LP Agent
Nvidia RTX 3050
Nvidia RTX 3050 pierde $0.05 al día minando Octopus a 23.89169 Mh/s y consumiendo 132.0 W de la red. Eso es tras descontar la electricidad a $0.1/kWh — sin llegar a cubrir costos a los precios actuales.
Proyección diaria
| Período | /Día | /Mes |
|---|---|---|
| Ingresos | $1.05 | $31.55 |
|
Costo
$0.1/kWh
|
$0.32 | $9.60 |
| Ganancia | $0.73 | $22.05 |
| Proveedor | GPU | Ingresos | Costo | Ganancia |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
CL
Clore Ai
Mercado de GPU
|
RTX 3050
$0.009/h ·
1 oferta
|
$0.18
109 CLORE/day
1 CLORE ≈ $0.00163
|
$0.32 |
$-0.14
★
Visitar →
|
| Coin | Algorithm | Ingresos | Costo | Ganancia |
|---|---|---|---|---|
CFX
⚠
Conflux
|
Octopus
23.89169Mh · 132.0W
|
$0.27 | $0.32 | $-0.05 |
|
BEAM
⚠
Beam
|
BeamHashIII
16Hh · 124.0W
|
$0.06 | $0.30 | $-0.24 |
|
RVN
Ravencoin
|
KAWPOW
12.3Mh · 129.0W
|
$0.05 | $0.31 | $-0.26 |
|
FTC
⚠
Feathercoin
|
NeoScrypt
858.11Kh · 128.0W
|
— | $0.31 | — |
|
—
|
Keccak
604.42849Mh · 108.0W
|
— | $0.26 | — |
ERG
⚠
Ergo
|
Autolykos2
79.83Mh · 60.0W
|
$0.03 | $0.14 | $-0.11 |
|
—
|
Ethash
23.202878Mh · 75.0W
|
— | $0.18 | — |
|
LTZ
⚠
Litecoinz
|
Zhash
30Hh · 113.0W
|
— | $0.27 | — |
NEXA
⚠
Nexa
|
NexaPoW
8.085Mh · 86.0W
|
$0.01 | $0.21 | $-0.20 |
|
ETC
Ethereum Classic
|
Etchash
23.202878Mh · 75.0W
|
$0.01 | $0.18 | $-0.17 |
|
AE
⚠
Aeternity
|
CuckooCycle
4Hh · 116.0W
|
$0.01 | $0.28 | $-0.27 |
|
VRSC
⚠
Verus
|
VerusHash
5.1449Mh · 100.0W
|
— | $0.24 | — |
|
MONA
⚠
Monacoin
|
Lyra2REv2
41.2638Mh · 126.0W
|
— | $0.30 | — |
|
—
|
X16R
10.33799Mh · 107.0W
|
— | $0.26 | — |
|
ACM
⚠
Actinium
|
Lyra2z
2.50804Mh · 75.0W
|
— | $0.18 | — |
|
—
|
Blake (2s)
3.319251631Gh · 109.0W
|
— | $0.26 | — |
KAS
Kaspa
|
KHeavyHash
265.066256Mh · 115.0W
|
— | $0.28 | — |
|
—
|
Blake3
34.0Mh · 90.0W
|
— | $0.22 | — |
|
IRON
⚠
Iron Fish
|
FishHash
12.0Mh · 140.0W
|
— | $0.34 | — |
|
—
|
X16Rv2
7.1533Mh · 108.0W
|
— | $0.26 | — |
|
—
|
Cuckarood29
1.124Hh · 95.0W
|
— | $0.23 | — |
|
—
|
Astralhash
11.5656Mh · 75.0W
|
— | $0.18 | — |
|
—
|
CNReverseWaltz
1.0615Kh · 96.0W
|
— | $0.23 | — |
|
—
|
Skydoge
300.0Mh · 50.0W
|
— | $0.12 | — |
|
—
|
XelisHashV2
1.4Gh · 140.0W
|
— | $0.34 | — |
|
—
|
zkSNARK
220.0Mh · 50.0W
|
— | $0.12 | — |
|
GRIN
⚠
Grin
|
Cuckatoo32
2.5Hh · 70.0W
|
— | $0.17 | — |
|
—
|
EvrProgPow
26.5Mh · 80.0W
|
— | $0.19 | — |
|
—
|
Memehash
13.5Mh · 100.0W
|
— | $0.24 | — |
|
—
|
X21S
5.2701Mh · 102.0W
|
— | $0.24 | — |
|
—
|
Radiant
375.818Kh · 114.0W
|
— | $0.27 | — |
|
—
|
Skein2
60.758816406Gh · 124.0W
|
— | $0.30 | — |
|
—
|
Argon2d4096
24.939Kh · 123.0W
|
— | $0.30 | — |
|
—
|
PHI1612
11.4209Mh · 89.0W
|
— | $0.21 | — |
|
—
|
Equihash(144,5)
36Hh · 130.0W
|
— | $0.31 | — |
|
—
|
X16RT
7.6345Mh · 109.0W
|
— | $0.26 | — |
|
—
|
Equihash+Scrypt
21.188Kh · 128.0W
|
— | $0.31 | — |
|
—
|
SHA256DT
974.038Mh · 122.0W
|
— | $0.29 | — |
|
—
|
Equihash(210,9)
180Hh · 121.0W
|
— | $0.29 | — |
|
—
|
Equihash(125,4)
20Hh · 118.0W
|
— | $0.28 | — |
|
—
|
Equihash(192,7)
17Hh · 108.0W
|
— | $0.26 | — |
|
—
|
HMQ1725
4.66437Mh · 115.0W
|
— | $0.28 | — |
|
VTC
⚠
Vertcoin
|
Lyra2REv3
39.65145Mh · 132.0W
|
— | $0.32 | — |
|
—
|
NIST5
20.26063Mh · 130.0W
|
— | $0.31 | — |
|
—
|
X15
7.99385Mh · 117.0W
|
— | $0.28 | — |
|
—
|
ProgPowZ
13.088639Mh · 132.0W
|
— | $0.32 | — |
|
—
|
Keccak-C
601.31338Mh · 109.0W
|
— | $0.26 | — |
|
—
|
C11
11.754Mh · 86.0W
|
— | $0.21 | — |
|
—
|
ProgPowSERO
13.111107Mh · 132.0W
|
— | $0.32 | — |
|
—
|
Ubqhash
26.19577Mh · 115.0W
|
— | $0.28 | — |
|
—
|
BCD
8.670626Mh · 86.0W
|
— | $0.21 | — |
|
—
|
Xevan
4.02172Mh · 129.0W
|
— | $0.31 | — |
|
—
|
Curvehash
1.7011Mh · 79.0W
|
— | $0.19 | — |
|
—
|
X25X
962.23Kh · 69.0W
|
— | $0.17 | — |
FIRO
Firo
|
FiroPoW
12.752Mh · 129.0W
|
— | $0.31 | — |
|
—
|
GhostRider
643Hh · 79.0W
|
— | $0.19 | — |
|
—
|
HeavyHash
208.0494Mh · 69.0W
|
— | $0.17 | — |
| Pool | Algoritmos soportados | Comisión | |
|---|---|---|---|
|
|
CuckooCycle (AE) · BeamHashIII (BEAM) · Autolykos2 (ERG) | 1.0% | Visit → |
|
|
BeamHashIII (BEAM) · Autolykos2 (ERG) · Etchash (ETC) | 0.9% | Visit → |
|
★
|
Autolykos2 (ERG) · Etchash (ETC) · KHeavyHash (KAS) | 1.0% | Visit → |
|
|
