% | Visit → |
Historial de pagos del hashmarket
| Período | /Día | /Mes |
|---|---|---|
| Ingresos | $0.16 | $4.80 |
|
Costo
$0.1/kWh
|
$0.38 | $11.40 |
| Ganancia | $-0.22 | $-6.60 |
Mezcla de consenso interno — derivada de fuentes externas, no una cotización directa de un solo mercado.
MRR
· KAWPOW
· $-0.03/day
MRR
Visitar on MRR →
| Rigs × Qty | Share | Rev /rig/day | Cost /rig/day | Profit /rig/day | Total profit /day |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| — | — | — | — | — | — |
Periodo de recuperación para AMD RX 6650 XT
Modela la recuperación de la inversión, el coste eléctrico y la rentabilidad del primer año para este equipo.
Hardware recuperado cuando la línea cruza cero. Después, todo ganancia.
| Month | Earned (mo) | Cost burned (mo) | Cumulative earned | Cumulative cost | Net | % ROI |
|---|
Emisiones anuales por fuente
Basado en el consumo eléctrico anual y la intensidad de carbono de redes comunes.
| Fuente de energía | CO₂e / año |
|---|---|
| Wind | 14.92 kg |
| Nuclear | 16.28 kg |
| Hydroelectric | 32.56 kg |
| Geothermal | 51.55 kg |
| Solar | 61.04 kg |
| Biofuels | 311.99 kg |
| Gas | 664.68 kg |
| Coal | 1,112.31 kg |
Solo estimaciones — las emisiones reales varían.
¿Qué significa eso realmente?
At the world-average grid intensity of about 475 g CO₂e/kWh, AMD RX 6650 XT running 24/7 for a year releases about 644 kg of carbon dioxide equivalent. Here's what that looks like in everyday terms:
Dónde lo enchufas importa
Electricity is not one thing. A kilowatt-hour from a coal plant carries roughly 820 g of CO₂; the same kilowatt-hour from a hydro reservoir carries about 24 g. That's a 34× difference — large enough that AMD RX 6650 XT's annual footprint swings from roughly 1,112 kg on coal-heavy grids down to about 33 kg on hydro-dominated grids. The single biggest lever a miner has on their carbon footprint is choosing where to plug in.
Regions commonly used for low-carbon crypto mining include Quebec and British Columbia (hydro-dominated, typically <50 g CO₂/kWh), Iceland and Norway (geothermal + hydro, often <30 g), Paraguay (Itaipú hydro), and parts of the US Pacific Northwest. Coal-heavy grids — Kazakhstan, Inner Mongolia, Poland, parts of Australia — sit at the opposite end, often above 700 g CO₂/kWh.
Some operators also reduce their net impact by using otherwise-wasted energy: flare gas at oil wells (burning methane that would be vented anyway), curtailed renewables (wind or solar that the grid can't absorb), or behind-the-meter hydro during off-peak hours. These arrangements can drop effective emissions below the local grid average because the energy would have been wasted or flared without the mining load.
Cómo reducir la huella de este equipo
- Pick a greener ASIC. The efficiency column above matters as much as the grid: a 15 J/TH rig emits roughly half the CO₂ of a 30 J/TH rig for the same hashrate.
- Choose a low-carbon host. Data centres advertising hydro, geothermal, or nuclear power typically sit at <100 g CO₂/kWh.
- Look for stranded or curtailed energy. Flare-gas miners, wind-curtailment co-location, and off-peak hydro arrangements use energy that would otherwise be wasted.
- Use heat recovery. Capturing the heat for greenhouse agriculture, pool heating, or district warmth offsets fossil-fuel heating that would have been burned anyway.
- Time-shift your uptime. In grids with high daytime solar, running more during the day and less at night lowers your effective intensity even if you don't switch providers.
- Purchase verifiable offsets. Treat this as a last resort, not a substitute — and favour additional, permanent, third-party-verified projects (Gold Standard, Verra VCS).
Preguntas frecuentes
Yearly electricity use = rig power (W) × 24 × 365 ÷ 1000. We multiply that by each row's grid intensity in grams CO₂-equivalent per kWh and convert to kilograms. Intensities are representative averages — real emissions depend on your specific utility mix, time of day, and local transmission losses.
