NVIDIA RTX 3080 12GB — Minería
NVIDIA RTX 3080 12GB genera $0.50 al día minando Octopus a 70 Mh/s y consumiendo 225.0 W de la red. Eso es tras descontar la electricidad a $0.1/kWh — rentable a los precios actuales.
NVIDIA RTX 3080 12GB mina Octopus con la mayor eficiencia. Esta página incluye la tabla completa de algoritmos, opciones de minería fusionada, pools recomendados y un gráfico de historial de pagos que puedes cambiar haciendo clic en cualquier fila.
Esta GPU tiene ? GB de VRAM — la mayoría de los mercados de IA requieren al menos 12 GB.
Proyección diaria
Ganadores diarios entre todos los streams — promediados del historial registrado del rig a $0.1/kWh
| Período | /Día | /Mes |
|---|---|---|
| Ingresos | $1.04 | $31.29 |
|
Costo
$0.1/kWh
|
$0.54 | $16.20 |
| Ganancia | $0.50 | $15.09 |
Historial de pagos por algoritmo ▶ Octopus
Beneficio neto $/día si minas este algoritmo continuamente a $0.1/kWh. Haz clic en cualquier algoritmo arriba para cambiar.
Proyección diaria
| Período | /Día | /Mes |
|---|---|---|
| Ingresos | $1.04 | $31.20 |
|
Costo
$0.1/kWh
|
$0.54 | $16.20 |
| Ganancia | $0.50 | $15.00 |
| Coin | Algorithm | Ingresos | Costo | Ganancia |
|---|---|---|---|---|
CFX
⚠
Conflux
|
Octopus
70Mh · 225.0W
|
$1.04 | $0.54 | $0.50 |
|
RVN
Ravencoin
|
KAWPOW
48.3Mh · 275.0W
|
$0.29 | $0.66 | $-0.37 |
|
BEAM
⚠
Beam
|
BeamHashIII
33Hh · 225.0W
|
$0.15 | $0.54 | $-0.39 |
ERG
⚠
Ergo
|
Autolykos2
197Mh · 171.0W
|
$0.12 | $0.41 | $-0.29 |
|
ETC
Ethereum Classic
|
Etchash
90Mh · 225.0W
|
$0.07 | $0.54 | $-0.47 |
NEXA
⚠
Nexa
|
NexaPoW
113.21Mh · 225.0W
|
$0.07 | $0.54 | $-0.47 |
|
AE
⚠
Aeternity
|
CuckooCycle
0.9Hh · 250.0W
|
$0.01 | $0.60 | $-0.59 |
|
ZEC
Zcash
|
Equihash
146.6Hh · 220.0W
|
$0.01 | $0.53 | $-0.52 |
KAS
Kaspa
|
KHeavyHash
857Mh · 260.0W
|
— | $0.62 | — |
IRON
⚠
Iron Fish
|
FishHash
41.0Mh · 250.0W
|
— | $0.60 | — |
|
—
|
EquihashZEL
80Hh · 225.0W
|
— | $0.54 | — |
|
LTZ
⚠
Litecoinz
|
Zhash
23Hh · 225.0W
|
— | $0.54 | — |
|
—
|
MTP
39.5Mh · 250.0W
|
— | $0.60 | — |
|
VTC
⚠
Vertcoin
|
Verthash
4.3Gh · 240.0W
|
— | $0.58 | — |
|
—
|
Memehash
5.5Mh · 250.0W
|
— | $0.60 | — |
|
—
|
XelisHashV2
11.1Mh · 250.0W
|
— | $0.60 | — |
|
—
|
zkSNARK
750.0Mh · 130.0W
|
— | $0.31 | — |
|
—
|
X16R
1.45Mh · 240.0W
|
— | $0.58 | — |
|
—
|
Blake3
46.5Hh · 250.0W
|
— | $0.60 | — |
|
—
|
Argon2d
470.0Hh · 250.0W
|
— | $0.60 | — |
FIRO
Firo
|
FiroPoW
39.5Mh · 250.0W
|
— | $0.60 | — |
|
—
|
EvrProgPow
98.0Mh · 240.0W
|
— | $0.58 | — |
|
EPIC
⚠
Epic Cash
|
ProgPow
93.0Mh · 300.0W
|
— | $0.72 | — |
|
—
|
GhostRider
63.0Mh · 240.0W
|
— | $0.58 | — |
|
—
|
CryptoNightFast
4.4Hh · 230.0W
|
— | $0.55 | — |
|
—
|
X25X
44.0Mh · 230.0W
|
— | $0.55 | — |
|
GRIN
⚠
Grin
|
Cuckatoo32
2.3Hh · 250.0W
|
— | $0.60 | — |
|
—
|
Cuckatoo31
8.7Hh · 250.0W
|
— | $0.60 | — |
|
—
|
Ethash
90Mh · 225.0W
|