FiroPoW (FIRO) · NexaPoW (NEXA) | 1.0% | Visit → |
LP Agent
- Architecture
- Ampere
- Boost Clock
- 1780 MHz
- CUDA cores
- 2560
- GPU Power
- 130 W
- Max Memory Size
- 8 GB
- Memory Type
- GDDR6
- Mining algos
- 25
- Model
- Nvidia RTX 3050
- Power
- 140 W
- Process
- 8 nm
- Release
- January 2022
- Release year
- 2022
- TDP
- 140 W
- Type
- GPU
- Vendor
- Nvidia
Cómo Nvidia RTX 3050 gana en el mercado de GPU para IA
| Proveedor | GPU | Ingresos | Costo | Ganancia |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
CL
Clore Ai
Mercado de GPU
|
RTX 3050
$0.009/h ·
1 oferta
|
$0.18
109 CLORE/day
1 CLORE ≈ $0.00163
|
$0.32 |
$-0.14
★
Visitar →
|
Nvidia RTX 3050 gana $-0.05/día minando Octopus, que supera los $-0.14/día que obtendrías alquilando en mercados IA. Las tarifas cambian a diario; conviene revisar con frecuencia.
| Mercado | Algoritmo | Beneficio /día | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
MRR floor
0% rented · matches cheapest seller
|
Lyra2REv2
0.00000030000 BTC/M/d
|
$0.62
★
$0.94 ingresos · $0.32 costo
Visitar →
|
|||
|
MRR recent
last 10 rentals · actual clearing price
|
Lyra2REv2
0.00002520563 BTC/M/d
|
$78.98
★
$79.30 ingresos · $0.32 costo
Visitar →
|
|||
|
MRR asking
aspirational — seller wish, not matched
|
Lyra2REv2
0.00000054154 BTC/M/d
|
$1.38
$1.70 ingresos · $0.32 costo
|
|||
| Lyra2z | |||||
|
MRR floor
0% rented · matches cheapest seller
|
Lyra2z
0.00000550000 BTC/M/d
|
$0.73
★
$1.05 ingresos · $0.32 costo
Visitar →
|
|||
|
MRR recent
last 10 rentals · actual clearing price
|
Lyra2z
0.00000600172 BTC/M/d
|
$0.83
★
$1.15 ingresos · $0.32 costo
Visitar →
|
|||
|
MRR asking
aspirational — seller wish, not matched
|
Lyra2z
0.00000754436 BTC/M/d
|
$1.12
$1.44 ingresos · $0.32 costo
|
|||
| Octopus | |||||
|
NiceHash
seller 24h-weighted avg
|
Octopus
0.00000002948 BTC/M/d
|
$-0.27
$0.05 ingresos · $0.32 costo
Visitar →
|
|||
|
MRR floor
0% rented · matches cheapest seller
|
Octopus
0.00000011000 BTC/M/d
|
$-0.12
★
$0.20 ingresos · $0.32 costo
Visitar →
|
|||
|
MRR recent
last 10 rentals · actual clearing price
|
Octopus
0.00000064110 BTC/M/d
|
$0.85
★
$1.17 ingresos · $0.32 costo
Visitar →
|
|||
|
MRR asking
aspirational — seller wish, not matched
|
Octopus
0.00000014808 BTC/M/d
|
$-0.05
$0.27 ingresos · $0.32 costo
|
|||
| X16R | |||||
|
MRR floor
0% rented · matches cheapest seller
|
X16R
0.00000053947 BTC/M/d
|
$0.11
★
$0.43 ingresos · $0.32 costo
Visitar →
|
|||
|
MRR recent
last 10 rentals · actual clearing price
|
X16R
0.00000061118 BTC/M/d
|
$0.16
★
$0.48 ingresos · $0.32 costo
Visitar →
|
|||
|
MRR asking
aspirational — seller wish, not matched
|
X16R
0.00000064023 BTC/M/d
|
$0.18
$0.50 ingresos · $0.32 costo
|
|||
| X16Rv2 | |||||
|
MRR floor
0% rented · matches cheapest seller
|
X16Rv2
0.00000053947 BTC/M/d
|
$-0.03
★
$0.29 ingresos · $0.32 costo
Visitar →
|
|||
|
MRR recent
last 10 rentals · actual clearing price
|
X16Rv2
0.00000063655 BTC/M/d
|
$0.03
★
$0.35 ingresos · $0.32 costo
Visitar →
|
|||
|
MRR asking
aspirational — seller wish, not matched
|
X16Rv2
0.00000082422 BTC/M/d
|
$0.13
$0.45 ingresos · $0.32 costo
|
|||
| NeoScrypt | |||||
|
NiceHash
seller 24h-weighted avg
|
NeoScrypt
0.00000061886 BTC/M/d
|
$-0.28
$0.04 ingresos · $0.32 costo
Visitar →
|
|||
|
MRR floor
5% rented · matches cheapest seller
|
NeoScrypt
0.00000320000 BTC/M/d
|
$-0.11
★
$0.21 ingresos · $0.32 costo
Visitar →
|
|||
|
MRR recent
last 10 rentals · actual clearing price
|
NeoScrypt
0.00000314000 BTC/M/d
|
$-0.11
★
$0.21 ingresos · $0.32 costo
Visitar →
|
|||
|
MRR asking
aspirational — seller wish, not matched
|
NeoScrypt
0.00000359000 BTC/M/d
|
$-0.09
$0.23 ingresos · $0.32 costo
|
|||
| FishHash | |||||
|
NiceHash
seller 24h-weighted avg
|
FishHash
0.00000003167 BTC/M/d
|
$-0.29
$0.03 ingresos · $0.32 costo
Visitar →
|
|||
|
MRR floor
0% rented · matches cheapest seller
|
FishHash
0.00000012000 BTC/M/d
|
$-0.21
★
$0.11 ingresos · $0.32 costo
Visitar →
|
|||
|
MRR recent
last 10 rentals · actual clearing price
|
FishHash
0.00000015078 BTC/M/d
|
$-0.18
★
$0.14 ingresos · $0.32 costo
Visitar →
|
|||
|
MRR asking
aspirational — seller wish, not matched
|
FishHash
