LP Agent
AMD RX 6950 XT — Periodo de recuperación
AMD RX 6950 XT pierde hasta $0.33 al día, mejor minando NexaPoW a 58.0423 Mh/s. También disponible: venta de hashpower KAWPOW ($-0.35/día). Consume 289 W de la red — a $0.10/kWh, sin llegar a cubrir costos a los precios actuales.
Toca para cambiar · 7 secciones Periodo de recuperación 6/7
Esta GPU tiene ? GB de VRAM — la mayoría de los mercados de IA requieren al menos 12 GB.
Proyección diaria
Ganadores diarios entre todos los streams — promediados del historial registrado del rig a $0.1/kWh
| Período | /Día | /Mes |
|---|---|---|
| Ingresos | $0.36 | $10.82 |
|
Costo
$0.1/kWh
|
$0.69 | $20.70 |
| Ganancia | $-0.33 | $-9.88 |
Mezcla de consenso interno — derivada de fuentes externas, no una cotización directa de un solo mercado.
LP Agent
Cheapest cloud GPUs for AI
Compare staking yields across networks.
Live gold + precious-metal spot prices.
Vietnamese product price comparison.
Tech reviews and gadget deep-dives.
Live RSI screener across stocks and crypto.
¿Te resultó útil esta página?
¡Gracias por los comentarios!
¿Algo más que debamos saber? El formulario está abajo.
Historial de pagos de minería
| Período | /Día | /Mes |
|---|---|---|
| Ingresos | $0.36 | $10.80 |
|
Costo
$0.1/kWh
|
$0.69 | $20.70 |
| Ganancia | $-0.33 | $-9.90 |
Mezcla de consenso interno — derivada de fuentes externas, no una cotización directa de un solo mercado.
| Algoritmo | Neto / día |
|---|---|
|
NEX
NexaPoW
★ Mejor
58.0423 Mh/s · 289.0 W
|
$-0.33 |
|
KAW
KAWPOW
35.75 Mh/s · 202.0 W
|
$-0.55 |
|
VER
VerusHash
20.5216 Mh/s · 289.0 W
|
$-0.63 |
|
AUT
Autolykos2
101.9 Mh/s · 155.0 W
|
$-0.64 |
|
ETC
Etchash
52.85 Mh/s · 212.0 W
|
$-0.66 |
|
LYR
Lyra2REv2
74.8795 Mh/s · 155.0 W
|
$-0.68 |
|
KHE
KHeavyHash
644.1 Mh/s · 151.0 W
|
$-0.69 |
|
X16
X16R
39.4726 Mh/s · 287.0 W
|
$-0.69 |
|
X16
X16Rv2
36.1086 Mh/s · 289.0 W
|
$-0.69 |
|
CUC
Cuckatoo31
1.124 Hh/s · 217.0 W
|
$-0.69 |
|
ETH
Ethash
52.85 Mh/s · 212.0 W
|
$-0.69 |
|
EQU
Equihash192_7
47.334 Hh/s · 164.0 W
|
$-0.69 |
|
EQU
Equihash210_9
218.252 Hh/s · 135.0 W
|
$-0.69 |
|
BLA
Blake (2s)
7.204 Gh/s · 143.0 W
|
$-0.69 |
| Coin | Algorithm | Ingresos | Costo | Ganancia |
|---|---|---|---|---|
NEXA
⚠
Nexa
|
NexaPoW
58.0423Mh · 289.0W
|
$0.36 | $0.69 | $-0.33 |
|
RVN
Ravencoin
|
KAWPOW
35.75Mh · 202.0W
|
$0.14 | $0.48 | $-0.34 |
|
VRSC
⚠
Verus
|
VerusHash
20.5216Mh · 289.0W
|
$0.06 | $0.69 | $-0.63 |
ERG
⚠
Ergo
|
Autolykos2
101.9Mh · 155.0W
|
$0.05 | $0.37 | $-0.32 |
|
ETC
Ethereum Classic
|
Etchash
52.85Mh · 212.0W
|
$0.03 | $0.51 | $-0.48 |
|
MONA
Monacoin
|
Lyra2REv2
74.8795Mh · 155.0W
|
$0.01 | $0.37 | $-0.36 |
KAS
Kaspa
|
KHeavyHash
644.1Mh · 151.0W
|