— | $0.54 | — |
|
—
|
Skydoge
1.1Gh · 150.0W
|
— | $0.36 | — |
|
—
|
cuckARooz29
8.9Hh · 220.0W
|
— | $0.53 | — |
| Pool | Algoritmos soportados | Comisión | |
|---|---|---|---|
|
|
CuckooCycle (AE) · BeamHashIII (BEAM) · Autolykos2 (ERG) | 1.0% | Visit → |
HeroMiners
|
BeamHashIII (BEAM) · Autolykos2 (ERG) · Etchash (ETC) | 0.9% | Visit → |
|
★
K1Pool
|
Autolykos2 (ERG) · Etchash (ETC) · KHeavyHash (KAS) | 1.0% | Visit → |
Rplant
|
FiroPoW (FIRO) · NexaPoW (NEXA) | 1.0% | Visit → |
| Mercado | Algoritmo | Beneficio /día | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
NiceHash
seller 24h-weighted avg
|
KAWPOW
0.00000007541 BTC/M/d
|
$-0.25
$0.29 ingresos · $0.54 costo
Visitar →
|
|||
MRR floor
9% rented · matches cheapest seller
|
KAWPOW
0.00000012997 BTC/M/d
|
$-0.03
$0.51 ingresos · $0.54 costo
Visitar →
|
|||
MRR recent
last 10 rentals · actual clearing price
|
KAWPOW
0.00000026852 BTC/M/d
|
$0.51
★
$1.05 ingresos · $0.54 costo
Visitar →
|
|||
MRR asking
aspirational — seller wish, not matched
|
KAWPOW
0.00000012322 BTC/M/d
|
$-0.06
$0.48 ingresos · $0.54 costo
|
|||
Octopus
|
|||||
|
NiceHash
seller 24h-weighted avg
|
Octopus
0.00000003664 BTC/M/d
|
$-0.33
$0.21 ingresos · $0.54 costo
Visitar →
|
|||
NexaPoW
|
|||||
|
NiceHash
seller 24h-weighted avg
|
NexaPoW
0.00000002148 BTC/M/d
|
$-0.34
$0.20 ingresos · $0.54 costo
Visitar →
|
|||
|
|
|||||
|
NiceHash
seller 24h-weighted avg
|
BeamHashIII
0.00000005042 BTC/H/d
|
$-0.41
$0.13 ingresos · $0.54 costo
Visitar →
|
|||
|
|
|||||
|
NiceHash
seller 24h-weighted avg
|
Etchash
0.00000001011 BTC/M/d
|
$-0.47
$0.07 ingresos · $0.54 costo
Visitar →
|
|||
MRR floor
4% rented · matches cheapest seller
|
Etchash
0.00000001320 BTC/M/d
|
$-0.44
$0.10 ingresos · $0.54 costo
Visitar →
|
|||
MRR recent
last 10 rentals · actual clearing price
|
Etchash
0.00000001711 BTC/M/d
|
$-0.42
$0.12 ingresos · $0.54 costo
Visitar →
|
|||
MRR asking
aspirational — seller wish, not matched
|
Etchash
0.00000001333 BTC/M/d
|
$-0.44
$0.10 ingresos · $0.54 costo
|
|||
Autolykos2
|
|||||
|
NiceHash
seller 24h-weighted avg
|
Autolykos2
0.00000000727 BTC/M/d
|
$-0.42
$0.12 ingresos · $0.54 costo
Visitar →
|
|||
|
Ethash
|
|||||
|
NiceHash
seller 24h-weighted avg
|
Ethash
0.00000001485 BTC/M/d
|
$-0.43
$0.11 ingresos · $0.54 costo
Visitar →
|
|||
FishHash
|
|||||
|
NiceHash
seller 24h-weighted avg
|
FishHash
0.00000003145 BTC/M/d
|
$-0.44
$0.10 ingresos · $0.54 costo
Visitar →
|
|||
|
|
|||||
|
NiceHash
seller 24h-weighted avg
|
Zhash
0.00000000761 BTC/H/d
|
$-0.53
$0.01 ingresos · $0.54 costo
Visitar →
|
|||
|
|
|||||
|
NiceHash
seller 24h-weighted avg
|
Equihash
0.00000000081 BTC/H/d
|
$-0.53
$0.01 ingresos · $0.54 costo
Visitar →
|
|||
MRR floor
21% rented · matches cheapest seller
|
Equihash
0.00000000069 BTC/H/d
|
$-0.53
$0.01 ingresos · $0.54 costo
Visitar →