0.00000024239 BTC/M/d
|
$-0.10
$0.22 ingresos · $0.32 costo
|
|||
| NexaPoW | |||||
|
NiceHash
seller 24h-weighted avg
|
NexaPoW
0.00000002177 BTC/M/d
|
$-0.31
$0.01 ingresos · $0.32 costo
Visitar →
|
|||
|
MRR floor
0% rented · matches cheapest seller
|
NexaPoW
0.00000006429 BTC/M/d
|
$-0.28
★
$0.04 ingresos · $0.32 costo
Visitar →
|
|||
|
MRR recent
last 10 rentals · actual clearing price
|
NexaPoW
0.00000032850 BTC/M/d
|
$-0.12
★
$0.20 ingresos · $0.32 costo
Visitar →
|
|||
|
MRR asking
aspirational — seller wish, not matched
|
NexaPoW
0.00000011682 BTC/M/d
|
$-0.25
$0.07 ingresos · $0.32 costo
|
|||
| Zhash | |||||
|
NiceHash
seller 24h-weighted avg
|
Zhash
0.00000000695 BTC/H/d
|
$-0.30
$0.02 ingresos · $0.32 costo
Visitar →
|
|||
|
MRR floor
0% rented · matches cheapest seller
|
Zhash
0.00000007080 BTC/H/d
|
$-0.16
★
$0.16 ingresos · $0.32 costo
Visitar →
|
|||
|
MRR recent
last 10 rentals · actual clearing price
|
Zhash
0.00000008185 BTC/H/d
|
$-0.13
★
$0.19 ingresos · $0.32 costo
Visitar →
|
|||
|
MRR asking
aspirational — seller wish, not matched
|
Zhash
0.00000007080 BTC/H/d
|
$-0.16
$0.16 ingresos · $0.32 costo
|
|||
| KAWPOW | |||||
|
NiceHash
seller 24h-weighted avg
|
KAWPOW
0.00000005633 BTC/M/d
|
$-0.27
$0.05 ingresos · $0.32 costo
Visitar →
|
|||
|
MRR floor
8% rented · matches cheapest seller
|
KAWPOW
0.00000010622 BTC/M/d
|
$-0.22
★
$0.10 ingresos · $0.32 costo
Visitar →
|
|||
|
MRR recent
last 10 rentals · actual clearing price
|
KAWPOW
0.00000013186 BTC/M/d
|
$-0.20
★
$0.12 ingresos · $0.32 costo
Visitar →
|
|||
|
MRR asking
aspirational — seller wish, not matched
|
KAWPOW
0.00000012529 BTC/M/d
|
$-0.20
$0.12 ingresos · $0.32 costo
|
|||
| VerusHash | |||||
|
NiceHash
seller 24h-weighted avg
|
VerusHash
0.00000002435 BTC/M/d
|
$-0.31
$0.01 ingresos · $0.32 costo
Visitar →
|
|||
|
MRR floor
0% rented · matches cheapest seller
|
VerusHash
0.00000010999 BTC/M/d
|
$-0.28
★
$0.04 ingresos · $0.32 costo
Visitar →
|
|||
|
MRR recent
last 10 rentals · actual clearing price
|
VerusHash
0.00000023020 BTC/M/d
|
$-0.23
★
$0.09 ingresos · $0.32 costo
Visitar →
|
|||
|
MRR asking
aspirational — seller wish, not matched
|
VerusHash
0.00000015453 BTC/M/d
|
$-0.26
$0.06 ingresos · $0.32 costo
|
|||
| BeamHashIII | |||||
|
NiceHash
seller 24h-weighted avg
|
BeamHashIII
0.00000004249 BTC/H/d
|
$-0.27
★
$0.05 ingresos · $0.32 costo
Visitar →
|
|||
| Ethash | |||||
|
NiceHash
seller 24h-weighted avg
|
Ethash
0.00000002000 BTC/M/d
|
$-0.28
★
$0.04 ingresos · $0.32 costo
Visitar →
|
|||
| Autolykos2 | |||||
|
NiceHash
seller 24h-weighted avg
|
Autolykos2
0.00000000557 BTC/M/d
|
$-0.29
★
$0.03 ingresos · $0.32 costo
Visitar →
|
|||
| Etchash | |||||
|
NiceHash
seller 24h-weighted avg
|
Etchash
0.00000000500 BTC/M/d
|
$-0.31
$0.01 ingresos · $0.32 costo
Visitar →
|
|||
|
MRR floor
11% rented · matches cheapest seller
|
Etchash
0.00000001320 BTC/M/d
|
$-0.30
★
$0.02 ingresos · $0.32 costo
Visitar →
|
|||
|
MRR recent
last 10 rentals · actual clearing price
|
Etchash
0.00000001610 BTC/M/d
|
$-0.29
★
$0.03 ingresos · $0.32 costo
Visitar →
|
|||
|
MRR asking
aspirational — seller wish, not matched
|
Etchash
0.00000001500 BTC/M/d
|
$-0.29
$0.03 ingresos · $0.32 costo
|
|||
| KHeavyHash | |||||
|
NiceHash
seller 24h-weighted avg
|
KHeavyHash
0.00000262706 BTC/T/d
|
$-0.32
$0.00 ingresos · $0.32 costo
Visitar →
|
|||
|
MRR floor
5% rented · matches cheapest seller
|
KHeavyHash
0.00000280000 BTC/T/d
|
$-0.32
★
$0.00 ingresos · $0.32 costo
Visitar →
|
|||
|
MRR recent
last 10 rentals · actual clearing price
|
KHeavyHash
0.00000387000 BTC/T/d
|
$-0.32
★
$0.00 ingresos · $0.32 costo
Visitar →
|
|||
|
MRR asking
aspirational — seller wish, not matched
|
KHeavyHash
0.00000528000 BTC/T/d
|
$-0.32
$0.00 ingresos · $0.32 costo
|
|||
| Blake3 | |||||
|
NiceHash
seller 24h-weighted avg
|
Blake3
0.00000000180 BTC/G/d
|
$-0.32
★
$0.00 ingresos · $0.32 costo
Visitar →
|
|||
| Rigs × Qty | Share | Rev /rig/day | Cost /rig/day | Profit /rig/day | Total profit /day |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| — | — | — | — | — | — |
Periodo de recuperación para Nvidia RTX 3050