It depends almost entirely on where the electricity comes from. A single rig plugged into hydro in Quebec emits less over a year than an average family's two cars in a month. The same rig on a coal-dominated grid can exceed that in a few days. The hardware is the same — the grid is what changes the answer.
Network-wide estimates vary by methodology; the Cambridge Centre for Alternative Finance's Bitcoin Electricity Consumption Index is the most widely cited reference. As of recent reporting, the network's sustainable-energy share has grown as more hashrate migrates to hydro, wind, solar, and stranded-gas sites. This page just estimates a single rig — for the big picture, CCAF's dashboard is the best source.
Not directly. The rig draws the same wattage regardless of which pool it joins or how difficulty trends — so its electricity use, and therefore its emissions, stay constant. Those factors change revenue, not power consumption.
Toca para cambiar · 7 secciones Periodo de recuperación 6/7
Esta GPU tiene ? GB de VRAM — la mayoría de los mercados de IA requieren al menos 12 GB.
Proyección diaria
Ganadores diarios entre todos los streams — promediados del historial registrado del rig a $0.1/kWh
| Período | /Día | /Mes |
|---|---|---|
| Ingresos | $0.16 | $4.80 |
|
Costo
$0.1/kWh
|
$0.38 | $11.40 |
| Ganancia | $-0.22 | $-6.60 |
Mezcla de consenso interno — derivada de fuentes externas, no una cotización directa de un solo mercado.
Historial de pagos de minería
| Período | /Día | /Mes |
|---|---|---|
| Ingresos | $0.07 | $2.10 |
|
Costo
$0.1/kWh
|
$0.38 | $11.40 |
| Ganancia | $-0.31 | $-9.30 |
Mezcla de consenso interno — derivada de fuentes externas, no una cotización directa de un solo mercado.
| Algoritmo | Neto / día |
|---|---|
|
KAW
KAWPOW
★ Mejor
16.1754 Mh/s · 157.0 W
|
$-0.31 |
|
AUT
Autolykos2
48.644 Mh/s · 99.0 W
|
$-0.35 |
|
NEX
NexaPoW
3.8253 Mh/s · 69.0 W
|
$-0.36 |
|
VER
VerusHash
6.8455 Mh/s · 127.0 W
|
$-0.36 |
|
ETC
Etchash
25.47 Mh/s · 66.0 W
|
$-0.36 |
|
LYR
Lyra2REv2
53.2468 Mh/s · 155.0 W
|
$-0.38 |
|
KHE
KHeavyHash
360.448 Mh/s · 154.0 W
|
$-0.38 |
|
X16
X16R
17.8611 Mh/s · 156.0 W
|
$-0.38 |
|
X16
X16Rv2
17.1544 Mh/s · 156.0 W
|
$-0.38 |
|
ETH
Ethash
25.47 Mh/s · 66.0 W
|
$-0.38 |
|
KAR
KarlsenHashV2
722.603 Mh/s · 143.0 W
|
$-0.38 |
|
EQU
Equihash192_7
19.503 Hh/s · 66.0 W
|
$-0.38 |
|
EQU
Equihash210_9
129.288 Hh/s · 60.0 W
|
$-0.38 |
|
BLA
Blake (2s)
3.6068 Gh/s · 51.0 W
|
$-0.38 |
| Coin | Algorithm | Ingresos | Costo | Ganancia |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
RVN
Ravencoin
|
KAWPOW
16.1754Mh · 157.0W
|
$0.07 | $0.38 | $-0.31 |
ERG
⚠
Ergo
|
Autolykos2
48.644Mh · 99.0W
|
$0.03 | $0.24 | $-0.21 |
NEXA
⚠
Nexa
|
NexaPoW
3.8253Mh · 69.0W
|
$0.02 | $0.17 | $-0.15 |
|
VRSC
⚠
Verus
|
VerusHash
6.8455Mh · 127.0W
|
$0.02 | $0.30 | $-0.28 |
|
ETC
Ethereum Classic
|
Etchash
25.47Mh · 66.0W