|
|||
MRR recent
last 10 rentals · actual clearing price
|
Equihash
0.00000000089 BTC/H/d
|
$-0.53
$0.01 ingresos · $0.54 costo
Visitar →
|
|||
MRR asking
aspirational — seller wish, not matched
|
Equihash
0.00000000085 BTC/H/d
|
$-0.53
$0.01 ingresos · $0.54 costo
|
|||
KHeavyHash
|
|||||
|
NiceHash
seller 24h-weighted avg
|
KHeavyHash
0.00000266261 BTC/T/d
|
$-0.54
$0.00 ingresos · $0.54 costo
Visitar →
|
|||
MRR floor
22% rented · matches cheapest seller
|
KHeavyHash
0.00000373000 BTC/T/d
|
$-0.54
$0.00 ingresos · $0.54 costo
Visitar →
|
|||
MRR asking
aspirational — seller wish, not matched
|
KHeavyHash
0.00000507000 BTC/T/d
|
$-0.54
$0.00 ingresos · $0.54 costo
|
|||
Historial de ingresos netos por hashmarket
| Período | /Día | /Mes |
|---|---|---|
| Ingresos | $0.51 | $15.24 |
|
Costo
$0.1/kWh
|
$0.54 | $16.20 |
| Ganancia | $-0.03 | $-0.96 |
| Rigs × Qty | Share | Rev /rig/day | Cost /rig/day | Profit /rig/day | Total profit /day |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| — | — | — | — | — | — |
Periodo de recuperación para NVIDIA RTX 3080 12GB
Modela la recuperación de la inversión, el coste eléctrico y la rentabilidad del primer año para este equipo.
Hardware recuperado cuando la línea cruza cero. Después, todo ganancia.
| Month | Earned (mo) | Cost burned (mo) | Cumulative earned | Cumulative cost | Net | % ROI |
|---|
Emisiones anuales por fuente
Basado en el consumo eléctrico anual y la intensidad de carbono de redes comunes.
| Fuente de energía | CO₂e / año |
|---|---|
| Wind | 21.38 kg |
| Nuclear | 23.33 kg |
| Hydroelectric | 46.66 kg |
| Geothermal | 73.87 kg |
| Solar | 87.48 kg |
| Biofuels | 447.12 kg |
| Gas | 952.56 kg |
| Coal | 1,594.08 kg |
Solo estimaciones — las emisiones reales varían.
¿Qué significa eso realmente?
At the world-average grid intensity of about 475 g CO₂e/kWh, NVIDIA RTX 3080 12GB running 24/7 for a year releases about 923 kg of carbon dioxide equivalent. Here's what that looks like in everyday terms:
Dónde lo enchufas importa
Electricity is not one thing. A kilowatt-hour from a coal plant carries roughly 820 g of CO₂; the same kilowatt-hour from a hydro reservoir carries about 24 g. That's a 34× difference — large enough that NVIDIA RTX 3080 12GB's annual footprint swings from roughly 1,594 kg on coal-heavy grids down to about 47 kg on hydro-dominated grids. The single biggest lever a miner has on their carbon footprint is choosing where to plug in.
Regions commonly used for low-carbon crypto mining include Quebec and British Columbia (hydro-dominated, typically <50 g CO₂/kWh), Iceland and Norway (geothermal + hydro, often <30 g), Paraguay (Itaipú hydro), and parts of the US Pacific Northwest. Coal-heavy grids — Kazakhstan, Inner Mongolia, Poland, parts of Australia — sit at the opposite end, often above 700 g CO₂/kWh.