Modela la recuperación de la inversión, el coste eléctrico y la rentabilidad del primer año para este equipo.
Hardware recuperado cuando la línea cruza cero. Después, todo ganancia.
| Month | Earned (mo) | Cost burned (mo) | Cumulative earned | Cumulative cost | Net | % ROI |
|---|
Emisiones anuales por fuente
Basado en el consumo eléctrico anual y la intensidad de carbono de redes comunes.
| Fuente de energía | CO₂e / año |
|---|---|
| Wind | 12.55 kg |
| Nuclear | 13.69 kg |
| Hydroelectric | 27.37 kg |
| Geothermal | 43.34 kg |
| Solar | 51.32 kg |
| Biofuels | 262.31 kg |
| Gas | 558.84 kg |
| Coal | 935.19 kg |
Solo estimaciones — las emisiones reales varían.
¿Qué significa eso realmente?
At the world-average grid intensity of about 475 g CO₂e/kWh, Nvidia RTX 3050 running 24/7 for a year releases about 542 kg of carbon dioxide equivalent. Here's what that looks like in everyday terms:
Dónde lo enchufas importa
Electricity is not one thing. A kilowatt-hour from a coal plant carries roughly 820 g of CO₂; the same kilowatt-hour from a hydro reservoir carries about 24 g. That's a 34× difference — large enough that Nvidia RTX 3050's annual footprint swings from roughly 935 kg on coal-heavy grids down to about 27 kg on hydro-dominated grids. The single biggest lever a miner has on their carbon footprint is choosing where to plug in.
Regions commonly used for low-carbon crypto mining include Quebec and British Columbia (hydro-dominated, typically <50 g CO₂/kWh), Iceland and Norway (geothermal + hydro, often <30 g), Paraguay (Itaipú hydro), and parts of the US Pacific Northwest. Coal-heavy grids — Kazakhstan, Inner Mongolia, Poland, parts of Australia — sit at the opposite end, often above 700 g CO₂/kWh.
Some operators also reduce their net impact by using otherwise-wasted energy: flare gas at oil wells (burning methane that would be vented anyway), curtailed renewables (wind or solar that the grid can't absorb), or behind-the-meter hydro during off-peak hours. These arrangements can drop effective emissions below the local grid average because the energy would have been wasted or flared without the mining load.
Cómo reducir la huella de este equipo
- Pick a greener ASIC. The efficiency column above matters as much as the grid: a 15 J/TH rig emits roughly half the CO₂ of a 30 J/TH rig for the same hashrate.
- Choose a low-carbon host. Data centres advertising hydro, geothermal, or nuclear power typically sit at <100 g CO₂/kWh.
- Look for stranded or curtailed energy. Flare-gas miners, wind-curtailment co-location, and off-peak hydro arrangements use energy that would otherwise be wasted.
- Use heat recovery. Capturing the heat for greenhouse agriculture, pool heating, or district warmth offsets fossil-fuel heating that would have been burned anyway.
- Time-shift your uptime. In grids with high daytime solar, running more during the day and less at night lowers your effective intensity even if you don't switch providers.
- Purchase verifiable offsets. Treat this as a last resort, not a substitute — and favour additional, permanent, third-party-verified projects (Gold Standard, Verra VCS).
Preguntas frecuentes
Yearly electricity use = rig power (W) × 24 × 365 ÷ 1000. We multiply that by each row's grid intensity in grams CO₂-equivalent per kWh and convert to kilograms. Intensities are representative averages — real emissions depend on your specific utility mix, time of day, and local transmission losses.
It depends almost entirely on where the electricity comes from. A single rig plugged into hydro in Quebec emits less over a year than an average family's two cars in a month. The same rig on a coal-dominated grid can exceed that in a few days. The hardware is the same — the grid is what changes the answer.
Network-wide estimates vary by methodology; the Cambridge Centre for Alternative Finance's Bitcoin Electricity Consumption Index is the most widely cited reference. As of recent reporting, the network's sustainable-energy share has grown as more hashrate migrates to hydro, wind, solar, and stranded-gas sites. This page just estimates a single rig — for the big picture, CCAF's dashboard is the best source.