— | $0.36 | — |
|
—
|
ProgPowZ
33.5717Mh · 289.0W
|
— | $0.69 | — |
|
—
|
Tribus
203.7074Mh · 288.0W
|
— | $0.69 | — |
|
—
|
Ubqhash
52.3693Mh · 248.0W
|
— | $0.60 | — |
|
—
|
X16R
39.4726Mh · 287.0W
|
— | $0.69 | — |
|
—
|
X16RT
39.5456Mh · 289.0W
|
— | $0.69 | — |
|
—
|
X16Rv2
36.1086Mh · 289.0W
|
— | $0.69 | — |
|
—
|
X17
38.3767Mh · 331.0W
|
— | $0.79 | — |
|
—
|
Xevan
11.6016Mh · 291.0W
|
— | $0.70 | — |
|
—
|
Cuckatoo31
1.124Hh · 217.0W
|
— | $0.52 | — |
|
—
|
X21S
27.2482Mh · 289.0W
|
— | $0.69 | — |
|
—
|
HeavyHash
596.6103Mh · 164.0W
|
— | $0.39 | — |
|
—
|
Chukwa
122.3815Kh · 332.0W
|
— | $0.80 | — |
|
—
|
Curvehash
12.5747Mh · 183.0W
|
— | $0.44 | — |
FIRO
Firo
|
FiroPoW
33.1794Mh · 235.0W
|
— | $0.56 | — |
|
—
|
Radiant
1.5088Gh · 289.0W
|
— | $0.69 | — |
|
—
|
SHA256DT
4.5936Gh · 289.0W
|
— | $0.69 | — |
|
—
|
GhostRider
1.656Kh · 135.0W
|
— | $0.32 | — |
|
—
|
KangarooTwelve
3.7024Gh · 289.0W
|
— | $0.69 | — |
|
—
|
X25X
5.0789Mh · 217.0W
|
— | $0.52 | — |
|
—
|
Astralhash
61.3803Mh · 288.0W
|
— | $0.69 | — |
|
—
|
EvrProgPow
34.4192Mh · 289.0W
|
— | $0.69 | — |
|
VTC
Vertcoin
|
Verthash
837.798Kh · 225.0W
|
— | $0.54 | — |
|
—
|
Argon2d-16000
13.089Kh · 303.0W
|
— | $0.73 | — |
|
—
|
Ethash
52.85Mh · 212.0W
|
— | $0.51 | — |
|
—
|
Equihash192_7
47.334Hh · 164.0W
|
— | $0.39 | — |
|
—
|
Equihash210_9
218.252Hh · 135.0W
|
— | $0.32 | — |
|
—
|
Blake (2s)
7.204Gh · 143.0W
|
— | $0.34 | — |
|
—
|
BCD
30.7388Mh · 175.0W
|
— | $0.42 | — |
|
—
|
Equihash(144,5)
65Hh · 148.0W
|
— | $0.36 | — |
|
—
|
HMQ1725
22.2457Mh · 286.0W
|
— | $0.69 | — |
|
—
|
PHI1612
72.8727Mh · 288.0W
|
— | $0.69 | — |
|
—
|
ProgPowSERO
35.343Mh · 288.0W
|
— | $0.69 | — |
| Pool | Algoritmos soportados | Comisión | |
|---|---|---|---|
|
|
Autolykos2 (ERG) · Etchash (ETC) · KHeavyHash (KAS) | 1.0% | Visit → |
|
★
AntPool
|
Etchash (ETC) · KHeavyHash (KAS) · KAWPOW (RVN) | 1.0% | Visit → |
|
G
getablocks.com
|
KAWPOW (RVN) | — | Visit → |
HeroMiners
|
Autolykos2 (ERG) · Etchash (ETC) | 0.9% | Visit → |
hitablock.com
|
KHeavyHash (KAS) | — | Visit → |
K1Pool
|
Autolykos2 (ERG) · Etchash (ETC) · KHeavyHash (KAS) | 1.0% | Visit → |
|
N
norpool.io
|
Etchash (ETC) | — | Visit → |
pool.kryptex.com
|
Autolykos2 (ERG) · Etchash (ETC) · KHeavyHash (KAS) | — | Visit → |
|
R
rkstratum.rustykaspa.org
|
KHeavyHash (KAS) | — | Visit → |
Rplant
|
FiroPoW (FIRO) · NexaPoW (NEXA) | 1.0% | Visit → |
Historial de pagos del hashmarket
| Período | /Día | /Mes |
|---|---|---|
| Ingresos | $0.34 | $10.10 |
|
Costo
$0.1/kWh
|
$0.69 | $20.70 |
| Ganancia | $-0.35 | $-10.60 |
Mezcla de consenso interno — derivada de fuentes externas, no una cotización directa de un solo mercado.