Some operators also reduce their net impact by using otherwise-wasted energy: flare gas at oil wells (burning methane that would be vented anyway), curtailed renewables (wind or solar that the grid can't absorb), or behind-the-meter hydro during off-peak hours. These arrangements can drop effective emissions below the local grid average because the energy would have been wasted or flared without the mining load.
Cómo reducir la huella de este equipo
- Pick a greener ASIC. The efficiency column above matters as much as the grid: a 15 J/TH rig emits roughly half the CO₂ of a 30 J/TH rig for the same hashrate.
- Choose a low-carbon host. Data centres advertising hydro, geothermal, or nuclear power typically sit at <100 g CO₂/kWh.
- Look for stranded or curtailed energy. Flare-gas miners, wind-curtailment co-location, and off-peak hydro arrangements use energy that would otherwise be wasted.
- Use heat recovery. Capturing the heat for greenhouse agriculture, pool heating, or district warmth offsets fossil-fuel heating that would have been burned anyway.
- Time-shift your uptime. In grids with high daytime solar, running more during the day and less at night lowers your effective intensity even if you don't switch providers.
- Purchase verifiable offsets. Treat this as a last resort, not a substitute — and favour additional, permanent, third-party-verified projects (Gold Standard, Verra VCS).
Preguntas frecuentes
Yearly electricity use = rig power (W) × 24 × 365 ÷ 1000. We multiply that by each row's grid intensity in grams CO₂-equivalent per kWh and convert to kilograms. Intensities are representative averages — real emissions depend on your specific utility mix, time of day, and local transmission losses.
It depends almost entirely on where the electricity comes from. A single rig plugged into hydro in Quebec emits less over a year than an average family's two cars in a month. The same rig on a coal-dominated grid can exceed that in a few days. The hardware is the same — the grid is what changes the answer.
Network-wide estimates vary by methodology; the Cambridge Centre for Alternative Finance's Bitcoin Electricity Consumption Index is the most widely cited reference. As of recent reporting, the network's sustainable-energy share has grown as more hashrate migrates to hydro, wind, solar, and stranded-gas sites. This page just estimates a single rig — for the big picture, CCAF's dashboard is the best source.
Not directly. The rig draws the same wattage regardless of which pool it joins or how difficulty trends — so its electricity use, and therefore its emissions, stay constant. Those factors change revenue, not power consumption.
Esta GPU tiene ? GB de VRAM — la mayoría de los mercados de IA requieren al menos 12 GB.
Proyección diaria
Ganadores diarios entre todos los streams — promediados del historial registrado del rig a $0.1/kWh
| Período | /Día | /Mes |
|---|---|---|
| Ingresos | $1.04 | $31.29 |
|
Costo
$0.1/kWh
|
$0.54 | $16.20 |
| Ganancia | $0.50 | $15.09 |
Historial de pagos por algoritmo ▶ Octopus
Beneficio neto $/día si minas este algoritmo continuamente a $0.1/kWh. Haz clic en cualquier algoritmo arriba para cambiar.