Not directly. The rig draws the same wattage regardless of which pool it joins or how difficulty trends — so its electricity use, and therefore its emissions, stay constant. Those factors change revenue, not power consumption.
Proyección diaria
| Período | /Día | /Mes |
|---|---|---|
| Ingresos | $1.05 | $31.55 |
|
Costo
$0.1/kWh
|
$0.32 | $9.60 |
| Ganancia | $0.73 | $22.05 |
| Proveedor | GPU | Ingresos | Costo | Ganancia |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
CL
Clore Ai
Mercado de GPU
|
RTX 3050
$0.009/h ·
1 oferta
|
$0.18
109 CLORE/day
1 CLORE ≈ $0.00163
|
$0.32 |
$-0.14
★
Visitar →
|
| Coin | Algorithm | Ingresos | Costo | Ganancia |
|---|---|---|---|---|
CFX
⚠
Conflux
|
Octopus
23.89169Mh · 132.0W
|
$0.27 | $0.32 | $-0.05 |
|
BEAM
⚠
Beam
|
BeamHashIII
16Hh · 124.0W
|
$0.06 | $0.30 | $-0.24 |
|
RVN
Ravencoin
|
KAWPOW
12.3Mh · 129.0W
|
$0.05 | $0.31 | $-0.26 |
|
FTC
⚠
Feathercoin
|
NeoScrypt
858.11Kh · 128.0W
|
— | $0.31 | — |
|
—
|
Keccak
604.42849Mh · 108.0W
|
— | $0.26 | — |
ERG
⚠
Ergo
|
Autolykos2
79.83Mh · 60.0W
|
$0.03 | $0.14 | $-0.11 |
|
—
|
Ethash
23.202878Mh · 75.0W
|
— | $0.18 | — |
|
LTZ
⚠
Litecoinz
|
Zhash
30Hh · 113.0W
|
— | $0.27 | — |
NEXA
⚠
Nexa
|
NexaPoW
8.085Mh · 86.0W
|
$0.01 | $0.21 | $-0.20 |
|
ETC
Ethereum Classic
|
Etchash
23.202878Mh · 75.0W
|
$0.01 | $0.18 | $-0.17 |
|
AE
⚠
Aeternity
|
CuckooCycle
4Hh · 116.0W
|
$0.01 | $0.28 | $-0.27 |
|
VRSC
⚠
Verus
|
VerusHash
5.1449Mh · 100.0W
|
— | $0.24 | — |
|
MONA
⚠
Monacoin
|
Lyra2REv2
41.2638Mh · 126.0W
|
— | $0.30 | — |
|
—
|
X16R
10.33799Mh · 107.0W
|
— | $0.26 | — |
|
ACM
⚠
Actinium
|
Lyra2z
2.50804Mh · 75.0W
|
— | $0.18 | — |
|
—
|
Blake (2s)
3.319251631Gh · 109.0W
|
— | $0.26 | — |
KAS
Kaspa
|
KHeavyHash
265.066256Mh · 115.0W
|
— | $0.28 | — |
|
—
|
Blake3
34.0Mh · 90.0W
|
— | $0.22 | — |
|
IRON
⚠
Iron Fish
|
FishHash
12.0Mh · 140.0W
|
— | $0.34 | — |
|
—
|
X16Rv2
7.1533Mh · 108.0W
|
— | $0.26 | — |
|
—
|
Cuckarood29
1.124Hh · 95.0W
|
— | $0.23 | — |
|
—
|
Astralhash
11.5656Mh · 75.0W
|
— | $0.18 | — |
|
—
|
CNReverseWaltz
1.0615Kh · 96.0W
|
— | $0.23 | — |
|
—
|
Skydoge
300.0Mh · 50.0W
|
— | $0.12 | — |
|
—
|
XelisHashV2
1.4Gh · 140.0W
|
— | $0.34 | — |
|
—
|
zkSNARK
220.0Mh · 50.0W
|
— | $0.12 | — |
|
GRIN
⚠
Grin
|
Cuckatoo32
2.5Hh · 70.0W
|
— | $0.17 | — |
|
—
|
EvrProgPow
26.5Mh · 80.0W
|
— | $0.19 | — |
|
—
|
Memehash
13.5Mh · 100.0W
|
— | $0.24 | — |
|
—
|
X21S
5.2701Mh · 102.0W
|
— | $0.24 | — |
|
—
|
Radiant
375.818Kh · 114.0W
|
— | $0.27 | — |
|
—
|
Skein2
60.758816406Gh · 124.0W
|
— | $0.30 | — |
|
—
|
Argon2d4096
24.939Kh · 123.0W
|
— | $0.30 | — |
|
—
|
PHI1612
11.4209Mh · 89.0W
|
— | $0.21 | — |
|
—
|
Equihash(144,5)
36Hh · 130.0W
|
— | $0.31 | — |
|
—
|
X16RT
7.6345Mh · 109.0W
|
— | $0.26 | — |
|
—
|
Equihash+Scrypt
21.188Kh · 128.0W
|
— | $0.31 | — |
|
—
|
SHA256DT
974.038Mh · 122.0W
|
— | $0.29 | — |
|
—
|
Equihash(210,9)
180Hh · 121.0W
|
— | $0.29 | — |
|
—
|
Equihash(125,4)
20Hh · 118.0W
|
— | $0.28 | — |
|
—
|
Equihash(192,7)
17Hh · 108.0W
|
— | $0.26 | — |
|
—
|
HMQ1725
4.66437Mh · 115.0W
|
— | $0.28 | — |
|
VTC
⚠
Vertcoin
|
Lyra2REv3
39.65145Mh · 132.0W
|
— | $0.32 | — |
|
—
|
NIST5
20.26063Mh · 130.0W
|
— | $0.31 | — |
|
—
|
X15
7.99385Mh · 117.0W
|
— | $0.28 | — |
|
—
|
ProgPowZ
13.088639Mh · 132.0W
|
— | $0.32 | — |
|
—
|
Keccak-C
601.31338Mh · 109.0W
|
— | $0.26 | — |
|
—
|
C11
11.754Mh · 86.0W
|
— | $0.21 | — |
|
—
|
ProgPowSERO
13.111107Mh · 132.0W
|
— | $0.32 | — |
|
—
|
Ubqhash
26.19577Mh · 115.0W
|
— | $0.28 | — |
|
—
|
BCD
8.670626Mh · 86.0W
|
— | $0.21 | — |
|
—
|
Xevan
4.02172Mh · 129.0W
|
— | $0.31 | — |
|
—
|
Curvehash
1.7011Mh · 79.0W
|
— | $0.19 | — |
|
—
|
X25X
962.23Kh · 69.0W
|
— | $0.17 | — |
FIRO
Firo
|
FiroPoW
12.752Mh · 129.0W
|
— | $0.31 | — |
|
—
|
GhostRider
643Hh · 79.0W
|
— | $0.19 | — |
|
—
|
HeavyHash
208.0494Mh · 69.0W
|
— | $0.17 | — |
| Pool | Algoritmos soportados | Comisión | |
|---|---|---|---|
|
|
CuckooCycle (AE) · BeamHashIII (BEAM) · Autolykos2 (ERG) | 1.0% | Visit → |
|
|
BeamHashIII (BEAM) · Autolykos2 (ERG) · Etchash (ETC) | 0.9% | Visit → |
|
★
|
Autolykos2 (ERG) · Etchash (ETC) · KHeavyHash (KAS) | 1.0% | Visit → |
|
|
FiroPoW (FIRO) · NexaPoW (NEXA) | 1.0% | Visit → |