MRR
· KAWPOW
· $0.08/day
Visitar on MRR →
MRR
Visitar on MRR →
| Rigs × Qty | Share | Rev /rig/day | Cost /rig/day | Profit /rig/day | Total profit /day |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| — | — | — | — | — | — |
Periodo de recuperación para AMD RX 6950 XT
Modela la recuperación de la inversión, el coste eléctrico y la rentabilidad del primer año para este equipo.
Hardware recuperado cuando la línea cruza cero. Después, todo ganancia.
| Month | Earned (mo) | Cost burned (mo) | Cumulative earned | Cumulative cost | Net | % ROI |
|---|
Emisiones anuales por fuente
Basado en el consumo eléctrico anual y la intensidad de carbono de redes comunes.
| Fuente de energía | CO₂e / año |
|---|---|
| Wind | 27.47 kg |
| Nuclear | 29.96 kg |
| Hydroelectric | 59.93 kg |
| Geothermal | 94.88 kg |
| Solar | 112.36 kg |
| Biofuels | 574.3 kg |
| Gas | 1,223.51 kg |
| Coal | 2,047.51 kg |
Solo estimaciones — las emisiones reales varían.
¿Qué significa eso realmente?
At the world-average grid intensity of about 475 g CO₂e/kWh, AMD RX 6950 XT running 24/7 for a year releases about 1,186 kg of carbon dioxide equivalent. Here's what that looks like in everyday terms:
Dónde lo enchufas importa
Electricity is not one thing. A kilowatt-hour from a coal plant carries roughly 820 g of CO₂; the same kilowatt-hour from a hydro reservoir carries about 24 g. That's a 34× difference — large enough that AMD RX 6950 XT's annual footprint swings from roughly 2,048 kg on coal-heavy grids down to about 60 kg on hydro-dominated grids. The single biggest lever a miner has on their carbon footprint is choosing where to plug in.
Regions commonly used for low-carbon crypto mining include Quebec and British Columbia (hydro-dominated, typically <50 g CO₂/kWh), Iceland and Norway (geothermal + hydro, often <30 g), Paraguay (Itaipú hydro), and parts of the US Pacific Northwest. Coal-heavy grids — Kazakhstan, Inner Mongolia, Poland, parts of Australia — sit at the opposite end, often above 700 g CO₂/kWh.
Some operators also reduce their net impact by using otherwise-wasted energy: flare gas at oil wells (burning methane that would be vented anyway), curtailed renewables (wind or solar that the grid can't absorb), or behind-the-meter hydro during off-peak hours. These arrangements can drop effective emissions below the local grid average because the energy would have been wasted or flared without the mining load.
Cómo reducir la huella de este equipo
- Pick a greener ASIC. The efficiency column above matters as much as the grid: a 15 J/TH rig emits roughly half the CO₂ of a 30 J/TH rig for the same hashrate.
- Choose a low-carbon host. Data centres advertising hydro, geothermal, or nuclear power typically sit at <100 g CO₂/kWh.
- Look for stranded or curtailed energy. Flare-gas miners, wind-curtailment co-location, and off-peak hydro arrangements use energy that would otherwise be wasted.
- Use heat recovery. Capturing the heat for greenhouse agriculture, pool heating, or district warmth offsets fossil-fuel heating that would have been burned anyway.
- Time-shift your uptime. In grids with high daytime solar, running more during the day and less at night lowers your effective intensity even if you don't switch providers.
- Purchase verifiable offsets. Treat this as a last resort, not a substitute — and favour additional, permanent, third-party-verified projects (Gold Standard, Verra VCS).
Preguntas frecuentes
Yearly electricity use = rig power (W) × 24 × 365 ÷ 1000. We multiply that by each row's grid intensity in grams CO₂-equivalent per kWh and convert to kilograms. Intensities are representative averages — real emissions depend on your specific utility mix, time of day, and local transmission losses.
It depends almost entirely on where the electricity comes from. A single rig plugged into hydro in Quebec emits less over a year than an average family's two cars in a month. The same rig on a coal-dominated grid can exceed that in a few days. The hardware is the same — the grid is what changes the answer.