Proyección diaria
| Período | /Día | /Mes |
|---|---|---|
| Ingresos | $1.04 | $31.20 |
|
Costo
$0.1/kWh
|
$0.54 | $16.20 |
| Ganancia | $0.50 | $15.00 |
| Coin | Algorithm | Ingresos | Costo | Ganancia |
|---|---|---|---|---|
CFX
⚠
Conflux
|
Octopus
70Mh · 225.0W
|
$1.04 | $0.54 | $0.50 |
|
RVN
Ravencoin
|
KAWPOW
48.3Mh · 275.0W
|
$0.29 | $0.66 | $-0.37 |
|
BEAM
⚠
Beam
|
BeamHashIII
33Hh · 225.0W
|
$0.15 | $0.54 | $-0.39 |
ERG
⚠
Ergo
|
Autolykos2
197Mh · 171.0W
|
$0.12 | $0.41 | $-0.29 |
|
ETC
Ethereum Classic
|
Etchash
90Mh · 225.0W
|
$0.07 | $0.54 | $-0.47 |
NEXA
⚠
Nexa
|
NexaPoW
113.21Mh · 225.0W
|
$0.07 | $0.54 | $-0.47 |
|
AE
⚠
Aeternity
|
CuckooCycle
0.9Hh · 250.0W
|
$0.01 | $0.60 | $-0.59 |
|
ZEC
Zcash
|
Equihash
146.6Hh · 220.0W
|
$0.01 | $0.53 | $-0.52 |
KAS
Kaspa
|
KHeavyHash
857Mh · 260.0W
|
— | $0.62 | — |
IRON
⚠
Iron Fish
|
FishHash
41.0Mh · 250.0W
|
— | $0.60 | — |
|
—
|
EquihashZEL
80Hh · 225.0W
|
— | $0.54 | — |
|
LTZ
⚠
Litecoinz
|
Zhash
23Hh · 225.0W
|
— | $0.54 | — |
|
—
|
MTP
39.5Mh · 250.0W
|
— | $0.60 | — |
|
VTC
⚠
Vertcoin
|
Verthash
4.3Gh · 240.0W
|
— | $0.58 | — |
|
—
|
Memehash
5.5Mh · 250.0W
|
— | $0.60 | — |
|
—
|
XelisHashV2
11.1Mh · 250.0W
|
— | $0.60 | — |
|
—
|
zkSNARK
750.0Mh · 130.0W
|
— | $0.31 | — |
|
—
|
X16R
1.45Mh · 240.0W
|
— | $0.58 | — |
|
—
|
Blake3
46.5Hh · 250.0W
|
— | $0.60 | — |
|
—
|
Argon2d
470.0Hh · 250.0W
|
— | $0.60 | — |
FIRO
Firo
|
FiroPoW
39.5Mh · 250.0W
|
— | $0.60 | — |
|
—
|
EvrProgPow
98.0Mh · 240.0W
|
— | $0.58 | — |
|
EPIC
⚠
Epic Cash
|
ProgPow
93.0Mh · 300.0W
|
— | $0.72 | — |
|
—
|
GhostRider
63.0Mh · 240.0W
|
— | $0.58 | — |
|
—
|
CryptoNightFast
4.4Hh · 230.0W
|
— | $0.55 | — |
|
—
|
X25X
44.0Mh · 230.0W
|
— | $0.55 | — |
|
GRIN
⚠
Grin
|
Cuckatoo32
2.3Hh · 250.0W
|
— | $0.60 | — |
|
—
|
Cuckatoo31
8.7Hh · 250.0W
|
— | $0.60 | — |
|
—
|
Ethash
90Mh · 225.0W
|
— | $0.54 | — |
|
—
|
Skydoge
1.1Gh · 150.0W
|
— | $0.36 | — |
|
—
|
cuckARooz29
8.9Hh · 220.0W
|
— | $0.53 | — |
| Pool | Algoritmos soportados | Comisión | |
|---|---|---|---|
|
|
CuckooCycle (AE) · BeamHashIII (BEAM) · Autolykos2 (ERG) | 1.0% | Visit → |
HeroMiners
|
BeamHashIII (BEAM) · Autolykos2 (ERG) · Etchash (ETC) | 0.9% | Visit → |
|
★
K1Pool
|
Autolykos2 (ERG) · Etchash (ETC) · KHeavyHash (KAS) | 1.0% | Visit → |
Rplant
|
FiroPoW (FIRO) · NexaPoW (NEXA) | 1.0% | Visit → |
| Mercado | Algoritmo | Beneficio /día | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
NiceHash
seller 24h-weighted avg
|
KAWPOW
0.00000007541 BTC/M/d
|
$-0.25
$0.29 ingresos · $0.54 costo
Visitar →
|
|||
MRR floor
9% rented · matches cheapest seller
|
KAWPOW
0.00000012997 BTC/M/d
|
$-0.03
$0.51 ingresos · $0.54 costo
Visitar →
|
|||
MRR recent
last 10 rentals · actual clearing price
|
KAWPOW
0.00000026852 BTC/M/d
|
$0.51
★
$1.05 ingresos · $0.54 costo
Visitar →
|
|||
MRR asking
aspirational — seller wish, not matched
|
KAWPOW
0.00000012322 BTC/M/d
|
$-0.06
$0.48 ingresos · $0.54 costo