- Architecture
- Ampere
- Boost Clock
- 1780 MHz
- CUDA cores
- 2560
- GPU Power
- 130 W
- Max Memory Size
- 8 GB
- Memory Type
- GDDR6
- Mining algos
- 25
- Model
- Nvidia RTX 3050
- Power
- 140 W
- Process
- 8 nm
- Release
- January 2022
- Release year
- 2022
- TDP
- 140 W
- Type
- GPU
- Vendor
- Nvidia
Cómo Nvidia RTX 3050 gana en el mercado de GPU para IA
| Proveedor | GPU | Ingresos | Costo | Ganancia |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
CL
Clore Ai
Mercado de GPU
|
RTX 3050
$0.009/h ·
1 oferta
|
$0.18
109 CLORE/day
1 CLORE ≈ $0.00163
|
$0.32 |
$-0.14
★
Visitar →
|
Nvidia RTX 3050 gana $-0.05/día minando Octopus, que supera los $-0.14/día que obtendrías alquilando en mercados IA. Las tarifas cambian a diario; conviene revisar con frecuencia.
| Mercado | Algoritmo | Beneficio /día | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
MRR floor
0% rented · matches cheapest seller
|
Lyra2REv2
0.00000030000 BTC/M/d
|
$0.62
★
$0.94 ingresos · $0.32 costo
Visitar →
|
|||
|
MRR recent
last 10 rentals · actual clearing price
|
Lyra2REv2
0.00002520563 BTC/M/d
|
$78.98
★
$79.30 ingresos · $0.32 costo
Visitar →
|
|||
|
MRR asking
aspirational — seller wish, not matched
|
Lyra2REv2
0.00000054154 BTC/M/d
|
$1.38
$1.70 ingresos · $0.32 costo
|
|||
| Lyra2z | |||||
|
MRR floor
0% rented · matches cheapest seller
|
Lyra2z
0.00000550000 BTC/M/d
|
$0.73
★
$1.05 ingresos · $0.32 costo
Visitar →
|
|||
|
MRR recent
last 10 rentals · actual clearing price
|
Lyra2z
0.00000600172 BTC/M/d
|
$0.83
★
$1.15 ingresos · $0.32 costo
Visitar →
|
|||
|
MRR asking
aspirational — seller wish, not matched
|
Lyra2z
0.00000754436 BTC/M/d
|
$1.12
$1.44 ingresos · $0.32 costo
|
|||
| Octopus | |||||
|
NiceHash
seller 24h-weighted avg
|
Octopus
0.00000002948 BTC/M/d
|
$-0.27
$0.05 ingresos · $0.32 costo
Visitar →
|
|||
|
MRR floor
0% rented · matches cheapest seller
|
Octopus
0.00000011000 BTC/M/d
|
$-0.12
★
$0.20 ingresos · $0.32 costo
Visitar →
|
|||
|
MRR recent
last 10 rentals · actual clearing price
|
Octopus
0.00000064110 BTC/M/d
|
$0.85
★
$1.17 ingresos · $0.32 costo
Visitar →
|
|||
|
MRR asking
aspirational — seller wish, not matched
|
Octopus
0.00000014808 BTC/M/d
|
$-0.05
$0.27 ingresos · $0.32 costo
|
|||
| X16R | |||||
|
MRR floor
0% rented · matches cheapest seller
|
X16R
0.00000053947 BTC/M/d
|
$0.11
★
$0.43 ingresos · $0.32 costo
Visitar →
|
|||
|
MRR recent
last 10 rentals · actual clearing price
|
X16R
0.00000061118 BTC/M/d
|
$0.16
★
$0.48 ingresos · $0.32 costo
Visitar →
|
|||
|
MRR asking
aspirational — seller wish, not matched
|
X16R
0.00000064023 BTC/M/d
|
$0.18
$0.50 ingresos · $0.32 costo
|
|||
| X16Rv2 | |||||
|
MRR floor
0% rented · matches cheapest seller
|
X16Rv2
0.00000053947 BTC/M/d
|
$-0.03
★
$0.29 ingresos · $0.32 costo
Visitar →
|
|||
|
MRR recent
last 10 rentals · actual clearing price
|
X16Rv2
0.00000063655 BTC/M/d
|
$0.03
★
$0.35 ingresos · $0.32 costo
Visitar →
|
|||
|
MRR asking
aspirational — seller wish, not matched
|
X16Rv2
0.00000082422 BTC/M/d
|
$0.13
$0.45 ingresos · $0.32 costo
|
|||
| NeoScrypt | |||||
|
NiceHash
seller 24h-weighted avg
|
NeoScrypt
0.00000061886 BTC/M/d
|
$-0.28
$0.04 ingresos · $0.32 costo
Visitar →
|
|||
|
MRR floor
5% rented · matches cheapest seller
|
NeoScrypt
0.00000320000 BTC/M/d
|
$-0.11
★
$0.21 ingresos · $0.32 costo
Visitar →
|
|||
|
MRR recent
last 10 rentals · actual clearing price
|
NeoScrypt
0.00000314000 BTC/M/d
|
$-0.11
★
$0.21 ingresos · $0.32 costo
Visitar →
|
|||
|
MRR asking
aspirational — seller wish, not matched
|
NeoScrypt
0.00000359000 BTC/M/d
|
$-0.09
$0.23 ingresos · $0.32 costo
|
|||
| FishHash | |||||
|
NiceHash
seller 24h-weighted avg
|
FishHash
0.00000003167 BTC/M/d
|
$-0.29
$0.03 ingresos · $0.32 costo
Visitar →
|
|||
|
MRR floor
0% rented · matches cheapest seller
|
FishHash
0.00000012000 BTC/M/d
|
$-0.21
★
$0.11 ingresos · $0.32 costo
Visitar →
|
|||
|
MRR recent
last 10 rentals · actual clearing price
|
FishHash
0.00000015078 BTC/M/d
|
$-0.18
★
$0.14 ingresos · $0.32 costo
Visitar →
|
|||
|
MRR asking
aspirational — seller wish, not matched
|
FishHash
0.00000024239 BTC/M/d
|
$-0.10
$0.22 ingresos · $0.32 costo
|
|||
| NexaPoW | |||||
|
NiceHash
seller 24h-weighted avg