|
$0.02 | $0.16 | $-0.14 |
|
MONA
Monacoin
|
Lyra2REv2
53.2468Mh · 155.0W
|
— | $0.37 | — |
KAS
Kaspa
|
KHeavyHash
360.448Mh · 154.0W
|
— | $0.37 | — |
|
—
|
ProgPowSERO
16.6392Mh · 157.0W
|
— | $0.38 | — |
|
—
|
ProgPowZ
16.6799Mh · 157.0W
|
— | $0.38 | — |
|
—
|
Tribus
90.8062Mh · 154.0W
|
— | $0.37 | — |
|
—
|
Ubqhash
3.1429Mh · 59.0W
|
— | $0.14 | — |
|
—
|
X16R
17.8611Mh · 156.0W
|
— | $0.37 | — |
|
—
|
X16RT
17.9245Mh · 155.0W
|
— | $0.37 | — |
|
—
|
X16Rv2
17.1544Mh · 156.0W
|
— | $0.37 | — |
|
—
|
X21S
11.7941Mh · 155.0W
|
— | $0.37 | — |
|
—
|
HeavyHash
427.1167Mh · 156.0W
|
— | $0.37 | — |
|
—
|
Curvehash
1.9125Mh · 40.0W
|
— | $0.10 | — |
FIRO
Firo
|
FiroPoW
16.7152Mh · 157.0W
|
— | $0.38 | — |
|
—
|
Radiant
653.9427Mh · 157.0W
|
— | $0.38 | — |
|
—
|
SHA256DT
1.9517Gh · 157.0W
|
— | $0.38 | — |
|
—
|
GhostRider
783Hh · 104.0W
|
— | $0.25 | — |
|
—
|
BMW512
1.5068Gh · 150.0W
|
— | $0.36 | — |
|
VTC
Vertcoin
|
Verthash
372.5145Kh · 97.0W
|
— | $0.23 | — |
|
—
|
Ethash
25.47Mh · 66.0W
|
— | $0.16 | — |
|
—
|
KarlsenHashV2
722.603Mh · 143.0W
|
— | $0.34 | — |
|
—
|
Equihash192_7
19.503Hh · 66.0W
|
— | $0.16 | — |
|
—
|
Equihash210_9
129.288Hh · 60.0W
|
— | $0.14 | — |
|
—
|
Blake (2s)
3.6068Gh · 51.0W
|
— | $0.12 | — |
|
—
|
BCD
12.1299Mh · 58.0W
|
— | $0.14 | — |
|
—
|
C11
14.6807Mh · 53.0W
|
— | $0.13 | — |
|
—
|
Equihash(125,4)
22.5Hh · 131.0W
|
— | $0.31 | — |
|
—
|
Equihash(144,5)
32.924Hh · 65.0W
|
— | $0.16 | — |
|
—
|
PHI1612
31.8178Mh · 154.0W
|
— | $0.37 | — |
| Pool | Algoritmos soportados | Comisión | |
|---|---|---|---|
|
|
Autolykos2 (ERG) · Etchash (ETC) · KHeavyHash (KAS) | 1.0% | Visit → |
|
★
AntPool
|
Etchash (ETC) · KHeavyHash (KAS) · KAWPOW (RVN) | 1.0% | Visit → |
|
G
getablocks.com
|
KAWPOW (RVN) | — | Visit → |
HeroMiners
|
Autolykos2 (ERG) · Etchash (ETC) | 0.9% | Visit → |
hitablock.com
|
KHeavyHash (KAS) | — | Visit → |
K1Pool
|
Autolykos2 (ERG) · Etchash (ETC) · KHeavyHash (KAS) | 1.0% | Visit → |
|
N
norpool.io
|
Etchash (ETC) | — | Visit → |
pool.kryptex.com
|
Autolykos2 (ERG) · Etchash (ETC) · KHeavyHash (KAS) | — | Visit → |
|
R
rkstratum.rustykaspa.org
|
KHeavyHash (KAS) | — | Visit → |
Rplant
|
FiroPoW (FIRO) · NexaPoW (NEXA) | 1.0% | Visit → |
Historial de pagos del hashmarket
| Período | /Día | /Mes |
|---|---|---|
| Ingresos | $0.16 | $4.80 |
|
Costo
$0.1/kWh
|
$0.38 | $11.40 |
| Ganancia | $-0.22 | $-6.60 |
Mezcla de consenso interno — derivada de fuentes externas, no una cotización directa de un solo mercado.
MRR
· KAWPOW
· $-0.03/day
MRR
Visitar on MRR →
| Rigs × Qty | Share | Rev /rig/day | Cost /rig/day | Profit /rig/day | Total profit /day |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| — | — | — | — | — | — |
Periodo de recuperación para AMD RX 6650 XT
Modela la recuperación de la inversión, el coste eléctrico y la rentabilidad del primer año para este equipo.