|
|||
Octopus
|
|||||
|
NiceHash
seller 24h-weighted avg
|
Octopus
0.00000003664 BTC/M/d
|
$-0.33
$0.21 ingresos · $0.54 costo
Visitar →
|
|||
NexaPoW
|
|||||
|
NiceHash
seller 24h-weighted avg
|
NexaPoW
0.00000002148 BTC/M/d
|
$-0.34
$0.20 ingresos · $0.54 costo
Visitar →
|
|||
|
|
|||||
|
NiceHash
seller 24h-weighted avg
|
BeamHashIII
0.00000005042 BTC/H/d
|
$-0.41
$0.13 ingresos · $0.54 costo
Visitar →
|
|||
|
|
|||||
|
NiceHash
seller 24h-weighted avg
|
Etchash
0.00000001011 BTC/M/d
|
$-0.47
$0.07 ingresos · $0.54 costo
Visitar →
|
|||
MRR floor
4% rented · matches cheapest seller
|
Etchash
0.00000001320 BTC/M/d
|
$-0.44
$0.10 ingresos · $0.54 costo
Visitar →
|
|||
MRR recent
last 10 rentals · actual clearing price
|
Etchash
0.00000001711 BTC/M/d
|
$-0.42
$0.12 ingresos · $0.54 costo
Visitar →
|
|||
MRR asking
aspirational — seller wish, not matched
|
Etchash
0.00000001333 BTC/M/d
|
$-0.44
$0.10 ingresos · $0.54 costo
|
|||
Autolykos2
|
|||||
|
NiceHash
seller 24h-weighted avg
|
Autolykos2
0.00000000727 BTC/M/d
|
$-0.42
$0.12 ingresos · $0.54 costo
Visitar →
|
|||
|
Ethash
|
|||||
|
NiceHash
seller 24h-weighted avg
|
Ethash
0.00000001485 BTC/M/d
|
$-0.43
$0.11 ingresos · $0.54 costo
Visitar →
|
|||
FishHash
|
|||||
|
NiceHash
seller 24h-weighted avg
|
FishHash
0.00000003145 BTC/M/d
|
$-0.44
$0.10 ingresos · $0.54 costo
Visitar →
|
|||
|
|
|||||
|
NiceHash
seller 24h-weighted avg
|
Zhash
0.00000000761 BTC/H/d
|
$-0.53
$0.01 ingresos · $0.54 costo
Visitar →
|
|||
|
|
|||||
|
NiceHash
seller 24h-weighted avg
|
Equihash
0.00000000081 BTC/H/d
|
$-0.53
$0.01 ingresos · $0.54 costo
Visitar →
|
|||
MRR floor
21% rented · matches cheapest seller
|
Equihash
0.00000000069 BTC/H/d
|
$-0.53
$0.01 ingresos · $0.54 costo
Visitar →
|
|||
MRR recent
last 10 rentals · actual clearing price
|
Equihash
0.00000000089 BTC/H/d
|
$-0.53
$0.01 ingresos · $0.54 costo
Visitar →
|
|||
MRR asking
aspirational — seller wish, not matched
|
Equihash
0.00000000085 BTC/H/d
|
$-0.53
$0.01 ingresos · $0.54 costo
|
|||
KHeavyHash
|
|||||
|
NiceHash
seller 24h-weighted avg
|
KHeavyHash
0.00000266261 BTC/T/d
|
$-0.54
$0.00 ingresos · $0.54 costo
Visitar →
|
|||
MRR floor
22% rented · matches cheapest seller
|
KHeavyHash
0.00000373000 BTC/T/d
|
$-0.54
$0.00 ingresos · $0.54 costo
Visitar →
|
|||
MRR asking
aspirational — seller wish, not matched
|
KHeavyHash
0.00000507000 BTC/T/d
|
$-0.54
$0.00 ingresos · $0.54 costo
|
|||
Historial de ingresos netos por hashmarket
| Período | /Día | /Mes |
|---|---|---|
| Ingresos | $0.51 | $15.24 |
|
Costo
$0.1/kWh
|
$0.54 | $16.20 |
| Ganancia | $-0.03 | $-0.96 |
| Rigs × Qty | Share | Rev /rig/day | Cost /rig/day | Profit /rig/day | Total profit /day |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| — | — | — | — | — | — |
Periodo de recuperación para NVIDIA RTX 3080 12GB
Modela la recuperación de la inversión, el coste eléctrico y la rentabilidad del primer año para este equipo.