Network-wide estimates vary by methodology; the Cambridge Centre for Alternative Finance's Bitcoin Electricity Consumption Index is the most widely cited reference. As of recent reporting, the network's sustainable-energy share has grown as more hashrate migrates to hydro, wind, solar, and stranded-gas sites. This page just estimates a single rig — for the big picture, CCAF's dashboard is the best source.
Not directly. The rig draws the same wattage regardless of which pool it joins or how difficulty trends — so its electricity use, and therefore its emissions, stay constant. Those factors change revenue, not power consumption.
Toca para cambiar · 7 secciones Periodo de recuperación 6/7
Esta GPU tiene ? GB de VRAM — la mayoría de los mercados de IA requieren al menos 12 GB.
Proyección diaria
Ganadores diarios entre todos los streams — promediados del historial registrado del rig a $0.1/kWh
| Período | /Día | /Mes |
|---|---|---|
| Ingresos | $0.36 | $10.82 |
|
Costo
$0.1/kWh
|
$0.69 | $20.70 |
| Ganancia | $-0.33 | $-9.88 |
Mezcla de consenso interno — derivada de fuentes externas, no una cotización directa de un solo mercado.
Historial de pagos de minería
| Período | /Día | /Mes |
|---|---|---|
| Ingresos | $0.36 | $10.80 |
|
Costo
$0.1/kWh
|
$0.69 | $20.70 |
| Ganancia | $-0.33 | $-9.90 |
Mezcla de consenso interno — derivada de fuentes externas, no una cotización directa de un solo mercado.
| Algoritmo | Neto / día |
|---|---|
|
NEX
NexaPoW
★ Mejor
58.0423 Mh/s · 289.0 W
|
$-0.33 |
|
KAW
KAWPOW
35.75 Mh/s · 202.0 W
|
$-0.55 |
|
VER
VerusHash
20.5216 Mh/s · 289.0 W
|
$-0.63 |
|
AUT
Autolykos2
101.9 Mh/s · 155.0 W
|
$-0.64 |
|
ETC
Etchash
52.85 Mh/s · 212.0 W
|
$-0.66 |
|
LYR
Lyra2REv2
74.8795 Mh/s · 155.0 W
|
$-0.68 |
|
KHE
KHeavyHash
644.1 Mh/s · 151.0 W
|
$-0.69 |
|
X16
X16R
39.4726 Mh/s · 287.0 W
|
$-0.69 |
|
X16
X16Rv2
36.1086 Mh/s · 289.0 W
|
$-0.69 |
|
CUC
Cuckatoo31
1.124 Hh/s · 217.0 W
|
$-0.69 |
|
ETH
Ethash
52.85 Mh/s · 212.0 W
|
$-0.69 |
|
EQU
Equihash192_7
47.334 Hh/s · 164.0 W
|
$-0.69 |
|
EQU
Equihash210_9
218.252 Hh/s · 135.0 W
|
$-0.69 |
|
BLA
Blake (2s)
7.204 Gh/s · 143.0 W
|
$-0.69 |
| Coin | Algorithm | Ingresos | Costo | Ganancia |
|---|---|---|---|---|
NEXA
⚠
Nexa
|
NexaPoW
58.0423Mh · 289.0W
|
$0.36 | $0.69 | $-0.33 |
|
RVN
Ravencoin
|
KAWPOW
35.75Mh · 202.0W
|
$0.14 | $0.48 | $-0.34 |
|
VRSC
⚠
Verus
|
VerusHash
20.5216Mh · 289.0W
|
$0.06 | $0.69 | $-0.63 |
ERG
⚠
Ergo
|
Autolykos2
101.9Mh · 155.0W
|
$0.05 | $0.37 | $-0.32 |
|
ETC
Ethereum Classic
|
Etchash
52.85Mh · 212.0W
|
$0.03 | $0.51 | $-0.48 |
|
MONA
Monacoin
|
Lyra2REv2
74.8795Mh · 155.0W
|
$0.01 | $0.37 | $-0.36 |
KAS
Kaspa
|
KHeavyHash
644.1Mh · 151.0W