Hardware recuperado cuando la línea cruza cero. Después, todo ganancia.
| Month | Earned (mo) | Cost burned (mo) | Cumulative earned | Cumulative cost | Net | % ROI |
|---|
Emisiones anuales por fuente
Basado en el consumo eléctrico anual y la intensidad de carbono de redes comunes.
| Fuente de energía | CO₂e / año |
|---|---|
| Wind | 14.92 kg |
| Nuclear | 16.28 kg |
| Hydroelectric | 32.56 kg |
| Geothermal | 51.55 kg |
| Solar | 61.04 kg |
| Biofuels | 311.99 kg |
| Gas | 664.68 kg |
| Coal | 1,112.31 kg |
Solo estimaciones — las emisiones reales varían.
¿Qué significa eso realmente?
At the world-average grid intensity of about 475 g CO₂e/kWh, AMD RX 6650 XT running 24/7 for a year releases about 644 kg of carbon dioxide equivalent. Here's what that looks like in everyday terms:
Dónde lo enchufas importa
Electricity is not one thing. A kilowatt-hour from a coal plant carries roughly 820 g of CO₂; the same kilowatt-hour from a hydro reservoir carries about 24 g. That's a 34× difference — large enough that AMD RX 6650 XT's annual footprint swings from roughly 1,112 kg on coal-heavy grids down to about 33 kg on hydro-dominated grids. The single biggest lever a miner has on their carbon footprint is choosing where to plug in.
Regions commonly used for low-carbon crypto mining include Quebec and British Columbia (hydro-dominated, typically <50 g CO₂/kWh), Iceland and Norway (geothermal + hydro, often <30 g), Paraguay (Itaipú hydro), and parts of the US Pacific Northwest. Coal-heavy grids — Kazakhstan, Inner Mongolia, Poland, parts of Australia — sit at the opposite end, often above 700 g CO₂/kWh.
Some operators also reduce their net impact by using otherwise-wasted energy: flare gas at oil wells (burning methane that would be vented anyway), curtailed renewables (wind or solar that the grid can't absorb), or behind-the-meter hydro during off-peak hours. These arrangements can drop effective emissions below the local grid average because the energy would have been wasted or flared without the mining load.
Cómo reducir la huella de este equipo
- Pick a greener ASIC. The efficiency column above matters as much as the grid: a 15 J/TH rig emits roughly half the CO₂ of a 30 J/TH rig for the same hashrate.
- Choose a low-carbon host. Data centres advertising hydro, geothermal, or nuclear power typically sit at <100 g CO₂/kWh.
- Look for stranded or curtailed energy. Flare-gas miners, wind-curtailment co-location, and off-peak hydro arrangements use energy that would otherwise be wasted.
- Use heat recovery. Capturing the heat for greenhouse agriculture, pool heating, or district warmth offsets fossil-fuel heating that would have been burned anyway.
- Time-shift your uptime. In grids with high daytime solar, running more during the day and less at night lowers your effective intensity even if you don't switch providers.
- Purchase verifiable offsets. Treat this as a last resort, not a substitute — and favour additional, permanent, third-party-verified projects (Gold Standard, Verra VCS).
Preguntas frecuentes
Yearly electricity use = rig power (W) × 24 × 365 ÷ 1000. We multiply that by each row's grid intensity in grams CO₂-equivalent per kWh and convert to kilograms. Intensities are representative averages — real emissions depend on your specific utility mix, time of day, and local transmission losses.
It depends almost entirely on where the electricity comes from. A single rig plugged into hydro in Quebec emits less over a year than an average family's two cars in a month. The same rig on a coal-dominated grid can exceed that in a few days. The hardware is the same — the grid is what changes the answer.
Network-wide estimates vary by methodology; the Cambridge Centre for Alternative Finance's Bitcoin Electricity Consumption Index is the most widely cited reference. As of recent reporting, the network's sustainable-energy share has grown as more hashrate migrates to hydro, wind, solar, and stranded-gas sites. This page just estimates a single rig — for the big picture, CCAF's dashboard is the best source.
Not directly. The rig draws the same wattage regardless of which pool it joins or how difficulty trends — so its electricity use, and therefore its emissions, stay constant. Those factors change revenue, not power consumption.