|
NexaPoW
0.00000002177 BTC/M/d
|
$-0.31
$0.01 ingresos · $0.32 costo
Visitar →
|
|||
|
MRR floor
0% rented · matches cheapest seller
|
NexaPoW
0.00000006429 BTC/M/d
|
$-0.28
★
$0.04 ingresos · $0.32 costo
Visitar →
|
|||
|
MRR recent
last 10 rentals · actual clearing price
|
NexaPoW
0.00000032850 BTC/M/d
|
$-0.12
★
$0.20 ingresos · $0.32 costo
Visitar →
|
|||
|
MRR asking
aspirational — seller wish, not matched
|
NexaPoW
0.00000011682 BTC/M/d
|
$-0.25
$0.07 ingresos · $0.32 costo
|
|||
| Zhash | |||||
|
NiceHash
seller 24h-weighted avg
|
Zhash
0.00000000695 BTC/H/d
|
$-0.30
$0.02 ingresos · $0.32 costo
Visitar →
|
|||
|
MRR floor
0% rented · matches cheapest seller
|
Zhash
0.00000007080 BTC/H/d
|
$-0.16
★
$0.16 ingresos · $0.32 costo
Visitar →
|
|||
|
MRR recent
last 10 rentals · actual clearing price
|
Zhash
0.00000008185 BTC/H/d
|
$-0.13
★
$0.19 ingresos · $0.32 costo
Visitar →
|
|||
|
MRR asking
aspirational — seller wish, not matched
|
Zhash
0.00000007080 BTC/H/d
|
$-0.16
$0.16 ingresos · $0.32 costo
|
|||
| KAWPOW | |||||
|
NiceHash
seller 24h-weighted avg
|
KAWPOW
0.00000005633 BTC/M/d
|
$-0.27
$0.05 ingresos · $0.32 costo
Visitar →
|
|||
|
MRR floor
8% rented · matches cheapest seller
|
KAWPOW
0.00000010622 BTC/M/d
|
$-0.22
★
$0.10 ingresos · $0.32 costo
Visitar →
|
|||
|
MRR recent
last 10 rentals · actual clearing price
|
KAWPOW
0.00000013186 BTC/M/d
|
$-0.20
★
$0.12 ingresos · $0.32 costo
Visitar →
|
|||
|
MRR asking
aspirational — seller wish, not matched
|
KAWPOW
0.00000012529 BTC/M/d
|
$-0.20
$0.12 ingresos · $0.32 costo
|
|||
| VerusHash | |||||
|
NiceHash
seller 24h-weighted avg
|
VerusHash
0.00000002435 BTC/M/d
|
$-0.31
$0.01 ingresos · $0.32 costo
Visitar →
|
|||
|
MRR floor
0% rented · matches cheapest seller
|
VerusHash
0.00000010999 BTC/M/d
|
$-0.28
★
$0.04 ingresos · $0.32 costo
Visitar →
|
|||
|
MRR recent
last 10 rentals · actual clearing price
|
VerusHash
0.00000023020 BTC/M/d
|
$-0.23
★
$0.09 ingresos · $0.32 costo
Visitar →
|
|||
|
MRR asking
aspirational — seller wish, not matched
|
VerusHash
0.00000015453 BTC/M/d
|
$-0.26
$0.06 ingresos · $0.32 costo
|
|||
| BeamHashIII | |||||
|
NiceHash
seller 24h-weighted avg
|
BeamHashIII
0.00000004249 BTC/H/d
|
$-0.27
★
$0.05 ingresos · $0.32 costo
Visitar →
|
|||
| Ethash | |||||
|
NiceHash
seller 24h-weighted avg
|
Ethash
0.00000002000 BTC/M/d
|
$-0.28
★
$0.04 ingresos · $0.32 costo
Visitar →
|
|||
| Autolykos2 | |||||
|
NiceHash
seller 24h-weighted avg
|
Autolykos2
0.00000000557 BTC/M/d
|
$-0.29
★
$0.03 ingresos · $0.32 costo
Visitar →
|
|||
| Etchash | |||||
|
NiceHash
seller 24h-weighted avg
|
Etchash
0.00000000500 BTC/M/d
|
$-0.31
$0.01 ingresos · $0.32 costo
Visitar →
|
|||
|
MRR floor
11% rented · matches cheapest seller
|
Etchash
0.00000001320 BTC/M/d
|
$-0.30
★
$0.02 ingresos · $0.32 costo
Visitar →
|
|||
|
MRR recent
last 10 rentals · actual clearing price
|
Etchash
0.00000001610 BTC/M/d
|
$-0.29
★
$0.03 ingresos · $0.32 costo
Visitar →
|
|||
|
MRR asking
aspirational — seller wish, not matched
|
Etchash
0.00000001500 BTC/M/d
|
$-0.29
$0.03 ingresos · $0.32 costo
|
|||
| KHeavyHash | |||||
|
NiceHash
seller 24h-weighted avg
|
KHeavyHash
0.00000262706 BTC/T/d
|
$-0.32
$0.00 ingresos · $0.32 costo
Visitar →
|
|||
|
MRR floor
5% rented · matches cheapest seller
|
KHeavyHash
0.00000280000 BTC/T/d
|
$-0.32
★
$0.00 ingresos · $0.32 costo
Visitar →
|
|||
|
MRR recent
last 10 rentals · actual clearing price
|
KHeavyHash
0.00000387000 BTC/T/d
|
$-0.32
★
$0.00 ingresos · $0.32 costo
Visitar →
|
|||
|
MRR asking
aspirational — seller wish, not matched
|
KHeavyHash
0.00000528000 BTC/T/d
|
$-0.32
$0.00 ingresos · $0.32 costo
|
|||
| Blake3 | |||||
|
NiceHash
seller 24h-weighted avg
|
Blake3
0.00000000180 BTC/G/d
|
$-0.32
★
$0.00 ingresos · $0.32 costo
Visitar →
|
|||
| Rigs × Qty | Share | Rev /rig/day | Cost /rig/day | Profit /rig/day | Total profit /day |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| — | — | — | — | — | — |
Periodo de recuperación para Nvidia RTX 3050
Modela la recuperación de la inversión, el coste eléctrico y la rentabilidad del primer año para este equipo.
Hardware recuperado cuando la línea cruza cero. Después, todo ganancia.