|
— | $0.36 | — |
|
—
|
ProgPowZ
33.5717Mh · 289.0W
|
— | $0.69 | — |
|
—
|
Tribus
203.7074Mh · 288.0W
|
— | $0.69 | — |
|
—
|
Ubqhash
52.3693Mh · 248.0W
|
— | $0.60 | — |
|
—
|
X16R
39.4726Mh · 287.0W
|
— | $0.69 | — |
|
—
|
X16RT
39.5456Mh · 289.0W
|
— | $0.69 | — |
|
—
|
X16Rv2
36.1086Mh · 289.0W
|
— | $0.69 | — |
|
—
|
X17
38.3767Mh · 331.0W
|
— | $0.79 | — |
|
—
|
Xevan
11.6016Mh · 291.0W
|
— | $0.70 | — |
|
—
|
Cuckatoo31
1.124Hh · 217.0W
|
— | $0.52 | — |
|
—
|
X21S
27.2482Mh · 289.0W
|
— | $0.69 | — |
|
—
|
HeavyHash
596.6103Mh · 164.0W
|
— | $0.39 | — |
|
—
|
Chukwa
122.3815Kh · 332.0W
|
— | $0.80 | — |
|
—
|
Curvehash
12.5747Mh · 183.0W
|
— | $0.44 | — |
FIRO
Firo
|
FiroPoW
33.1794Mh · 235.0W
|
— | $0.56 | — |
|
—
|
Radiant
1.5088Gh · 289.0W
|
— | $0.69 | — |
|
—
|
SHA256DT
4.5936Gh · 289.0W
|
— | $0.69 | — |
|
—
|
GhostRider
1.656Kh · 135.0W
|
— | $0.32 | — |
|
—
|
KangarooTwelve
3.7024Gh · 289.0W
|
— | $0.69 | — |
|
—
|
X25X
5.0789Mh · 217.0W
|
— | $0.52 | — |
|
—
|
Astralhash
61.3803Mh · 288.0W
|
— | $0.69 | — |
|
—
|
EvrProgPow
34.4192Mh · 289.0W
|
— | $0.69 | — |
|
VTC
Vertcoin
|
Verthash
837.798Kh · 225.0W
|
— | $0.54 | — |
|
—
|
Argon2d-16000
13.089Kh · 303.0W
|
— | $0.73 | — |
|
—
|
Ethash
52.85Mh · 212.0W
|
— | $0.51 | — |
|
—
|
Equihash192_7
47.334Hh · 164.0W
|
— | $0.39 | — |
|
—
|
Equihash210_9
218.252Hh · 135.0W
|
— | $0.32 | — |
|
—
|
Blake (2s)
7.204Gh · 143.0W
|
— | $0.34 | — |
|
—
|
BCD
30.7388Mh · 175.0W
|
— | $0.42 | — |
|
—
|
Equihash(144,5)
65Hh · 148.0W
|
— | $0.36 | — |
|
—
|
HMQ1725
22.2457Mh · 286.0W
|
— | $0.69 | — |
|
—
|
PHI1612
72.8727Mh · 288.0W
|
— | $0.69 | — |
|
—
|
ProgPowSERO
35.343Mh · 288.0W
|
— | $0.69 | — |
| Pool | Algoritmos soportados | Comisión | |
|---|---|---|---|
|
|
Autolykos2 (ERG) · Etchash (ETC) · KHeavyHash (KAS) | 1.0% | Visit → |
|
★
AntPool
|
Etchash (ETC) · KHeavyHash (KAS) · KAWPOW (RVN) | 1.0% | Visit → |
|
G
getablocks.com
|
KAWPOW (RVN) | — | Visit → |
HeroMiners
|
Autolykos2 (ERG) · Etchash (ETC) | 0.9% | Visit → |
hitablock.com
|
KHeavyHash (KAS) | — | Visit → |
K1Pool
|
Autolykos2 (ERG) · Etchash (ETC) · KHeavyHash (KAS) | 1.0% | Visit → |
|
N
norpool.io
|
Etchash (ETC) | — | Visit → |
pool.kryptex.com
|
Autolykos2 (ERG) · Etchash (ETC) · KHeavyHash (KAS) | — | Visit → |
|
R
rkstratum.rustykaspa.org
|
KHeavyHash (KAS) | — | Visit → |
Rplant
|
FiroPoW (FIRO) · NexaPoW (NEXA) | 1.0% | Visit → |
Historial de pagos del hashmarket
| Período | /Día | /Mes |
|---|---|---|
| Ingresos | $0.34 | $10.10 |
|
Costo
$0.1/kWh
|
$0.69 | $20.70 |
| Ganancia | $-0.35 | $-10.60 |
Mezcla de consenso interno — derivada de fuentes externas, no una cotización directa de un solo mercado.