Hardware recuperado cuando la línea cruza cero. Después, todo ganancia.
| Month | Earned (mo) | Cost burned (mo) | Cumulative earned | Cumulative cost | Net | % ROI |
|---|
Emisiones anuales por fuente
Basado en el consumo eléctrico anual y la intensidad de carbono de redes comunes.
| Fuente de energía | CO₂e / año |
|---|---|
| Wind | 21.38 kg |
| Nuclear | 23.33 kg |
| Hydroelectric | 46.66 kg |
| Geothermal | 73.87 kg |
| Solar | 87.48 kg |
| Biofuels | 447.12 kg |
| Gas | 952.56 kg |
| Coal | 1,594.08 kg |
Solo estimaciones — las emisiones reales varían.
¿Qué significa eso realmente?
At the world-average grid intensity of about 475 g CO₂e/kWh, NVIDIA RTX 3080 12GB running 24/7 for a year releases about 923 kg of carbon dioxide equivalent. Here's what that looks like in everyday terms:
Dónde lo enchufas importa
Electricity is not one thing. A kilowatt-hour from a coal plant carries roughly 820 g of CO₂; the same kilowatt-hour from a hydro reservoir carries about 24 g. That's a 34× difference — large enough that NVIDIA RTX 3080 12GB's annual footprint swings from roughly 1,594 kg on coal-heavy grids down to about 47 kg on hydro-dominated grids. The single biggest lever a miner has on their carbon footprint is choosing where to plug in.
Regions commonly used for low-carbon crypto mining include Quebec and British Columbia (hydro-dominated, typically <50 g CO₂/kWh), Iceland and Norway (geothermal + hydro, often <30 g), Paraguay (Itaipú hydro), and parts of the US Pacific Northwest. Coal-heavy grids — Kazakhstan, Inner Mongolia, Poland, parts of Australia — sit at the opposite end, often above 700 g CO₂/kWh.
Some operators also reduce their net impact by using otherwise-wasted energy: flare gas at oil wells (burning methane that would be vented anyway), curtailed renewables (wind or solar that the grid can't absorb), or behind-the-meter hydro during off-peak hours. These arrangements can drop effective emissions below the local grid average because the energy would have been wasted or flared without the mining load.
Cómo reducir la huella de este equipo
- Pick a greener ASIC. The efficiency column above matters as much as the grid: a 15 J/TH rig emits roughly half the CO₂ of a 30 J/TH rig for the same hashrate.
- Choose a low-carbon host. Data centres advertising hydro, geothermal, or nuclear power typically sit at <100 g CO₂/kWh.
- Look for stranded or curtailed energy. Flare-gas miners, wind-curtailment co-location, and off-peak hydro arrangements use energy that would otherwise be wasted.
- Use heat recovery. Capturing the heat for greenhouse agriculture, pool heating, or district warmth offsets fossil-fuel heating that would have been burned anyway.
- Time-shift your uptime. In grids with high daytime solar, running more during the day and less at night lowers your effective intensity even if you don't switch providers.
- Purchase verifiable offsets. Treat this as a last resort, not a substitute — and favour additional, permanent, third-party-verified projects (Gold Standard, Verra VCS).
Preguntas frecuentes
Yearly electricity use = rig power (W) × 24 × 365 ÷ 1000. We multiply that by each row's grid intensity in grams CO₂-equivalent per kWh and convert to kilograms. Intensities are representative averages — real emissions depend on your specific utility mix, time of day, and local transmission losses.
It depends almost entirely on where the electricity comes from. A single rig plugged into hydro in Quebec emits less over a year than an average family's two cars in a month. The same rig on a coal-dominated grid can exceed that in a few days. The hardware is the same — the grid is what changes the answer.
Network-wide estimates vary by methodology; the Cambridge Centre for Alternative Finance's Bitcoin Electricity Consumption Index is the most widely cited reference. As of recent reporting, the network's sustainable-energy share has grown as more hashrate migrates to hydro, wind, solar, and stranded-gas sites. This page just estimates a single rig — for the big picture, CCAF's dashboard is the best source.
Not directly. The rig draws the same wattage regardless of which pool it joins or how difficulty trends — so its electricity use, and therefore its emissions, stay constant. Those factors change revenue, not power consumption.