| Month | Earned (mo) | Cost burned (mo) | Cumulative earned | Cumulative cost | Net | % ROI |
|---|
Emisiones anuales por fuente
Basado en el consumo eléctrico anual y la intensidad de carbono de redes comunes.
| Fuente de energía | CO₂e / año |
|---|---|
| Wind | 12.55 kg |
| Nuclear | 13.69 kg |
| Hydroelectric | 27.37 kg |
| Geothermal | 43.34 kg |
| Solar | 51.32 kg |
| Biofuels | 262.31 kg |
| Gas | 558.84 kg |
| Coal | 935.19 kg |
Solo estimaciones — las emisiones reales varían.
¿Qué significa eso realmente?
At the world-average grid intensity of about 475 g CO₂e/kWh, Nvidia RTX 3050 running 24/7 for a year releases about 542 kg of carbon dioxide equivalent. Here's what that looks like in everyday terms:
Dónde lo enchufas importa
Electricity is not one thing. A kilowatt-hour from a coal plant carries roughly 820 g of CO₂; the same kilowatt-hour from a hydro reservoir carries about 24 g. That's a 34× difference — large enough that Nvidia RTX 3050's annual footprint swings from roughly 935 kg on coal-heavy grids down to about 27 kg on hydro-dominated grids. The single biggest lever a miner has on their carbon footprint is choosing where to plug in.
Regions commonly used for low-carbon crypto mining include Quebec and British Columbia (hydro-dominated, typically <50 g CO₂/kWh), Iceland and Norway (geothermal + hydro, often <30 g), Paraguay (Itaipú hydro), and parts of the US Pacific Northwest. Coal-heavy grids — Kazakhstan, Inner Mongolia, Poland, parts of Australia — sit at the opposite end, often above 700 g CO₂/kWh.
Some operators also reduce their net impact by using otherwise-wasted energy: flare gas at oil wells (burning methane that would be vented anyway), curtailed renewables (wind or solar that the grid can't absorb), or behind-the-meter hydro during off-peak hours. These arrangements can drop effective emissions below the local grid average because the energy would have been wasted or flared without the mining load.
Cómo reducir la huella de este equipo
- Pick a greener ASIC. The efficiency column above matters as much as the grid: a 15 J/TH rig emits roughly half the CO₂ of a 30 J/TH rig for the same hashrate.
- Choose a low-carbon host. Data centres advertising hydro, geothermal, or nuclear power typically sit at <100 g CO₂/kWh.
- Look for stranded or curtailed energy. Flare-gas miners, wind-curtailment co-location, and off-peak hydro arrangements use energy that would otherwise be wasted.
- Use heat recovery. Capturing the heat for greenhouse agriculture, pool heating, or district warmth offsets fossil-fuel heating that would have been burned anyway.
- Time-shift your uptime. In grids with high daytime solar, running more during the day and less at night lowers your effective intensity even if you don't switch providers.
- Purchase verifiable offsets. Treat this as a last resort, not a substitute — and favour additional, permanent, third-party-verified projects (Gold Standard, Verra VCS).
Preguntas frecuentes
Yearly electricity use = rig power (W) × 24 × 365 ÷ 1000. We multiply that by each row's grid intensity in grams CO₂-equivalent per kWh and convert to kilograms. Intensities are representative averages — real emissions depend on your specific utility mix, time of day, and local transmission losses.
It depends almost entirely on where the electricity comes from. A single rig plugged into hydro in Quebec emits less over a year than an average family's two cars in a month. The same rig on a coal-dominated grid can exceed that in a few days. The hardware is the same — the grid is what changes the answer.
Network-wide estimates vary by methodology; the Cambridge Centre for Alternative Finance's Bitcoin Electricity Consumption Index is the most widely cited reference. As of recent reporting, the network's sustainable-energy share has grown as more hashrate migrates to hydro, wind, solar, and stranded-gas sites. This page just estimates a single rig — for the big picture, CCAF's dashboard is the best source.
Not directly. The rig draws the same wattage regardless of which pool it joins or how difficulty trends — so its electricity use, and therefore its emissions, stay constant. Those factors change revenue, not power consumption.