MRR
· KAWPOW
· $0.08/day
Visitar on MRR →
MRR
Visitar on MRR →
| Rigs × Qty | Share | Rev /rig/day | Cost /rig/day | Profit /rig/day | Total profit /day |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| — | — | — | — | — | — |
Periodo de recuperación para AMD RX 6950 XT
Modela la recuperación de la inversión, el coste eléctrico y la rentabilidad del primer año para este equipo.
Hardware recuperado cuando la línea cruza cero. Después, todo ganancia.
| Month | Earned (mo) | Cost burned (mo) | Cumulative earned | Cumulative cost | Net | % ROI |
|---|
Emisiones anuales por fuente
Basado en el consumo eléctrico anual y la intensidad de carbono de redes comunes.
| Fuente de energía | CO₂e / año |
|---|---|
| Wind | 27.47 kg |
| Nuclear | 29.96 kg |
| Hydroelectric | 59.93 kg |
| Geothermal | 94.88 kg |
| Solar | 112.36 kg |
| Biofuels | 574.3 kg |
| Gas | 1,223.51 kg |
| Coal | 2,047.51 kg |
Solo estimaciones — las emisiones reales varían.
¿Qué significa eso realmente?
At the world-average grid intensity of about 475 g CO₂e/kWh, AMD RX 6950 XT running 24/7 for a year releases about 1,186 kg of carbon dioxide equivalent. Here's what that looks like in everyday terms:
Dónde lo enchufas importa
Electricity is not one thing. A kilowatt-hour from a coal plant carries roughly 820 g of CO₂; the same kilowatt-hour from a hydro reservoir carries about 24 g. That's a 34× difference — large enough that AMD RX 6950 XT's annual footprint swings from roughly 2,048 kg on coal-heavy grids down to about 60 kg on hydro-dominated grids. The single biggest lever a miner has on their carbon footprint is choosing where to plug in.
Regions commonly used for low-carbon crypto mining include Quebec and British Columbia (hydro-dominated, typically <50 g CO₂/kWh), Iceland and Norway (geothermal + hydro, often <30 g), Paraguay (Itaipú hydro), and parts of the US Pacific Northwest. Coal-heavy grids — Kazakhstan, Inner Mongolia, Poland, parts of Australia — sit at the opposite end, often above 700 g CO₂/kWh.
Some operators also reduce their net impact by using otherwise-wasted energy: flare gas at oil wells (burning methane that would be vented anyway), curtailed renewables (wind or solar that the grid can't absorb), or behind-the-meter hydro during off-peak hours. These arrangements can drop effective emissions below the local grid average because the energy would have been wasted or flared without the mining load.
Cómo reducir la huella de este equipo
- Pick a greener ASIC. The efficiency column above matters as much as the grid: a 15 J/TH rig emits roughly half the CO₂ of a 30 J/TH rig for the same hashrate.
- Choose a low-carbon host. Data centres advertising hydro, geothermal, or nuclear power typically sit at <100 g CO₂/kWh.
- Look for stranded or curtailed energy. Flare-gas miners, wind-curtailment co-location, and off-peak hydro arrangements use energy that would otherwise be wasted.
- Use heat recovery. Capturing the heat for greenhouse agriculture, pool heating, or district warmth offsets fossil-fuel heating that would have been burned anyway.
- Time-shift your uptime. In grids with high daytime solar, running more during the day and less at night lowers your effective intensity even if you don't switch providers.
- Purchase verifiable offsets. Treat this as a last resort, not a substitute — and favour additional, permanent, third-party-verified projects (Gold Standard, Verra VCS).
Preguntas frecuentes
Yearly electricity use = rig power (W) × 24 × 365 ÷ 1000. We multiply that by each row's grid intensity in grams CO₂-equivalent per kWh and convert to kilograms. Intensities are representative averages — real emissions depend on your specific utility mix, time of day, and local transmission losses.
It depends almost entirely on where the electricity comes from. A single rig plugged into hydro in Quebec emits less over a year than an average family's two cars in a month. The same rig on a coal-dominated grid can exceed that in a few days. The hardware is the same — the grid is what changes the answer.
Network-wide estimates vary by methodology; the Cambridge Centre for Alternative Finance's Bitcoin Electricity Consumption Index is the most widely cited reference. As of recent reporting, the network's sustainable-energy share has grown as more hashrate migrates to hydro, wind, solar, and stranded-gas sites. This page just estimates a single rig — for the big picture, CCAF's dashboard is the best source.
Not directly. The rig draws the same wattage regardless of which pool it joins or how difficulty trends — so its electricity use, and therefore its emissions, stay constant. Those factors change revenue, not power consumption.